Robert Lindsay Is Back: Reveals Ketchum Study Publication Date(s), Description Of Sierra Kills Bigfoot, Erickson Project Film
Our old friend, Robert Lindsay just got released from Bigfoot prison and he's now back with a vengeance. In Lindsay's "Bigfoot News April 16, 2012", he predicts that the Ketchum Bigfoot DNA study is wrapping up and will be released at the end of this month. If it's not released by May 1st, he tells us to just forget about it because it's never going to happen.
Lindsay also gives a detailed description of the Sierra Kills Bigfoot illustration that's going to be in a book by Mike Greene. There are two illustrations, but Lindsay has only seen the "adult" one. Supposedly, there is an illustration of a juvenile Bigfoot that hasn't been released to Lindsay yet.
The rumored Erickon Project documentary is slated to be released soon after the Ketchum Study publication. The documentary will feature Matilda the sleeping sasquatch.
Let the games begin...
Bigfoot News April 16, 2012
Many have noted that there have not been any Bigfoot updates for some time now. This is correct. The reason is that Melba Ketchum and her loyal minions killed off most of my sources. That is, they outed them via counterespionage measures that I won’t go into here, and then they cut them off from all future information. So we’ve been in the dark.
As we are a cutting edge Bigfoot blog that in general depends on hot news, underground rumor and leaks of not to be disclosed information from anonymous sources (along the lines of investigative reporters like Jack Anderson), we simply don’t have any Bigfoot news to report.
Sure, we could report the regular Bigfoot news like Shawn at Bigfoot Evidence does so well, but that’s not what we are here for. We are here to do Anderson style investigative reporting along with all the skullduggery that goes along with it. No anonymous sources with hot news, no Bigfoot updates. Real simple.
Nevertheless, have been able to dredge up some Bigfoot news lately, and we still have a source or two around, plus we might have gained one or two new ones.
Ketchum DNA paper will be coming out very soon, within the next two weeks! We can now report breaking news that the Ketchum DNA paper will finally be published, probably within the next 2 weeks. We would say definitely, but at this point, nothing is certain.
Ketchum stated 6 weeks ago that the paper would be out in 6-8 weeks. Just recently, she made a final and very minor rewrite at the request of reviewers. The paper has more or less completely passed peer review, and the reviewers have only been asking for the most minor of rewrites and fixes. The paper will be released on a Thursday or Friday, so it will come out either April 19-20 or April 26-27.
My opinion is that if it’s not out by the end of the month or so, just forget it. Maybe it’s never coming out, who knows?
The name of the journal is a closely guarded secret and despite extreme efforts, we have not been able to determine the journal’s name.
Josh Gates Yeti sample tested presumptive for Bigfoot by Ketchum. Ketchum was asked this question on her blog and she non-answered it in her usual foggy and obfuscatory way that makes it seems like she cleared everything up but that in reality substitutes an actual answer for half-truths, lawyerese and PR-speak.
In other words, she answers the question and makes it seem like she answered the question in toto, but in reality, she didn’t really answer the question at all! Ketchum is an expert at this sort of talk.
Our prior information was incorrect in a sense. The Yeti sample was tested by Ketchum and did reveal a result that was presumptive for Bigfoot or more properly presumptive for a non-human hominid closely related to Bigfoot. What she did not do is test the sample for either MtDNA or nuclear DNA.
What she did instead was a “quick and dirty” DNA test on the sample that reveals something called male and female peaks which I do not understand at all. Humans get a certain male-female peak that is around 105-115, and the Bigfoots all get a different male-female peak that is close to human but is decidedly nonhuman.
The Josh Gates Yeti male-female peak test revealed a result of 106 – 112 (which I don’t understand) that is close to the Bigfoots. However, to prove the existence of the Yeti further, it would be nice to have some MtDNA and nuclear DNA testing done. As is, I do believe that Yetis exist based on footprints and the preliminary DNA testing. Ketchum is correct that preliminary testing used up the whole sample and that the Yeti findings will not appear in the coming paper.
Artist’s rendition of the male Bigfoot from the Sierra Kills available and examined. I have had the extreme good luck of getting ahold of one of the artist renditions of the head of the male Bigfoot from the Sierra Kills. There is also a drawing of the baby Bigfoot, but I haven’t been able to get ahold of that one. Both drawings will be used in the upcoming book about the Sierra Kills currently being authored by Mike Green. Green is very smart and writes well, so the book should be well written.
