What is a bigfoot? Why do they stink? These and more questions are answered by a panel of eyewitnesses and researchers. The description one witness gives is amazing. Check it out:
2:37... There is no scientific method for measuring sightings reports. Unfortunately, there's no physical evidence to support the sightings reports of "dogmen". But we're lucky there is for what is commonly referred to as Sasquatch.
2:40... "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand." - Bertrand Russell
Stop whining like a little girl and find a god damn monkey suit.
What you claim is bigfoot physical evidence is actually dogman physical evidence. There are only reports of bigfoot with no physical evidence to back it up.
Quit trolling dogman evidence as bigfoot related. You've lost all credibility. The top Bigfoot scientist dismissed the Patterson Hoax as a hoax and now you're using dogman evidence to prop up bigfoot.
Sykes is a geneticist mate... Not a "Bigfoot scientist", a primatologist, an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist, an SFX expert or a plastic surgeon... A geneticist. If he thinks Patty is a costume, it matters nothing. So does Anna Nekaris, and she's a full blown enthusiast.
So Bryan Sykes is not a scientist that is involved in Bigfoot research? He hasn't researched Bigfoot, tested alleged Bigfoot DNA samples, published his findings? Is he not the botttom line when it comes to scientifically testing potential Bigfoot DNA? Fuss over semantics much?
Bryan Sykes is the world's most pioneering geneticist who's currenlty researching the DNA of relict hominids. A geneticist is only as good as the samples he's provided... And has no expertise on anything else outside of that area.
Right. He's geneticist. We didn't already know that? Being a geneticist does not limit one from being an expert at something else. For example, he's an author as well. Would you not say he has expertise in writing?
He's not qualified to comment on the PGF's authenticity... And though his opinion is repected, until he brings the magic monkey suit, he's debunked nothing.
if you deny the PGF you might as well deny global warming 1. there was no CGI at the time you berks ! 2. There was no stretch fabric at the time 3. if it was hoaxed it must have been some big hollywood name so why haven't they admitted it after all these years ? 4. I'm tired of arguing with idiots
Nice try. I asked a Photoshop expert and she said there was no way the Mark Anders videos could be CGI. I then asked her about a costume and she said she doubted it was a costume. I then showed her the Patterson Hoax and she pointed out the cut out holes for the eyes and she had nothing good to say about the amateurish quality.
You haven't provided any evidence that Mark Anders' Bigfoot is a hoax. Where is the costume or the computer files that contain a CG constructed character as you mistakenly believe?
I agree with Bryan Sykes on the Patterson Hoax but it's not a matter of opinion. The Patterson Hoax WAS a hoax.
It takes one look at Anders’ YouTube channel trailer to see that he is a master of CGI and Photoshop effects. It's the reason why nobody on the planet is celebrating his images.
Now your turn. Claiming that the PGF is a hoax, because it's a hoax is circular logic... A logical fallacy. Where's the evidence?
Wow! CGI? Photoshop? 1967, original planet of apes costumes were GROUNDBREAKING. Your photoshop expert was probably not even born yet. Oh wait, I forgot your troll generation is a bunch of knowitalls, but unfortunately you cannot change developmental history! Go smoke your rock in your parents basement, I'm sure you're going to be a mainstay for your groupies here ...giving new meaning to "rocks for brains"
^ how many do you have ? The PGF is the best evidence of bigfoot and you skeptools refuse to admit it . Please give us a break and stop being a fool . Do us all a favor and replicate it then i'll see your point otherwise shove off
yes because we all know the had CGI back in 1967. i know these trolls are just trying to get a rise out of us . still no monkey suit after all these years
According to the Patterson, Freeman, Anders and Zana accounts we can now definitely say that Bigfoot is not nocturnal. Even most of the Finding Bigfoot stories happen during the day.
Good point. Sykes never said a word about Zana being nocturnal and most of the small amount of footage that exits is in the day. There should be tons of film. Hmmmm
Thanks 8:19 your theory holds a lot of water in my book. I don't believe the Anders thing for a minute but the rest of your thoughts are spot on. It's about time we had someone around here that knows something this mystery. Way to think out of the box!
9:16... Why should there be tons of film? This is a creature that's evaded classification. What's more... Is you can post a million videos, your perverse denial means you'll comment in eve very next second like nothing's been posted like a total nut job.
9:20... Exactly why would there be a higher chance of a body if it wasn't nocturnal?
9:41... And you have the audacity to claim other people have discussions with themselves? You're clearly crazy mate.
This simply proves that Bigfoot is a myth. He couldn't possibly do his thing during day light hours or he would have been captured or killed long ago. Case closed.
