Florida Skunk Ape Encounters
A couple encounter stories from the state of Florida, home of the skunk ape, bigfoot's swampy cousin. From the Bigfoot Case Files youtube channel.
Popular posts from this blog
Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rhettman Mullis To Talk About Oxford DNA Testing Project Tonight On Coast To Coast AM
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
The fact that it's still debatable years later sinks the HMS Bigfoot
ReplyDeleteGo play with your battleships and rubber duckies in the tub boyo ! This is a place for serious debate and the question of whether bigfoot is real or not is not up for debate, sorry, you lose as usual !
Deletecheers
Joe
"This is a place for serious debate."
DeleteHahahahahahahahahaha - so what are you doing here?
Nwah... PS thinks he can debate.
Delete(LOL!!!!!)
See how these losers follow and stalk me, creepy
DeleteI just can’t get enough of you PS.
DeleteSo it seems my friend, just because we argue doesn't mean I don't love you
DeleteSo do you think Todd Standing's blinky is an actual bigfoot captured on film?
DeleteSo are you still thinking on this?
DeleteI in fact have issues with “Blinky”. Why? Are you no longer a fan of Todd?
DeleteNot like you to hide, I won't engage you in the other thread. What's the take, your honest opinion about Blinky?
DeleteNo, Blinky is actually a real sasquatch
DeleteNow if we listen to Shirley we are told that a sasquatch looks like a cave man. We should listen to Shirley, he's highly credible
DeleteIs Erickson's sasquatch a sasquatch?
DeleteCome on, we're getting somewhere now
DeleteMoneymaker says it's 100% a real sasquatch, is Moneymaker credible? He says he's actually seen sasquatch
DeleteThese men are presented here as sasquatch experts
DeleteCome on, this is real actual sasquatch presented as evidence of species. It's not footprints or very disappointing dna results
DeleteWho do you present? Just Paterson Gimlin? Are all the researchers frauds since? Has sasquatch never been photographed?
DeleteI think we need to lay down a definitive modern day presentation of sasquatch evidence, a new PG so to say
DeleteI'll submit Blinky because he looks like PG. What do you think about that?
DeleteAre you no longer a fan of Todd?
DeleteTo all of you above it is a fool's errand to try and dissuade icktomi from his "evidence". He has shown time and time again he will accept no other facts but his own. There is no one anywhere who is an "expert" on Sasquatch because you first have to prove it exists.
DeleteNow if we take that image that so clearly resembles PG then I have to say that hands down it is absolutely the best most remarkable image of sasquatch ever presented
DeleteI am a Todd fan , is that image accurate? Do you find it best represents sasquatch as per the PG film? Should we build a new foundation on it?
DeleteIt sure looks like PG and you swear that's real
DeleteAnd that's getting pretty dated. It can't be the only sasquatch ever filmed rather clearly can it?
DeleteLet's go with one that looks like PG , I think we shouldn't confuse everyone with the multiple different images of sasquatch
Delete“To all of the above...”
DeleteOh dear. Was alluding to you being Todd’s biggest fan the catalyst for the sockpuppet meltdown? PS... Are you no longer a fan of Todd? I remember you were having a long-term exchange with Rush, looking forward to all the latest news. So on that basis, it’s pretty crazy to then compare an alleged image of Bigfoot from someone you claimed is the best, as a means to discount the PGF?
Jesus.
PS... Blinky is not seen walking along a sandbar. He/she is not shown to have an entire body yielding biological tissue impossible to hoax. And Blinky hasn’t left physical evidence that is consistent with homo erectus trackways studied for decades.
