Monday, March 5, 2018

Juvenile Bigfoot Enters Home!


Blayne Tyler claims that a juvenile bigfoot broke into his house and terrifyed his cats. How woul you react if this happened to you?

37 comments:

  1. "How would you react if this happened to you?"

    I'd check myself into a psychiatric hospital or start taking safer drugs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, you should do just that. As soon as they open in the morning go there.

      Delete
    2. It said IF you f*cking fat illiterate redneck.

      Delete
    3. Notice the aggression this one has toward ladies?

      “An abusive or negligent mother, sister, teacher or girlfriend can plant a seed deep down in their brain’s subcortical matter.
      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

      All in the name of “free speech”, right?

      Delete
    4. ^ Only a misogynist and sexist like you would assume that a woman needs to be rescued and have things mansplained for her.

      Delete
    5. Only a narcissist & psychopath like you would think flagging vile antisocial behaviour is beneath it, and reason to project that on others. And Chick b-slapped you. She doesn’t need rescuing from a coward like you.

      Delete
    6. I'm more than happy to flag your "vile and antisocial behavior" -- as you unartfully called it. And if she doesn't need rescuing, then why are you still posting idiotic comments? I think she can speak for herself.

      Delete
    7. And my “vile and antisocial behaviour” is? Cowards need addressing. If you did that to a lady on the street you’d be addressed by anyone who can function properly in a civil society.

      Delete
    8. Referring to women as "b*tches" is about as vile as misogyny could possibly be. And this is not the 1800's, women are fully capable of speaking for themselves without a snotty man like you butting in and trying to act for them.

      Delete
    9. On dear... another fantasy.

      Do you have a quote from me where I’ve referred to women as “bitches”? You do know that these obvious little attempts at mind games are indicative of you being irate? I don’t think Chick would be remotely offended by me addressing your cowardice. And this isn’t the first time of course.

      Calling women the names like you just did, and then claiming someone is sexist... it’s utterly crazy, dear boy. You’re obviously unhinged.

      Delete
    10. So what does the "b" in "b-slapped" stand for? Not only are you the ugliest, most vile sexist who thinks it's funny to makes jokes that reference violence against women, you try to hide your brutal sexism like the spineless crumb you are.

      Delete
    11. B*tch-slap

      Deliver a stinging blow to (someone), typically in order to humiliate them.
      "I would have b*tch-slapped him for talking that way"
      Origin

      1990s: originally black English, referring to a woman hitting or haranguing her male partner.

      Delete
    12. "The issue is that a bitch slap references the unequal power relationships between men and women, even when women are instigating said slap to others. This is because through the act of the bitch slap, we are essentially celebrating one person taking advantage of unequal power status against another. The primary motivation for this is the purpose of humiliation. In this way, the bitch slap is the physical manifestation of this imbalanced power relationship and we participate in the violence by laughing at the humiliation."

      www.theradicalnotion.com/the-inherent-sexism-in-the-term-bitch-slap/

      Delete
    13. When someone who is so violently opposed to feminism is trawling the internet to defend his latest misogyny, for sources on sexism... one must simply sit back and watch the incredible mess unfold. I’ll say it again... You would make a psychologist very famous.

      And Chick gave you a proper b-slap.

      Delete
    14. oh my ! Stewy is in a prickly mood today. I've kinda liked the b-slap by chick on him and the stinging online KO from Iktomi that sent the poor lad to the canvas.
      Poor stey will surely need lots of time to recover from this ultimate humiliation and i am loving every second of it !
      Cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    15. Me and Chick are the Legion of Doom, and Stuey is Paul Bearer.

      Delete
    16. Lol! Love this^ . Guess I must have pressed a button before I fell asleep. Hope you're all having a lovely day, this thread has given me a quite a giggle. :)

      Delete
    17. You fat ugly bitches, aah guh guh guh guh guh guh guh

      Delete
    18. A grown man, old enough to be a grandfather, insulting woman from behind anonymity.

      Could there possibly be a tougher man around?

      Delete
    19. I'll punches yer sissky face an you cry like a wimmins, aah guh guh guh guh guh guh

      Delete
  2. "How would you react if this happened to you?"

    I would shoot it and turn the carcass over to science and be famous forever. Obviously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ This would be the correct answer...if it existed.

      Delete
    2. If something exists... it leaves trace evidence that can be tested to the point of peer review.

      And guess what?

      Delete
    3. Famous forever? a hero? Guess again.
      It will likely be confiscated and if you dont cooperate, you might wind up 411.
      The rich and powerful could care less about rules and/or rights, they make their own. In a Different scenario, sadly, been there,done that.

      Delete
    4. They confiscated your dogman???!!!

      Delete
    5. Sorry, no dogman or bigfoot.....What was discovered is no less significant IMHO. That is all I can say. After two decades I am still picking up the pieces of whats left of my life. Lessons learned...... 1.Stealth is your friend. 2. Fly under the radar.3. Better to be an unsong hero rather than a battered one. 4. There is a time and place for everything, though it may never come to pass. 5. Be careful what you wish for you may not like what you find.

      z-hawk

      Delete
    6. Hoaxers exist. Hoaxers leave trace "evidence". Peer review has confirmed the existence of hoaxers.

