Friday, March 16, 2018

Bigfoot Shaking Tree Caught on Video


From Mountain Beats Monsters comes a clip of what some believe shows a tree being shaken by a bigfoot. Some people believe bigfoot shakes trees when they become agitated.


9 comments:

  1. Yeah, Roger said that they tracked Patty for 3.5 miles before losing her sign on pine needles. That would be a slow process to follow whatever sign was being left and might require dismounting numerous times or even doing the whole tracking event on foot while pulling your horse.

    Maybe that lie was supposed to tie in with another lie told about Gimlin being a tracker with Indian ancestry. But then that partnership fell apart and the story didn't work out. The rather monumental tracking excursion bit got dumped from the already-inconsistent narrative. The timeline given doesn't even allow for the hours it would have taken to do the tracking trip and then still do everything else.

    Gimlin doesn't talk about the tracking and people who question him at lectures seem to know to avoid that subject. The bent stirrup lie is avoided as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I think we all agree that Roger Patterson was an embellisher/exaggerator. That doesn't mean he's a liar. I think he was one of those people who exaggerates what he has seen and done. I've known people like that myself."
      - Skunk Ape on the BFF
      http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/8811-the-mutual-contradictions-of-roger-patterson-and-bob-gimlin/

      "I yelled 'Bob Lookit' and there about 80 or 90 feet in front of us this giant humanoid creature stood up. My horse reared and fell, completely flattening a stirrup with my foot caught in it."
      "My foot hurt but I couldn't think about it because I was jumping up and grabbing the reins to try to control the horse. I saw my camera in the saddle bag and grabbed it out, but I finally couldn't control the horse anymore and had to let him go."
      - Roger Patterson October 20th 1967
      ... Al Hodgson was also a witness to this bent stirrup and we know they were on horses because of footage of them prior to their encounter.

      JREF - “Impossible 36 hours developing timeline... Impossible 36 hours developing timeline... Impossible 36 hours developing timeline... “

      Bill Munns comes along - “Kodachrome II took a little over an hour to develop.”

      The whole “The timeline given doesn't even allow for the hours it would have taken to do the tracking trip and then still do everything else“ jig, rests on the lie that it would take 36 hours to develop the particular type of film. It’s smoke and mirrors and the definition of strawman (another appropriately applied concept that’s cropped up in the last few hours, eh Stuey?)

      Delete
    2. Oh... and though not known to be a tracker (creased), “Gimlin is of Indian descent, Chirokowa Apache to be exact.”
      http://sasquatchsummit.com/speaker/bob-gimlin/

      Delete
    3. Not known to be a Bigfoot researcher either Ikdummy! Where's his proof before Patty? They go in, surprise a Bigfoot, and get the money shot? Do you realize how pathetically special stupid this is??? And on loud horses? Oh, sand muffled the sound, and the horses masked their scent, LOL, THE EXCUSES ARE HILARIOUS, AND SO CONTRARY TO COMMON SENSE!!
      But if u don't research, you throw any knowledge out the window!
      I'd like to see ONE RESEARCHER WHO HAS PROOF LIKE I DO, THAT WOULD CLAIM PATTY IS LEGIT, JUST ONE!
      All the non researching idiots reviewed Patty, and all the non researching idiots believe she's real! Birds of a feather sure flock together!
      Blind leading the Blind!!!

      Delete
    4. Not known to be a Bigfoot researcher either Ikdummy! Where's his proof before Patty? They go in, surprise a Bigfoot, and get the money shot? Do you realize how pathetically special stupid this is??? And on loud horses? Oh, sand muffled the sound, and the horses masked their scent, LOL, THE EXCUSES ARE HILARIOUS, AND SO CONTRARY TO COMMON SENSE!!
      But if u don't research, you throw any knowledge out the window!
      I'd like to see ONE RESEARCHER WHO HAS PROOF LIKE I DO, THAT WOULD CLAIM PATTY IS LEGIT, JUST ONE!
      All the non researching idiots reviewed Patty, and all the non researching idiots believe she's real! Birds of a feather sure flock together!
      Blind leading the Blind!!!

      Delete
    5. Roger Patterson authored a book and filmed half of what was going to be a documentary on historical sightings. Roger Patterson did so much research in fact, that psuedosceptics have tried twisting this as a red flag for his success in filming the creature he’s set out to prove. Pretty much the same faulty rhetorical logic you’re applying now.

      Bigfoot has been reported by tens of thousands of people by anything of to a 1000 different types of circumstances. Be it on horses, be it in cars (cars make heck of a noise), be it in groups, individuals hunting shooting guns... the list of circumstances goes on and on leading to nothing but the total consistency of what we see in the PGF. The witness walking one way, the hominin in the other. If you had but a rudimentary understanding of the reports, you wouldn’t be embarrassing yourself now.

      “Patterson chose the area because of intermittent reports of the creatures in the past, and of their enormous footprints since 1958. (His familiarity with the area and its residents from prior visits may also have been a factor.) The most recent of these reports was the nearby Blue Creek Mountain track find, which was investigated by journalist John Green, Bigfoot hunter RenĂ© Dahinden, and archaeologist Don Abbott on and after August 28, 1967. This find was reported to Patterson (via his wife) soon thereafter by Al Hodgson, owner of the Willow Creek Variety Store, a five and dime at the time.”
      - Wikipedia

      You’re not a researcher, you snap photos of brush and draw lines on the blurry images. Try asking someone what’s in your images before you draw dots for eyes.

      Delete
    6. This is a subject I am trying to learn more and more about all the time, so expect to hear a lot from me on this blog in future. I'm not sure if you have the time to respond on your past comments (as I intend on checking out your past comments) but I will comment on as much as possible as this entire subject thrills me to pieces and the fact that you personally respond to comments speaks volumes of your character and I'm sure you will help me learn loads, as unfortunately I live in a country with no reported wildmen for hundreds of years.

      Delete
  2. PROOF of giant human bones in South Africa -

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lKSGrR3LlY

    ReplyDelete