The latest bigfoot image to hit the Internet has worked its way to Parabreakdown. Have a look and see what he thinks about this photo of a possible bigfoot in Pennsylvania.
All modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Adam Davies visits Dr. Johnson at the SOHA base camp, and tries a new experiment to test the relationship Dr. Johnson has with his bigfoot friends. But how did it turn out?
This photograph was first shown at a Bigfoot conference in Washington over the weekend where witnesses were blown away. While we're currently seeking permission to post the screengrab here, we'll provide the link to the image on Facebook for now. The image is just a snapshot of a 5 minute-long footage of a Bigfoot caught on thermal. Washington Bigfoot researcher Derek Randles explains the image:
Here's the latest update from Stacy Brown Jr. from the mine shafts in Hellen Georgia: Stacy Brown Sr. and Jr. stumble upon a very odd spot in the woods behind the cabin.
It's not bigfoot because his flying dinosaur and dogman aren't with him. :)
ReplyDeleteDazz
Nice bear ass... expert bobo...
ReplyDeleteNothing.
don`t say you expected anything else
DeleteAgain I ask: Where is the video?
ReplyDeleteAll modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Nothing less that a specimen will suffice.