      Bigfoot? No. Not really.

      Delete
    7. It’s a good thing we have accredited scientists who’ve concluded otherwise, isn’t it?

      Delete
    8. Argh yes! Of course... For thousands of years, there has been a culture hopping secret society of gorilla suit wearing hoaxers all out to get your money. These conspirators, though finding each others customs undesirable, and spanning from a time when they didn't even know what a non-human primate looked like, have in fact managed to hoax the exact same anatomical and behavioural traits, as well as cheat experts with fake morphological traits too!

      Conspiracy theories eh?

      Delete
    9. Let us examine your strawman hypothesis, Ikky, that hoaxes can only be made by an organized and coordinated conspiracy of hoaxers. Let's look at some specific data points.

      Ivan Marx was a hoaxer. Rick Dyer is a hoaxer. Ray Wallace was a hoaxer. Ray Pickens was a hoaxer.

      Did Ivan Marx know Dyer, Wallace, or Pickens? No. Did Dyer know Wallace or Pickens? No. Did Wallace know Pickens? Again, no.

      So there are four completely off the cuff data points refuting and destroying your hypothesis that hoaxes can only be committed by a connected and organized conspiracy. Clearly individual efforts can, and do prevail.

      Consider your straw man to be peer reviewed. And BTFO.

      Delete
    10. And with the exception of Ray Wallace, who many believe was in fact an enthusiast, whose legacy his family wanted to distance themselves from after his passing... All there evidence was weak, obvious and outside of the repeatable versions of evidence that would require a consorted and accossiative diolgoue between people to produce and make look convincing.

      Different individual hoaxers would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand. This would equire a consorted and accossiative diolgoue to manufacture. They would also have to place such fakes in places where some people might not trek for many decades, hoping that someone some day would stumble across them out of miles and miles of wilderness. This would need planning and the information on strangers to predict to the exact yard out of hundreds of miles of wilderness. Lastly... To hoax convincing biological dermatoglyphics that are primate in origin, one would have to have a knowledge of all human primate and non-human primate dermals (that not many people on the planet do), THEN fool multiple forensic experts. This would require some accosoation between amateur hoaxers from the general public and leading academics.

      The same is true of the behavioural traits noted native Americans over hundreds of years, by witnesses in the 1800’s and early 1900’s, before general knowledge of primates was common, and before these hominins were in popular culture, eroding away any powers of suggestion. For there to be consistency of this, there would need to be require a consorted and accossiative diolgoue to invent over a transitional period of pop culture.

      So nope! Your conspiracy delusion remains. Nwah... did you stay up until now thinking of that?

      (Bless)

      How many?

      Delete
    11. Hahaha.

      No.

      Special pleading, Ikky, and that fails the smell test as well.

      Meldrum is STILL trying to promote Marx's "cripplefoot" as genuine. And Krantz used to claim there were four "secret" criteria by which he could determing the hoaxes from the real thing. And then Daegling tested him with a known hoax cast and he deemed it genuine. Oops.

      So no, hoaxers'evidence is not "weak, obvious and outside of the repeatable versions of evidence blahblah blah."

      It's more than good enough to fool the "experts", and continue fooling them today.

      Peer reviewed again. And BTFO.

      You need a body Ikky. Nothing less is good enough. Stop wasting our time here and go get one.

      Delete
    12. ... And there is no evidence that Marx hoaxed the cripple foot. There is evidence however that to substantiate that find, that he then hoaxed laughably bad footage and images that are outside of any consistency of reports. There is too much anatomical detail to the cripple foot, that is impossible for someone from the general public to hoax.

      There are also no known biologists, other than those that are studying Bigfoot tracks, that are being hoaxed. Therefore there is no comparative scenario to the detriment of said biologists and anthropologists. Outside of Daegling doing that to Meldrum (an impartial scientist not looking to character attack should probably have impartially tested the same method on other anthropologists not studying Bigfoot tacks as well)... It's impossible for a hoaxer from another continent to guess the exact same archaic foot morphology, and then find a method of having this morphology arranged in a trackway, whereby such a trackway encompasses different footballs only indicative of a genuine biological foot... And THEN ensures that such a trackway is found by, & then fools a government employee.

      Oopsy daisy!

      So yes... the hoaxer’s footprint evidence would need a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot, encompassing total accuracy regarding bipedal evolution that only very few educated people understand. You are of course invited to challenge the cripple foot track... but we know how that usually pans out. No, I don’t need a body, I need evidence to warrant enthusiasts their premise.

      And I have it peer reviewed.

      How many?

      Delete
    13. Comes back for more ass kicking, you sissky, aah guh guh guh guh guh guh

      Delete
    14. He pees sittings down likes a wimmins, aah guh guh guh guh guh guh

      Delete