Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Oh yes there is!!!
ReplyDeleteYes, there are Bigfoot in Utah, but not many. Estimates give a Utah sasquatch population of less than 10 in the entire state.
ReplyDeleteOk that is hilarious.
DeleteMy friend, if there is one there are hundreds upon hundreds.
In 2012, field biologists estimated the Utah sasquatch population using the same method employed to estimate wild gorilla populations in Africa, by counting nesting sites. Based on this methodology, the biologists gave a conservative estimate of 5-8 sasquatches in the entire state of Utah. Hopefully that number has risen since 2012.
DeleteSo you're saying there isn't even one.
DeleteBecause if there were hundreds someone would have caught one by now.
Do you know how ******* crazy you come across, putting words in people's mouths to that perverse level?
DeleteIf you only knew who you are talking to…
DeleteWhat exactly makes an area "squatchy" or not?
ReplyDeleteIt can't mean that bigfoot can be found there, because nobody has ever provably found bigfoot anywhere. Sure people have claimed to have seen bigfoot, but people have claimed to have seen bigfoot in Central Park too. does that mean Central Park is "squatchy"? What about Madison Square?
Maybe "squatchy" means conducive to hoaxing.
No Bigfoot, but one hell of a lot of Mormons. That's moron but with an extra 'm'.
ReplyDelete