Sunday, April 3, 2016

Eyewitness Describes What He Believes A Bigfoot Is After Seeing One


What is a bigfoot? Why do they stink? These and more questions are answered by a panel of eyewitnesses and researchers. The description one witness gives is amazing. Check it out:


74 comments:

  1. With all the dogman reports, dogman must be real, right Iktomi/Joe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Applying Sicktomi logic means that if there are substantial reportings of a creature then it must exist.


      I like all Bigfoot videos except for the Patterson hoax.


      Delete
    2. 2:37... There is no scientific method for measuring sightings reports. Unfortunately, there's no physical evidence to support the sightings reports of "dogmen". But we're lucky there is for what is commonly referred to as Sasquatch.

      2:40... "A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
      - Bertrand Russell

      Stop whining like a little girl and find a god damn monkey suit.

      Delete
    3. What you claim is bigfoot physical evidence is actually dogman physical evidence. There are only reports of bigfoot with no physical evidence to back it up.

      Delete
    4. http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints

      ... Ain't nothing but a troll!

      Delete
    5. Quit trolling dogman evidence as bigfoot related. You've lost all credibility. The top Bigfoot scientist dismissed the Patterson Hoax as a hoax and now you're using dogman evidence to prop up bigfoot.

      Delete
    6. Sykes is a geneticist mate... Not a "Bigfoot scientist", a primatologist, an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist, an SFX expert or a plastic surgeon... A geneticist. If he thinks Patty is a costume, it matters nothing. So does Anna Nekaris, and she's a full blown enthusiast.

      Delete
    7. So Bryan Sykes is not a scientist that is involved in Bigfoot research? He hasn't researched Bigfoot, tested alleged Bigfoot DNA samples, published his findings? Is he not the botttom line when it comes to scientifically testing potential Bigfoot DNA? Fuss over semantics much?

      Delete
    8. Bryan Sykes is the world's most pioneering geneticist who's currenlty researching the DNA of relict hominids. A geneticist is only as good as the samples he's provided... And has no expertise on anything else outside of that area.

      Delete
    9. Funny how many people can be experts at 2 or more different things but you limit Bryan Sykes to just one. Presumptuous?

      Delete
    10. Right. He's geneticist. We didn't already know that? Being a geneticist does not limit one from being an expert at something else. For example, he's an author as well. Would you not say he has expertise in writing?

      Delete
    11. He's not qualified to comment on the PGF's authenticity... And though his opinion is repected, until he brings the magic monkey suit, he's debunked nothing.

      Delete
    12. ^ the PGF is obviously clever CGI you idiot

      Delete
    13. ^ ...either that or maybe Photoshop...but it is hard to tell which nowadays isn`t it.

      Delete
    14. if you deny the PGF you might as well deny global warming
      1. there was no CGI at the time you berks !
      2. There was no stretch fabric at the time
      3. if it was hoaxed it must have been some big hollywood name so why haven't they admitted it after all these years ?
      4. I'm tired of arguing with idiots

      $$$

      Joe

      Delete
    15. Real Bigfoot video:

      https://youtu.be/mgWY0D3UcN8

      Don't fall for the Patterson Hoax.

      Delete
    16. 7:04

      Consensus is that the PG film is CGI and definitely not a Photoshop job ...but they could always be wrong I suppose but I doubt it.

      Delete
    17. CGI wasn't invented in 1967 you netter !
      go to bed dumbarse !

      Joe

      Delete
    18. 7:59 Nah mate it was around long ago before that.

      Delete

  2. The most definitive Bigfoot evidence so far:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ottjXRiq_fY

    Got Monkey suit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a suit... An expert on CGI.

      Now your turn;
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      Ain't nothing but a troll!

      Delete
    2. Nice try. I asked a Photoshop expert and she said there was no way the Mark Anders videos could be CGI. I then asked her about a costume and she said she doubted it was a costume. I then showed her the Patterson Hoax and she pointed out the cut out holes for the eyes and she had nothing good to say about the amateurish quality.

      The most definitive Bigfoot evidence so far.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ottjXRiq_fY

      Delete
    3. Argh right... How long has this meltdown of yours lasted now? A week?

      Delete
    4. How long has your Patterson Hoax meltdown lasted, your entire life?

      Delete
    5. I don't have issue with the footage. You appear to be having a break from reality... Leave the desktop and get some fresh air.

      Delete
    6. You think the Patterson Hoax is real. It seems you are the one having a break from reality. Your life revolves around a hoax.

      Delete
    7. Patterson was a shady character to begin with.

      Delete
    8. Last time I checked... You still hadn't provided any evidence that the PGF was a hoax.

      Such an "obvious hoax", yet such an obvious lack of evidence to prove that.

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    9. 5:24... If you believe what you read from Greg "liar" Long, indeed.

      Delete
    10. You haven't provided any evidence that Mark Anders' Bigfoot is a hoax. Where is the costume or the computer files that contain a CG constructed character as you mistakenly believe?

