Bigfoot Hoaxing 101
Think it's difficult to hoax bigfoot tracks. This video shows you how, and with some time you could easily perfect the method and fool most people.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
lol at that picture of the "trackway".
ReplyDeleteGood one.
"""" NO WONDER THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNNITY DOES NOT TAKE US SQUATCHER'S SERIOUSLY""""!!!
Deletemy farts no longer make noise!!!! , :' -(
Art Bell Radio - 🙈 Bigfoot Hunters 🙊- The First "Bugs" Interview 🔫
DeleteDUDE.....
Anyone who believes in bigfoot is a looney toon
ReplyDelete^ anyone who wastes his time on a site on a subject they don't believe in is far more insane than those who believe in bigfoot. is your xbox broken or do you just have no life ?
DeleteJoe
^ corr futt me dass a bit stwong ain it me ol charna corr futt me
DeleteAnyone who devotes their entire life to hating a subject that they are in denial about, is far worse than a "loony toon". There are in fact very real psychologists studying the behaviour of 4:15... People who are convinced by a level of scientific evidence for Sasquatch; not so much.
Delete^ No scientific evidence that bigfoot is real has yet been presented.
DeleteHair samples with uniform morphology are scientific evidence.
DeleteDermatoglyphics in track castings that are consistent across samples, is scientific evidence.
The lengths a crazy nerd troll with stoop just to get a bit of cyber attention, incredible.
^ The only people believe any of the "evidence" so far presented are the loons and berks..such as yourself..not one legitimate scientist states bigfoot is real.
DeleteThen you'll have no problem finding "proper scientists" to debunk their work? Should be easy... I'll wait for you to source just one.
DeleteJust to let you know, some of the very best conservationists and primatologist in the world are more than optimistic. I know there was some big words there, maybe your moma can incorporate them into your bedtime story?
This video is bloody awful !
ReplyDeleteThose tracks are obviously fake and any moron with half a brain can see that isn't even close to a real bigfoot print. Dr Meldrum would have a laughing fit is anyone showed him these tracks claiming to be real
Joe
Meldrum has been caught out with far worse prints..and you no doubt sanctioned them as being the real deal..you bloody fool.
Deletetham bigfeets reel eenough thays bein heers fer yeers
Delete4:48- you sound like a jealous fluff mate. Meldrum will run circles around you in your dreams . Next time you fall asleep pal look for the giant prints around your bed and you'll know what i'm talking about
DeleteJoe
I wonder how many primatologists, biologists and anthropologists would be "caught out" if someone was deliberately setting out to hoax them? A pretty mute argument... But that's the pseudosceptical community for ya!
Delete^ The jotomis` - still getting caught out is nothing for you to brag about - and you`ve been caught out a surprisingly large number of times - you bloody fools.
DeleteWow... That made a lot of sense.
Delete^ still getting caught out - but that is not surprising at all.
DeleteYou're a loon.
Deletesounds the loon alert !
Delete7:45 & 7:58 is off his meds again
Joe
^ hits the bottle about now
DeleteBill Brock can hunt down them bigfoots ... he will get the JOB DONE !!!
ReplyDeleteAnother NON-RESEARCHER with ZERO Evidence!
DeleteBill Brock is another JOKE!
Ridiculous, the gait & geometry has NOTHING to do with real sasquatch tracks & trackway.
ReplyDeleteHe forgot to mention the importance of forming the clay mold with your hands to make sure dermal ridges are transferred from your hands to the stompers. Just make sure to to it all random and haphazard; that's what puts the "unknown" in unknown primate species.
ReplyDeleteFigure 41. Dermal ridge experimental cast. Dr. John Bodley made this cast, which included impressions of his own skin. It was shown to various fingerprint experts, along with one of those from the Blue Mts. All five authorities immediately picked Bodley's cast as showing anatomically incorrect ridge orientations, but could find nothing wrong with the other one.
DeleteKrantz, Grover S. Bigfoot Sasquatch Evidence-The Anthropologist Speaks Out.
Canada, Hancock House Publishers Ltd, 1999, Page 82.
Pick up a book, crazy nerd.
^ only looks at the pictures of books..usually the glossy man mags are his fave but the pages get stuck together too quickly
DeleteThere you go again trying to prove a negative with a negative, Ikky.
Delete