Your effort at a comparison is both disingenuous, illogical... and down right embarrassing
http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
Deletehttp://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
https://youtu.be/31iMxiZUqVc
The PGF is all you'd ever need to prove the existence of Bigfoot ! Because people like PS can never ever ever prove it was real they demand more and more evidence and it seems there is never enough to satisfy their sick and twisted logic so they pull the bloody awful Morris attempt to recreate it as proof it was a bloke in a suit to them . It's laughable, it's ridiculous and a total waste of all of our time to try to have a serious debate with jokers like them. They have already made up their mind because it's shuttered for good from logic and reason
Deletecheers
Joe
Why do you insult me when I actually discuss a living breathing proof of bigfoot? I have said multiple times that I am a Todd fan. Now besides PG who shall we present? I say Todd
DeleteCome on ladies, you two are the sasquatch boosters. Who's putting out the best evidence of a living breathing sasquatch? Todd shows the head measurement using pinne needles. It's cut and dryed proof
DeleteLet's go through the images to see what's the best sasquatch. We're going to use PG as our base because Joe says that's all the proof there is. ( that's rather disappointing)
DeleteTodd shows images of a sasquatch running up a steep incline. That's an actual filmed shot much better and clearer than PG. Do you accept it? No person could run up a steep incline like that . Again all measured for evidence
DeleteIf you accept PG then it's only logical to accept Todd's, unless you have better. Or has no one filmed a sasquatch since PG? Is that to be our only source of clear sasquatch video
DeleteYou know there are great parallels here between PG and Standing, both set out with the specific purpose of filming sasquatch and succeeded
DeleteIt makes me wonder why they succeed and sooo many others fail. Now Todd goes way out in the deep woods multiple times, PG sure were lucky when you consider it. Yeah I give Todd credit, he actually does his homework
DeleteEither way if I was to just go by what you're saying there is no evidence other than PG and footprints, which of themselves proves feet, and of course the dna has been very inconclusive. Agree, disagree?
DeleteArgh but you’re original argument isn’t regarding the incline Bigfoot. If you’re referring to that then there is in fact an expert in human kinesthetics that has studied the footage and it does appear that few people would be able to achieve that speed in that type of terrain. Now if that footage had the physical evidence to go along with it, then I would be the first to be shouting about it.
DeleteAnd no, accepting all of Todd’s alleged evidence just because another source has double the scientific detail (wow... just wow), is not logical at all (cringe). In fact, that’s what proper sceptics are obligated to do... Question their own standpoint. To me, “Blinky” has unnatural eyebrow movement.
I have provided you with many footage sources in the links above. Most of which show speed & movement that is not achievable by normal humans. So whilst the PGF is extremely rare in what it shows, more footage rolls in every year without fail. And I could have added at least another ten footage sources to that list.
And to the rhetorical drivel that people who accomplish what they set out to achieve is somehow proof that they are hoaxing. 1) Roger Patterson had help via research and reports from the best names in the Bigfoot field in 1967, and was encouraged to go to Northern California and in the end by that network of research got what they set out to achieve. 2) for whatever anyone thinks of Todd Standing, there were plenty condemning him for allegedly stealing a genuine research area. This, along with the testimony of an anthropologist and wildlife biologist who experienced activity, certainly lends further credence to that research area.
And nope. The evidence amounts to thousands of years of anthropological data transitioning three databases of modern reports. There are hair samples all linked to activity and physical evidence of which are verified to be morphologically congruent, in turn sequenced to be human. Then you have the many footage sources and thermal hits. And THEN to top it off you have the physical evidence that is plentiful enough to show Gaussian distribution, yielding average height & weight ratios, that some of which is now peer reviewed for its consistency with widely accepted hominin trackways.
Now is there anything else I can help you with PS? Would you like me to now publish the amount of times you lauded Standing to Rush?
There we are, Todd Standing shall be our new PG. I'm glad to see you finally pick a winner. The incline is much better than PG and to quell your fears you may fearlessly accept Blinky as our new PG . That is the face of a sasquatch. You shouldn't insult a powerful man like Rush. He was right to back Standing. Now without being a total Spoiler there is some dna research on that end that should actually please you.
DeleteI’m sorry, care to point out where I’ve insulted Rush?
DeleteTodd Standing will not be our “new PGF”. When Todd provides more physical evidence then that might be the case.
Todd's provided plenty of evidence, Joe are you in on this? I'm glad we can finally have much better evidence than grainy old PG. That was really lucky on their part to film that when you think about it, right? Todd has to really go out a lot and follow a lot of leads to just get a snippet of film.
DeleteYep, really lucky, and not any HD either. No way we need that now. Of course our next phase is to discuss the varied appearances of such a rare species. I feel better about having a living breathing sasquatch filmed to back up the argument for bigfoot. Unfortunately for us Todd doesn't really explain how his sasquatch look so different. That's why I am so glad we have Blinky. He is a spitting image of PG, right?
