Friday, May 4, 2018

Deep Woods Stories of Terror


From Swamp Dweller on youtube:

It's no secret that I love to explore the woods. Over the past few weeks I've covered many terrifying tales from the woods, these are 30 of the creepiest tales from our state parks, deep woods, and middle of nowhere.

26 comments:

  1. I realize I'm not going out on much of a limb here but I'd like to let everyone know that no amount of stupid plaster casts and bear fur will ever prove the existence of giant Neanderthals living in the woods of the United states of America, bigfoot doesn't exist, I know it, you know it. Really it's about having fun and of course making a buck off of gullible people. I realize how ridiculous I sound always making dumb excuses why a minimum 10 foot tall creature is always able to hide and seem elusive, and i also apologize for chumming around with mental cases like Khat and Leon just because they supported my stupid narrative. That should have been a tipping point for most of you that my stubborn arguments held no validity and although no bigfoot evidence came out of such things it was a perfect example of my shamelessness. Apologies to all, especially when I get cornered by logic and real science and lash out with personal insults and act like I'm the freaking internet police. I've been here for years putting out the same "evidence " and sadly a site called bigfoot evidence has produced absolutely nothing to back up even a shred of what I claimed. Blurry pictures and track ways always later proven to be faked, Gimlin and Biscardi making money despite my ignorant denials, I behaved shamefully and I apologize to Matt and Shawn for acting like an ass on their retarded non evidence site. It's fun to imagine bigfoot but when you site bullshit facts you make up and stalk and harass people I guess it really is a bridge too far. Sorry again but I am an ass and I do work for this site after all so I'm also guilty of making those bigfoot bucks, really low, lower than pond scum, that's me .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me guess... to respond to this will means I’m obsessed with you? Ha ha ha ha!!

      "The height average for the sampled population is 7’ 10", derived from a combination of eyewitness estimates and scaling from footprints."
      http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_FAQ.asp?id=585

      What's been determined is there is reliable data in track impressions that points to a hominin with the same widely reported anatomy leaving its sign on the environment of the North America. The data extrapolated from that evidence over a 60 year period, gives the creature leaving that evidence an average height of 7.10 feet tall. Over a three decade period of that evidence, morphological congruency has been pointed to in three casts that span two continents, notably before particular replica casts were manufactured, and before things like mid-tarsal breaks had scientific attention drawn to them... aligned with track ways that show that a genuine biological foot has made contact with the ground. Every time biological evidence for “Bigfoot” such as hair is sequenced for DNA, it comes back human. Human DNA doesn’t confirm Bigfoot’s classification because the majority of the people observing those results are expecting a new non-human primate’s DNA. 12 morphologically congruent hair samples, one directly linked to a report by government employees, that yielded track impressions of the same hominin whose physical evidence was added to the three casts just cited (now peer reviewed)... Is the reason why in my opinion Bigfoot is an archaic homo sapien, with those results having nothing to do with “human contamination”. If not, then “Bigfoot” something so close to us in the genus homo that it requires more testing to establish. If we are therefore talking about a type of primitive human, and we likely are... Anthropologists never need a body, and innumerable studies have occurred by researching tribes in their natural environments.

      Stating evidence is debunked because it’s debunked is circular reasoning; a logical fallacy. Calling evidence that has repeatable standards pseudoscientific without debunking it with a scientific equivalent, is pseudoscientific. And not attending to your burden of debunking the evidence and simply offering insults... is ad hominem. And you Stuey, are a joke who’s obsessed with this subject 24/7, but who’s too lazy to actually try and research the subject properly. Who therefore believes that if he drives people away from commenting, his opinion stands unchallenged and seems more “gospel” to someone who’s naive. When in fact you simply reiterate shortfalls in logic and scientific principles via conjecture, contradictions, circular logic and conspiracy theories.

      But please Stuey... tell me how science works?

      Delete
    2. So now I admit I'm obsessed while I totally ignore my Khat and Leon embraces, I truly am shameful, and to top it all off I repost "evidence " that proves nothing on a site that proves nothing, I don't even think to deny I'm employed by this site,well there's a full confession, no wonder I won't turn anyone away who goes with the narrative. Circular logic always comes up behind me and bites me in the ass

      Delete
    3. If the evidence isn’t proof of a genuine biological archaic foot... don’t cry, prove it.

      “Turned away”? Stuey for being banned and blaming it on me?

      Delete
    4. Funny how I deflect and avoid about Khat, Leon, and being employed by this site, hope everyone doesn't notice that. No need to disprove something that's never been proven like say a biological archaic foot, because again that's just me saying that, just like it was just me that verified those skeletons, I'm glad that people are too stupid to actually question my "evidence ". Let the payychecks roll

      Delete
    5. No Stuey... There’s “no need to disprove” the evidence because not only are you too stupid... but people car cleverer than you can’t and that means no outlet. And the got nothing to do with what I’ve claimed, I just reference the evidence presented by qualified scientists, verified to be acceptable to the scientific standard by their peers.

      Don’t cry about it... Debunk it.

      Delete
    6. ^ STUpefaction of the mind.

      Delete
    7. No wonder we haven't found any bigfoot, their average height is only 7’ 10". ikdummy has set us straight on his imaginary hide and seek monster.

      LOL

      Delete
    8. Car cleverer, and I work here, embarrassing

      Delete
    9. Plenty found, ****head... nine classified.

      Delete
    10. Where and when were these nine specimens classified?

      Delete
    11. Where would you be if you didn’t have typos to fall back on? Oh that’s right, same place as you are with them... crying because you can’t debunk Bigfoot.

      Delete
    12. I know. I get so flustered when people realize my relationship with crazies like Khat and Leon and when I can't deny I work for this site I just go car cleverer, I should know when to shut up so I don't catch a further beating, tell Matt and Shawn that's what's coming, this is ending with my nonsense

      Delete
    13. Wow, that made a lot of sense... you should probably compose yourself a little, wipe the tears from your eyes and try and find some coherency.

      Would you like a tissue?

      Delete
    14. Deflecting from the truth again? Why won't I comment about Khat and Leon and how I'm employed by this site? I know the answer and the shameful light it shines showing me a big hypocrite and liar, that's why I use the good IKTOMI name and not the Fitz one

      Delete
    15. I thought I was Russian?

      (Pfffft!!)

      Delete
    16. School them IKTOMI

      Delete
    17. Yes, the comment was meant to offend and that particular mission was accomplished! =~)

      Delete
    18. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh, so it wasn’t a paranoid ramble with its roots in obsessing about me 24/7, sitting in that computer chair wondering who, where I am?

      Just like I’m “employed by the blog”?

      : )

      Delete
    19. It’s all the more humorous, considering only the other day I alluded to how obsessed you were before with me allegedly being affiliated to the blog... and you totally denied it embarrassed.

      Delete
    20. Yes, I was pretty embarrassed, but I cheered up after watching Chelsea dispatch Liverpool! =~)

      Delete
    21. You’re a Chelsea fan now, eh? I’ve even got you watching football... how sweet.

      Delete
  2. I had to find someone to support since my hometown side Leeds began its struggles. And don’t tell me about Huddersfield. =~(

    ReplyDelete