The latest bigfoot image to hit the Internet has worked its way to Parabreakdown. Have a look and see what he thinks about this photo of a possible bigfoot in Pennsylvania.
All modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
It's not bigfoot because his flying dinosaur and dogman aren't with him. :)
ReplyDeleteDazz
Nice bear ass... expert bobo...
ReplyDeleteNothing.
don`t say you expected anything else
DeleteAgain I ask: Where is the video?
ReplyDeleteAll modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Nothing less that a specimen will suffice.