The latest bigfoot image to hit the Internet has worked its way to Parabreakdown. Have a look and see what he thinks about this photo of a possible bigfoot in Pennsylvania.
All modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
It's not bigfoot because his flying dinosaur and dogman aren't with him. :)
ReplyDeleteDazz
Nice bear ass... expert bobo...
ReplyDeleteNothing.
don`t say you expected anything else
DeleteAgain I ask: Where is the video?
ReplyDeleteAll modern trail cameras can take video, and with extremely high capacity camera cards so cheap and plentiful, there's no reason not to. At the bare minimum most cameras take multiple images for every motion detection event.
So where are the other images for this supposed "bigfoot"? Why haven't they been released?
Because additional images or video would clearly show this is nothing more than a bear. The person submitting this image knew that, and so cherry picked this one image that looks the most ambiguous (though still obviously a bear) out of the lot to submit as "evidence" of bigfoot.
This is why images, especially single images, are not evidence. They are worthless.
Nothing less that a specimen will suffice.