Friday, June 8, 2012

Robert Lindsay: A Photo of The Bigfoot Steak From The Sierra Kills Location


Here it is, ladies and gentlemen. The photo of the Bigfoot steak taken from the Sierra Kills location, courtesy of Robert Lindsay:

"A photograph of the actual Bigfoot steak, or slice of Bigfoot, from the same incident. This is the first photograph ever of a slice of actual Bigfoot tissue that has been confirmed by DNA." - Robert Lindsay

Here is the photo of the Bigfoot steak. This is the one that was misidentified as coming from a coyote. But if you know animals very well, you can readily tell that it’s not from a coyote. If that hair looks like anything at all, it might look somewhat like a bear. However, that’s not from a bear. A bear looks different. Pretty amazing photo! - Robert Lindsay

Click here to read about the Sierra Kills "Body Recovery" effort written by Bart Cutino.

[via robertlindsay.wordpress.com]

129 comments:

  1. I mean is that what's supposed to shake the world?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just like Ketchum....an "earth shattering" picture of fake hair. Oh, and where are DNA results on this piece Robert? Geez...

      Delete
    2. The DNA from the pictured sample confirmed it came from a male Bigfoot, and is included in the Ketchum DNA study. It's a pretty big deal for me to see this genuine specimen from a BF.

      Delete
    3. God you're a stupid f*king bitch.

      Delete
    4. You believer's are absolutely moronic, gullible fools.

      Delete
    5. @Timmy Why did Ketchum release it?

      Delete
    6. Susi you cant be that fn slow. How can you confirm anything like that when you have no freaking specimen to compare it to. Also if I remember correctly Justin said he shot a female and a young. He also said the young were much darker in color so that cant be from the young.

      Delete
  2. Dammit man, it's a Man Purse!

    ReplyDelete
  3. jesus.... when are we gonna quit putting ANY stock in this idiot opening his mouth... enough already.

    Anon in Tx

    ReplyDelete
  4. looks like an off-cut from the patterson gimlim suit

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lol i wonder why he put his name on it. I am sire he doesn't own the photo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's up with the sharp cut upper left hand corner? I bet he has his name on it because he cut it from a costume and took the pic himself.

      Delete
    2. He would have to have permission to use such a photo, even if he took the photo of someone else's evidence... Therefor he has every right to put his name on it? Now if he doesn't and it's a real photo. Then the owner has to make charges against him PER copyright.gov?

      Delete
  6. Bull $hit,that's the backside of Lindsays dog.Unbelievable!!!!!!!!What a''HOAXER''!!!!!!!1

    ReplyDelete
  7. Looks like tanned leather with hair. Not a piece of hide cut from a carcass or left laying around. Pure bull.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Looks like someone lost their brostache.

    ReplyDelete
  9. anyone who buys the shooting story is fucking retarded

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess I'm retarded then. I mean, I like to think I'm pretty good at identifying BS and the way JS told that story leads me to believe that it did in fact happen. Maybe not perfectly like he stated BUT I truly believe he did indeed cap two of them. Again, maybe there are some minor changes from the 110% truth of what happened that day BUT the meat and potatoes portion (him seeing and shooting them) is the important part AND that much I believe did happen.

      If it didn't I'll eat crow 9 ways from Sunday but his story was too well told to be a fabrication. Dear Lord, if it is (not true at all), he IS one of the BEST LIARS in the WORLD, period and he deserves some sort of award for his performance.

      Delete
    2. hes a terrible liar, didnt fool me

      Delete
    3. Anon-3:56 I don't think you are retarded and would not be surprised if you have experience with witnesses. However we are asked being asked to believe something very far-fetched. You cant blame people for thinking this is reminiscent of "Georgia", and they ironed out the wrinkle of having to produce the body.

      Delete
    4. Yup. The Sierra Kills story is a tall tale from top to bottom.

      Delete
    5. But, But, But! Bart Cutino, Alex Hearn

      It has to be real :)

      Delete
    6. Anyone that would use the word "retarded" is ignorant. Once that word leaves your mouth it automatically overshadows what ever you say. Expand your vocabulary and come up with a more suitable word.

