Breaking: Roger Patterson Lost Reel About To Be Released By Mike Rugg This Sunday (Update: Film Will Not Be Revealed This Sunday)


Roger Patterson was allegedly working on a Bigfoot documentary when he filmed the creature at Bluff Creek, California in 1967. Him and Bob Gimlin managed to capture a a whole 60 shaky seconds of a Bigfoot on a single reel before running out of film. The footage is one of the most recognized film in history and it's famously known as the Patterson-Gimlin film. Before the P/G footage, Patterson was a well respected rodeo rider who had developed an interest that inspired him to write a small self-published book about Bigfoots in Washington, California and Oregon. According to a new discovery, there's more to Patterson apparently and a new movie reel is about to show something no one has ever seen before.

Last night, Nadia Moore reposted an announcement by Mike Rugg that the Bigfoot Discovery Museum had received a "mystery" 16mm film that apparently features Roger Patterson casting a footprint and sitting on a desk with a suit and tie talking about his book. No one really knows what else in the reel, but one thing that's for certain is that the film has never been seen before. Here's what Mike sent out to Bigfoot Discovery Museum members about the film:

Dear fellow bigfoot wonderers,

We hope you'll come to our monthly meeting this Sunday, Aug 19 at 6 PM at the Bigfoot Discovery Museum. We have exciting news: the mystery 16mm film that we received apparently features Roger Patterson both casting a footprint and sitting on a desk with a suit and tie talking about his book; the words Bigfoot Yakima, Wash also appear on screen. We think this might be a documentary film featuring Roger himself... we hope to know more by meeting time. We plan to have this professionally archived to DVD soon and then we'll have a public meeting (as fundraiser) to view the film (for the first time?) The film is in Super 16mm format and that means it has sound..

We have a lot to talk about; several recent sightings and news from other fronts.

We'll be having chicken (dark meat) BBQ so bring your own drink and/or alternate meat or side dish/dessert.

Thanks,

Mike
(still alive and kicking)

[Update: Nadia Moore clarifies that the meeting is for members only and that the film will NOT be shown this Sunday.]

Let me clarify that this Sundays meeting is for Museum Members ONLY! IF you want to come you can be prepared to become a member by picking one of the member options and paying the accompanying fee, and you need to bring a potluck item.

And NO the film will NOT be revealed this Sunday, it has not even been viewed yet as Mike has not been able to obtain a working projector that this old real fits on.....

Shawn Evidence can you update your blog entry to reflect my information above. Thanks!

- Nadia Moore

Comments

  1. Damn, I'm a vegetarian.

    I guess after the 'FUNDRAISER' he can then upload the video for free to youtube and I can munch on a carrot while watching.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Mike Rugg and the Museum have ongoing payments and expenses that the last fund raiser did not address, it was to cover his county taxes only.

      Let me clarify that this Sundays meeting is for Museum Members ONLY! IF you want to come you can be prepared to become a member by picking one of the member options and paying the accompanying fee, and you need to bring a potluck item.

      And NO the film will NOT be revealed this Sunday, it has not even been viewed yet as Mike has not been able to obtain a working projector that this old real fits on.....

      Delete
    2. Nadia, you might want to advise him to seek advice rather than just finding a projector he thinks will work. I have experience with 16mm projectors, and you can easily damage the film if you don't know what you're doing. May I suggest contacting a projectionist guild or organization in California (I assume you're in California, attached to the museum?). Projectionists are quirky and they may have some old "home use" equipment lying around. I know there are a couple of projectionist guilds in California. A good camera shop would also work, if you can find one!

      Delete
  2. What, he hasn't previewed the whole thing?

    I doubt there is more Bigfoot footage (hee hee: Bigfoot footage. Pardon me but that struck me as funny.) Anyway, if there had been more scenes of a Bigfoot then he would have released it away back when.
    Still, him talking about it all should be interesting and hopefully informative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. The film is probably pre Patty and might not be much. However if it is post Patty, then this might be a real find. Anyway it might help to get a little insight into Roger.

      Chuck

      Delete
  3. this is something I will definitely be missing work for.

    Why do people ALWAYS make an announcement similar to this, but make us wait "a few days" or "coming soon".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. money? I think the fundraiser bit gives it away...drum up some business.

