Of course not, what a dumb question.I am sure there are odd ones who are cases of mistaken indentity and some may be hoaxes done by tossers like stuey but by far the vast majority are the real deal and credible cheers
As Joe and anon said most are real sightings but of course there are notable hoaxes and hoaxer who wish to stroke their egos in a childish attempt at being first or good at something in their otherwise dreary lives. Look at the Germs, Scat Hansen, Fraud Standing on a Pale horse, ( which in Micmac Indian meant couldn't be trusted), Puke Sullivan are a few that come to mind as well as the classics we all know and hate. There are also the lunatic fringe who I think may believe their own fantasies. Dr. Matthew J, Lasperitis, Drinker Drunker come to mind. There are also bona fide, real sightings by well grounded, salt of the earth types who have nothing to gain (but much to lose) who report these families daily.
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Of course not, what a dumb question.I am sure there are odd ones who are cases of mistaken indentity and some may be hoaxes done by tossers like stuey but by far the vast majority are the real deal and credible
ReplyDeletecheers
Joe
No of course not just everything you here on The Germs channel.
ReplyDeleteAs Joe and anon said most are real sightings but of course there are notable hoaxes and hoaxer who wish to stroke their egos in a childish attempt at being first or good at something in their otherwise dreary lives. Look at the Germs, Scat Hansen, Fraud Standing on a Pale horse, ( which in Micmac Indian meant couldn't be trusted), Puke Sullivan are a few that come to mind as well as the classics we all know and hate. There are also the lunatic fringe who I think may believe their own fantasies. Dr. Matthew J, Lasperitis, Drinker Drunker come to mind. There are also bona fide, real sightings by well grounded, salt of the earth types who have nothing to gain (but much to lose) who report these families daily.
ReplyDelete