Bruce can find a dogman in any photo ! A class reunion photo? Bruce will find a hidden creature without any doubt. "School Griffen smiling at baby tree boy" haha cheers
I'm too busy destroying fake Patty!!! Yeah, got tons of proof, found A REAL CREATURE in the Patterson video too! TOTAL EPIC FAILURE IKDUMMY!
OOPS, A RIP IN THE COSTUME!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a--m4o35PCE
PLAIN COMMON SENSE TELLS YOU SHE'S FAKE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCd6_QjexgE
4:26, If that were true, anyone could. Ikdummy already proved my evidence true by not getting any pics of anything on any local walking trail. And that includes you, PIB, whoever!
“My last areas of observation are of the posterior lower leg and ankle. The two heads of the gastrocnemius muscle (medial and lateral) can be seen in the right leg. In spite of the “grainy” characteristic of the film, the contraction and relaxation of the heads of the gastrocnemius are observable, comparable to that seen in the triceps described above. The tendon of this muscle is of further interest. The Achilles’ tendon runs to its attachment on the calcaneus (heel bone). The tendon is seen with a depression anterior to it, correlated with the elongated heel and distance between the tendon and the tibia, as with the posterior knee, the creation of a depression with a costume is essentially impossible. Additionally, the end of the pant leg made from non-stretch material needs to be made wider to accommodate for the foot being passed through. This is clearly seen in the costume used in the MMP. There is no such excess of material seen in the PGF, with the gastrocnemius tapering into the ankle, and then widening out to the foot.“
O. Allen Guinn, III, M.D., F.A.C.S. Aurora Plastic Surgery Lee’s Summit, MO
Bruce really doesn't give up. He's either really into his role playing game as a bigfoot researcher or a total delusional loon of the highest degree cheers
also Bruce: Patterson filmed a living creature that had movement on film. What did you ever get ? i have seen squat from you as far as any video footage of anything that appears to be moving. all you have my dear is nothing but twigs , leaves and branches along with tree bark that in your deluded fantasy you believe to be some fantastic imaginary creatures on par with anything from Narnia or lord of the rings . That Bruce, is an epic fail on the grandest level ! CREASED ! Cheers
Don't quote something by another clueless non researcher, like Lorin Coleman! Anyone can study a person in a suit! All these yo-yo's have one thing in common, THEY DON'T FIELD RESEARCH!!!
YOU'RE A SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID FOR NOT FIELD RESEARCHING, AND BELIEVING A FAKE! A FAKE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN REPLICATED! BIGFOOT EVIDENCE IS REPEATABLE, I DO IT EVERYDAY! AND SO WOULD EVERY RESEARCHER IF THEY PUT ENOUGH TIMNE IN!
HERE'S THE FAKE RESEARCHERS, AND THE REAL ONE'S! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDO6WZAIQck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmUrBHw35q4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZehlAknVxU
Funny how you never comment on the waste your time no evidence researchers, but shun the best evidence, and push Patty, who's FAKE! You refuse to field research, you refuse to take a single pic, refuse to take a pic of yourself, prove who you are and where you really live. Man, you sure are the lowest of the low1
You are not remotely qualified to claim who’s a genuine researcher or not. Look at your affiliates... there is nobody. You take blurry photos of brush. If footage of a creature that cannot be hoaxed (PGF) has a subject in it that leaves physical evidence behind that is not only found in another place in the States many years later... But is also found in another continent decades later, with different foot falls and impressions attesting to an actual biological foot, then that’s genuine repeatable evidence. Your version of repeatable evidence is the same colour blur in consecutive blurs. Not only does Patty enjoy consistency across innumerable reports... but the science is behind her as well.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Nothing to see as usual. If they cant do any better than that then why even bother?
ReplyDeleteThese sort of photos are a bit pointless.I can't see anything.Maybe Bruce can draw on it for us xx
DeleteBruce can find a dogman in any photo !
DeleteA class reunion photo? Bruce will find a hidden creature without any doubt. "School Griffen smiling at baby tree boy"
haha
cheers
Joe
It's one of those paredidles.
ReplyDeleteYou could be right seeing as the Ikdummy boy is always beating his "drum".
DeleteI'm too busy destroying fake Patty!!! Yeah, got tons of proof, found A REAL CREATURE in the Patterson video too!
ReplyDeleteTOTAL EPIC FAILURE IKDUMMY!
OOPS, A RIP IN THE COSTUME!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a--m4o35PCE
PLAIN COMMON SENSE TELLS YOU SHE'S FAKE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCd6_QjexgE
4:26, If that were true, anyone could. Ikdummy already proved my evidence true by not getting any pics of anything on any local walking trail. And that includes you, PIB, whoever!
