Alaskan Bigfoot Researcher Speaks Out


Alaskan bigfoot researcher Larry Baxter sits down with host Lon Strickler on Arcane Radio.

Comments

  1. The fact that it's still debatable years later sinks the HMS Bigfoot

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go play with your battleships and rubber duckies in the tub boyo ! This is a place for serious debate and the question of whether bigfoot is real or not is not up for debate, sorry, you lose as usual !
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    2. "This is a place for serious debate."

      Hahahahahahahahahaha - so what are you doing here?

      Delete
    3. Nwah... PS thinks he can debate.

      (LOL!!!!!)

      Delete
    4. See how these losers follow and stalk me, creepy

      Delete
    5. So it seems my friend, just because we argue doesn't mean I don't love you

      Delete
    6. So do you think Todd Standing's blinky is an actual bigfoot captured on film?

      Delete
    7. So are you still thinking on this?

      Delete
    8. I in fact have issues with “Blinky”. Why? Are you no longer a fan of Todd?

      Delete
    9. Not like you to hide, I won't engage you in the other thread. What's the take, your honest opinion about Blinky?

      Delete
    10. No, Blinky is actually a real sasquatch

      Delete
    11. Now if we listen to Shirley we are told that a sasquatch looks like a cave man. We should listen to Shirley, he's highly credible

      Delete
    12. Is Erickson's sasquatch a sasquatch?

      Delete
    13. Come on, we're getting somewhere now

      Delete
    14. Moneymaker says it's 100% a real sasquatch, is Moneymaker credible? He says he's actually seen sasquatch

      Delete
    15. These men are presented here as sasquatch experts

      Delete
    16. Come on, this is real actual sasquatch presented as evidence of species. It's not footprints or very disappointing dna results

      Delete
    17. Who do you present? Just Paterson Gimlin? Are all the researchers frauds since? Has sasquatch never been photographed?

      Delete
    18. I think we need to lay down a definitive modern day presentation of sasquatch evidence, a new PG so to say

      Delete
    19. I'll submit Blinky because he looks like PG. What do you think about that?

      Delete
    20. To all of you above it is a fool's errand to try and dissuade icktomi from his "evidence". He has shown time and time again he will accept no other facts but his own. There is no one anywhere who is an "expert" on Sasquatch because you first have to prove it exists.

      Delete
    21. Now if we take that image that so clearly resembles PG then I have to say that hands down it is absolutely the best most remarkable image of sasquatch ever presented

      Delete
    22. I am a Todd fan , is that image accurate? Do you find it best represents sasquatch as per the PG film? Should we build a new foundation on it?

      Delete
    23. It sure looks like PG and you swear that's real

      Delete
    24. And that's getting pretty dated. It can't be the only sasquatch ever filmed rather clearly can it?

      Delete
    25. Let's go with one that looks like PG , I think we shouldn't confuse everyone with the multiple different images of sasquatch

      Delete
    26. “To all of the above...”

      Oh dear. Was alluding to you being Todd’s biggest fan the catalyst for the sockpuppet meltdown? PS... Are you no longer a fan of Todd? I remember you were having a long-term exchange with Rush, looking forward to all the latest news. So on that basis, it’s pretty crazy to then compare an alleged image of Bigfoot from someone you claimed is the best, as a means to discount the PGF?

      Jesus.

      PS... Blinky is not seen walking along a sandbar. He/she is not shown to have an entire body yielding biological tissue impossible to hoax. And Blinky hasn’t left physical evidence that is consistent with homo erectus trackways studied for decades.

      Your effort at a comparison is both disingenuous, illogical... and down right embarrassing

      Delete
    27. http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
      https://youtu.be/31iMxiZUqVc

      Delete
    28. The PGF is all you'd ever need to prove the existence of Bigfoot ! Because people like PS can never ever ever prove it was real they demand more and more evidence and it seems there is never enough to satisfy their sick and twisted logic so they pull the bloody awful Morris attempt to recreate it as proof it was a bloke in a suit to them . It's laughable, it's ridiculous and a total waste of all of our time to try to have a serious debate with jokers like them. They have already made up their mind because it's shuttered for good from logic and reason
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    29. Why do you insult me when I actually discuss a living breathing proof of bigfoot? I have said multiple times that I am a Todd fan. Now besides PG who shall we present? I say Todd

      Delete
    30. Come on ladies, you two are the sasquatch boosters. Who's putting out the best evidence of a living breathing sasquatch? Todd shows the head measurement using pinne needles. It's cut and dryed proof

      Delete
    31. Let's go through the images to see what's the best sasquatch. We're going to use PG as our base because Joe says that's all the proof there is. ( that's rather disappointing)

