Friday, February 5, 2016

Bigfoot Stalks Investigator "It Sounded Like A Dozer Going Through The Woods"


From the youtube channel of the Kentucky Bigfoot Research Organization:

On a hot summer afternoon In June 2013, John (Wig) was exploring a sighting location. He was paralleled by something breaking large branches. As he approached it's location eight grunts or growls were heard, Location: Russellville, Kentucky.

72 comments:

  1. Joe said 4 years ago that he knew that sykes had sequenced bigfoot DNA.

    SO WHERE IS IT???

    BLOWN THE FU CK OUT AGAIN

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And it turns out he was more right than he anticipated.

      : )

      Delete
    2. He? you mean you. You have been replying to comments aimed at joe all day. Did you suddenly feel the need for some damage control on that?

      He was right? So did he just forget to mention this bigfoot DNA in his bigfoot documentary then?

      YOU CANT MAKE IT UP

      Delete
    3. Who Joe?

      It's basic research in it's progression. At the end of Bigfoot Files, he was interested in the ancient morphology of Khwit's skull and had only sequenced one side of Zana's lineage. By the time he had written Nature of the Beast, he had sequenced both lineages, to which you only have to look at the nature of his theories to know how much he'd moved on in premise.

      Pick up a book kid, I know how desperate you are to cling to Bigfoot Files. It's ok... Nothing will hurt you, I'm here to baby sit you full time if you get scared.

      Delete
    4. bigfoot files blew you the fu ck out m8

      zanas dna was 100% modern human (fact) which is another nail in your desperate coffin

      Delete
    5. Ancient human that shares our exact DNA... Just like fossil examples of us like Cro-Magnon that had anatomical and morphological differences.

      Delete
    6. That's quite a guess considering there is no Bigfoot DNA to test... oh wait. Nice attempt to cover your tracks.

      Delete
    7. Hairs and skulls actually pal... Let me know should you need pointing in the general direction of that.

      Delete
    8. The state of DNA knowledge as of 2016 ,,any viable sequence CAN DETERMINE ,HIGHT ,EYE COLOR,POSSIBLE CANCER SUSCEPTIBILTY'S,RACE,HAIR COLOR,IQ LEVEL,ECT.
      ITS VERY SAD WHEN JOE F STARTS TO PROJECT HIS "EXTREME LACK " of knowledge pertaining to the subject matter on folks that have 3-4x his intellegence
      WHAT A DOOFUS!!!
      Haaaa Haaaaa Haaaa lol

      AC collins

      Delete
    9. Joe just got butt Slammed by AC ! Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa!

      Delete
    10. Wow... Drunk again, are we? Take it up with Sykes. I'll take the word of a world beating geneticist over a drunk with a superiority trolling complex any day.

      Delete
    11. Just got back from the pub ...
      Son !
      Something you would know NOTHING ABOUT BOYO!!

      The heck with sykes!
      Svante Paabo is the REAL DNA SPECIALIST!
      AC collins

      Delete
    12. Actually, AC, you drunk joke... DNA can tell us about hair colour, decease, sex, eye colour, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), body clock, thrill seeking and obesity.
      https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/apr/27/genetics.cancer
      ... Height is still an area that research requires research in;
      "Predicting adult body height from genetic data is helpful in several areas such as pediatric endocrinology and forensic investigations. However, despite large international efforts to catalog the genes that influence the stature of humans, knowledge on genetic determinants of adult body height is still incomplete. Now DNA-based prediction of taller-than-average body height is feasible."
      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131120103613.htm

      Anyone who boasts they're drunk all the time has probably not been the legal age to drink too long.

      Delete
    13. The difference is, I conciously try to be a joke! You on the other hand Joe, COME BY IT UNCONSCIOUSLY THRU
      BEING ABSOLUTELY NEUROTIC!
      which is kool with me !! that being said ,, WHO'S JOE? and what's it too ya??

      Your friend AC collins!

      Delete
    14. You're a rude and try to be a bully, and then claim to be people's friends, it's strange behaviour. Your comments when you're not like that are some of the most stimulating to read, and then you go in full loony mode and nobody knows where they stand with you.