Oh dear. Your drivel destroyed in one GIF;
Deletehttp://cryptomundo.com//wp-content/uploads/PattyF307F311ElbowJointLocAG2A.gif
The Patterson Gimlin footage was not the result of anyone “sneaking up” on anything. They rounded a corner and there the subject was, seemingly off-guard. Bigfoot has been reported by tens of thousands of people by anything of to a 1000 different types of circumstances. Be it on horses, be it in cars, be it in groups, individuals hunting... the list of circumstances goes on and on leading to nothing but the total consistency of what we see in the PGF. The witness walking one way, the hominin in the other. If you had but a rudimentary understanding of the reports, you wouldn’t be embarrassing yourself now.
“Patterson chose the area because of intermittent reports of the creatures in the past, and of their enormous footprints since 1958. (His familiarity with the area and its residents from prior visits may also have been a factor.) The most recent of these reports was the nearby Blue Creek Mountain track find, which was investigated by journalist John Green, Bigfoot hunter RenĂ© Dahinden, and archaeologist Don Abbott on and after August 28, 1967. This find was reported to Patterson (via his wife) soon thereafter by Al Hodgson, owner of the Willow Creek Variety Store, a five and dime at the time.”
Darth Synmor -
“Retire your channel.....It's pure garbage”
Tony Montana -
“this video didn't prove anything!“
... listen to your audience and give up.
“My last areas of observation are of the posterior lower leg and ankle. The two heads of the gastrocnemius muscle (medial and lateral) can be seen in the right leg. In spite of the “grainy” characteristic of the film, the contraction and relaxation of the heads of the gastrocnemius are observable, comparable to that seen in the triceps described above. The tendon of this muscle is of further interest. The Achilles’ tendon runs to its attachment on the calcaneus (heel bone). The tendon is seen with a depression anterior to it, correlated with the elongated heel and distance between the tendon and the tibia, as with the posterior knee, the creation of a depression with a costume is essentially impossible. Additionally, the end of the pant leg made from non-stretch material needs to be made wider to accommodate for the foot being passed through. This is clearly seen in the costume used in the MMP. There is no such excess of material seen in the PGF, with the gastrocnemius tapering into the ankle, and then widening out to the foot.“
DeleteO. Allen Guinn, III, M.D., F.A.C.S. Aurora Plastic Surgery
Lee’s Summit, MO
Oh... And you can’t replicate pareidolia, just as you refused to even attempt someone else’s.
Delete^ hasn`t the faintest idea.
Delete10,000 role-players allegedly in the woods of North America.
DeleteAnd not a shred of evidence, other than conspiracy theories and conjecture.
Now there’s a great idea.
Bruce really doesn't give up. He's either really into his role playing game as a bigfoot researcher or a total delusional loon of the highest degree
Deletecheers
Joe
also Bruce:
DeletePatterson filmed a living creature that had movement on film. What did you ever get ? i have seen squat from you as far as any video footage of anything that appears to be moving. all you have my dear is nothing but twigs , leaves and branches along with tree bark that in your deluded fantasy you believe to be some fantastic imaginary creatures on par with anything from Narnia or lord of the rings .
That Bruce, is an epic fail on the grandest level !
CREASED !
Cheers
Joe
Don't quote something by another clueless non researcher, like Lorin Coleman! Anyone can study a person in a suit! All these yo-yo's have one thing in common, THEY DON'T FIELD RESEARCH!!!
ReplyDeleteYOU'RE A SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID FOR NOT FIELD RESEARCHING, AND BELIEVING A FAKE! A FAKE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN REPLICATED!
BIGFOOT EVIDENCE IS REPEATABLE, I DO IT EVERYDAY! AND SO WOULD EVERY RESEARCHER IF THEY PUT ENOUGH TIMNE IN!
HERE'S THE FAKE RESEARCHERS, AND THE REAL ONE'S!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDO6WZAIQck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmUrBHw35q4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZehlAknVxU
Funny how you never comment on the waste your time no evidence researchers, but shun the best evidence, and push Patty, who's FAKE!
You refuse to field research, you refuse to take a single pic, refuse to take a pic of yourself, prove who you are and where you really live.
Man, you sure are the lowest of the low1
You are not remotely qualified to claim who’s a genuine researcher or not. Look at your affiliates... there is nobody. You take blurry photos of brush. If footage of a creature that cannot be hoaxed (PGF) has a subject in it that leaves physical evidence behind that is not only found in another place in the States many years later... But is also found in another continent decades later, with different foot falls and impressions attesting to an actual biological foot, then that’s genuine repeatable evidence. Your version of repeatable evidence is the same colour blur in consecutive blurs. Not only does Patty enjoy consistency across innumerable reports... but the science is behind her as well.
DeleteGot two blurry images that are the same?
Got monkey suit, Bruce?
That's the face of pareidolia.
ReplyDelete