Honey Island Swamp Monster? Oh, Mark Anders You're So Funny


This is the famous Honey Island Swamp Monster. At least that's what Mr. Anders wants us to believe. Watch his commentary below:



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. AWESOME, JOE!! WHAT DO U THINK OF STANDING'S "BIGFOOT" VIDEO?

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    2. We're not gonna know either way for sure about the photos until more evidence is presented, but I think it significant that he's managed to get Les Stroud, not to mention Meldrum and Bindenagle experiencing something. I'm gonna sit tight, do a little homework and see what unfolds...

      I enjoyed the first episode, was hoping a YouTube link to the second would have been posted here by now!

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. YEAH, ME TOO!! HOPEFULLY, SHAWN WILL HAVE IT UP SOON!!

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    4. anyone have a link to the first ep??

      Delete
  2. morning joe!
    And I thought MK Davis had evidence to proof Honey Island Swamp was a big hoax!
    Mark Anders is the type of individual that this community needs to clean up and STOP promoting wtf?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't agree more! I'm not commenting anymore on Dyer (I realize I'm doing that now though!) because it's what these people want!

      However... You can't stop popular culture.

      Peace.

      Delete
  3. Have you guys watched this yet? Les Stroud/Todd Standing video from Survivorman ep. 2.....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjj40k4zcAo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that!! I just hope it's not taken down before I finish work!!!!

      Delete
  4. It is only a short highlight video posted from Les Stroud's Youtube channel, when ep.2 in full comes up I will try to post a link for it here. If BFE does not do it first, of course!

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you were a bigfoot researcher and after years of looking you finally managed to capture one out in the open on film would you:

    a) return to the location time and time again looking to get further evidence of the creature now that you know exactly where one is and that it can be caught out in the open

    Or

    b) never return to the area again, not even once.

    This question is fundamental in understanding the source of the bigfoot subculture we see today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/photographer-spooked-off-big-spirit.html?m=1

      ... Dealt with substantially here.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. Nope.

      Roger never went back.

      Deal with it.

      Delete
    3. He never went back because he had to go on a promotion tour for it. Sound familiar?

      Delete
    4. Lol so unbelievably true^

      Delete
    5. 4:41... Incorrect. There was one heck of a lot of work to get back up there and conduct research. Just because I haven't pasted numerous quotes from researchers confirming that fact, doesn't make it any less true. It's also a measure of what you are left with as opposed to confronting the said source appropriately.

      It's slightly embarrassing.

      5:29...

      The circumstances are different. You have a legitimate hominid captured on film from a time when awareness of these creatures was very minimal... Whereas Dyer has hoaxed before and has not had one ounce of positive attention from neither skeptics or enthusiasts, with the exception of nut a couple.

      It's pretty dyer (pun intended) that you people should jump all over the Dyer crap now, where have you been all this time? That's right... Running out of options.

      ; )

      Delete
    6. Also... It's pretty audacious that now that one hoaxer should travel round on a promotion tour, that the inumerable examples of other researchers in this field should be conveniently forgotten in an attempt to compare but one idiot to a source that has the backing of credible scientists.

      What we have here, as was always the case... Is Dyer mimicking legitimate researchers in order to appear consistent with those before him.

      Delete
    7. Why didn't roger go back though?

      Delete
    8. "Roger's next plans were to capture a Bigfoot, which he planned a full expedition returning to California and searching all the way up to Canada. He planned a one-year expedition with tracking dogs, cages, a large crew, and the entire project filmed. This would have been a huge financial project. So they immediately went to Hollywood for funding, but they turned him down.

      Roger then went on his film tour- he made lots of money, started his own organization, and started investigating capture claims to bag one that way (and was duped in the process). He partnered with Ron Olson to fund the 'capture expedition' that he originally planned. They were going to fund the expedition themselves by making a movie, but that never panned out and the expedition never happened.

      Roger kept investigating claims. He eventually had Ron do investigations for him because by that time he was getting too sick. Roger died and Ron basically continued where they left off doing research, and ended up making a docudrama movie based on Roger's ideas (Sasquatch: Legend of Bigfoot).

      For one, a lot more people were in and out of that area immediately following the film. So the odds of seeing another in the general area were much more slim.

      He also had no means to capture a Bigfoot which would be the next logical step.

      We could speculate all day long and go over 'would haves' and 'could haves', but reality is never that black and white. The facts show that Patterson did make immediate plans for a return to California and a capture- it just didn't pan out financially."

