Bigfoot Encounters On Military Bases


There are a few tales here and there about bigfoot encounters on military bases. Here's a few of those stories for your entertainment.

In 1978, Edwin Godoy was a soldier stationed at Fort Lewis, in a heavily forested area of Washington state. One night, a truck broke down on base. The commander ordered the soldiers to return to base by foot, and instructed Godoy to guard the truck until it could be towed in the morning.

Shortly after midnight, Godoy was surprised to see a giant creature, covered with hair, standing about 300 meters away in the pine forest. The creature had a broad chest and powerful build. To Godoy’s shock, its eyes glowed red, even though the moon was behind it and there was no other light source.

The creature charged at Godoy. He commanded several times for it to halt, then fired into the air. As the creature continued to race towards him, Godoy fired at it. The creature clutched its chest, moaned, and ran off into the forest. Unnerved by the encounter, Godoy locked himself in the truck for the rest of the night.

Godoy reported the story to the mechanics who came for the truck, who in turn reported it to base and then to scientists who appeared on the scene. The scientists took samples of the creature’s footprints, and the blood spilled from the gunshot wound.

For more, click here. 

Comments

  1. What the Hay'ell is wring with this site that it takes 3-4 minutes just to load the comments???!!! Come on now, I know its been doin' this for at LEAST 6 months. Pretty please can we give this thing a tune up?! Its gone way past irritating and into ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i noticed that too chick but i thought my computer was slow. i guess it's not my computer after all
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    2. Hi howdy

      Same problem here. No problem with mobile though

      MMC

      Delete
  2. Is there anyone around here in their eighties or older, I have a Bigfoot question about the old days ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello out there. From what I've read in the older days they use to call them Wildmen and now they call them Bigfoot. What changed ?

      Delete
    2. They have always gone by many names

      The common parlence is Bigfoot /Sasquatch here in the states. The Ausies use the term yowie. Back when I was young I knew the BC provincial govmt called them wild men.

      Delete
    3. It’s a way of retconning contradictory myths and legends to fit the modern fantasy conception of bigfoot.

      Delete
    4. Bigfoot is real for sure.

      “ retconning” ?

      Back in my day you would have gotten beat for spelling like that.

      Delete
    5. Maybe you’d better check into a nursing home pops:

      ret·con
      ˈretkän
      verb
      gerund or present participle: retconning
      revise (an aspect of a fictional work) retrospectively, typically by introducing a piece of new information that imposes a different interpretation on previously described events.

      Delete
    6. OUCH! I guess back in his day they used simple words.

      Delete
    7. If you didn’t already catch on... all the above is Pedo Stu talking to himself. You see, when Pedo Stu doesn’t have the confidence to debate with someone, he’ll set up a sockpuppet and argue with himself. Yeah... he’s that f’n nuts. But he’s been up for hours waiting for someone to point out the obvious so he can giggle with his hand down his pants.

      Reports in North America before the 20th century largely described "wildmen". It was only with more depictions of gorillas in 20th century pop culture that the reports generally started to describe a non-human primate. So basically, the fluctuations between “wildmen” and “apemen” are prevalent with increases in understanding of primates over the last 250 years, as well as the increase of communication links with eyewitnesses & researchers in recent times due to things like the internet. For example, if you were anyone in the 19th and early 20th centuries, and see a hair-covered biped, you’d likely deduce it was a type of human since only humans are recognised to walk on two legs.

      The name “Bigfoot” has no intended connotation for either a human or non-human primate, and is a perversely naive and an embarrassing take on the subject. The very origin of the name "Big Foot" in the mid-20th century was in direct reference to what was being documented even before these hominin’s sightings were being widely disclosed by witnesses. This essentially erodes any suggestion of major media influences on eyewitnesses, before any major powers of suggestion.

      Delete
    8. Now, now Pedo Stu. You don’t like being reminded you were reported to the authorities in the US... so don’t bait people into saying it.

      Why would you deliberately drive people from this blog to make your sockpuppeting and your embarrassing arguments stand out more?

      And then cry about it?

      Delete
    9. You’re an embarrassing cry baby who puts yourself in these situations and then stamps your feet about it when you’re called out. An embarrassment boyo. Your family would be ashamed of knowing they have such a whimp of an old nonce around the house.

      Delete
    10. Iktomi just screws kids, seems to touch a nerve with him

      Delete
    11. Didn’t you demand the details of the authorities because you’re scared?

      Delete
    12. I called the US Authorities on Iktomi because he just screws kids

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?