Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Skeptical Hunter Has Run In With Bigfoot


From Bigfoot Eyewitness Radio:

Tonight's guest, Mark Blankenship, used to think Sasquatch didn't exist. That all changed one day when Mark and a friend were scouting for hunting season. Little did Mark know, that wasn't going to be his last run-in with a Sasquatch either. A much more intense encounter was yet to come.

Click here to listen

44 comments:

  1. Come little children ill take you away. Into a land of enchantment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Stop it joe ! "we" all know its you!!

      Delete
    2. " A much more intense encounter was yet to come."

      Ohhh I do hope so - shiver shiver thrill

      Joe

      Delete
  2. http://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/cryptomundian-refutes-dr-squatch/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NO WAY HOR HAY (jeorge in espanola).!!!

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. KAUPE I'll meet you in the park behind the men's toilets

      Delete
    2. Yet you felt compelled to comment four times. Your jealousy has become unhealthy DS.

      Delete
  4. The dermal ridges prove FART BELCH GLUG GLURG FART BELCH BURP GLUG GLURG also Khat says CRAPTURD LATRINE FART BELCH GLUG GLURG FART BELCH

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have always wondered if such programs as Bgfoot Eyewitness, Sasquatch Chronicles, Bigfoot Outlaws, Benton Sawin Mysteries, Dark Waters - Never Heard Bigfoot Stories, Kentucky Outlaw, My Crypto World, Coast To Coast and probably a dozen more I have omitted have done to advance belief in the existence of Sasquatch? It boggles the mind that if all these accounts are true how Bigfoot has managed to escape detection by now. Obviously all the stories could not account for one type of creature as the descriptions and characteristics differ greatly in many cases. I would be curious to know if the true believers here put much stock in these stories or hold one of these sites above the others as being more believable. Do any one here actually listen to these shows from start to finish?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not lonely just curious.

      Troll??? LOL - well, if you say so.

      Delete
    2. It's ironic Curious, that you comment on how many countless encounters have occurred, yet Bigfoot have evaded detection. I believe your bias has distorted your perspective.

      Delete
    3. Bias? Is that statement not a fact?

      Delete
    4. That statement is a contradiction.

      Delete
    5. Ah - I see what you are getting at. Well in my dictionary detection is described as the act of finding out or the FACT of being found out and discovery of something hidden or obscure. It is a fact that Bigfoot is not recognized as being discovered so I do not think that is a contradiction at all.

      Care to take a shot at the main subject of radio programs?

      Delete
    6. You can go ahead and let the tens of thousands of eyewitnesses know that their experiences are not factual if that makes you feel better.

      Delete
    7. I can't say it makes me feel better but I CAN say these "tens of thousands" eyewitness reports have done nothing to prove the existence of Bigfoot. I CAN say not all of these "tens of thousands" eyewitness reports can possibly be true. I CAN say that relating a story of an encounter that happened years ago without any evidence of it happening does little to install confidence that Bigfoot might actually exist.

      So you believe all these stories on the programs mentioned?

      Delete
    8. It only takes one. From that perspective, the mathematical odds become at the very least "curious".

      Delete
    9. Of course there are many real stories but many are fabrications,purely orientated by cash.

      Delete
    10. On that point we can agree 12:27. With the same reasoning all we need is one body. It truly is curious.

      Delete
    11. Hey Curious, Don't let these,,
      "JOKERS" influence your questions. As I for one enjoy you thoughts,questions,and CLASS!!
      I gotta go, otherwise I would like to Ponder some of your question's an answers.

      AC collins

      Delete
  6. Cryptomundian PhotoExpert takes Dr. Squatch to task on Bigfoot sign (tree twists, tree breaks, stick structures, blue bag markers, etc,).

    This guy and his explanations are so far off base that he should not be called Dr. Squatch but Dr. Squat!

    First of all, during the video, we the viewers see all these old broken trees and some newly broken trees. We also see quite a bit of mud. The ground is so saturated, we actually see the landscape dotted with little pools of water. But what we do no see are any Bigfoot prints. Not a single one! Because of the amount of mud and water still there, the most logical explanation is that a pretty sizable storm recently rolled through the area with some force. That would account for the freshly broken tree limbs scattered about. Proof of that happening are the broken tree limbs, the mud, the pools of water, etc.That is the most logical explanation for any rationale human being. But not for this guy! He states it must be a Sasquatch. Then where sir are the footprints? All that mud and not one single Bigfoot print. Explain that! I can, a storm passed through and the evidence confirms that. Your lack of footprint evidence proves it was not a Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Secondly, the plastic bags are not markers of any kind. I have seen this hundreds of time. Newton states that an object in motion will tend to stay in motion, until acted upon by an outside force. As the wind blew the bags around, they were stopped by the outside force of the rough bark of those twigs sticking out. Wind follows patterns. So we would expect to find several plastic bags in the same area. They were not placed there by Bigfoot!