      - Roguefooter from the BFF

      Delete
    9. But why didnt roger go back though?

      Delete
    10. But you'd think he would go back to the area he actually filmed one, no?

      Delete
  6. Amazing these footers keep bringing up packhams recreation as some sort of proof patty is real instead of say oh I don't know maybe producing the actual bigfoot.

    Packhams suit was not supposed to be a replicar of patty nor was any sort of bbc suit budget spent on it. It is an off the shelf budget suit.

    Packham stated they would recreate the ACTION at bluff creek not that they would try to replicate the suit. The action they replicated excellently. Bloke in a suit at distance, compliant gait, shaky camera, the works.

    These butt hurt footers cling to these fallacies because it's all they have. Their mythical ape is nowhere to be found because it doesn't exist.

    A confession from bob h IS as good as a confession from bob g because he was there and involved in Rogers schemes (photographic) evidence. He is not some random guy, he lives a few doors from bob g and other locals have confirmed it was him.

    Obliterated.

    Fish in a barrel.

    MMG in a blender.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/joe-rogan-explains-why-people-read.html?m=0

      ... 'Obliterated' here... And don't make me paste large extracts from it and make you look silly.

      Troll in a barrel.

      Delete
    2. Obliterated would be you dumping a bigfoot that resembles patty on my doorstep. Until then please shut up about your ridiculous fantasies.

      Delete
    3. How is not believing in a creature that has no evidence to suggest it exists trolling? Seriously.

      Delete
    4. You want to be serious on this blog?

      Wow,just wow.

      Delete
    5. 6:57...

      You can't leave your basement and you expect someone to bring a Bigfoot to your door against a regime that does everything to censor it? You failing to agknowldege scientific evidence isn't at the detriment of this field, but highlights your ignorance.

      Seriously... One weak troll.

      Delete
    6. Failing to acknowledge scientific evidence? Err what evidence? Please link to the peer reviewed published papers about this. We all eagerly await this discovery of the century...

      Delete
    7. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/listen-sasquatch-chronicles-finding.html?m=0

      ... You want a peer review, but journals pull out of publishing at the last moment. You want verification, yet by your standards peer reviews shouldn't be trustworthy because there are examples of the process being manipulated?

      Do you even know what you're taking about??

      Delete
    8. Lol^

      Nice conspiracy theories with nothing to back them up.

      Footery is now right up there with ufos, 911 truthers and moon hoax advocates.

      Delete
    9. On the other hand, being spoon fed and excepting of the status quo absolutely, without ever questioning it, is solid...

      Delete
    10. 8:50...

      If you don't think there is anything on UFO's, then your disposition needs a reevaluation... Even the Catholic Church agknowldeges alien life.

      (Oh dear)

      ... Also, explain this;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/could-this-be-bigfoot-skull-mk-davis-is.html?m=0

      ... I'll be eagerly awaiting your intelligent response to why such a find would be archived away on the quiet.

      ; )

      Delete
  7. "Roger then went on his film tour"

    Joe obliterating himself right there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roger had a Bigfoot on film... And then toured to raise awareness (and make a little money from one of the finds of history).

      Stating facts (that obliterated your argument), old boy.

      Delete
  8. Swamp monster eat U for sure

    ReplyDelete
  9. honey island swamp monster - bogs smell like a lot of things, but nothing like honey...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Got to listen to this weeks episode of the Sasquatch files. Coonbo Baker is extraordinary with experiences he has been through. He made an interesting observation I had not heard before or thought of. Said he could tell which hand a bigfoot had used to cause a tree break just by the way it is twisted. They twist it inwards towards there body. Sure makes sense when you think about it.

    Give it a listen
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wasn't it amazing!! Was meant to finish listening to it last night but was too busy in the end.

      Coonbo is a total legend!!

      Delete
  11. Anders sure could show Bigfoot movie-makers a thing or two about costume design. Geesh, Anders has the best looking bigfoot costume I've seen yet. (unless Todd Standing's footage is fake). With costumes like Anders', there's no end to the hoaxing that will ensue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anders does not have a costume, he has a TOY figure of a Sasquatch; examine every one of his photos carefully - the foliage, though very cleverly positioned, is always way out of scale with the figure, which appears to be about 12 to 16 inches tall. The example above is staged between blades of grass in the foreground, and leafy twigs in the background.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

Breaking: Derek Randles Releases Most Amazing Thermal Footage of Bigfoot Ever