World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
Nathan the PROPHET will lead the believers to the Bigfoot. Listen to his soothing voice full of explanation and promise. Someone you can place your hope and trust in. All you need do is believe and follow.
and make a small donation to his crowdfund to gain access to his insiders club...aka sheep
Because they don't want to be seen thats why. Maybe he needs to be more specific with terminology he uses for his google search. Thats why he hasn't seen one himself. Heres a thought...has anyone straight out asked him how many bigfeet he has ever seen?
he will be more than happy to answer any and all questions for 5.95 each
This putz thinks he is so slick. Must be related to David Koresh to have them all eating his bs. Wait for the movie folks: seige of utah sasquatch! Where they find he had baby bigfoot brides by the dozen and made all the menfolk sleep out in the bigfeet shelters he found on google.
I can't stand people like Reo, he's just another bullshitter in the long list of bullshitters in the Bigfoot world. The problem is, he will always have an audience. The gullible believers who felt Sasquatch Ontario was authentic just flock to the next guy. The next guy is Reo, for now.
(Gasp) OMG Vegas - you spoke negatively about a FELLOW BELIEVER! Why... you're...you're...a monster!They are going to kick you out of the club for that.
Let's make a video of water and pepper, INSTEAD OF GOING OUT IN FIELD AND RESEARCHING!!!!!!!WOW!
Nathan the Newbie, doesn't know squat about Bigfoot. He is living in denial of Bigfoot being paranormal, even though he has already been exposed to a lot of evidence that indicates that they are. But due to the beauty of living in denial, Nathan cherry picks what he wants to study, remember and/or just consider as evidence that just maybe, he doesn't know what the frick he is talking about. He has taken on this public persona of a know-it-all. He is too far committed now and cannot back down on the BS that he has been guessing at, but then spewing it out as fact, even though it is only his inexperienced opinion. He is also extremely adept at burying his head in the sand in regard to teachings by Sasquatch Ontario, who not only came on the scene before him, he is currently light years ahead of Nathan. Nathan hasn't come up with anything that could be considered as irrefutable proof. SO has.
Yes, he's pretty much clueless, and has ZERO EVIDENCE.No one researches more than me, and i don't see anything paranormal (you claim evidence indicates they are, WHAT EVIDENCE?......i shouldn't have any pics, if they can go through a porthole??You're off your rocker if you think Sas Ontario is Legit.....Not a single pic, cuz the bigfoot don't like it, yeah right!Got Bubba yesterday!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVbhkqI9rCI
It's not spamming, this site won't show any EVIDENCE, so i will!
It's amazing how much money can be made from a mythical creature like bigfoot.
It's amazing how much a "mythical creature" can reduce a grown man to self reassure on the internet every day of his life. The Internet doubles as cheap source of therapy I guess.
So, the big guy needs a bath?
This guy Nathan actually gets off the couch and does the hard work, sometimes hiking 5 miles off trail in areas where if nobody knows where you are, you could die of exposure just by breaking your ankle and becoming immobile. How many SAS researchers hike more than a mile from their trucks? How many even get off the couch. I recently had a medical issue that kept me in the house for 3 months. My main endeavor during this downtime? Research all the available blogs, sighting, pics, essays etc on SAS. I read hundreds of articles and reports, scrutinized dozens of pics and vids and any documentary I could find. I did this with the great intensity as there was nothing else to do besides succumbing to watching reality shows. My work paid off as I came to a conclusion I'm pretty sure about. Sadly, and to my great disappointment, my conclusion is that SAS isn't so. No big hairy guy anywhere in North America and the world for that matter. The biggest reason for my "it doesn't exist" conclusion. Many things but the one thing I noticed that tipped the scales (and so far no one has mentioned) is that SAS is not seen by minorities. Or said another way: SAS RESERACH IS THE RELM PRIMARILY OF MIDDLE AGE TO OLDER WHITE GUYS THAT ARE IN OR NEAR RETIREMENT. That simple. Or at least white guys in general.I didn't see one non white face in any video or referenced in any way. If SAS was out there, sightings would at least roughly mirror North American demographics, or at least some non whites would be talking about the subject. Next to none are. Why?Some please comment on my "findings". I'm not interested in racial slurs or pithy one liners. Someone please be serious and tell me why black people (and other non whites) don't see, talk about, blog about or take pics or vids of SAS. Statistically, there would have to be non whites in the mix somewhere, at least more than a few. I think this is solid proof that SAS is not out there, it's "in there", in the minds of all those white guys that grew up hearing about SAS from other white guys.WHAT DO TOU THINK? Please at least one intelligent answer or feedback would be appreciated!
