M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
"VegasthedogWednesday, July 2, 2014 at 6:24:00 AM PDT
ReplyDeleteI was just like a lot of you on here, I didn't believe in Bigfoot (only difference is I would bad mouth those that believe). Then one day while bow hunting I have an encounter. I promise you Bigfoot is real, that or someone had a pet gorilla that they taught to walk on two legs had gotten loose that day. Ever since that time, not only do I believe, but I am attempting to prove they exist"
Did you prove it yet vegas?
Hows your head injury 6:24?
DeleteBigfoot is bulls1t
DeleteI saw one in the 70's they're real!
ReplyDelete