These renditions have been floating around for a while now and some people do have them, but they are very hard to get. I have been trying to get one for a long time now, but the people who have them would never give me a copy.
It has hard to describe the rendition, and I am not allowed to publish it. It has a coned head that is covered with hair. The hairless area is around the eyes and nose as with Patty. The hair on the coned head is sparse for some reason. Also the “beard” has sparse hair similar to Patty.
What does it look like? It looks like a man! Like a hairy man. Trying not to be racist, I would say that it looks like an elderly Black man. I keep thinking I have seen a Black man that looks like this, but I can never find a photo that resembles the drawing.
Getting even more exact, one might say that it looks like an elderly Black man with a very primitive or archaic phenotype. The phenotype is so archaic looking that I am not certain there are any existing Blacks around who look like this. But it definitely looks like a man, not an ape. It’s so human looking that it’s downright creepy!
Ketchum may be seeing Bigfoots in Texas, not Oklahoma. We reported earlier that Ketchum has been seeing Bigfoots at Arla Williams’ place in the Honobia region of Oklahoma. We now believe she is seeing them in Texas. She has obviously leased land either at a habituation site or next to one, and this is where she is seeing the Bigfoots. There is definitely a habituation site in East Texas that may or may not have been part of the Erickson Project.
Adrian Erickson Project movie will probably be released within the next two weeks or soon after. The EP movie has always been slated to be released in tandem with the Ketchum DNA project.
The agreement between Ketchum and Erickson has not been torn up. It was only amended a bit so that Erickson could release information about some of the samples that he collected in Golden Ears Provincial Park in British Colombia. They are still seriously locked together and it would not surprise me if Ketchum has been threatening Erickson with lawsuits over this and that if he’s not a good boy. These threats were probably behind the scary language on Erickson’s site.
Erickson in Vermont? Rumor has it that Erickson is in Vermont these days, doing God knows what. Chris Noel does live there, and Chris is the Lord of the Bigfoot habituation scene. Whether or not Erickson is seeing Noel is unknown, but I think Noel knows quite a bit about the Erickson Project and has probably even signed NDA’s.
Melissa Hovey Bigfoot photo is not a suit. In discussions with an expert who works in a museum, the expert affirmed for me that the Hovey photo is surely not a man in a suit. It can’t possibly be. First of all, that is real hair in the photo, not synthetic hair as is used in all suits. Also, no suit has been produced that looks like this.
It’s quite dubious that a human subject had multiple insect infestations, bleeding injuries and skin disorders either. However, a taxidermy-type model cannot be ruled out. If this is a taxidermy model, it would have to be one of the finest ever done and would have to had to have been done by one of the masters in the business such as Bill Munns.
Personally, I’m quite sure that that is a photo of a real Bigfoot, but we need the other photos in the series to prove that, and they do exist.
[...]
Many have noted that there have not been any Bigfoot updates for some time now. This is correct. The reason is that Melba Ketchum and her loyal minions killed off most of my sources. That is, they outed them via counterespionage measures that I won’t go into here, and then they cut them off from all future information. So we’ve been in the dark.
As we are a cutting edge Bigfoot blog that in general depends on hot news, underground rumor and leaks of not to be disclosed information from anonymous sources (along the lines of investigative reporters like Jack Anderson), we simply don’t have any Bigfoot news to report.
Sure, we could report the regular Bigfoot news like Shawn at Bigfoot Evidence does so well, but that’s not what we are here for. We are here to do Anderson style investigative reporting along with all the skullduggery that goes along with it. No anonymous sources with hot news, no Bigfoot updates. Real simple.
Nevertheless, have been able to dredge up some Bigfoot news lately, and we still have a source or two around, plus we might have gained one or two new ones.
Ketchum DNA paper will be coming out very soon, within the next two weeks! We can now report breaking news that the Ketchum DNA paper will finally be published, probably within the next 2 weeks. We would say definitely, but at this point, nothing is certain.
Ketchum stated 6 weeks ago that the paper would be out in 6-8 weeks. Just recently, she made a final and very minor rewrite at the request of reviewers. The paper has more or less completely passed peer review, and the reviewers have only been asking for the most minor of rewrites and fixes. The paper will be released on a Thursday or Friday, so it will come out either April 19-20 or April 26-27.
My opinion is that if it’s not out by the end of the month or so, just forget it. Maybe it’s never coming out, who knows?
The name of the journal is a closely guarded secret and despite extreme efforts, we have not been able to determine the journal’s name.