    Thirdly, I thought Bigfoots were secretive and shied away from human contact. So why would a Bigfoot show up at that location. That area has such a heavy human presence that the sound of the cars whizzing buy actually interfered with your video. For goodness sake, you filmed a steady stream of them passing by. Not a good place for a Bigfoot or human to cross. But you ignored that fact and started saying some dead branch was a marker for Bigfoot to cross there. If Bigfoot exists, the creature would be more intelligent than to tell other Bigfoots to cross a busy road and mark that crossing. Ridiculous!

    Fourthly, everywhere you panned your camera, there was a building or man made structure in the background. Why would Bigfoots gather and lay markers in such a heavily populated area? Not typical Bigfoot behavior for a Bigfoot, Dr. Squat!

    Fifthly, I noticed some mesh logs laid about. How did they get there Dr. Squat? It would take many grown men to bring those in. But they were not carried there by any group of men. They certainly were not laid there by a Bigfoot. They were brought in by maybe a couple of men. And they brought them in on a tractor! You know, the kind they use to cut a field of grass. In fact, probably a tractor very similar to the one used to cut the baseball field we see in the background that you point out. The cutting blade on the tractor was raised a couple of inches to clear the ground, the mesh laid across that and then brought there and laid down. The raised cutting blade was responsible for knocking down or bending those hundreds of pieces of grass. One Bigfoot did not do that! Nor did a troop of Bigfoots. This was done on a dry or drier day so the tractor did not get caught up in the mud. That is why you see no tractor tread marks. And that is the same reason you inexplicably see no Bigfoot prints. That’s because Bigfoot did not do this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. But Dr. Squat, you certainly use Bigfoot being responsible for every natural occurrence you see. Even if the facts contradict your belief, you give credit to Bigfoot. Ever wonder why your secretly hidden camera in that mesh, never captured any Bigfoot activity? Because Bigfoot can not be attributed to these naturally occurring or man made happenings. Only a BELIEVER would jump to such ludicrous conclusions.

    I give you obvious answers but you are in denial because they go against your predetermined beliefs. My observations confirm the facts at hand. You provide no evidence of Bigfoot involvement and provide no data or evidence to contradict your belief, I mean theory. No, I was right the first time–your belief!

    Thomas Steenburg is correct! You are wrong! And the evidence is clear. My explanation accounts for what we see. For your explanation to be correct, we would have to believe that Bigfoot is not a secretive animal that avoids humans but seeks them out actively. We would have to believe that Bigfoot is as light as a feather and that while it is tearing down fresh tree limbs, that same body mass does not leave one print in all that mud and saturated earth. We would have to believe that Bigfoot wants other Bigfoots to put their lives in jeopardy and marks a pathway to cross a super busy road.

    Your theory contradicts everything that is reported about Bigfoot. You are simply wrong. You are incorrect. Logical explanations support everything we see in your video. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And you have provided none to back up your claims. That is because your claims are biased and that of a believer. I bet you could attribute a pebble in the field being placed there by Bigfoot. LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cryptomundian photo expert can't even debunk ONE of my pics, LOL!

      Article is from 2015, I give the idiot (Craig Woolheater) credit for the futile attempt, but since last year, now HUNDREDS of pics, yeah, Craig, you really look stupid!
      Not to mention I emailed him, asking what proof will be shown this year at the Texas Bigfoot convention....Yep, you guessed it, another convention of idiots, with ZERO proof!

      Delete
    2. Sorry, you were actually just completely debunked, this makes you a liar,so much for your holier than though Christian act

      Delete
    3. LOL!
      Hundreds of pics and he can't debunk a single one! This yo-yo has never been in the woods much like yourself!
      He's also sticking up for Thomas Steenberg, who has ZERO evidence!
      HILARIOUS!

      Everyone knows you're jealous of me fake Zaskey!

      Delete
    4. Can you read stupid, the breakdown of your video was complete, no footprints on wet ground retard, why?It's completely obvious you never went into the woods on this one either, REAL BIGFOOT EVIDENCE AT CRYPTOREALITY.US FOLKS,NOTHING TO SEE ON DR DUMBASS' SITE

      Delete
    5. What an addled mental case, always asking for people to prove him wrong so when they do he cries like a stupid bitch, CRYPTOREALITY.US, REAL EVIDENCE, REAL BIGFOOT, SEE THE FACES I DON'T HAVE TO DRAW ONTO THE FREAKING PICTURES

      Delete
    6. Ouch.

      Case closed on Dr. Squat.

      Delete
    7. ^ GNERK GNEERK GNEE GNEE GEEORRRRCHHHH.

      Jeorg Juicer

      Delete
    8. How many times do you think it rained, since the tree was down??? WOW, HOW REALLY DUMB ARE YOU?

      Crypto Photo Expert.............How many pics of mine has he debunked>?

      YES, YOU REALLY ARE THAT STUPID........AND JEALOUS.........I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    9. Shut up you stupid bitch,REAL BIGFOOT EVIDENCE, ACTUAL FACES NOT BLURRED CRAP WITH LAME ASS EXCUSES WHY IT'S BLURRY

      Delete
  9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htJN-1RGMi0

    ReplyDelete