Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Bigfoot Encounter Lasts 5 Days!


Two experienced hunters have the experience of their lifetimes when they are surrounded by bigfoot in the Ohio wilderness. The total experience lasted 5 days.

64 comments:

  1. Yo G money, this story aint no true. Bigfoot doesnt exist dogg. Word to yo mudda. Peace!

    Dingo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The evidence for Bigfoot is scientifically repeatable. It can’t be hoaxed, therefore thousands of years of cultural and modern anecdotes are of a genuine hominin.

      Delete
    2. ^ Scientifically repeatable ?

      Are you off your head ?

      Don`t bother with a reply...we have known for a long long time.

      Sheeeeeeeshhhh.

      Delete
    3. Do you know what that means?

      There is no “we”, there is just you. Isolated and at a desktop.

      Delete
    4. ^ Likewise - there is simply "you" pretending and putting forth spurious claims...there are no "scientists"...or rather,there are, but the type of scientist that is so called with this "specific" punctuation point surrounding them...questionable doesn`t do it justice.

      Delete
    5. ikky is full of shit,he has no evidence to back up his fantasies from anyone other than make believe "scientists".

      Delete
    6. Sorry Stuey... It appears you’ve been awake so long and babbling your horse **** so much, that you might even be starting to believe it. If the scientists I reference are so questionable... why do you struggle so I’m debunking their ideas? Doesn’t say much for you, does it?

      I have 60 years of physical evidence, repeatable across continents. Don’t like it? Do something about it...

      Delete
    7. Do something about nothing? That's all you've got

      Delete
    8. No, that’s actyally sound advice. If I was obsessed with you about a subject, as much as you are this, I would simply channel the same amount of effort in actually trying to support my ideas.

      You’re either too stupid, or the subject is far from as obvious as you would prefer.

      Delete
    9. Actually the fact that you can do nothing but resort to insults proves me right and you angry and wrong, nothing you can do about it

      Delete
    10. I’ve not only trampled all over your best, but the argumemts of people far cleverer than you as well.

      If I want to insult you after that, deal with it.

      Delete
  2. If they were "surrounded by bigfoot", why didn't they shoot one and get a specimen?

    Are bigfoot "researchers" even trying?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because bigfoot looks so close to being human that the hunters are supposedly freaked out about shooting them. Don’t ask me why we’re also told that those same hunters would shoot hoaxers in gorilla suits without thinking twice.

      Delete
    2. You are told, based on the accounts of many real hunters... that they don’t shoot Bigfoot because they’re too human looking, they have certain tags, they’re not alone, they’re too big.

      Plenty of missing hunters too.

      We are told by you, that not only is this not plausible and that they should shoot something that looks human anyway (wow... just wow), but that what is commonly referred to as Bigfoot are hoaxes and role-play anyway. The problem is those hoaxers and role-players are not turning up shot dead either, which makes another of your 8 years assertions irrelevant and fall by the wayside.

      And speaking of logic, according to you, it’s all role-play, then it’s not all role-play but all misidentification that leaves no room for role-play... which means it’s even more impossible to hoax the level of evidence that’s helping get this subject peer reviewed.

      Good job.

      Delete
    3. Oh FFS Ikky. They don't shoot bigfoot because they're LYING about seeing bigfoot. There were no bigfoots there to shoot. And that's a clearly a bear track in the picture.

      Hoaxers don't get shot because hoaxers know better than to hoax during hunting season. And have a crew of photographers on hand to make sure of it. That's why Gimlin didn't shoot Heironimus.

      However, hoaxers have been known to get run over crossing the highway.

      Bigfoot "researchers" have had over half a century to produce a specimen. They've failed utterly to do so. All they've delivered are hoaxes. So at this point there are only two possibilities: either bigfoot researchers are the most absolutely incompetent people on the planet (not a hard conclusion to make based on shows like Finding Bigfoot and Monsterquest), or bigfoot doesn't exist.

      Also, it doesn't matter how many time you say "peer reviewed". It won't make it true. Your concept of peer review is flawed and invalid regardless. What's the article under review? Who are the reviewers? What journal is this in?

