New Breakdown Video Finding Bigfoot Bobo Pennsylvania Bigfoot Photo
The latest bigfoot image to hit the Internet has worked its way to Parabreakdown. Have a look and see what he thinks about this photo of a possible bigfoot in Pennsylvania.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
It's not bigfoot because his flying dinosaur and dogman aren't with him. :)
ReplyDeleteDazz
Nice bear ass... expert bobo...
ReplyDeleteNothing.
don`t say you expected anything else
DeleteAgain I ask: Where is the video?
ReplyDeleteAll modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Nothing less that a specimen will suffice.