Tim Fasano raids the deep swamps of Florida in search of the skunk ape. At the end of the video is some footage Tim is calling controversial. Check it out and see what he's talking about.
Ordinarily, when you can't get any footage, you shoot a video of you going to get the footage, and everyone will forget that you produced no video follow up of you falling flat on your face. Since that apparently doesn't work anymore, the Plan B of choice is to shoot a bunch of worthless B roll footage, and then proclaim that it is controversial, without specifically stating what part of it is controversial. I wonder what Plan C will be?
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Ordinarily, when you can't get any footage, you shoot a video of you going to get the footage, and everyone will forget that you produced no video follow up of you falling flat on your face. Since that apparently doesn't work anymore, the Plan B of choice is to shoot a bunch of worthless B roll footage, and then proclaim that it is controversial, without specifically stating what part of it is controversial. I wonder what Plan C will be?
ReplyDeleteTotal BS.
ReplyDelete