Josh Gates Yeti sample tested presumptive for Bigfoot by Ketchum. Ketchum was asked this question on her blog and she non-answered it in her usual foggy and obfuscatory way that makes it seems like she cleared everything up but that in reality substitutes an actual answer for half-truths, lawyerese and PR-speak.
In other words, she answers the question and makes it seem like she answered the question in toto, but in reality, she didn’t really answer the question at all! Ketchum is an expert at this sort of talk.
Our prior information was incorrect in a sense. The Yeti sample was tested by Ketchum and did reveal a result that was presumptive for Bigfoot or more properly presumptive for a non-human hominid closely related to Bigfoot. What she did not do is test the sample for either MtDNA or nuclear DNA.
What she did instead was a “quick and dirty” DNA test on the sample that reveals something called male and female peaks which I do not understand at all. Humans get a certain male-female peak that is around 105-115, and the Bigfoots all get a different male-female peak that is close to human but is decidedly nonhuman.
The Josh Gates Yeti male-female peak test revealed a result of 106 – 112 (which I don’t understand) that is close to the Bigfoots. However, to prove the existence of the Yeti further, it would be nice to have some MtDNA and nuclear DNA testing done. As is, I do believe that Yetis exist based on footprints and the preliminary DNA testing. Ketchum is correct that preliminary testing used up the whole sample and that the Yeti findings will not appear in the coming paper.
Artist’s rendition of the male Bigfoot from the Sierra Kills available and examined. I have had the extreme good luck of getting ahold of one of the artist renditions of the head of the male Bigfoot from the Sierra Kills. There is also a drawing of the baby Bigfoot, but I haven’t been able to get ahold of that one. Both drawings will be used in the upcoming book about the Sierra Kills currently being authored by Mike Green. Green is very smart and writes well, so the book should be well written.
These renditions have been floating around for a while now and some people do have them, but they are very hard to get. I have been trying to get one for a long time now, but the people who have them would never give me a copy.
It has hard to describe the rendition, and I am not allowed to publish it. It has a coned head that is covered with hair. The hairless area is around the eyes and nose as with Patty. The hair on the coned head is sparse for some reason. Also the “beard” has sparse hair similar to Patty.
What does it look like? It looks like a man! Like a hairy man. Trying not to be racist, I would say that it looks like an elderly Black man. I keep thinking I have seen a Black man that looks like this, but I can never find a photo that resembles the drawing.
Getting even more exact, one might say that it looks like an elderly Black man with a very primitive or archaic phenotype. The phenotype is so archaic looking that I am not certain there are any existing Blacks around who look like this. But it definitely looks like a man, not an ape. It’s so human looking that it’s downright creepy!
Ketchum may be seeing Bigfoots in Texas, not Oklahoma. We reported earlier that Ketchum has been seeing Bigfoots at Arla Williams’ place in the Honobia region of Oklahoma. We now believe she is seeing them in Texas. She has obviously leased land either at a habituation site or next to one, and this is where she is seeing the Bigfoots. There is definitely a habituation site in East Texas that may or may not have been part of the Erickson Project.
Adrian Erickson Project movie will probably be released within the next two weeks or soon after. The EP movie has always been slated to be released in tandem with the Ketchum DNA project.
The agreement between Ketchum and Erickson has not been torn up. It was only amended a bit so that Erickson could release information about some of the samples that he collected in Golden Ears Provincial Park in British Colombia. They are still seriously locked together and it would not surprise me if Ketchum has been threatening Erickson with lawsuits over this and that if he’s not a good boy. These threats were probably behind the scary language on Erickson’s site.
Erickson in Vermont? Rumor has it that Erickson is in Vermont these days, doing God knows what. Chris Noel does live there, and Chris is the Lord of the Bigfoot habituation scene. Whether or not Erickson is seeing Noel is unknown, but I think Noel knows quite a bit about the Erickson Project and has probably even signed NDA’s.
Melissa Hovey Bigfoot photo is not a suit. In discussions with an expert who works in a museum, the expert affirmed for me that the Hovey photo is surely not a man in a suit. It can’t possibly be. First of all, that is real hair in the photo, not synthetic hair as is used in all suits. Also, no suit has been produced that looks like this.
It’s quite dubious that a human subject had multiple insect infestations, bleeding injuries and skin disorders either. However, a taxidermy-type model cannot be ruled out. If this is a taxidermy model, it would have to be one of the finest ever done and would have to had to have been done by one of the masters in the business such as Bill Munns.