The comments are interesting.
Interesting observation and to be honest, the only blacks that I have seen involved with the Bigfoot phenomenon was the team on the Million Dollar Bigfoot Bounty show. Seeing that you have looked at much more material than I have I will take your word that this is a rarity.I will say that I have seen videos of and heard many Native Americans make claims of sightings although I agree that white males seem to be the far prevalent group involved with this subject. I have come to the same conclusion as you as to the existence of Bigfoot and I agree that it's more of a social and psychological issue that a real flesh and blood being.
Amazing you'll take the word of someone who's "come to the same conslusion as you", Mr Curious. There in lies a curious reach in the way you think. There is a perfectly good explanation for what's been proposed. (Hint... Open the link I provided).
LOL - I had a hunch this morning that you would comment on this so I checked back. Now lktomi I have seen many times you agreeing with those here who have the most outlandish of stories so by that measure you seem to be taking their word because they support your belief in Bigfoot. This is of course human nature to side with those who believe as they do. All I stated is that the only blacks I have seen involved with the Bigfoot search is those I mentioned. If there are more than by all means link me to the videos showing such and I will admit winkylife is incorrect. I did say that I have seen many instances of Native Americans ( a minority) stating they have seen Bigfoot so I corrected him on that but apparently you did not recognize that part. I truly don't know if not having many minorities involved with Bigfoot has any significance or not but I continue to maintain it's more of a social and psychological issue than a real life being.
For someone so observant, you'd have no issue in sourcing an example of where I've agreed upon the most outlandish of stories, right? I guess it is indeed human nature to side like that... And as I've come to know well, so is repeatedly ignoring readily available data for the conclusion that this is a psychological phenomena too. One can draw upon the same trait with regards to this immediate topic. The plain and simple truth, is that a majority of people who reside in very rural areas, are white Americans and native Americans. This is factual, Mr Curious. Also... The point of me bringing up those two instances of African Americans going on expeditions and having experiences, was to show that if someone actually knows people who conduct research (actually knows what they're talking about), they'd know that what you're endorsing is in fact a serious misconception.
I think "endorsing" is an inappropriate word to use as I was merely commenting on an observation that I could not dispute. I too, have not seen many blacks in the US involved with Bigfoot and I have since noted your explanation.As for sourcing examples where you have agreed with outlandish stories, the first things that comes to mind was a while back when I questioned Khat Hansen on the purported Bigfoot skulls she claimed to have seen. When I have time I will have to go back and look but I seem to remember you took no issue and didn't ask for proof of that. I stop commenting with her when it became clear to me she wasn't going to do anything to show proof of such. You do realize of course that by providing such would completely seal your argument that such exists. In conclusion, you may not clearly agree with the outlandish stories but you sure don't question them as well. You appear to be educated and sensible - surely you cannot accept most of the crazy things we read on this site such as portals, mindspeak, blue bags, Nephilim and crazy pictures? I will entertain some of your arguments however when you stay silent and appear to accept these type of things I must part complete company with you.
I've actually been meaning to speak to Khat about that skull, thank you for reminding me. Though I think the world of what I know of Khat, I think you'll be hard pressed to find where I've jumped in with two feet regarding that. I don't endorse all the latter things you've listed, and you won't ever find me doing so. I do however I do find remote viewing and psychic ability fascinating and feel that the scientific research invested in this telling of a very real phenomena.Laters, Curious.
Oh yeah, and the fact that REO speaks the queen's English well, can pronounce words without an accent, is fit, healthy and has a jaw line that could cut glass, all contribute to his likability. The other guys out there doung blogs at least have a way to go to rise to REO's level!
I really think the guys bashing him here either think the whole topic is a joke or they have a form of REO penis envy.
This comment has been removed by the author.