      If you want to be people's "friends", stop acting like a jerk.

      Delete
    15. Earth to AC ,anyone who boast they blow goats all the time has probably not been the legal age to blow goats too long .

      Joe

      Delete
    16. Ha ha ha ha ha ha,, Joe ,why are you so Uptight? You have been here too long to "NOT GET IT" Bro ,try and stop projecting you feelings ,,
      IMO you take things wrong 60%
      Of the time. Anyways be cool
      Joe !
      AC :-)

      Delete
    17. ^ Joe`s too much of a control freak to ever be calm enough mentally in order to be "cool"...cold fish in a heated mentality is his state.

      Delete
  2. What we have now is reasonable cause to dismiss the PGF as a hoax. The provenance stinks and the images are ridiculous. There will never be any "science" done on the film because there's nowhere to start. There's not one thing about it that's reliable enough to support anything more than a rather casual opinion.

    The footers need a scientific conclusion? Too bad. It's no one's job to bother with bigfoot at all, and certainly it's no one's responsibility to fund such a silly waste of time. However, Odinn should feel free to go ahead and do all the work he wants. No one is stopping him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In actual fact, we can deduce a lot from the images of the PGF, so much so that we can compare the apparent organic tissue to that of elderly people;
      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      From this we can approach people like plastic surgeons to apply their expert opinion in determining whether it is consistent with biological tissue;
      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns%20&%20Meldrum%20Commentary_2013.pdf
      ... Unfortunately it's the opinions of experts that's important here. The fact of that matter is some people would love the PGF to be all forgotten about and push a version of events where scientists have not invested enthusiasm in it's authenticity. Unfortunately it still proves to be one of their biggest obstacles, hence the requirement to almost plead that it's not relevant evidence. I think the author of that comment is hoping that research isn't funded more than anything.

      What we have now after 47 years of SFX advances is reasonable cause to dismiss the PGF as being a hoax.

      Delete
    2. That sounds like a lot of BS.

      Delete
    3. That's not how science works. Besides I'm sure all the footers would claim that it sucks regardless.

      Delete
    4. Actually... When a source is presented as authentic by an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist, a primatologist, an SFX expert and a pioneering plastic surgeon... To test the idea that the subject in the footage is biological you would need to do what?

      Please don't pretend like you know how science works.

      Delete
    5. Perhaps they should write a paper and have it published.

      Delete
    6. Keep up the great work Iktomi....cement heads schooled yet again!

      Delete
    7. 5:18... There's plenty here;
      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/

      Delete
    8. 5:18, that sounds like the way science works. That's not how iktomi works. He's content being an expert on an entertainment blog.

      Delete
    9. Hey... You're invited to counter everything I post as scientific evidence of course. Should be easy, right?

      Delete
    10. Please provide some conclusive, quality, testable, repeatable evidence.

      Delete
    11. Species traits in convincing biological dermals across States and decades.
      Audio recordings that became the subject of a year-long University based engineering study, with the results determined that the vocalizations were primate in origin, and that at least one of the voices exceeded normal human ranges, that the recordings were spontaneous at the time of recording with no evidence of pre-recording or re-recording at altered tape speed.
      Over a dozen unknown primate hair samples, verified by multiple camps of primatologists, all morphologically uniform and all effectively indistinguishable from a human hair of the particular structure, found around sightings and tracks.
      Thermal hits, one with two subjects in the height range of 9 feet and another in the region of 8.5.

      Glad I could help.

      Delete
  3. There is no need to debunk the pgf, as bigfoot itself is debunked due to its absolute absence from the fossil record, and natural history of North America. Footie is a legendary creature for credules and the pgf is their porn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so why are you here other than to be a huge arse ?

      Joe

      Delete
    2. There is only a handful of teeth for a fossil record for chimps and gorillas in Africa, and we have 150 years of science journals that document very large human skeletal remains.

      Thanks for playing.

      Delete
    3. and that makes bigfoot real how exactly?

      Delete
    4. It doesn't... It blows your ten year old's reasoning to dismiss it's existence out of the water though.

