Bob Gimlin Talks About Patty
Bob Gimlin talks about that historic day when he saw Patty. Did he have any idea that it would lead to a lifetime involvement?
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Got monkey suit?
ReplyDeleteDidn’t think so.
Peace!
Nice to see you back Iktomi ! Been too many clowns on here especially scott green who i suspect is stu and/or DS
Deletecheers
Joe
^ stop commenting to yourself you lonely perverted weirdo
DeleteBob Gimlin is either lying through his teeth or sasquatches actually exist. That's all there is to it.
ReplyDeleteGimlin has told his story periodically through the years and has never wavered. If he is lying and has been for decades, he is exceedingly good at lying. The far more likely scenario is that he is telling the truth.
Even if you are a skeptic, you have to admit that, if that was a hoax done via a costume, it was an exceedingly well done costume. What is the likelihood of Patterson being able to create such a well done costume (with little to no budget) so much so that over 50 years later a number of scientists who have studied it have concluded that it is far more likely to be an actual animal rather than a man in a costume.
I have to go with Jane Goodall's argument when she said that she has personally talked with so many credible eyewitnesses over the years that she believes that bigfoot has to exist. There are simply too many credible people who have seen this animal for them to all be lying or misidentifying some other animal. I also agree with Jane Goodall when she said that she can't explain why there is no proof yet for science. I think that it has to do with the fact that this animal is incredibly rare, is likely the most intelligent primate after man, and is extremely shy. When it is seen, it is almost always seen in situations where it was surprised. In many cases where humans have reported interacting with it, the animal is not even seen but only heard as it seems to want to drive people out of the area in what appears to be a territorial display.
Unfortunately, there has been so much BS associated with bigfoot, especially since the rise of the internet, that the BS has given credible interest and research into the subject a black eye.
I am hopeful that some hard evidence/ proof will come within the next few years as more amateur researchers gain access to high tech surveillance gear that is becoming increasingly more affordable. The most likely scenario for the final proof of their existence is that one of them will be hit by a car some day as the animal attempts to cross a road. Road crossings are by far the most frequent situation in which the animal is sighted.
Thank you for your well thought out and intelligent comment . What a breath of fresh air from the usual suspects on here who don't give a toss about bigfoot and only seem to want to rile everyone up. i agree with you 100%, there's just been way way too many credible witnesses to discount the idea of bigfoot existing. They are seeing something, and it's something huge and living . What exactly bigfoot is no one really knows 100%. it could be a long lost member of the human family that has both primate and human features like no other animal or it could be something entirely different. As you said the only way to find out is to have a body and maybe one day a hunter will get one or it will be run over by accident although something that huge will cause more damage to a vehicle that it would to itself so it would have to be something like a truck rather than a car
Deletecheers
Joe
Thank you for your comment to a comment. Kinda reminds me of that time I went camping with Yule Gibbons and we were winding down the day in front of the fire eating’ some jerky and wild hickory nuts.
DeleteSo we went to bed and come 2am I woke up with Bigfoot squating over my face, mouth full of squatch-shit, so much it was pouring out the sides of my mouth. That damn Yule Gibbons didn’t do a damn thing. Just kept eating his friggin hickory nuts.
Scott Green, you are a top notch wanker. Why don't you go to porn hub and leave this site alone. Foolish twonk !
Deletecheers
Joe
^ knows a thing or three about wankers and wanking...doncha eh,Joe?
DeleteAnonymous posters are BRITISH losers joe and the rest... post your name ,you spineless idiots ,joe and the rest of you cowards,this site is for info to move topic forward ,NOT A PLACE TO HARBOUR HATE ,see ya losers ,go to your mothers and say " im a useless ,spineless ,internet troll ,how did i end up here ?
ReplyDeleteYes, I am anonymous but I’m definitely not British. I do however like a good banger in the morning, not quite as good as Taylor Ham, but tasty all the same.
Delete