      Delete
    2. That's right man it's America!

      Delete
    3. You think, look to the east as it's getting closer.

      Delete
    4. Mike did NOT make this announcement, it was meant for Museum Members only, but I accidentally released it to try to get more membership.

      He has not been able to view it as he has not yet been able to obtain a working projector from this era.... It is pretty simple and is not some kind of "conspiracy" or withholding of information as you anonymous posters always like to accuse people of!

      Let me clarify that this Sundays meeting is for Museum Members ONLY! IF you want to come you can be prepared to become a member by picking one of the member options and paying the accompanying fee, and you need to bring a potluck item.

      And NO the film will NOT be revealed this Sunday, as has erroneously been posted elsewhere, it has not even been viewed yet as Mike has not been able to obtain a working projector that this old real fits on.....

      Delete
    5. “accidentally released it to try to get more membership”?
      That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It sounds like you intentional released it to get more membership or you accidentally released it. Saying that you “accidentally released it to try to get more membership” is like saying that you accidentally burned down your house for the insurance money.

      Delete
    6. Nadia is a fraud. Just another one in it for the money. This field is hopeless as long as people like her are involved.

      Delete
    7. Nadia, people are rightfully skeptical since there have been so many in this business who are rotten. It just comes with the territory at this point. Thank you for clarifying things though.

      Delete
  4. This sounds like it quite possibly could be one of the versions of the documentary that Patterson and Al DeAtley took on four-wall theater tours. If that is truly the case it will have been seen before by many, but will still be of major, huge significance. It may contain the presumably "lost" Roll Two of the October 20th, 1967 footage. Let us hope so. I see no reason that such a large roll of film with sound would have been compiled from random Patterson film pieces.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This sounds like it quite possibly could be one of the versions of the documentary that Patterson and Al DeAtley took on four-wall theater tours. If that is truly the case it will have been seen before by many, but will still be of major, huge significance. It may contain the presumably "lost" Roll Two of the October 20th, 1967 footage. Let us hope so. I see no reason that such a large roll of film with sound would have been compiled from random Patterson film pieces.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This sounds like it quite possibly could be one of the versions of the documentary that Patterson and Al DeAtley took on four-wall theater tours. If that is truly the case it will have been seen before by many, but will still be of major, huge significance. It may contain the presumably "lost" Roll Two of the October 20th, 1967 footage. Let us hope so. I see no reason that such a large roll of film with sound would have been compiled from random Patterson film pieces.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understood your post the first time,a bit better the second time and the third made it crystal clear.thanks for being thorough.

      Delete
    2. LMFAO, now that was a good one!

      Delete
    3. Don't be so hard on Steven(AKA Crazy Eyes-Steve Buscemi).

      He's still trying to learn how to wipe his Taterwhole on his own.

      Delete
    4. um, my phone did it.

      And really, no comment to that last idiot.

      Delete
  7. Don't exited about more Patty footage because if Roger had that he would have released it then.Roger was hurting for cash at the time but it will be nice to have some more video/audio from Patterson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amen to that. Not that it would change anything, but it could help soften the next 40 years discussing it, instead of the PGF.

      Delete
  8. It is the first reel shown at the public viewings that Roger charged admission for. He showed this reel which has an interview of him as well as some scientists. Then he would show the "Patty" film.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bloopers, out-takes, and old summer vacation vids. If it had anything decent it would have been released a long time ago.
    Seems like every other day there is someone trying to up the ante on breaking news.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me clarify that this Sundays meeting is for Museum Members ONLY! IF you want to come you can be prepared to become a member by picking one of the member options and paying the accompanying fee, and you need to bring a potluck item.

      And NO the film will NOT be revealed this Sunday, as has erroneously been posted elsewhere, it has not even been viewed yet as Mike has not been able to obtain a working projector that this old real fits on.....

      Delete
  10. Justin smeja just tweeted he is going to be there. OMG guys this could be huge

    ReplyDelete
  11. Meldrum just called and said he was bringing over a bag of soft tacos and some chalupas

    ReplyDelete
  12. If there was footage of Bob h suiting up and taking practice walks the footers would cut that out and be in denial that it ever happened. The pgf is fundamental to a footers belief.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, to bad he wasn't smart enough to film it..what a card.