      Delete
    5. anon cowards get blown the f**k out by Iktomi once again !

      Joe

      Delete
    6. Joe's ratio for meaningful posts to number of messages is horrible. But he rides your crotch so you tolerate him.

      Delete
    7. I think he's doing something right with all the comment sections dedicated to hating him.

      Delete
    8. Nice to see you are keeping up with the statistics 5:28. Guess all that schooling your parents paid for went to some use after all. Let me know when my ratio ever hits Pi , always had a fondness for 3.14....
      I must be doing something right when I seem to be on so many people's hearts and mind, maybe i'll get lucky this year and get a valentine day card from one of the trolls, hahaha

      Joe

      Delete
    9. I bet this troll ^ has never seen a bigfoot!

      Delete
  4. It is Bigfooter 101 to take the position that science is sitting on its hands instead of actually studying such tripe as the PGF.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually... Plenty of scientists have studied the PGF and conclude it's authentic. It's now your move to prove them wrong.

      Or don't you have the minerals?

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    2. SHOW ME THE MONKEY (SUIT) !

      Joe

      Delete
  5. so many witnesses describe the same overwhelming sound when encountering a bigfoot. it must be super scary i'm sure to hear

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes... Thousands of years of it apparently. The only BS is between those ears of yours, kid.

      Delete
    2. Not to mention his association with Fraud Standing.

      Delete
    3. Standing who presented him and Bindernagle with an encounter in a known active research area?

      Delete
    4. What became of that, do tell.

      Delete
    5. standing got banished to the yukon and bindernagle just got the willard scott award. ( sponsered by smuckers jelly of course)

      MMG

      Delete
    6. Yet he provided an encounter in a research area where enthusiasts were screaming he had stolen and was genuine.

      Delete
    7. Check out this site, Iktomi.
      www.kentuckybigfoot.com
      Under the video tab there is a clip of a supposed juvenile belly crawling. Apologies if you've seen it already.

      Delete
  6. That Meldrum blends myth and math, fable and forensics, is what puts off so many of his colleagues. A scientist should not be a believer, said Martin Hackworth, a senior lecturer in the physics department at Idaho State University . . . Hackworth called Meldrum's research a joke and said some 30 professors signed a letter scolding the university for hosting Meldrum's Bigfoot gathering on campus . . . "Do I cringe when I see the Discovery Channel and I see Idaho State University, Jeff Meldrum? Yes, I do," Hackworth said. "He believes he's taken up the cause of people who have been shut out by the scientific community. He's lionized there. He's worshipped. He walks on water. It's embarrassing."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yet Meldrum has people like the best conservationist in the world putting forwords in his book? "A scientists should not be a believer", yet lying to oneself regarding mounting evidence is somehow better? Scientists conduct research and then form a conclusive hypothesis; this is a fundamental scientific principle. In Meldrum's case being an authority of evolutionary bipedalism; the probability that all the physical evidence he's collected being a hoax is more unbelievable than it being authentic in like with the reliable frequency of reports. From Hackworth's perspective, I think he's a tad bit jealous that someone on a fringe topic is doing a little better than him. Just take a little look at Meldrum's online journal editorial board;
      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/board.shtml

      .. None of them would be present if Meldrum wasn't respected by his peers, and I didn't read Hackworth's present one argument against his work.

      Delete
    2. In best Ricardo Montalban voice,

      "Welcome to Fantasy Island!"

      Delete
    3. That gets around to helping Hackworth out, doesn't it?

      Delete
  7. "Yeah, that 3D printed footie has about as much to do with science and reality as does me going to my garage and building a life size X-Wing model." - dmaker

    FU CKING BEAUTIFUL DMAKER!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. uuunnnnnhhhh! uuunnnnnhhhh! That is the sound Iktomi makes when he plays prison biotch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol, you don't come around enough.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, you need all the friends you can get.

      How's Biscardi, Haints?

      Delete
    3. Haints is drunk again. Poor sot just can't handle his light ale like he used to

      Joe

      Delete
    4. unlike you whom can handle ale the male all the time

      Delete