The Details Behind Paul Freeman's Bigfoot Evidence
Bigfoot Case Files on youtube takes a close look at the Paul Freeman bigfoot case, and some of the overlooked details.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
I believe that bigfoot may exist, but I also believe that the Freeman footage is hoaxed BS.
ReplyDeleteOh they exist, dont worry about that! I am a sasquatch field researcher and been studying two family groups for the last ten years.
ReplyDeleteIts pretty obvious its Freemans oldest son in a suit. Anyone that new Freeman new that he was terrified of Bigfoot. He was way to calm and the camera was more steady than it should be. Notice his son looks down to keep from tripping. Patty walked off and you never seen her look down at the ground as she was walking.
ReplyDelete