Baby Bigfoot Video Breakdown
When someone posts a video of a baby bigfoot, it gets attention. Well, it got Parabreakdown's attention at least, and he takes a closer look at the footage in this breakdown.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
For crying our loud! It's so obviously a frickin' bear!
ReplyDeleteThat is 100% a juvenile bigfoot. How much proof do you need. If anybody can prove it isn't a bigfoot i will leave this site for good. Good luck skeptards!
DeleteToodle doo
Joe
I really wish you would leave this site fake Joe aka Pedo stu !
DeleteI'l even pay for your going away party
Good riddance trash
cheers
Joe
It's a pigfoot
Delete^ it's a wank puffin !
Deletecheers
Joe
Didn't you just say it was 100% a bigfoot? Now it's a wank puffin. Does this mean you are leaving the site for good. Please say yes. I wish it was possible to come on this site and have an intelligent conversation about bigfoot not being real.
DeleteArgh yes, of course... now proceed in trying to prove that by spending every waking hour watching every last Bigfoot YouTube channel and obsessing over every single last researcher... and even making your own crypto blog.
DeleteYou sure know how to convince people, eh?