      Delete
    7. Justin or whoever released this to Lindsay didn't ask my permission? So, why mention me? I'm not connected with the Olympic Project?

      Although I do know them guys a little from the NET; What did I do to get mentioned here?

      I wasn't there, I have no ties to the Sierra kills. Don't agree with it in any way. I wasn't included in the Radio segment either?

      So again~~~Why Mention ME!

      In fact this story brings a little song to my head~~~GA ON MY MIND (STOLEN FROM PB). Need more evidence?

      I need to hear Justin and his friends tell this story a few times, maybe in person, before I'll believe it.

      There's more to it I would say? BTW: I wouldn't give you all the details if I was them either~~~LOL!

      I guess for Science, the sample had to be used~~~But I could easily make a case for not using it too.

      As I could for any sample received, by either study (Science Alive or Ketchum). So I'm not picking on JS, Derek, David or anyone else .

      Speaking of Studies; Did you know that the OXFORD Study is actually the "Science Alive" study? Thus it is connected to the Erickson Project too?

      Not that, that is a bad thing; it's just the facts!

      Again this isn't my gig! So keep me out of it, especially if you are going to do it ANON~Man Up Loser!

      Delete
    8. I find it interesting that some people feel they are being asked to believe anything? The GA incident was two idiots bragging and creating youtube vids of a body they supposedly had and biscardi confirmed it, youd have to be an idiot to believe that had any chance of being reality. The sierra kills was a leak that no researcher involved ran and pushed the incident as true, though DR backed ketchum on bff thread. Even smeja didnt, he was merely asked to do interviews and complied. If Lindsay is correct Regarding smeja and ketchums relationship then why is the purported hoaxer smeja not supporting the specilist whos making the claim his sample is legit? Just some food for thought.
      I think many of the idiots who believedthe ga hoax have egg on their faces and think they get cred back by screaming hoax here without knowing facts or results.

      Delete
    9. Anon 1:38,

      The word retarded is a perfectly suitable word to describe someone with a very limited intelligence. You could "look it up". Just because it hurts your feelings doesn't make it any more unsuitable. You give retards everywhere a bad wrap.

      Delete
  10. Replies
    1. You missed out the 'A' between Gaga and twat.

      Delete
  11. WTF? This is earth shattering? Why is his name on it? Didn't he learn anything from the Hovey debacle? Yet he still follows in her corn ridden footprints. Unreal.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jesus - it's beautiful...Lindsay get that in the back alleys of San Francisco? Fucking LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Enough with the bad language.

      Delete
    2. Who the fuck are you to decide what is acceptable or bad language? Typical fucking moron.

      Delete
    3. look, there may be adults reading these comments. So please for the love of god stop fucking all this twating profanity and muther fucking swearing you bunch of c*nts.

      Delete
  13. Didn't this supposed Bigfoot ''HIDE'' lay out for two weeks or more in the woods? It's in such damn good conditition.It could be a piece of 70's style shag carpet!!!! I just don't know anymore.(Rolls his eyes)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Confirms 100% with the shag carpet in the "Matilda" photo.

      Delete
    2. Buwahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

      Delete
    3. It was frozen in snow. Didn't u listen to the interview? That's why it's in good condition

      Delete
    4. And you call that good condition?

      Delete
  14. It really looks like a piece of hide from a long haired calico cat.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This is davey crocketts hat tail!!!! And nothing more!! Steak my ass!!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. HAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHA

    let me catch my breath.... ok

    HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hahahaha! Earth shattering news. Lol! This guy is getting pretty pathetic - even for him. I used to think of Lindsay as a gossip columnist, but now I am starting to think that saying such a thing is an insult to gossip columnists. If we got some real gossip columnists, who get outside of their Mom's basement and do some real work, onto this story we might have found out the name of the journal, by now. Unfortunately, all we have is Lindsay...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Smeja shot Ron Jeremy.

    Earth shattering 70s porn bush steak.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Does anybody here read? I suspect this is the earth shattering news.
    Quoting RL from a paragraph above-

    "This is the first photograph ever of a slice of actual Bigfoot tissue that has been confirmed by DNA." - Robert Lindsay

    BIGFOOT TISSUE CONFIRMED BY DNA, apparently he does know something, whether he can back it up or not I guess we'll find out!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL anon at 4:59pm- I had caught that and saw no mention of it before your post.