DeleteI think we've built a pretty solid base to prove sasquatch you skeptards. No blah blah footprints and very disappointing dna results. Actual living breathing sasquatch filmed. Go see it.This site should just run it 365/ 24
DeleteStanding is a professional researcher and no one " owns" the woods unless you live in a monarchy. So I can guarantee everyone here that what you are seeing is sasquatch. Meldrum loved it and you all know who worships Meldrum around here. That guy is never going to be fooled by a makeup job. Bindernagle went to his death a Happy man. I can't wait for Todd's next movie. I don't know exactly why he left an active bigfoot site where he filmed a blackface cave man to go to Cali but you know he has to produce sasquatch. Research pays off
DeleteSize matters, that's why the measurement of Blinky's head is so great. It's massive. So is the back of the sasquatch Todd filmed in his movie. He showed Meldrum a lot of footprints and stuff but that was pretty boring, Meldrum liked them though. The blackface cave man seemed almost human sized in comparison to the other bigfoots. Maybe it's dead by now because it was kind of puny
DeleteAnyhoo we have Blinky and Meldrum liked it and Blinky is big like PG and of course Meldrum likes PG. Meldrum also liked little blackface and he was nothing like PG. I don't want to cheat everyone out of exciting sasquatch images but I feel that if we're going to use PG as a bigfoot example then our next progression should naturally be Blinky. They match up great. The eskimo ones are just creepy but they do have nice smooth skin considering how they live out in the elements and all, I'm so jealous of them. Anyway PG is our base forward. Joe is this good by you? Again Meldrum loved it so it should be.
DeleteDifferences in hominin faces will never be an issue for me. If you look at the diversity in the Dmanisi fossils (below), it’s tempting to deduce that they are different species. Yet we know that these individuals came from the same location and the same geological time, so they could, in principle, represent a single population of a single species;
Deletehttp://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/anthropology/science-dmanisi-human-skull-georgia-01474.html
Good enough for me, cements our using Standing
DeleteI never said PG is the only evidence you think headed pratt ! I said it is the only evidence you really need . there's plenty of other evidence around that can also support bigfoot being real but PG is pretty much the gold medal standard . Now PS, if our good ship lollipop is sinking will you go down with your ship as any good captain will do or will you be a coward as I suspect and jump ship leaving all others behind ?
Deletecheers
Joe
Let me get this straight - Todd Standing's "Blinky" is now the new standard for Bigfoot's existence?
DeleteHahahahahahahahaha - yep, the case for Bigfoot is truly advancing.
Unfortunately, your little troll bait was denied comments ago. And what would Rush think if he knew you were disrespecting his well-funded evidence?
DeleteListen, you have a tendency to attribute every post to me. You need to stop that. And yes we can use Todd as our new base, he's the only one putting out anything. As far as I'm concerned the film's are all backed and even you must admit Meldrum supports him. Nothing wrong with backing Todd.
DeleteHow I deal with Rush is my business, we're friends and grown men. If Rush needs to reach out he will so don't concern yourself with that. Look real good at the incline film, that's a real sasquatch. If you accept the hand grabbing the apple then boom, as DS would say. Case closed my friend, proof. Now what is it? DNA Todd, I know you know.
DeleteI might actually have want DS weighing in here, he has actually filmed sasquatch through his trees and has a working knowledge on where they winter. He just needs to stay away from the post office
DeleteI’m not entirely sure you’re playing with a full deck, old boy.
DeleteWell not entirely sure is better than entirely sure so I'll take it, thx
DeleteWell I for one AM sure icktomi isn't playing with a full deck. You better get use to having every post attributed to you Anon 5:21 because icktomi's fragile ego can't bear the thought of there being more than one poster who doesn't buy into his dogma. The evidence for Bigfoot is what HE deems valid and that's all there is to it.
DeleteOk but read what I'm saying. I submit to you that A. Blinky is an actual living breathing bigfoot and B. The incline film shows a sasquatch running up a steep incline. I'm satisfied with the evidence presented by Standing and see no proof of hoax. You now have the closest, clearest image of a bigfoot ever taken. Proof of species. People can accept it or not but it does prove his case.
DeleteAlso keep in mind that I am strictly using Blinky because it matches the PG sasquatch and that's what generally people accept as sasquatch. We will have further discussion on some seriously strange sasquatch representations, even some by Standing. Our general size range right now seems to be exceeding 8 feet.
DeleteDon't fall for the Standing turning into Blinky film because you can do it with any image and the actual size of Blinky's head is just massive
DeleteSo yeah folks, Fraud Standing has actually presented you with a living breathing better than PG bigfoot. WTF is it? Man, animal, alien (maybe), why not? Anyway not a spirit or a disappearing ghost. Just a slick forest dweller that's good enough to avoid capture thus far.
DeleteDamn Melba really screwed up the dna evidence and that was a brilliant idea, they should never have released it.
DeleteIt also sinks the HMS Pinafore.
ReplyDeleteThe HMS Titanic sunk the night of May 17 1911 off the coast of Newfoundland as free it hit a frozen bigfoot.
ReplyDelete