      Delete
  13. Professionally edited, with sound (Super 16 does not have sound, it has sprockets on both sides, so no sound strip on either side), has to be documentary stuff. They would not have added the out-takes, the behind the scenes, the "hey Bob, do the walk again but this time stop clowning around and walk normal!" cutting room floor bits of footage. So this should be clean, easy and not revealing of anything new.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Let me clarify that this Sundays meeting is for Museum Members ONLY! IF you want to come you can be prepared to become a member by picking one of the member options and paying the accompanying fee, and you need to bring a potluck item.

    And NO the film will NOT be revealed this Sunday, it has not even been viewed yet as Mike has not been able to obtain a working projector that this old real fits on.....

    ReplyDelete
  15. I HERD THAT THIS SHOWS A HAIRY UPRIGHT BI PETAL APE LIKE BEING WALKING ACROSS A CRICK. CAN ANYONE CONFIRM THIS?!111ONEONEONE

    I NOES BIGFOT IS REEL. CUZ I'S SEEN EM. THEY LIVE OUTSIDE UNDER MY AIRCONDITIONER UNIT THAT BROKE IN 72. THE 7 DOGS THAT LIVED UNDER MY TRAILER PORCH LEFT AFTER THEY STARTED STAYN THAR.

    ROGER PATTERSON IS MY EYE DOLL!!2111

    AND MELDUMB TOO!!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. It probably just documents the "strange" Patterson & Gimlin bagged when they were supposedly out "bigfoot hunting".

    ReplyDelete
  17. There are many pieces of "random" footage from Roger Patterson that Bill Munns has gotten from Patricia Patterson and scanned. This does not look nor sound like that sort of thing. It is on a big roll, not the small rolls that Patterson used. Hence, this is surely some kind of documentary. From what has been said of the contents it can be narrowed down quite significantly. It has to be rather early. This might be the one that Patterson and DeAtley used in touring theaters, of which there were apparently three versions. One was just a short 20 minutes or so, and then more was added, until a third version was produced which was basically feature length, and had parts that were taken from a BBC documentary that used the Roll Two footage. It has been presumed lost or hidden in DeAtley's vaults for ages. It would be monumental if this footage reemerged. I remember seeing such a film in a drive-in in 1974. Could this be the same one? What I recall had a guy (Gimlin) jumping off a stump into the sand, etc. That is what I mean by "not random." It is surely a produced film roll for presentation, for theaters or TV.

    There were also pieces of Roger's previous "docu-drama" project included in the touring version and BBC documentary. So far as I know, this early BBC doc has also been "lost." The BBC had a bad habit of recycling or trashing film and video back in the day. There is a tale told by Terry Gilliam of how he was called into the offices, where he found his Monty Python animation proofs and materials sitting in trash bins. He was there just in time to save these priceless pieces from oblivion. Some BBC shows from earlier days have no extant record, as they reused the video tape they were recorded on.

    I would highly recommend having this copied immediately, before running it through some old projector that could damage or ignite the film. This may be the last of its kind, and needs to be preserved.

    So far as a DVD presentation of it, well, it is probably under copyright in some way or other. If it contains the Bigfoot footage or anything else from Patterson, Patricia, his widow, might claim ownership.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. why do footers try so hard to hide all the bits of patterson film?

      would be nice if there was a full res version available for all to look at.

      is it because the hoax is obvious?

      Delete
  18. So what are ya trying to say Nadia?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I don't get it either: I guess this event is open to EVERYONE -- and we're going to get to see this exciting footage!

      (haha -- seriously, she is probably now drinking scotch to calm her nerves, still fearful that a tidal wave of Bigfoot enthusiasts -- zombie-like in their zeal -- will wash into the little museum meeting room this Sunday)

      Delete
  19. So, where did this "mystery" 16mm come from? Who had it? Who gave it to the bigfoot museum? Could this be the missing October 1967 blooper reel?