      Don't you know if there's pictures few here read the info.

      Delete
    2. Well said Anon 4:59:00! This "steak" has been DNA tested proving it originated from a *male* Bigfoot, and now it is a major part of the Ketchum DNA study due to the size of the Bigfoot tissue and hair sample as seen in the above picture. It is so hard for some of us to realize that these creatures truly do exist. Most of us have thought that these creatures were figments of people's imagination. I had believed there was something to all of the sightings from responsible and respected people such as soldiers on maneuvers, police, and game wardens to name just a few,and then I actually saw one. So, for me, seeing this picture brought back terrifying memories of my sighting. Yikes Twice, I know they are real, and I will not be going exploring in the woods alone again due to my personal fear of them:( I appreciate Robert Lindsay for posting this picture. I had no clue what the purported Bigfoot "steak" looked like, and seeing it helps to solidify the reality of my sighting. This picture shows how the hair looked on the male Bigfoot that I witnessed,so I am thankful that Robert Lindsay was able to obtain and publish this unique and rare picture of a piece of a Bigfoot.

      Delete
    3. @Linda Respectfully~It's not a major piece of the Ketchum study because of it's size. The only thing that would or is keeping it in the study is it's DNA SIG.

      I would be more concerned with how he got this picture? I would think unless it's been approved by Melba that it should not be shown. If it's of Justin's sample, the sample supplied to the Study per NDAs signed with Melba, it should not be shown?

      So what he is actually doing is showing Justin or someone else's property before they can?

      Thus taking value away from true owner? What's to appreciate about that?

      I'm not sure why you would Appreciate anything Robert Lindsay says or does? Nothing he says should be associated with this study~unless Melba allows it. This man is a proven ENEMY of the study and those involved. He has done nothing but attack those involved and those that hunt Bigfoot in general. I'm not sure why anyone would appreciate anything this man does. Unless they hold his views also!

      Delete
    4. Well I have come to the conclusion that Alex Hearn is a Ketchum"shill" and therefore has lost all of what tiny credibility he had left. Thanks for stopping by and exposing yourself.

      Delete
  20. What I didn't see: OP has not sent a portion of that sample to Dr. Skyes/Oxford? They do send a hair to Meldrum (why not directly to Skyes? - must be that picture of Meldrum on their website...he must be their leader), but not a sample from the "steak?" Odd.
    Wally Hersom needn't worry about the bucks, Dr. Skyes is offerring this analysis free...
    The behavior of the many parties around this Quest doesn't seem to be straight forward, or forthright ...
    No one I know can change the past, hard as they might try, I suppose we shall know the truth eventually...once the jockeying for the future is the past.

    LOL Shawn...no need to wait on this one, eh?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do we know if Dr. Skyes is taking specimens from America? I thought that the Oxford study was for European specimens. Surly some samples will be sent from America if they are accepting them from here, and Dr. Ketchum will be able to share her samples after her DNA is published. I guess that we need to be patient for a little while longer.

      Delete
    2. Where the fuck did you ever DREAM UP that Sykes was only testing European samples? You're a joke. GTFO

      Delete
    3. @Linda Again Respectfully~Of course he is~Those he got from Richard Stubstad and JavaBob! His study is basically the SCIENCE ALIVE STUDY!

      I just wonder if that study is including the Science Alive Sample or Sample(s) supplied by Biscardi! That would really be SAD!

      LOL, if it does that ruins that studies credibility!

      BTW-I got some of this info from each of the Science Alive Founders. So it's straight up true! Bob was on my Crypto show this week and we talked for hours before. As I said I am giving both of them a chance. Richard is still featured on my AZCRO main page .NET

      Of course any sample the AZCRO gets would go to Melba 1st, but with her permission I would consider giving some also to Richard~With the condition that he no longer uses any Biscardi connected samples. I would hope any credible researcher dealing with Science Alive and Skyes would make that request.

      Don't let the news get in the way of the truth!

      Delete
  21. you people are the fucking stupid ones. you will have all the answers soon tho you likely still wont believe. this is no hoax. simpletons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your intellect is obvious. :p

      Delete
    2. You see, that's the goddamn problem.