Personally, I’m quite sure that that is a photo of a real Bigfoot, but we need the other photos in the series to prove that, and they do exist.
[...]
Read the rest here.
[via robertlindsay.wordpress.com]
For once Mrs. Doubtfire is cool and not cocky.
ReplyDeleteRobert Lindsay is like the father we never had.
Delete...or wanted.
DeleteWhere does Lindsay getting his info and why doesn't he ever post the names of his contacts or his sources? Talking is one thing but where is his proof?
DeleteThis statement is not correct because there is an animatronic rental of a monkey with that type of "hair" on it. The photo is too low a resolution to claim it is actual hair. SO, this is wrong:
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, that is real hair in the photo, not synthetic hair as is used in all suits. Also, no suit has been produced that looks like this.
Any flaws are likely generated by those who have rented it.
DeleteIt is probably a werewolf costume from comparisons that have been posted recently.
DeletePlease, enough already. No, it isn't a werewolf costume. There was numerous comparisons, blah, blah, blah. There has yet to be any person come forward with the "suit" Give it up with the naysaying. This is so tiring. If someone were to claim your beard was fake, does that make it so?
DeleteIt's fake. It is most likely from a werewolf costume.
Delete"It wasn't me. It was the one armed bigfoot."
LMAO...seriously?
Giving up on nay saying about stupid crap is like giving up using the bathroom. Can't be and won't be done!
On it's own, with no provenance and no follow up photos, it means diddly squat. Time to move on with this particular charade. Besides I thought the skin colour was supposed to be darker, based on the hundreds of more or less reliable sightings.
DeleteHoxey was probably excited to be mentioned by Lindsay. :)
DeleteOh, how we've missed you Robert! Nobody can shake up the BF community quite like you can. Let the games begin, indeed... ;)
ReplyDeleteDavid from the PAC/NW
Ha! The king of dis-information reappears from his closet. He is no mover or shaker David. Rather he is just a legend in his own mind who wants so desperately to hang off the coat tails of others. I find it really easy to ignore him as a serious contender. Every circus needs a clown or two and he seems to fits the bill nicely. Does anyone take him seriously? Does he really expect that playing the sympathy card because his leaking sources were shut down. And then you snidely have a go at Ketchum for cutting you off at the knees. Give us a break RL.
Delete^ Someone peed in your wheaties this morning....
Deletehey david koresh look a like winner(lindsay) what the HELL is cutting edge bigfoot news? you still suck. where have you been you troll? i guess your hero(obama) cut the funds for the local mental institutions! i know i didn't miss your piss poor so-called cutting edge reports! and no one peed in my wheaties this morning. you socialist loser!
DeleteOh, yahoo, word from the great prophet and elementary school playground sorcerer of information. I kinda miss hearing his amblyopic information.
ReplyDeleteIt is quite clear that your extremely jealous of Robert Lindsey, so much so that you feel the need to insult him.
DeleteRobert Lindsey has proven time and time again that he is the most credible source of new and cutting edge Bigfoot news- end of story. This man has a countless number of people reading his blog and you cannot say the same. Perhaps if you paid close attention to Mr. Lindsey you would learn something and would make your blog something people would want to read.
^ thanks for clearing that up for us Robby. Since you say you are credible you must be. Just like Bisacardi is the best Bigfoot hunter of all time, you are the most credible Bigfoot reporter. I understand that the Bigfoot community is just jealous of your insight and genius. I have the same problem all the time. I tell everyone that I am the worlds #1 best and most credible expert on the Sheep Man of Antarctica, but the world is full of jealous haters. So keep up your credible anonymously sourced articles so we can all know the TRUTH. You are my hero Robert, and I have no doubt that even though I'm the #1 expert you may be the one who someday proves Sheep Mans existence.
DeleteYo, Red: I got yer amblyopic information right here, and it aint gonna suck itself! Oh!
DeleteLike him or not, Lindsay is 99.9% of the time right. It is what it is!
DeleteWhat does he tell us that is not already known or expected? Not much! Throw in a few insinuations or innuendo to stir the pot and you have typically poor journalism. He is the king at that.
DeleteMany people are jealous that Robert Lindsey has become the most respected figure in the Bigfoot research scene- especially Matt Moneymaker.
ReplyDeleteLindsey once again provides "all the news that is fit to print on the Bigfoot scene" and offers information that on its face appears completely logical and 100% true".
I have a question about one aspect of this post that perhaps Robert Lindsey could answer. I ask that he respond because to be honest none of the other people who regularly post on the blog, absent Shawn, its founder, are smart enough to provide a legitimate answer, as this is beyond their level of intelligence.