So...are all the Dukie & juvie comments on this site one op? Or is this the after school Hangout for all acne scared 14yo boys that must "come straight home". 35 comments, not ONE worth reading.
so then go to the Kardashian forum. Perhaps it would be more on your intellectual level. Blame the trolls, they have ruined any type of smart discussion on here
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
With all the dogman reports, dogman must be real, right Iktomi/Joe?
ReplyDeleteApplying Sicktomi logic means that if there are substantial reportings of a creature then it must exist.
DeleteI like all Bigfoot videos except for the Patterson hoax.
2:37... There is no scientific method for measuring sightings reports. Unfortunately, there's no physical evidence to support the sightings reports of "dogmen". But we're lucky there is for what is commonly referred to as Sasquatch.
Delete2:40... "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
- Bertrand Russell
Stop whining like a little girl and find a god damn monkey suit.
What you claim is bigfoot physical evidence is actually dogman physical evidence. There are only reports of bigfoot with no physical evidence to back it up.
Deletehttp://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
Delete... Ain't nothing but a troll!
Quit trolling dogman evidence as bigfoot related. You've lost all credibility. The top Bigfoot scientist dismissed the Patterson Hoax as a hoax and now you're using dogman evidence to prop up bigfoot.
DeleteSykes is a geneticist mate... Not a "Bigfoot scientist", a primatologist, an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist, an SFX expert or a plastic surgeon... A geneticist. If he thinks Patty is a costume, it matters nothing. So does Anna Nekaris, and she's a full blown enthusiast.
DeleteSo Bryan Sykes is not a scientist that is involved in Bigfoot research? He hasn't researched Bigfoot, tested alleged Bigfoot DNA samples, published his findings? Is he not the botttom line when it comes to scientifically testing potential Bigfoot DNA? Fuss over semantics much?
DeleteBryan Sykes is the world's most pioneering geneticist who's currenlty researching the DNA of relict hominids. A geneticist is only as good as the samples he's provided... And has no expertise on anything else outside of that area.
DeleteFunny how many people can be experts at 2 or more different things but you limit Bryan Sykes to just one. Presumptuous?
DeleteHe's a geneticist.
DeleteRight. He's geneticist. We didn't already know that? Being a geneticist does not limit one from being an expert at something else. For example, he's an author as well. Would you not say he has expertise in writing?
DeleteHe's not qualified to comment on the PGF's authenticity... And though his opinion is repected, until he brings the magic monkey suit, he's debunked nothing.
Delete^ the PGF is obviously clever CGI you idiot
Delete^ ...either that or maybe Photoshop...but it is hard to tell which nowadays isn`t it.
DeleteAin't nothing but a troll.
Deleteif you deny the PGF you might as well deny global warming
Delete1. there was no CGI at the time you berks !
2. There was no stretch fabric at the time
3. if it was hoaxed it must have been some big hollywood name so why haven't they admitted it after all these years ?
4. I'm tired of arguing with idiots
$$$
Joe
Real Bigfoot video:
Deletehttps://youtu.be/mgWY0D3UcN8
Don't fall for the Patterson Hoax.
7:04
DeleteConsensus is that the PG film is CGI and definitely not a Photoshop job ...but they could always be wrong I suppose but I doubt it.
CGI wasn't invented in 1967 you netter !
Deletego to bed dumbarse !
Joe
He ain't nothing but a troll.
Delete7:59 Nah mate it was around long ago before that.
Delete^ yes deffo
Delete
ReplyDeleteThe most definitive Bigfoot evidence so far:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ottjXRiq_fY
Got Monkey suit?
Not a suit... An expert on CGI.
DeleteNow your turn;
http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
Ain't nothing but a troll!
Nice try. I asked a Photoshop expert and she said there was no way the Mark Anders videos could be CGI. I then asked her about a costume and she said she doubted it was a costume. I then showed her the Patterson Hoax and she pointed out the cut out holes for the eyes and she had nothing good to say about the amateurish quality.
DeleteThe most definitive Bigfoot evidence so far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ottjXRiq_fY
Argh right... How long has this meltdown of yours lasted now? A week?
DeleteHow long has your Patterson Hoax meltdown lasted, your entire life?
DeleteI don't have issue with the footage. You appear to be having a break from reality... Leave the desktop and get some fresh air.
DeleteYou think the Patterson Hoax is real. It seems you are the one having a break from reality. Your life revolves around a hoax.
DeletePatterson was a shady character to begin with.
DeleteLast time I checked... You still hadn't provided any evidence that the PGF was a hoax.
DeleteSuch an "obvious hoax", yet such an obvious lack of evidence to prove that.
(Sigh)
5:24... If you believe what you read from Greg "liar" Long, indeed.
DeleteYou haven't provided any evidence that Mark Anders' Bigfoot is a hoax. Where is the costume or the computer files that contain a CG constructed character as you mistakenly believe?