      It's always soon... soon... soon...

      Never f@#king now!!! That's why it sounds like a load of s#@t!!! That's why the s@#tstorm from the posters here!! That's why so many are so skeptic now.

      This is not how a peer review paper works. It's how a scam works.

      Stop with the "soon" and release the so-called f#$king proof already!!!

      Prove me and everybody else here wrong.

      We really, really want you to.

      Delete
  22. I thought he shot them and left only to come back to look for them later. They never did find the body they said. They found this piece of meat instead. So that leaves me to wonder how does a bullet carve out a hunk of meat from Bigfoots body. I'd like to find out what kind of bullet he used, it would be great to shoot the game and have it skinned at the same time. Maybe Bigfoot did it when he was trying to remove the bullet with his leatherman tool. There's no scale on the size of this piece of meat. Maybe if we can figure out the font and size we could use that as a scale. Why not lay down a ruler or some known object like a soda can. Is this a 6, 8, or 12 ounce steak? Give us something to see. I thought they were professionals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This looks closer to a 20 oz new york strip. A little too big for me, I prefer the 12 oz sirloin.

      Delete
    2. The full piece was reported to be 6lbs? I believe, Justin and his friend each kept 2lbs; they sent about the same to TOP, Who then sent some to MElBA. That's not the official chain of custody but the simplified version. So this piece could have been shown to RL by any of the above or those they showed it too.

      Either way, with out the owners permission it's a COPYRIGHT violation. I'm not sure why any one that owns those rights would sell them to Lindsay...

      Also who said the piece he found was carved out by a bullet? I think really they implied it was probably scavenged before they could retrieve it. It has also snowed allot before they could retrieve it. At least that is what they have said so far?

      Delete
    3. The original peace was less than 2 lbs they cut a small piece off for Ketchum and split the rest!

      Delete
  23. there was no shooting, that looks like some chick shaved off her hairy beaver hahaha, show me a body!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  24. I thought Lindsey was gone for good...now hes back...what a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  25. First of all, if any of you had ever had a conversation with Lindsay, you would soon realize he is NOT the author of this blog. He is a puppet. I imagine the puppeteer is Biscardi and this story has been in the making for years.
    Someone is deliberately feeding him this information and it began years ago.
    Wake up America!
    Meldrum said the fur resembled coyote and he was not impressed.
    If Bart is hiding the evidence for Smeja, then he will soon be losing credibility as well and that is sad.
    Ketchum was a mediocre veterinarian and hardly a DNA expert.
    This is all coming to a head and what an ugly head it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So biscardi is lindsay essentially?
      Barts hiding evidence for JS?
      My understanding is bart suspects ketchum isn't all that and he's bringing whatever evidence he's got rather its boots or clothes to "real" scientists to see if there's valid forensic evidence. From what I read.....out of bart's mouth..in an article he wrote, and posted here with shawn and crypto mundo a while back. I recall him saying that the flesh found was "circumstantial" in nature and he didnt have faith in ketchums study and evid would have to stand on its own or big picture, sierra shootings if happened is meaningless, he also mentioned meldrum didnt jump to conclusions about sample when examined at "kills site," which I never believed RL's version. Say what you want, but I give a thumbs up to both Dr. Meldrum & Bart with the roles they've played so far.

      LC

      Delete
    2. Could you back it up, Sharon Lee?

      Delete
    3. She's busy backing up enough things with her strap on, so give her some time to reply.

      Delete
    4. Some of what you say is true, Biscardi and Lindsay certainly have ties? Allegedly they met at a Lolicon convention?

      Biscardi is certainly feeding him some of this stuff. He has one obvious connection to this stuff listen to his show and see who he has on talking about a Bigfoot living in a 57 Chevy. This person has shown personal emails to Biscardi before involving me, do you think he stopped there? I do not, I think he showed him personal emails involving this stuff too~~~Just my opinion, but why would he stop with just some emails about me~~~When there are much juicier emails???

      He wouldn't!!! Reminds me of what Dixon Steele said in "In a lonely place"; There is no sacrifice to great, for a chance at immortality! (Even Friendship/Loyalty)

      Your personal attack on Ketchum is cheap and Biscardi like; coming from someone hiding behind ANON it's gutless.