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. “They don't shoot bigfoot because they're LYING about seeing bigfoot. There were no bigfoots there to shoot.“

      “... instead of overwhelmingly misidentifications, which is what I believe.”
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/bigfoot-and-gigantopithecus-are-they.html?m=0

      So what is it? I’m struggling to get any coherency from the comments you publish from one hour to the next? Do you think staying up all night, multiple nights, worrying about Bigfoot is rotting your brain? It is impossible for every single hunter to be lying, because not only are hunters not just reporting these creatures, but there is repeatable scientific evidence for what they are reporting. And if hoaxers know better not to get shot during hunting season, why are these reports from hunters that account for every credible pillar of society, during hunting season, as well as physical evidence all year round being documented? For everyone to be lying... wouldn’t that equate to a nation-wide hoaxing conspiracy? You see... These conspiracies are easy to apply, since the people pushing them seldom think they need to explain their silly ideas. Furthermore, people in wilderness areas have guns on them all year round. By your reasoning, surely someone would make the shot of the century and not hold off just because they’re not in hunting season? Or needing to use self-defence?

      Amateur Bigfoot researchers have documented every single piece of evidence just short of type specimen, over a 60 year period that this subject has been in popular culture. There has been nothing BUT evidence from the point that more people could apply their efforts. Before that, the reports lasted hundreds and hundreds of years. Some of the that evidence is now passing the peer review process. That’s a lot of evidence you need to prove is bunk, but my experience of obsessive scaredy cats like you, you’d rather try and dominate a comment section and prevent people exchanging ideas than putting your money where your mouth is. Bigfoot researchers are far from incompetent, they just need the time and resources. It took a year to track the Bili Ape and there has never been an equivalent study for this subject regardless of the evidence dwarfing that which the Bili ape enjoyed at this stage of research. Plus, every time a researcher tries raising funds to try and accommodate that type of research, they’re rhetorically “chasing the dollars”. Let me guess... “you’d love Bigfoot to exist”?

      (Creased)

      And actually... It doesn’t matter how many times you claim one peer review is the exception to all other peer reviews. It’s an embarrassing cherry picking exercise against a concept you’ve cheered on for eight years of your life. You’ve had the journal rubbed in your face every day of your life for the past few months, and if you know anything of the process you’ve been championing for eight years, you’d know that reviewers are anonymous. Essentially snatching away your ad hominem tactic like a hemorrhoid pillow. One of us has peer review and the scientific method.. the other has conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and conjecture.

      Delete
    6. Sums up your average response rather nicely.

      Delete
    7. Because you're quoting me while communicating with someone else. This is my first post on this thread. I thought that your all anyone are same tact was a goof but it seems it's your canon. Another wrong premise but will be "backed up" by you linking to "proof" that I post everything, I'm sure.


      Delete
    8. “Another wrong premise but will be "backed up" by you linking to "proof" that I post everything, I'm sure.“
      ... which is the exact drivel, buzz word “premise”, used over a period of the last two days here;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/bigfoot-and-gigantopithecus-are-they.html?m=0

      ... And comments you’ve published maybe a few hours previous to the one up top. Not too smart, are you? So what is it? I’m struggling to get any coherency from the comments you publish from one hour to the next? Are witnesses all lying, or are they all misidentifying, which reduces your role-playing empire to zilch.

      And what about all the hoaxers dodging all these blood thirsty hunters?

      Delete
    9. ^ fuming with rage under the dribble.

      haha haha hahahahahah HAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    10. Get some sleep Stuey... you’ve been up for three days straight obsessing about “imaginary creatures”.

      Delete
    11. Yes, ikdummy, I used "premise" on the Gigantopithicus thread. This is my 2nd post so far on this thread. You honestly can't conceive of there being more than 1 anonymous poster? You are as thick-headedly stubborn on that as you are bigfoot.

      Delete
    12. 11:00, you know how ikdummy proved that we are all one monolithic anonymous person? Get this (and I’m not making this up):

      (1) The “troll” uses more than one writing style and (2) The “troll” always uses the same writing style.

      In ikdummy’s diseased mind, any writing style at all is proof that we are all one person! He can just choose random comments and “prove” his point.

      It’s similar to ikummy’s shifting claims that sometimes bigfoot looks human, but other times it looks like a gorilla. That way, he can make any and all evidence (even if it directly conflicts with other evidence) fit his insane premise!

      Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    13. Silly Stuey.

      You harped on about my “premises” on the Giganto thread whilst claiming that the majority of US sightings are misidentification. Now, even after admitting being that same person, you think nobody is going to notice you switching back to your role-playing-liar-hoaxing conspiracy theory? Not too smart... are you? And then you address your own comment with the exact same insults, whilst believing anyone on the planet would believe you’re a different poster? Not too sane... are you?

