Bigfoot On Thermal Video
A man-like object is captured on thermal video deep in the woods. Is it bigfoot? The team tries to figure it out.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Is there a Dr in the house?
ReplyDeleteYes Dr Squatch what seems to be the problem ?
ReplyDeleteWhat is this? Some blog about some creature called bigfoot? And some story about some thing called bigfoot caught on some thing called thermal video? And some comments that I don't understand? More liberal propaganda from the lame stream media. I'm not interested. Done.
ReplyDeleteYou've been around for at least 5 YEARS. Whatta baffoon!
Delete^ Jotomi in anon mode.
DeleteThe very thought makes sets your heart aflutter doesn't it.
DeleteThat image is of a tree morphing into a bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteFake news ...?
ReplyDeleteThermal imaging will never prove the existence of bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteThermal imaging bigfoot BS is easier to fake than regular video.
I think thermal actually terrifies you and you NEED to convince people of that. You say the exact same drivel every time a thermal video comes pops up.!When you have a thermal hit of a sibkecybin the height ranges that have already been documented (Browns 8.5 feet, Cutino 7 feet x 2), then there is nothing that can really be faked about it.
DeleteYou can't pick them up on thermal, or there would be thousands of video's of them, not TWO! Brown & Cutting lack repeatable evidence, if their thermal video's were real, they would a ton of it, and they NOTHING!
DeleteDS... Are you aware of how difficult it is to film an deer at night? That's just two thermal hits I referenced because he height ranges put the two sources out of the likelihood of any hoax. There's a lot more.
DeleteWhat scientifically repeatable evidence do you have?
Oh, and by the way... Bart Cutino had physical evidence to support that thermal.
DeleteYou don't have ANY evidence whatsoever Iktomi, don't even patronize me with your ignorance! Check my playlist and see the overwhelming repeatable evidence I have of MULTIPLE SPECIES!
DeleteIt's beyond easy to film a deer at night, what are talking about?
Cutino does not have Physical proof, and if he did, he would TONS MORE OF IT! He has nothing...WHAT WAS THAT LIKE 10+ years ago...C'MON!
The researchers you hate on have things like documented track impressions to support their findings. DS, the only thing that separates me and you, is you've snapped photos and pointed to "subjects" in them that are dubious at best. Maybe this is why you're so angry all the time?
DeleteI have the best pics on planet, and for you to even question one of them, tells me so much about you! You just keep following these other idiots who don't research, and have their information from pep people like me, who do all the work!
DeleteI'm angry because you're totally clueless! You think I'm dishonest or something? You think I scout everyday for nothing?
I have the best pics on planet, and for you to even question one of them, tells me so much about you! You just keep following these other idiots who don't research, and have their information from pep people like me, who do all the work!
DeleteI'm angry because you're totally clueless! You think I'm dishonest or something? You think I scout everyday for nothing?