Just what are the habitats that are referred to? If there are places where people can just go watch Bigfoot don't you think people would have gone their long before now? Are these on private lands where people have been denied access.
I would like to see Mr. Lindsey added to the cast of Finding Bigfoot as it would bring more credibility to the show.
Has anyone heard anymore info on Bigfoot being, like shorter than humans. Is it true? If so I think that is a very disappointing finding.
DeletePublicist?
Delete1%
What the, since when is eight feet a shorter height than humans? LOL
DeleteRead the siege at Honobia if you want to know a little about one of the "habitats" Mr. we all lack the intelligence, ect. Lindsay is a gleaner, nothing more.
DeleteYou mean the habitations?
ReplyDeleteI assure you that there is an ongoing habitation at Ketchum's leased property somewhere in Texas. There seems to be a ongoing habitation at Arla Williams' place in the Honobia, Oklahoma region. There is also an ongoing habitation somewhere in East Texas that Chris Noel has access to. There may be an ongoing habitation somewhere in Michigan at a woman's home.
There is an ongoing habitation off the Clackamas River in Oregon. There is also an ongoing habitation in Golden Ears Provincial Park in British Colombia.
You're welcome to go look around the Clackamas River or Golden Ears Park, but I doubt if you will see anything.
The rest of the locations are closely guarded secrets. People don't reveal the locations because they don't want their property overrun with Bigfooters. Anyway, as soon as new people show up, the Bigfoots tend to take off when the habitation is on private property.
Thank you for the prompt and detailed response. Have you heard of any researchers who try and keep others away because they want to be the ones to get credit for any discoveries that are made?
DeleteA Bigfoot on my property - I'm honored.
DeleteA prowler on my property - I'm opening fire.
Do reseachers try to keep others out of their areas so they can be the ones to get credit? The Arizona guys with AZCRO have been doing this forever, Mitch and the gang. Mind you, Mitch does some good work, but he's greedy and nasty as Hell like so many egotists in this game.
DeleteI know for a fact that just about everyone tries to keep the BFRO out of their areas! The BFRO has a horrid reputation for finding out about your area, invading and basically taking it over and in the process scaring the Bigfoots away.
If you have BF's on your property, you for sure don't want people to know! I know that when Biscardi's crew showed up at Crittenden, Kentucky at the habituation site, the BF's took off afterward for quite some time.
You can't turn your property into a Bigfoot Wild Animal Park. Just doesn't work. The BF's just get used to a few folks there and if new people come around, they just leave, real simple.
From someone in the know who reads your blog everytime you posy your scuttlebutt and laughs... You are so far off the mark on so many things. Fire your sources. They are consistently not credible.
DeleteHey, look, more made up bullshit.
ReplyDeleteBullshit comes from people food.
DeleteYes! Haha! It'll never get old.
DeleteThat was, and is funny. I never get tired of those jokes.
DeleteArea 51 habitations Ha!!
ReplyDeleteIt's a damn shame that we can't throw Lindsay in a real jail. If he was in Europe then his mouth might get him sent there.
ReplyDeletePishaw, Pishaw. In Lindsey were in Europe he would be knighted or made a part of the royal family.
DeleteAnother ketchum release date....
ReplyDeleteYeah but this one looks good. And if it's not, we can pretty much hang it up, at least for now. I've known about this date for a while now, but I didn't have enough information to report on it.
DeleteWell this is it for me. If its not out then I give up hope
DeleteWhy? In the case it doesn't come out that doesn't mean they don't exist, they don't care about papers they'll just go on living.
DeleteSome odd comments on Lindsay's blog, one Natalie doesn't want bigfoot to be human. LOL Well darling, you can't pick a species to your liking like that they are what they are.
Whatever that may be, but the drawing sounds interesting and what else but such a different species could they be realistically.
Hello All
ReplyDeleteI am happy to report that I have just gotten off the phone with Jack Bindernagel. He is back on his feet and wants to thank all of you for the well wishes.
Jack and I spoke at length about the Erickson Project and based on what he told me the time frame is right for its release is just as Robert Lindsey reports. I said "come on Jack, you can tell me if what Lindsey says about the DNA is true". His response was "during the early stages of the project I signed a confidentiality agreement, and as a result I am not allowed to speak about it". "I will say I do not have an overwhelming sense of surprise about what Bob wrote".
How's Jack doing btw?