      Plus it's also incorrect and obviously more of a example of how opinionated you are than knowledgeable. If her science is OK for the Federal Government (9/11 and such) and the State of TX (Criminal cases) then it's certainly good enough for this. Also again you make a false assumption/claim that she did all the DNA testing herself? She didn't Many many labs were involved. I'm sure the Peer Review is also double checking all that science and that would also have to be done by many labs...

      Todd Disotel told me he would like to be involved in Melba's study ~ I think it's safe to assume that means he thinks her science is good too ~~~ I would trust his opinion before yours or anyone else's when it comes to DNA!

      Especially since he knows this will probably make him look bad to some degree~~~He missed what she and others found!

      Delete
  26. Even if it is part of the hide that Smeja found, we know it's from a Bigfoot how? Oh that's right Melba tested it and confirmed it and it's the center piece of her scientific paper that proves BF exists...paper...paaaaper. Where's the fvcking paper?
    There is no paper, there never was. There is no basis for calling this BF hide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The journal with Dr. Ketchum's DNA study proving the reality of this species will be released before the end of the year. This report has to be perfect, all I's dotted and T's crossed because it is a huge event to verify the reality of a new species, especially a species that has been considered a joke and about as likely to exist as the Unicorn does. However, In this case, This species does exist, it's real, and the world will know in the next few months,possibly even sooner the reality of their existence. I hope we can pass laws against the killing off of this species after the general public discovers they do exist. It would be horrible if we killed the species off after we discovered they were real:(

      Delete
    2. Pffft, blow it out your puppet ass.

      Delete
    3. shes a dumb bitch isn't she?

      Delete
    4. Later this year???

      Ketchum and her flunkies were spewing the same nonsense last year.

      Either show us the proof or piss off.

      Delete
  27. I haven't watched Star Trek in awhile but I am pretty sure that's a Tribble.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Mmmmmm....eggiwegs and bigfoot steaky wakes oh my brothers!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hey, anon et al...there are plenty of opinions about what is pictured here, and where it came from. And plenty of speculation surrounding what really happrened circa October/November,2010 in the Sierras...
    none of us have seen this piece of evidence in person, nor the complete DNA results. I doubt any of you know JS or RL personally. The Big Fella is obviously not talking, so unless you have something poignant to offer the rest of us who take this subject seriously, I suggest you put a cork in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Idiot. You've probably procreated, haven't you? Sick sob

      Delete
    2. Thanks Tommy, i feel like this blog has been invaded by ten year olds!

      Delete
    3. Appreciate the enthusiasm tommy but I think you've missed the boat here.

      I'm also from the Pac NW and share a belief in the "possibility" of biggy due to an incident in the Pasayten Wilderness years ago.

      However, please don't put so much stock in JS or RL. It is very ironic that you take these guys at their word and then say you take the subject seriously. I'm the exact opposite. I take the subject seriously, therefore I ignore both of them.

      Delete
    4. Well said, Tommy. Proving the existence of a new species is a big deal among mainstream scientists and for most of general public,especially when it's a species that has often been considered to be a figment of someone's imagination, or a joke played by someone in a costume. Having seen a Bigfoot, I now know that they are real, and I hope that Dr. Ketchum's DNA and films of this species that will be released around the same time will convince some of the general public that BF is real and living in our forests all around America.

      Delete
    5. Tommy how bout I shove a cork up your ass?

      Delete
  30. Someone please photo shop that mustache on a picture of Melba. :)

    ReplyDelete
  31. Tommy, nobody in thier right mind takes this subject seriously. This is entertainment just like pro wrestling.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Bigfootery appears to be imploding. The con-men & whackos might not be able to save it this time. I guess I'll have to start laughing at UFOers now.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Contrary to what Lindsay said, it does look almost identical to coyote fur, and does not look anything like any bear I've ever killed or even seen. If it is real, I can see how it could be mistaken for coyote. The edges of the skin look pretty square-cut, rather than jagged like you would expect.

    ReplyDelete
  34. hMMM.. I don't see a 'steak' but a chunk of fur.

    Where's the beef?