      I agree with Bryan Sykes on the Patterson Hoax but it's not a matter of opinion. The Patterson Hoax WAS a hoax.

      Delete
    11. It takes one look at Anders’ YouTube channel trailer to see that he is a master of CGI and Photoshop effects. It's the reason why nobody on the planet is celebrating his images.

      Now your turn. Claiming that the PGF is a hoax, because it's a hoax is circular logic... A logical fallacy. Where's the evidence?

      Delete
    12. ^ i think the PG film is cgi...definitely

      Delete
    13. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...

      Delete
    14. 7:01 has been smoking too many banana peels

      Joe

      Delete
    15. Wow! CGI? Photoshop? 1967, original planet of apes costumes were GROUNDBREAKING. Your photoshop expert was probably not even born yet. Oh wait, I forgot your troll generation is a bunch of knowitalls, but unfortunately you cannot change developmental history! Go smoke your rock in your parents basement, I'm sure you're going to be a mainstay for your groupies here ...giving new meaning to "rocks for brains"

      Delete
    16. 7:01

      Consensus is that the PG film is CGI and definitely not a Photoshop job ...but they could always be wrong I suppose but I doubt it.

      Delete
    17. How many identities does Joe have?

      None seen too bright. Are all their lives based around the Patterson Hoax?

      Delete
    18. ^ how many do you have ?
      The PGF is the best evidence of bigfoot and you skeptools refuse to admit it . Please give us a break and stop being a fool . Do us all a favor and replicate it then i'll see your point otherwise shove off

      Joe

      Delete
    19. ^ It is CGI you berk - why don`t you listen ?

      Delete
    20. ^ I think they all know it`s probably CGI and that`s why they don`t answer.

      Delete
    21. Has there ever been a bigger meltdown from the village idiot?

      Delete
    22. yes because we all know the had CGI back in 1967. i know these trolls are just trying to get a rise out of us .
      still no monkey suit after all these years

      Joe

      Delete
    23. 11:12 - Yes...every day from you when we see your breakdown amid the tears.

      Delete
  3. These guys sound like dim bulbs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ these "guys" are mostly Joetomi debating himself

      Delete
  4. According to the Patterson, Freeman, Anders and Zana accounts we can now definitely say that Bigfoot is not nocturnal. Even most of the Finding Bigfoot stories happen during the day.

    Why so little footage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI

      Delete
    2. Good point. Sykes never said a word about Zana being nocturnal and most of the small amount of footage that exits is in the day. There should be tons of film. Hmmmm

      Delete
    3. And another thing, since it's not nocturnal there should also be a body. Hmmmmm?

      Delete
    4. Thanks 8:19 your theory holds a lot of water in my book. I don't believe the Anders thing for a minute but the rest of your thoughts are spot on. It's about time we had someone around here that knows something this mystery. Way to think out of the box!

      Delete
    5. This evidence really woke me up:

      https://youtu.be/mgWY0D3UcN8


      But the stuff Joe posts.....BLURRY :(

      Delete
    6. 9:16... Why should there be tons of film? This is a creature that's evaded classification. What's more... Is you can post a million videos, your perverse denial means you'll comment in eve very next second like nothing's been posted like a total nut job.

      9:20... Exactly why would there be a higher chance of a body if it wasn't nocturnal?

      9:41... And you have the audacity to claim other people have discussions with themselves? You're clearly crazy mate.

      Delete
    7. Actually this is not good news for footers.

      Delete
    8. LOL Sicktomi Joe just nailed her own coffin.

      Delete
    9. Come to think of it Smeja shot his Bigfoot during the day.

      Delete
    10. Brilliant 8:19 you've spotted something right in front of us all this time.

      Delete
    11. This messes everything up and 2/3 of the excuses !

      Delete
    12. Like I said, this is not a good development for footers.

      It upsets the applecart big time.

      Delete
    13. Even Les Stroud had his alleged Bigfoot encounter during the day while making his shelter in the Alaskan back country. You're the man 8:19!

      Delete
    14. This simply proves that Bigfoot is a myth. He couldn't possibly do his thing during day light hours or he would have been captured or killed long ago. Case closed.

      Delete
    15. Read em and weep believer's !

      Ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
  5. So...are all the Dukie & juvie comments on this site one op? Or is this the after school Hangout for all acne scared 14yo boys that must "come straight home". 35 comments, not ONE worth reading.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so then go to the Kardashian forum. Perhaps it would be more on your intellectual level. Blame the trolls, they have ruined any type of smart discussion on here

      joe

      Delete
    2. ...And a big tiddly doo to you!

      Delete
    3. 8:27 is one of the biggest trolls of this site...what a hypocrite he is.

      Delete
    4. pffft, I wouldn't have to get down and dirty if i didn't have to deal with trolls such as yourself.
      Move along

      Joe

      Delete
  6. Dayum! Welshi's marking every corner today!

    ReplyDelete