DeleteGood God, if this is true, it's really amazing.
DeleteJack Niggerbagel?? What the....
DeleteI am happy to say Jack is doing much better and his hip is as good as new. He said he feels like a new man and can't wait to get back in the field.
DeleteSo now even you doubt the things you write? ^
DeleteI am glad to hear that he is doing better. I haven't heard from him in a while. Next time you see him let him know I said hi and that he needs to call me so we can catch up on things.
DeleteWill do. You know Jack he will likely be back at the strip clubs, bourbon in one hand and $10 bill in the other. He is actually heading to San Pedro Island in Texas for Spring Break.
DeleteI always doubt what I write. All my information comes from anonymous sources who I won't reveal, and you never know if they are right or wrong.
DeleteHi Robert, could you weigh in on the story and photo of the young woman holding the giant bigfoot dump? We eagerly await your full breakdown!!!
DeleteI don't know anything about the girl with the huge poo pile. But I understand that the BF's leave a pretty gigantic dump in the woods.
DeleteRobert, I think you should have your own pod cast where the subject is the women of bigfootery. It could be called Exskankt
DeleteYou have to be the same guy who cracked on the footers hero "Jack Niggerbagel"...There can't be 2 people this funny on a bigfoot website.
DeleteI honestly don't remember Ketchum saying it will be out in 6-8 weeks, 6 weeks ago. Maybe I missed it, but is this true or is Robert just pulling info out of his ass?
ReplyDeleteRobert doesn't pull things out of his ass, he forces them into it.
DeleteLike Mike Greene.
Deletezzzzzzzzzzzzz..............
ReplyDeleteI do not know Robert Lindsay and from the looks of it, some people seem to trash him on a normal basis. But, it does seem as though he has been almost always right when reporting breaking news about the bigfoot/sasquatch mystery. I would not be suprised if a report or video is released soon. Then again, I won't be suprised if it isn't too.
ReplyDeleteEither way, I know that the Sasquatch are real. Seen one. Heard more than one on several occasions.
I look forward to one day seeing the look on the life time skeptics faces when their worlds are turned upside down like mine was.
Archer1
Hes essentially the voice of reason a lot of people in the bigfoot world dont wanna hear. Most of what he says ends up being true in some form, but some choose to look at what hes guessed wrong. Because he speaks how he feels, a lot of people dont like him and constantly trash the guy.
Delete"Voice of reason". Thanx. Now there is coffee on my screen.
DeleteRobert, if the film were going to be released simultaneously with the paper, movie theaters would know it was coming because they'd have to clear a spot on their schedules for it. Unless its not a national release or maybe it will be a direct to streaming type of deal? My buddy used to run a movie theater and he thinks it's highly unlikely NO ONE in the theatre business would not know if it were indeed being released in two weeks.
ReplyDeleteHi, it will not be released in theaters. It will be released either as a DVD or possibly on TV as a TV movie somehow.
DeleteBTW, keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Blob!
ReplyDeleteFound this.....
ReplyDeleteDr. Melba Ketchum
Update: There is not a pub date yet but things are going well. So much more fiction as usual. Very entertaining.
How can a sample test as beong bigfoot?
ReplyDeleteIs there a proven bigfoot dna sample that nobody knows about that she is using for comparison?
Or maybe it's just more "come closer I want to tell you a secret" BS that works so well for bigfooters.
Bobby Lindsay has been wrong on every bit of info he put out so far, why belive this?
How many times has he given us a release date that never panned out? Cmon ppl.
Being ^^
DeleteSorry
C'mon where?
Deletehuman male-female peak between 105 - 115 and the test sample was male - female peak between 106 - 112
ReplyDeletethese numbers seem to fall in the hman range to me how is this a bigfoot or yeti from this dna test?
I could be wrong but I read it as...Human: male=105 female=115 Yeti: male=106 female=112.
DeleteNo the human male female peak is something like say 108 - 114, some set of two numbers between 105-115. I forget the exact numbers. Anyway, the BF peaks are different, and the Yeti peaks resemble the BF peaks, maybe not precisely.
DeleteIt's just a quick and dirty test that is suggestive. To really prove the Yeti we would need some MtDNA and nuclear DNA studies.
Robert, when you go by what people in the know tell you or read between the lines are you convinced yourself, that sasquatch is not an animal but rather another species of strange near human?
Deletemale female peaks have nothing to do with establishing the existence of bigfoot.
Delete[headline]NOTHING![/headline]
"I forget the exact numbers," because they never existed. Such bullshit.