    1%

    ReplyDelete
  35. So that’s what Hovey does with her bikini waxing strips :) Sends them to this ass Lol!!

    ReplyDelete
  36. This is the meal deal, folks.

    ReplyDelete
  37. That really looks like raccoon fur. The brown black two tone color makes me think it is from the base of the tail. J.D.

    ReplyDelete
  38. This has zero credibility. This could be many different things. The article quotes Lindsay as saying, "Pretty amazing photo." Yeah "amazing" in the sense that it is yet another bigfoot related item from a repeat hoaxer. Based on the comments with this article, folks are not buying his BS.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I always wondered what happened to Henry Mays moustache.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I though a two-pound steak was a piece of meat, not a skinned piece of hide with hair???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True dat, I was hoping for a good sized piece of meat. Mmmmm, meat

      Delete
  41. This field just gets more ridiculous with each passing day.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Would anybody like to make predictions for when this really goes tits up, of who cries foul the loudest to cover their *cough* so called Bigfoot careers?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Predictions? I don't think there will be a defining tits up moment. Nothing is going to be released and Ketchum's web presence will completely disappear, which is already happening with her FB page.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Does anyone know if an NDA protects from fraud? You're signing away any type of rights so I'd assume the right to prosecute the individual that had you sign the NDA is gone also.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Robert, I am always amazed at the information you are able to discover and I sincerely thank you for sharing this picture with us. I had wondered what the "steak" looked like, and now, thanks to you, I have been able to see it. Also, the pictures of the young and adult Bigfoot were amazing. Somehow you manage to stay on the cutting edge of this research,and I learn something new every time I read your articles. Thank you for all of your hard work, and for supporting the Ketchum study.As are many others, I'm deeply invested in the Ketchum DNA study, and am living for the day when it will be released so we BF believers will finally be vindicated, plus this species will gain the recognition and protection it deserves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're being sarcastic surely?

      Delete
    2. Absolutely not. Why would I not mean what I said? Robert *is* on the cutting edge of the BF discovery world, and he supports the Ketchum DNA study as I do. I appreciate Robert's support of Dr. Ketchum and her DNA study, and his support for those of us who are working with her. Robert is my friend, I trust him, and I support him. Period.

      Delete
    3. Robert does in no way support the Ketchum study Linda? I'm not even sure that is really Linda talking if you say that?

      Delete
  46. You appear too vunerable and sweet, so I shall leave you alone in your own little world.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Bob should be commended for being the first person to make this photo public. Very nice job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John, only if he has permission to show it?

      Not sure why he would? Unless he paid for it? Did Biscardi Buy the steak as talked about in DEC? That would mean that Biscardi did release the photo to RL? Did Biscardi again get the $$ from William Lett?

      I would like to hear from Justin or Derek?

      The people here commending RL does this also mean you are a Biscardi supporter? YUCK! Hope Not~~~That's just nasty to think about? John is that really you???????????

      Delete
    2. Alex, Melba's calling you, its time for dinner. She said to make sure you're all washed up and in your Sunday best. If you're a good boy, she'll let you do the dishes too.

      Delete
  48. Amen to that J. Bindernagel. I've never seen this picture anywhere before seeing it here.

    ReplyDelete
  49. how the hell do you confirm something through DNA without having confirmed DNA to test it against? all they can say is ''unknown''

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has a point. How do you Bigfoot believers think that “DNA evidence” will prove the existence of Bigfoot?

      Delete
    2. Because unknown DNA is all they will ever have. And an unknown source means its automatically a big foot.

      Delete
  50. Steak? If that is a steak send it back to the chef! A piece of fur is not a steak. Where is the "steak" tissue? Better yet, why no head, hand, or foot? I call this a "baloney fur non-steak".

    new anony

    ReplyDelete
  51. ANON? What a loser comment? Good Comeback!

    I understand the 10yr old comment further back now.

    So who's steak is this and who gave RL the permission to use the photo?

    ReplyDelete
  52. By the looks of the rectangular cut skin, it resembles a sample of NFT werewolf fur.

    ReplyDelete
  53. OK so I'm new to this story... its 05 July 2012 - whats happened since June 10, 2012 ???

    ReplyDelete
  54. Looks like a Racoon tail!!!!

    ReplyDelete