    Watch, it shows Bob Hieronomous tripping and falling on the log at Bluff Creek during take no. 1.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Do you credulous JREF butt plugs still bleeve that Melissa Hovey's stunt double Kitakaze has found the suit or has it become obvious that he's pretending ?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Did anyone mention the Bigfoot Discovery Museum in Felton, California offers paid memberships and holds a member meeting on the 3rd Sunday each month at 6pm along with a potluck of dishes the members bring to share while discussing the latest about bigfoot? You know, stuff like sightings, news and films.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think theres more than enough proof that the film is the holy Grail of sightings. Ive met Bob Gimlin in person and I looked dead in the eye when I asked him that question. You could tell the sighting shook him to the bone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's called "believing your own lies"! He should be able to sell it with some conviction/believability after telling it 6000 times.
      Same thing is eventually going to happen with Smeja. Actors do it every day for a living. Just because someone is on the big screen flying across the galaxy in a spaceship thats traveling at light speed doesnt mean its really happening. Whats that saying..Ignorance is bliss?

      Delete
  23. First off I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question which I'd like to ask if you don't mind.
    I was curious to find out how you center yourself and clear your thoughts before writing.
    I have had a hard time clearing my thoughts in getting my ideas out there.
    I truly do take pleasure in writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are generally lost just trying
    to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or hints? Many thanks!


    my page; frontiernet
    Also see my site > plurk.com

    ReplyDelete
  24. Now I am going to do my breakfast, afterward having my breakfast coming again to read other news.


    Feel free to surf to my web site ... exercises for vertical leap

    ReplyDelete
  25. Good day! This is kind of off topic but I need some help from an established blog.

    Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I'm thinking about
    making my own but I'm not sure where to begin. Do you have any tips or suggestions? With thanks

    My webpage; identi.ca

    ReplyDelete
  26. I must thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this blog.
    I'm hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts from you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own blog now ;)

    Feel free to surf to my blog; workouts to jump higher

    ReplyDelete
  27. It's very trouble-free to find out any topic on net as compared to textbooks, as I found this article at this site.

    my page: travel voucher

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hello! Do you use Twitter? I'd like to follow you if that would be okay. I'm definitely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.


    Feel free to visit my page: http://julio.estudiosuma.cl

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hey There. I discovered your blog the use of msn. That is a very smartly written article.
    I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information.
    Thanks for the post. I'll definitely return.

    My blog post - exercises to jump higher

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hurrah! After all I got a webpage from where I be capable of
    in fact get helpful information regarding
    my study and knowledge.

    Here is my webpage - richpinhead.com

    ReplyDelete
  31. Greetings! Very useful advice within this post!
    It is the little changes that will make the most important changes.
    Thanks for sharing!

    Also visit my web blog ... teakspace.com

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hi, its pleasant post about media print, we all be familiar
    with media is a great source of data.

    My website ... http://demo.socialengineexpress.com/profile/calliepjz

    ReplyDelete
  33. Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
    A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would
    really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design.

    With thanks

    my site ... bikersowned.ca

    ReplyDelete
  34. Ahaa, its nice dialogue about this article here at this weblog, I have read all that,
    so at this time me also commenting at this place.


    Also visit my page; www.dryanovo.net

    ReplyDelete
  35. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your
    efforts and I will be waiting for your further post
    thank you once again.

    my site: workouts to improve vertical

    ReplyDelete
  36. Useful information. Fortunate me I found your site by chance, and I'm shocked why this accident didn't came about
    in advance! I bookmarked it.

    My web blog :: vacation destinations in mexico maps

    ReplyDelete
  37. Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
    Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I'm
    thinking about making my own but I'm not sure where to begin. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Cheers

    Have a look at my homepage; Air Jordan 2013

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hmm it appears like your website ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I'll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I'm thoroughly enjoying your
    blog. I as well am an aspiring blog blogger but I'm still new to the whole thing. Do you have any points for first-time blog writers? I'd really appreciate it.


    Feel free to visit my site: More Hints

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thanks for your marvelous posting! I really enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author.
    I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will come back in the future.
    I want to encourage you to continue your great writing,
    have a nice holiday weekend!

    Stop by my web-site; Read Full Article

    ReplyDelete
  40. Thanks very nice blog!

    Here is my weblog ... Air Max Femme

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story