      Delete
    32. Todd shows images of a sasquatch running up a steep incline. That's an actual filmed shot much better and clearer than PG. Do you accept it? No person could run up a steep incline like that . Again all measured for evidence

      Delete
    33. If you accept PG then it's only logical to accept Todd's, unless you have better. Or has no one filmed a sasquatch since PG? Is that to be our only source of clear sasquatch video

      Delete
    34. You know there are great parallels here between PG and Standing, both set out with the specific purpose of filming sasquatch and succeeded

      Delete
    35. It makes me wonder why they succeed and sooo many others fail. Now Todd goes way out in the deep woods multiple times, PG sure were lucky when you consider it. Yeah I give Todd credit, he actually does his homework

      Delete
    36. Either way if I was to just go by what you're saying there is no evidence other than PG and footprints, which of themselves proves feet, and of course the dna has been very inconclusive. Agree, disagree?

      Delete
    37. Argh but you’re original argument isn’t regarding the incline Bigfoot. If you’re referring to that then there is in fact an expert in human kinesthetics that has studied the footage and it does appear that few people would be able to achieve that speed in that type of terrain. Now if that footage had the physical evidence to go along with it, then I would be the first to be shouting about it.

      And no, accepting all of Todd’s alleged evidence just because another source has double the scientific detail (wow... just wow), is not logical at all (cringe). In fact, that’s what proper sceptics are obligated to do... Question their own standpoint. To me, “Blinky” has unnatural eyebrow movement.

      I have provided you with many footage sources in the links above. Most of which show speed & movement that is not achievable by normal humans. So whilst the PGF is extremely rare in what it shows, more footage rolls in every year without fail. And I could have added at least another ten footage sources to that list.

      And to the rhetorical drivel that people who accomplish what they set out to achieve is somehow proof that they are hoaxing. 1) Roger Patterson had help via research and reports from the best names in the Bigfoot field in 1967, and was encouraged to go to Northern California and in the end by that network of research got what they set out to achieve. 2) for whatever anyone thinks of Todd Standing, there were plenty condemning him for allegedly stealing a genuine research area. This, along with the testimony of an anthropologist and wildlife biologist who experienced activity, certainly lends further credence to that research area.

      And nope. The evidence amounts to thousands of years of anthropological data transitioning three databases of modern reports. There are hair samples all linked to activity and physical evidence of which are verified to be morphologically congruent, in turn sequenced to be human. Then you have the many footage sources and thermal hits. And THEN to top it off you have the physical evidence that is plentiful enough to show Gaussian distribution, yielding average height & weight ratios, that some of which is now peer reviewed for its consistency with widely accepted hominin trackways.

      Now is there anything else I can help you with PS? Would you like me to now publish the amount of times you lauded Standing to Rush?

      Delete
    38. There we are, Todd Standing shall be our new PG. I'm glad to see you finally pick a winner. The incline is much better than PG and to quell your fears you may fearlessly accept Blinky as our new PG . That is the face of a sasquatch. You shouldn't insult a powerful man like Rush. He was right to back Standing. Now without being a total Spoiler there is some dna research on that end that should actually please you.

      Delete
    39. I’m sorry, care to point out where I’ve insulted Rush?

      Todd Standing will not be our “new PGF”. When Todd provides more physical evidence then that might be the case.

      Delete
    40. Todd's provided plenty of evidence, Joe are you in on this? I'm glad we can finally have much better evidence than grainy old PG. That was really lucky on their part to film that when you think about it, right? Todd has to really go out a lot and follow a lot of leads to just get a snippet of film.

      Delete
    41. Yep, really lucky, and not any HD either. No way we need that now. Of course our next phase is to discuss the varied appearances of such a rare species. I feel better about having a living breathing sasquatch filmed to back up the argument for bigfoot. Unfortunately for us Todd doesn't really explain how his sasquatch look so different. That's why I am so glad we have Blinky. He is a spitting image of PG, right?