      You USED to have two writing styles, until I buried your AC Collins sockpuppet (cue to AC Collins sockpuppet any minute)...
      F-AC Sockpuppet Style Proven -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/strange-cases-of-missing-people.html?m=0

      Rape Threat Boasts With Same “>>” As Quotations -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html

      And Your Twisted “Free Speech” Sentiment linked with the above “>>” Quotation Marks -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/bigfoot-truth-told.html
      ... There is one troll. There has only ever been one troll, and there will only ever be one troll. I am not the first person to point it out. You have pretended to be multiple people for so long that you’re desperate now to cling to it. It’s what’s kept you here.

      If something tends to walk on two feet... it’s natually associated with humans. When trying project your ad hoc conspiracy conjecture on me, deliberately trying to convey my gorilla suit statement literally isn’t going to wash. Instead of “gorilla costume”, I could quite easily write “non-human primate” costume. Which to many is exactly what they report in these hominins. In fact, you’ll notice innumerable comment sections with me using that exact statement to bring into context the likelihood of Native Americans offering the exact same descriptions & behavioural traits that we come to recognise in primates today... in a country and from a time when no recognised primates reside (allegedly).

      Now... How’s about finally offering up a reason for gorilla suit wearing hoaxers dodging bullets?

      Delete
    14. HAHAA! Right, "you are all the same because you are all different and all the same".

      Plus, he's posted on here for EIGHT years, so, of course, we all have too. Then he'll post a link "proving" it. Links and agenda-driven journals trump reality every time for ikdummy.

      Delete
    15. I actually haven’t published here for 8 years... But having gone back over an 8 year period of comment sections, this was around about the time you started attempting to medicate your depression with Bigfoot denial.

      And when you’ve quite finished talking to yourself.

      Delete
    16. LOL You went over 8 years of posts and "proved" an untruth. I guess you can shape any reality you want on the internet. Lame.

      Delete
    17. I’ve got you sussed out boio. Dirty sockpuppets need exposing.

      Delete
    18. In your head only. Go back to your telly programming, foolish one.

      Delete
    19. And I’ll always be around to let everyone know of your little games.

      What a shame.

      Delete
    20. Ikky. You're talking to multiple people here, not just one, and claiming otherwise is really making you look stupid. Crying "sock puppet" won't change that.

      Peer reviewed? What article, reviewed by who, for what journal?

      And where's the specimen?

      Delete
    21. It’s gone Stuey. Your sockpuppet games are done and dusted. Nobody’s crying... Just effortlessly publishing links to your exposure.

      Oh dear... You must have a poor memory. Staying awake for three days on end worrying about monsters will do that to you. How about you refer back to your last mindbending, it’s all there. And you’ll have a specimen once someone funds the study.

      Delete
    22. Yeah, lying is beautiful, idiot.

      Delete
    23. Stuey destroyed again... There's always tomorrow Stuey LOL!

      Delete
    24. ikdummy has at various times declared that he had incontrovertible proof that I am dmaker, haints, Daniel, AC Collins, and about 20 other people.

      Once (and I kid you not), he announced that because another person and me used a dash in our comments that it was absolute proof that we were one and the same person!

      ikdummy repeatedly returns to this sad routine because he has no valid argument in favor of bigfoot. He resorts to these little games and personal attacks to divert attention away from the idiocy of his bigfoot nonsense.

      Delete
    25. ...Stuey crying in his bowl of Fruit Loops.

      Delete
    26. F-AC Sockpuppet Style Proven -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/strange-cases-of-missing-people.html?m=0

      Rape Threat Boasts With Same “>>” As Quotations -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html

      And Your Twisted “Free Speech” Sentiment linked with the above “>>” Quotation Marks -
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/bigfoot-truth-told.html

      Never gets old publishing those links. And if I have no valid argument for Bigfoot, why do you struggle every day of your life to debunk the evidence I reference? Stop crying and stamping your feet... chop, chop... You’re supposed to be an adult.

      Put your money where your mouth is.

      Delete
    27. Psycho Joe/iktomi with his fake dossier, collecting data in his imaginary struggle to prove all anonymous posters are the same person and that bigfoot is not a myth.

      Good luck, stupid!

      Delete
    28. Not all posters... just little old degenerate you.

      Deal with it punk.

      Delete
    29. I’d be angry if you debunked Bigfoot.

      Delete
    30. Peer reviewed? What article, reviewed by who, for what journal?

      And where's the specimen?

