Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The Paul Freeman Bigfoot Video


The Paul Freeman footage has been debated heavily over the years, but no solid evidence of it being faked has ever been provided.

35 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. It's a funny video. Some idiot on here a long time ago thought it was real.

      Delete
    2. ^ they`ve been rolling in the aisles for a long time now

      Delete
    3. ^ I`ve been "rolling around" for some years now too..all the cum I`ve squeezed from my well used ring piece has been dripped into a special type of cheese making machine and there`s now enough to supply the whole village with my home-made cheese quiche slices in the bakery..there`s just a hint of brown now after processing.

      Joe.

      Delete
    4. I wonder why there`s nobody here any longer at the blogsite?

      It used to be such a friendly place with only one abusive troll called Joe Fitzperson making waves.Now it appears a dismal and very dull place where not even the trolls are consistent.

      Delete
  2. Freeman was a BS hoaxer. The Freeman footage is a BS hoax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Anonymous know it all. You should move out of your mums basement & start supporting yourself while you think you know everything. I know scary thought hahaha.. Basement dwellers are the lowest of trolls.

      Delete
  3. Casts of footprints at Freeman footage location were authenticated by PHD's lending credibility to the footage as genuine. But when I assess bigfoot evidence I always ignore the PHD experts and listen to the teenage BFE trolls. You know because annoying adolescent kids know everything. Good point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Footers somehow forget that Freeman himself admitted to faking tracks. LOL

      Delete
    2. 8:52 That's an appeal to authority fallacy...like the doctors used to recommend smoking, they're authorities, they must be right.

      If you;re going to believe an authority, believe Paul Freeman himself who admitted faking tracks.

      Delete
    3. BS... Allow me to stoop so low as to demonstrate how. The books Bigfoot of the Blues and Walla Walla Bigfoot explain Freeman's research in the Utimala range and Mill creek water shed areas. Freeman stated he made a fake track to see if he could replicate what he was finding. What the testing showed was a manufactured track could not achieve the same kind of movement shown with flexing over rocks and curling toes into mud and sticks.

      "The biggest flap surrounded comments made by Freeman on a "Good Morning America" appearance. He acknowledged "trying to make" a set of fake footprints. Freeman explained to me as we chatted at my house before the interview that his remarks were taken out of context. He wanted to create a set of deliberate fakes for comparison purposes. He never tried to portray his fakes as anything but an experiment. But by acknowledging on camera that he had 'tried' to make fake footprints, he created a dust-up that many would seize upon to cast doubt on any and all evidence ever gather by this remarkably dedicated field researcher."
      - Tom Powell

      AND MORE BS... Allow me to again stoop so low as to demonstrate how. When YOU demand that someone present evidence for "Bigfoot" in a peer reviewed journal, who are the people that are likely to lend their opinions to that process? You are in such chronic denial that you'll contradict yourself in the most embarrassing ways. Opinions from the likes of PhD's is what makes the scientific world go around, and when the opinions of some are based of repeatable scientific evidence, then doesn't that make you look like even more of an idiot?

      A PhD following the scientific method... Would base his educated opinion on data (evidence). Very, very, basic stuff.

      Delete
    4. ^ i mustd confess to shaving my legs for that silken thigh feel that hungry vigorous men like..it seems to drive them wild too when I leave my underarm areas unshaven and when i`m too sore from rigorous shafting they use my hairy underarm as a surrogate puussy..the only downside is when the dip gets filled with hot liquidity and become stuck to the hairs..it can be a devil of a job to get rid of especially the semen smell..but hey,i like to leave my men wanting more.

      Delete
    5. ^ please come out of the closet, I can feel your anger just reading this. It's 2017, it's ok to be who you are. When one writes homoerotic comments like the above, the percentile of the commenter having had a homosexual experience increases tenfold.

      Delete
    6. ^ Oh yes yes yes..excuse me while I comport myself..as I look into the mirror I see a slight dribble of semen has dribbled down my lip and I`m about to wipe it off with a handkerchief..I do hope it doesn`t spoil the glossy lipstick as the next customer is due any moment..can you wait a moment,Joe ?

      Delete
    7. ^ ps..I`d come out of the closet if I could unwedge the door..as it is they`ve locked me in here and I`m strapped in to some kind of device where they can use me as a cum-bucket..please unwedge the door,Joe.

      Delete
    8. It's obvious you are homosexual. Why are you ashamed of yourself?

      Delete
  4. No solid evidence of it being real has ever been provided either.

    And that's where the burden of proof lies.

    The opinions of "PhDs" are just opinions, not evidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In science, the burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. Your extraordinary claim is that there is nothing to thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports, that have physical evidence to support. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof.

      To acknowledge the current state of evidence is to adhere to the idea that consistency in field biology is very likely (something we've already seen can be utterly contradictory on your part), given the tried and tested scientific methods applied. It is to open all sorts of locked doors to repressed emotions such as the fear of what's in your backyard. The boogeyman.