Delete?
DeleteYes of course it's a near human. I think is it Homo Heidelbergensis or something similar to that. It's no animal.
DeleteI was told the numbers for the human M-F peaks over the the phone but I didn't write them down. I only wrote down the numbers for the Bigfoots. The phone conversation was rather uncomfortable so I didn't want to prolong it.
HAHAHA! You suck, Lindsay. Ketchum already swatted down your publication time-frame rumor - wrong again! You and your sources don't know what you're talking about. You're a pathetic excuse for a journalist, you trashy gossip columnist. Go work for TMZ.
ReplyDeletehttp://dilbertflimsy.blogspot.com/
Yeah but she automatically swats down everything I say no matter what. She will never confirm anything I say. I'm not sure why; I am told that she doesn't like me at all.
DeleteHAHAHA! I wonder why she doesn't like you? Seriously, though, there is a reason that she swats down that which you post - because it's wrong.
DeleteWell, in all the madness surrounding the subject of bigfoot it still sounds like dr. Ketchum will be the winner in all of this. How I read a lot of it is lots of people are terribly jealous at her, good god, a woman of all people discovering and scientifically confirming real this new species of near man primate. LOL
DeleteKetchum is walking a very fine line between success and having a class action lawsuit brought against her by all of the submitters. If she really threatened to kill the whole study because she couldn't get her way she is very much underestimating the kind of retribution the Bigfoot community is capable of. If she screws this up people will put such a target on her head she will pretty much have to close up her business. People will rip her reputation to shreds. They will make sure her name goes down with the likes of Dyer and Whitten. They will make her regret she ever heard the word Bigfoot.
DeleteThis is Dilbert Flimsy's reporting that we're talking about. You really should go to Facebook and ask Ketchum about it before you assume that any such conflict between Ketchum and the submitters is happening. I think that Ketchum's pal, Sally, said that she believes that about 90% of what Lindsay posts is dead wrong.
DeleteKetchum the Frog. Sorry, couldn't help it. lol
Deletelindsey the "rumor mill slut" is back weaving his tangles webs of hearsay
ReplyDeletealong with his mindless critics
DeleteEveryone should go on to Lindsay's website and read all of his White Power posts. The ones where he says, "F**K Trayvon Martin" are especially classy. He is an Uber Racist.
ReplyDeleteno, he's just a pig liberal socialist! christ your giving the white pride movement a bad name.
DeleteLiberal socialists (contradiction by the way)are not antisemitic racists therefor he´s no liberal socialist
Deleteno-one said anything about them jews dude! it's about the fuck trevon martin comment above! mr. lindsay's words not mine. he's still a pig liberal socialist! nothing can change my contradiction no matter how hard you try to educate me! a racist pig is still a pig on the outside.
DeleteWhat a charming bunch of people we have ended up with here.
DeleteNo he is not a racist! He wore a hoody in support of Trevon Martin. It was white with a tall point and they all stood around a burning cross in prayer.
DeleteThose trolling the bigfoot subject obviously are closet bigfooters afraid of stepping out, a pretty pathetic bunch.
DeleteYou can't troll a troll.
DeleteKetchum has never put a time frame on the publication. In fact, she has stated that she couldnt put a time frame on it. She never said 6 to 8 weeks. She simply didnt.
ReplyDeleteShe never gave a date publicly, correct. But she has said lots of stuff off the record. She gave the May 1 to a few different people, including a couple of my sources.
DeleteWhatever the date will be, truly think this lady's got the Bigfoot goods we need to prove the species a reality.
DeleteRegardless of what type of outfit Lindsay wears, or who he does or does not like on his site; when he visits this site his information is Sasquatch related and he is almost always right. Go back and check his prior posts. He usually predicts something, and then sooner or later it comes out.
ReplyDeleteDon't know who he knows, but the truth is that Lindsay knows more about the insider info. on bigfoot than everyone else on this site combined.
Which is why he's repeatedly wrong about the Ketchum publication date ????
DeleteYeah um ok. FAIL !
Guess where my information comes from, kiddo? If I am wrong, then Ketchum is wrong. Ketchum has been predicting publication dates for some time now, and we report on them, but I guess she can't read crystal balls either. Everyone is trying to predict the future. Actual publication date is up to the journal where the paper presently resides.
DeleteIt is being held up waiting for DNA results from the Trevon Martin steak.
DeleteSo lindsey are you saying that your source is Ketchum herself ????