      Delete
    31. You know the article, reviewers are largely anonymous, and you know the journal.

      When someone funds a study to find one.

      Delete
    32. So there isn't an article, the "reviewers" are just more credulous fools, and if there's an actual journal, it's a made up one like Ketchum tried to run with.

      And you just keep repeating "Peer reviewed! Peer reviewed! Ikky wanna cracker! Peer reviewed!" as if it means something coming from you.

      Otherwise you'd simply post it.

      And funding a study? I WISH I got the funding bigfoot "research" gets. It's ridiculous how many different television shows have paid how much to send idiots out into the woods to "find bigfoot".

      The problem isn't that there's no funding. Bigfoot "research" gets plenty of funding. The problem is all that money is going to bigfoot believers, who are demonstrably incompetent and credulous. (Seriously, you know your little obsession / hobby has problems when Rictor Riolo is the voice of reason). Also it doesn't help that bigfoot doesn't exist.

      Delete
    33. Journal of Scienti c Exploration, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 356–374, 2016 0892-3310/16

      Sasquatch & Other Wildmen: The Search for Relict Hominoids
      Jeff Meldrum
      Idaho State University
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf

      Here we go Stuey... You’ve had it published anything you to 10 times, but I’ll play your little game. No amount of television shows that are obligated to devise entertainment that’s in line with pop culture, is an equivalent to a biological field study by professionals over a prologue period that primate studies usually demand. “Sending idiot’s into the Woods” pretty much sums up your entire knowledge of the subject; which amounts to embarrassing reality TV and cable documentaries. I’m sorry the big science words are a little over your head... but it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, no matter how many times you request a peer review source like it never happened.

      There has been not one professionally funded expedition to study these hominins in the wild. You can call all the amateur researchers everything in the world... but even by their standards they’ve managed to gather 60 years worth of evidence that consists of every type of evidence just short of type specimen... some of which is now peer reviewed. And just like your imaginary role-playing empire... “Role-players” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round... facts on the money that’s allegedly thrown at Bigfoot research would never materialise when asked to provide... because one of us has the scientific method... the other has conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories.

      And when you’ve quite finished cheering on your own comments.

      Delete
    34. Stick to Rictor reality TV Stuey... That’s your level. It’s also far more reassuring about monsters, and far less time consuming than looking for ad hominem about reviewers who are seldom known anyway.

      (Creased)

      Delete
  3. No one can convince you that your giant apemen don't exist, just like no one can convince you that all anonymous posters are not the same person.

    You're a crazy lady. Do you own a lot of cats?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m more than open to being convinced... should you debunk the evidence. Go ahead Stuey... show me the error of my ways.

      You seem like you’re really trying to convince people that you’re not sockpupetting...

      Delete
    2. Your mind was made up long ago, you don't want to be confused with the facts.

      Gee, you are constantly saying that all anonymous posters are the same person but if anyone corrects you it is deflecting from bigfoot?

      Delete
    3. Your “facts” are mere conjecture. You are too scared to respond to any scrutiny because you can’t piece together your conspiracy theories with a moment’s worth of logic. And I’m meant to be convinced by that? Is that meant to convince anyone?

      I’m not claiming that all anon posters are the same person... I’m saying you are the one troll and sockpuppet of this place. This place is dead, and you are that obsessed, plus upset about a lot of things. You always have, and I’ve read over your drivel long enough, that I can recognise your vomit piles a mile off.

      Stop crying, man up and debunk Bigfoot like your life depends upon it.

      Delete
    4. LIAR^ You have said all anon posters are the same person multiple times.

      Anyone that doesn't believe in bigfoot is all the same person in your twisted head. You couldn't get away with your lies in a real debate.

      Delete
    5. “You have said all anon posters are the same person multiple times.”

      Quote me then, crazy boy. There is one troll, there has only ever been one troll, and there will only ever be one troll.

      You.

      Delete
    6. No one will waste time creating a dossier on you, idiot.

      Delete
    7. You’re just too stupid to back up anything you say.

      Delete
    8. …says the twit who can't post an article, name peers, or mention a journal when challenged to back up his claims of "Peer reviewed! Peer reviewed! Ikky wanna cracker! Peer reviewed!"

      Delete
    9. You’re getting angrier there Stu.

      Maybe you should have bookmarked it, for each time you sober up? And peer reviewers are largely anonymous... so let’s not pretend like you know the process you’ve been demanding for 8 years.

      (Cringe)

      Delete