      "What is it that causes you to repress thoughts and feelings? According to Freud its intense anxiety, an emotional state akin to fear. There are two phases that lead a person to repression, in the primary repression phase, an infant learns that some aspects of reality are pleasant, and others are unpleasant; that some are controllable, and others not. In order to define the "self", the infant must repress the natural assumption that all things are equal. Primary repression is the process of determining what is self, what is other; what is good, and what is bad. At the end of this phase, the child can now distinguish between desires, fears, self, and others."
      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201507/the-psychology-repression

      ... It's basically why you have such an angry troll here who is in full denial about the evidence for something that can rip your head off. Powerless people crave control... And to some nerds, they think control is attained by dominating an Internet forum's comment section, by any means necessary.

      Delete
    2. ^ lots of evidence and confirmation that Iktomi is a queer I`ll warrant.

      Delete
    3. What PHD knows anything about Bigfoot Iktomi?
      None!
      You don't make a fake ANYTHING...HELLO!!!
      You never answered my question Iktomi, are you a disinformation agent, or ignorant about true field research? Seems like both!
      Great job by Kelly huh Iktomi, 7 month waste of time, AGAIN!

      Delete
    4. There goes Ikky getting things exactly backwards again.

      The extraordinary claim will always be that an 8 foot tall bipedal ape is running about the woods of North America. That is where the burden of proof lies. Not on some babble about "cultural and contemporary reports". I can find you millions of "cultural and contemporary reports" that the earth was created in seven days by a magical bearded sky daddy, but that doesn't make it, or bigfoot, real.

      Anecdotal evidence isn't.

      Delete
    5. "Your extraordinary claim is that there is nothing to thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports, that have physical evidence to support."

      Learn to read son, start with the basics before trying to tackle some scientific theory. And here in lies your burden. If all those reports didn't have the physical evidence substantiating it, then maybe your drivel would apply. The trouble is, there is 50 years' worth of that physical evidence.

      Delete
    6. Again Ikky has no clue whatsoever who he's talking to.

      And still has things exactly backwards.

      And still doesn't know what physical evidence is.

      Delete
    7. Real evidence, physical evidence, or material evidence is any material object that plays some role in the matter that gave rise to the litigation, introduced in a trial, intended to prove a fact in issue based on the object's demonstrable physical characteristics."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_evidence

      If I knocked you over the head with a footprint cast, you'd no doubt feel the physical effects of it. By that track cast, we can tell things like weight, gait, height and morphology; all physical characteristics of the creature that left it. And who are YOU talking to, your audience? I'm talking to a troll... And the only person that's got anything backwards is you and your priorities. You wanna be addressing the evidence and trying to explain it away, not simply denying it's there for fear of looking stupid.

      Delete
    8. Iktomi the fuctard of bigfootery. The video that Freeman shot is of his oldest son in a costume. It's is well know that his oldest son was with him quit often when he was out doing research. He hoaxed tracks to see how it could be done and he did the same thing with a costume. You can see his fat ass son look down at the ground to keep from falling. This video is not of a real creature.

      Delete
  5. The Freeman footage is out of focus and grainy, but from what you can see, the fur looks soooo fake.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I always liked Freeman's response, to me, it has always felt natural. The camera work is what I questioned. Especially after hearing other researchers (who knew him) saying Freeman was "extremely scared" of Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've also always liked testicles, big ones

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. ^ I`m "real" and waiting for you to caress my silken thighs with your manly tongue.

      Delete
  8. DEBUNKING THE COALITION

    The Coalition is a group started in 2011 for the purpose of moling and trolling the Facebook. Bigfoot Community. They hide behind the Bluff Creek Conspiracy, which has some merit if they weren't involved in their troll conspiracy.

    Debunking their claims:

    They claim they identified a Humbolt Pine martin, an endangered species by trail camera. First failure is that there is no DNA confirmation of the species. The second fail is the Humboldt Pine Martin is listed as Of Concern, not endangered by the government. It's a manipulation of data to enhance the project.

    They claim they found the historical PGF site, but offer no confirmable proof. We are supposed to take their word for it. No evidence, no confirmation. Also this does nothing to advance Bigfoot Research since theres been no activity out of there, if it is there, in several decades. It's another attempt to enhance reputation.

    They claim they outed SOHA from Matthew Johnson. What they actually did was cyberstalk and troll him for two years, and then conspire to commit a hoax at SOHA. There was a plan to discredit the Olympic Project in the mix as well. The geologist, the one actual scientist in the Bluff Creek Consipracy has had issues with the Olympic Project and saw a chance to discredit them. That and one of the Coalition admins is the actual SOHA hoaxer.

    They also pick on a sixteen year old Austrailian kid over a cougar track. That's pretty lame.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Steven is on his 7th or 8th fabricated cover up story for his planting bigfoot evidence hoax scandal. My favorite version is one of the 1st Jamie Wayne was drunk and mis-spoke. Funny thing is there are only two people in this world that blurt the truth all of the time. That is children & drunk people. Because Jamie was drunk when he admitted this planned hoax to Stacy we know Jamie was telling the truth as he knew it. And since then Steven has fabricated many stories to try and cover it up or to distance himself from it. Not the 1st or last time Steven has fabricated stories either. He fabricated a bigfoot experience for television & he fabricated a marten story for the newspaper. If Jamie's admission had been an isolated incident then yes we would accept at least one or two of Stevens different explanations of his role in this bigfoot hoax he was planning. But given the track record of fabricating stories for personal gain. We have to believe drunk Jamie Wayne at the time of his confession

    ReplyDelete