DeleteNo, my sources are people she has talked to. She won't talk to me, and I don't even want to talk to her. We basically don't get along I'm afraid.
DeleteFor some reason I feel like watching a Peter Jackson movie.
ReplyDeleteThe notion of living human relatives makes me excited :) (i studied Prehistoric Archeology)
ReplyDeleteFor sure, times they are a-changing.
DeleteI hear it's more like less then a 1/2 lb of steak. according to my sources, Lindsay is on to something here because I heard smeja detests ketchum (& vice versa) because he feels she isn't honest or credible due to her volatile behavior, threats shes made towards him, he thinks she could be a fraud etc...smeja may come across as a dumb redneck but I've heard the guy is actually pretty wise and truthful, just unfiltered.
ReplyDeletefrom what I hear through oneof his friend's, bfoot researcher & friend of smeja/driver, bart cutino, has been suspicous of ketchum and her project for many reasons as last yr he was given the boots (blood) and possibly "clothes" worn the day of the shootings by smeja. apparently this stuff is being held out by cutino for a future "independent" analysis to examine on behalf of bigfoot community as due to potential significance, he won't risk ketchum contaminating it. If true, (i believe it is) bart is wise imo.... just in case. also I listened to bart's show with Abe a few months ago and he indicated this preference for blind testing.
I have heard this rumor, but last time I checked, Smeja still has the clothes and boots.
DeleteThe quantity of Bigfoot steak in possession of the two men is very controversial, but they do retain some.
cutino definitely 100% has boots ( at least as of last month)and smeja may've even turned money down to make sure he has them as according to him, bart is passionate & sincere with proving sasquatches are real and has no intentions to capitalize financially. i've never met him other then an email back and forth a few yrs ago but i know several other researcher friend's of his and he's well respected & liked. From my source, cutino believes he's quietly trying to do the honorable & safe thing (critical evidence) and sees alot of issues with ketchum. If you read what he's shared on bff and body search article this also makes perfect sense. As far as clothes, ive never heard that verified for sure if there even is clothing left w forensic evidence (my source not certain) but the bloody boots are no doubt in his possession.
ReplyDeleteIn the meantime im patiently awaiting the results of dr. Ketchums study and am starting to wonder myself if anything will ever materialize
Worry not, it 100% will.
Deletewell i'm wearing out with all the dates. i don't see how a discovery this important can drag out for sooooo long. may 1st is my limit. after that, i'm calling it vaporware. too much human bickering and b/s! sorry.
ReplyDeleteAnd if they'd said 10 years ago in 20 years you'll know for sure, wouldn't you've felt elated by hearing that? Now online activity and times are moving much quicker and it seems people have less patience than before, so what really is a few more weeks or months or even years if need be?
DeleteA BIG THANK YOU Mr Lindsay for your comment on the "kooks in Arizona". Your statements confirmed my suspicions on certain questionable practices and behavior. Some of these currently going on around here in my opinion are likely illegal. After much contemplation I have now come to the conclusion to no longer disclose or share any more pertinent information to certain individuals. When you do good things, good things come to you. Do bad things? Well, you know the story what goes around comes around. When ethics and morals are violated in any endeavor,new laws follow or current ones enforced. Honor,dignity and respect go a long ways.
ReplyDeleteHappy earth day!
Here it is April 27th and no word on the paper. Guess you "sources" are wrong again Lindsay.
ReplyDeleteBe careful on what you report to certain bigfoot groups or individuals if you ever find or see anything. Made that mistake once, never again. They will take all the credit and/or for monetary gain and you will get nothing. Besides that, now a particular area is full of a bunch of beavis and butthead yahoos making a mess of things trying to make a buck. Guides should be compensated for their services its only fair. If you offer these services or conduct any expedition for profit it would be best to be a licensed guide by that particular state as all mammals known and UNKNOWN are usually protected by the states wildlife agencies. Some states may require you to have liability insurance.A waver of responsibility does not cut it. If you do not have these and are caught or reported the consequences may be quite unpleasant and expensive. Sometimes it is left up to the discretion of the ones in authority who have jurisdiction over a specific area. It can go either way. Just my opinion.
ReplyDeleteWell guy no paper! Look at your calendars! What a bunch of horse crap!
ReplyDeleteHey very nice blog!
ReplyDeleteFeel free to surf to my site ... more
Wow, fantastic blog layout! How lengthy have you been blogging for?
ReplyDeleteyou make running a blog glance easy. The total glance of your website is fantastic, let
alone the content material!
my blog post: Click Here