      Delete
    42. I think we've built a pretty solid base to prove sasquatch you skeptards. No blah blah footprints and very disappointing dna results. Actual living breathing sasquatch filmed. Go see it.This site should just run it 365/ 24

      Delete
    43. Standing is a professional researcher and no one " owns" the woods unless you live in a monarchy. So I can guarantee everyone here that what you are seeing is sasquatch. Meldrum loved it and you all know who worships Meldrum around here. That guy is never going to be fooled by a makeup job. Bindernagle went to his death a Happy man. I can't wait for Todd's next movie. I don't know exactly why he left an active bigfoot site where he filmed a blackface cave man to go to Cali but you know he has to produce sasquatch. Research pays off

      Delete
    44. Size matters, that's why the measurement of Blinky's head is so great. It's massive. So is the back of the sasquatch Todd filmed in his movie. He showed Meldrum a lot of footprints and stuff but that was pretty boring, Meldrum liked them though. The blackface cave man seemed almost human sized in comparison to the other bigfoots. Maybe it's dead by now because it was kind of puny

      Delete
    45. Anyhoo we have Blinky and Meldrum liked it and Blinky is big like PG and of course Meldrum likes PG. Meldrum also liked little blackface and he was nothing like PG. I don't want to cheat everyone out of exciting sasquatch images but I feel that if we're going to use PG as a bigfoot example then our next progression should naturally be Blinky. They match up great. The eskimo ones are just creepy but they do have nice smooth skin considering how they live out in the elements and all, I'm so jealous of them. Anyway PG is our base forward. Joe is this good by you? Again Meldrum loved it so it should be.

      Delete
    46. Differences in hominin faces will never be an issue for me. If you look at the diversity in the Dmanisi fossils (below), it’s tempting to deduce that they are different species. Yet we know that these individuals came from the same location and the same geological time, so they could, in principle, represent a single population of a single species;

      http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/anthropology/science-dmanisi-human-skull-georgia-01474.html

      Delete
    47. Good enough for me, cements our using Standing

      Delete
    48. I never said PG is the only evidence you think headed pratt ! I said it is the only evidence you really need . there's plenty of other evidence around that can also support bigfoot being real but PG is pretty much the gold medal standard . Now PS, if our good ship lollipop is sinking will you go down with your ship as any good captain will do or will you be a coward as I suspect and jump ship leaving all others behind ?
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    49. Let me get this straight - Todd Standing's "Blinky" is now the new standard for Bigfoot's existence?

      Hahahahahahahahaha - yep, the case for Bigfoot is truly advancing.

      Delete
    50. Unfortunately, your little troll bait was denied comments ago. And what would Rush think if he knew you were disrespecting his well-funded evidence?

      Delete
    51. Listen, you have a tendency to attribute every post to me. You need to stop that. And yes we can use Todd as our new base, he's the only one putting out anything. As far as I'm concerned the film's are all backed and even you must admit Meldrum supports him. Nothing wrong with backing Todd.

      Delete
    52. How I deal with Rush is my business, we're friends and grown men. If Rush needs to reach out he will so don't concern yourself with that. Look real good at the incline film, that's a real sasquatch. If you accept the hand grabbing the apple then boom, as DS would say. Case closed my friend, proof. Now what is it? DNA Todd, I know you know.

      Delete
    53. I might actually have want DS weighing in here, he has actually filmed sasquatch through his trees and has a working knowledge on where they winter. He just needs to stay away from the post office

      Delete
    54. I’m not entirely sure you’re playing with a full deck, old boy.

      Delete
    55. Well not entirely sure is better than entirely sure so I'll take it, thx

      Delete
    56. Well I for one AM sure icktomi isn't playing with a full deck. You better get use to having every post attributed to you Anon 5:21 because icktomi's fragile ego can't bear the thought of there being more than one poster who doesn't buy into his dogma. The evidence for Bigfoot is what HE deems valid and that's all there is to it.

      Delete
    57. Ok but read what I'm saying. I submit to you that A. Blinky is an actual living breathing bigfoot and B. The incline film shows a sasquatch running up a steep incline. I'm satisfied with the evidence presented by Standing and see no proof of hoax. You now have the closest, clearest image of a bigfoot ever taken. Proof of species. People can accept it or not but it does prove his case.

      Delete
    58. Also keep in mind that I am strictly using Blinky because it matches the PG sasquatch and that's what generally people accept as sasquatch. We will have further discussion on some seriously strange sasquatch representations, even some by Standing. Our general size range right now seems to be exceeding 8 feet.

      Delete
    59. Don't fall for the Standing turning into Blinky film because you can do it with any image and the actual size of Blinky's head is just massive

      Delete
    60. So yeah folks, Fraud Standing has actually presented you with a living breathing better than PG bigfoot. WTF is it? Man, animal, alien (maybe), why not? Anyway not a spirit or a disappearing ghost. Just a slick forest dweller that's good enough to avoid capture thus far.

      Delete
    61. Damn Melba really screwed up the dna evidence and that was a brilliant idea, they should never have released it.

      Delete
  2. The HMS Titanic sunk the night of May 17 1911 off the coast of Newfoundland as free it hit a frozen bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story