DeleteI agree with Bryan Sykes on the Patterson Hoax but it's not a matter of opinion. The Patterson Hoax WAS a hoax.
It takes one look at Anders’ YouTube channel trailer to see that he is a master of CGI and Photoshop effects. It's the reason why nobody on the planet is celebrating his images.
DeleteNow your turn. Claiming that the PGF is a hoax, because it's a hoax is circular logic... A logical fallacy. Where's the evidence?
^ i think the PG film is cgi...definitely
DeleteRiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
Delete7:01 has been smoking too many banana peels
DeleteJoe
Wow! CGI? Photoshop? 1967, original planet of apes costumes were GROUNDBREAKING. Your photoshop expert was probably not even born yet. Oh wait, I forgot your troll generation is a bunch of knowitalls, but unfortunately you cannot change developmental history! Go smoke your rock in your parents basement, I'm sure you're going to be a mainstay for your groupies here ...giving new meaning to "rocks for brains"
Delete7:01
DeleteConsensus is that the PG film is CGI and definitely not a Photoshop job ...but they could always be wrong I suppose but I doubt it.
How many identities does Joe have?
DeleteNone seen too bright. Are all their lives based around the Patterson Hoax?
^ how many do you have ?
DeleteThe PGF is the best evidence of bigfoot and you skeptools refuse to admit it . Please give us a break and stop being a fool . Do us all a favor and replicate it then i'll see your point otherwise shove off
Joe
^ It is CGI you berk - why don`t you listen ?
Delete^ I think they all know it`s probably CGI and that`s why they don`t answer.
DeleteHas there ever been a bigger meltdown from the village idiot?
Deleteyes because we all know the had CGI back in 1967. i know these trolls are just trying to get a rise out of us .
Deletestill no monkey suit after all these years
Joe
Oh and tiddly doo.
Delete11:12 - Yes...every day from you when we see your breakdown amid the tears.
DeleteThese guys sound like dim bulbs.
ReplyDelete^ these "guys" are mostly Joetomi debating himself
Delete^ she's cwazy
DeleteJoe
According to the Patterson, Freeman, Anders and Zana accounts we can now definitely say that Bigfoot is not nocturnal. Even most of the Finding Bigfoot stories happen during the day.
ReplyDeleteWhy so little footage?
http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
Deletehttp://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
Good point. Sykes never said a word about Zana being nocturnal and most of the small amount of footage that exits is in the day. There should be tons of film. Hmmmm
DeleteAnd another thing, since it's not nocturnal there should also be a body. Hmmmmm?
DeleteThanks 8:19 your theory holds a lot of water in my book. I don't believe the Anders thing for a minute but the rest of your thoughts are spot on. It's about time we had someone around here that knows something this mystery. Way to think out of the box!
DeleteThis evidence really woke me up:
Deletehttps://youtu.be/mgWY0D3UcN8
But the stuff Joe posts.....BLURRY :(
9:16... Why should there be tons of film? This is a creature that's evaded classification. What's more... Is you can post a million videos, your perverse denial means you'll comment in eve very next second like nothing's been posted like a total nut job.
Delete9:20... Exactly why would there be a higher chance of a body if it wasn't nocturnal?
9:41... And you have the audacity to claim other people have discussions with themselves? You're clearly crazy mate.
Actually this is not good news for footers.
DeleteLOL Sicktomi Joe just nailed her own coffin.
DeleteCome to think of it Smeja shot his Bigfoot during the day.
DeleteBrilliant 8:19 you've spotted something right in front of us all this time.
DeleteThis messes everything up and 2/3 of the excuses !
DeleteLike I said, this is not a good development for footers.
DeleteIt upsets the applecart big time.
Even Les Stroud had his alleged Bigfoot encounter during the day while making his shelter in the Alaskan back country. You're the man 8:19!
DeleteThis simply proves that Bigfoot is a myth. He couldn't possibly do his thing during day light hours or he would have been captured or killed long ago. Case closed.
DeleteRead em and weep believer's !
DeleteHa ha ha!!!
So...are all the Dukie & juvie comments on this site one op? Or is this the after school Hangout for all acne scared 14yo boys that must "come straight home". 35 comments, not ONE worth reading.
ReplyDeleteso then go to the Kardashian forum. Perhaps it would be more on your intellectual level. Blame the trolls, they have ruined any type of smart discussion on here
Deletejoe
...And a big tiddly doo to you!
Delete8:27 is one of the biggest trolls of this site...what a hypocrite he is.
Deletepffft, I wouldn't have to get down and dirty if i didn't have to deal with trolls such as yourself.
DeleteMove along
Joe
Dayum! Welshi's marking every corner today!
ReplyDelete^ with bogeys from his nose
Delete