Saturday, July 30, 2016

You've Been Invited To Go See Bigfoot


Bigfooter Nathan Reo of Utah has extended an open invite to anyone who would like to join him, as he leads you directly to some bigfoot habitats in his area. All you have to do is show up.


39 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. If Bigfoot are every where as Reo suggests then where is Nathan Reo's clear photos & videos of them? Guess those are much tougher to hoax than the 157 post production placed audios of what he says is bigfoot vocalizing & wood knocking in his hoaxed monument video. He is a scam artist & if he is willing to fake audios in a video he is certainly capable of hoaxing anything to drum up more donations for his scam.

      Delete
    2. YOU ARE CORRECT SIR!

      Delete
    3. Wait.

      He added woodknocks? Can you prove that? If someone added woodknocks to their video and it can be proved then it to be regarded as hoaxing. Fake is fake regardless of whether it is audio or video.

      If you don't have the actual recorded audio then the only acceptable alternative is to have no audio track or maybe just 1970s style porn music in keeping with serious science.

      Show me the original audio with no woodknocks or otherwise prove it was added.

      Delete
    4. Redit proved Reo was recording in mono, every time he had a bigfoot style audio like wood knock or vocalization it switched to stereo. Suggesting he added this in post production editing. When Reo was confronted with being caught, all hell broke lose. He made all of his videos private he his away the monument video with the 157 hoaxed audios and then when he finally got his wits about him. He slowly started going public with certain videos and making his nieve' following pay to have access to his monument video. He then stated the reason it was in stereo in those sections is because he enhanced the audio. Everybody has asked him to produce the unedited video to prove the "enhanced" audio is there. Reo refuses his only excuse is what difference does it make, everyone will still call him a hoaxer. Sorry if this guy is honest about enhancing the audio he would have no problem shutting down those that busted him placing audio into his video. He is a con artist & wont put out the raw footage because it will prove what we all know is a faked video.

      Delete
  2. I don't get it.

    All the heat and smoke this guy generates and I've yet to see a credible bigfoot image from him, y'know the kind I can post up in here pretty much daily. This was probably the best from yesterday:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/je60uei243gt8d2/big_guy.tiff?dl=0

    Ok, it ain't Patterson/Gimlin but its the best from *a single days work*. This guy has been at it for months, where are the images?

    Even Dr. Squatch can produce an image though its usually just a picture of a blue bag his nephew tied high up in a tree under duress.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Your jealousy and your panties are showing.

      Delete
    2. Nah 2:19 I always go commando when i post on blgfootevidence.blogspot.com.

      lol

      Delete
    3. If you are going to go commando, you might do a better job of wiping...that jealousy away before hand.

      Might I suggest the Cottonelle butt wipes. Don't know how they work on jealousy though.

      Delete
    4. Nothing that I can see to be jealous of.

      I've got imagery, he doesn't.

      But you get a blue plastic bag for effort.

      Delete
    5. Also jealous of DS and now using his blue bags.

      I definitely see pink panties on you this time.

      Delete
    6. Don't bother 2:16. This place is full of real idiots. Just make a youtube video.

      Showing imagery here is meaningless, most don't even look.

      Delete
    7. No worries 2:57 the idiots don't trouble me.

      After all, I'm out finding bigfoot and they aren't so I'm sort of winning right out of the gate.

      Delete
    8. Dr. Squatch I have a question. What if there no actual blue plastic bags available at the local grocery stores? Would bigfoot use the white plastic bags instead as a substitute?

      'Cause man there is a lot of white plastic bags up in the trees around here. Kinda makes you wonder if we have bigfoot lurking. I once saw a white plastic bag way way out in a remote area where it could not have gotten there by itself.

      There is one store in town that uses red plastic bags. I have not seen those out in the bigfoot zones. I suppose they would work as well as any plastic bags really. Even the black plastic bags are probably used.

      Delete
    9. Lol..in Ireland plastic bags in trees are known as witches knickers :) xx

      Delete
    10. Yes they used white ones here before we switched to blue ones....you can see the deliberate placement of blue over white here.

      Delete
    11. Deliberate? Like deliberately placed by Bigfoot?

      That is lunacy, even for a bigfoot researcher.

      Stick structures? Yeah I believe in those.

      Bigfoot raiding garbage cans? Yeah I've got a photos of that.

      Bigfoot in someone's garage? Yep, got photos of that as well.

      Bigfoot hiding in streams and rivers? I'm all over it.

      But Bigfoot placing plastic grocery bags to mark locations, mark direction etc? Absolute codswallop. Then to double down on that BS when confronted is more than a bit cray cray. Had you simply put the idea on a shelf and continued meaningful research you might have been ok. I mean, Todd Standing actually faked imagery and he is still apparently in good graces with Jeff Meldrum and the rest of the celebrity researchers.

      But you dug your heals in until everyone has become convinced you are unstable. It destroyed any interest there may have been for actual research you were doing and left you typing in all caps on an anonymous message board trying to flog that dead theory.

      That about sum it up?

      Delete
    12. And what's your channel again?

      Delete
    13. Ouch! Or in Dr. Squatch's case OUCH!!!

      Delete
    14. And that picture of a log you posted earlier is going to require some red circles and a couple of arrows because I don't see sh.it.

      Delete
    15. My gf sees bigfoot in that photo. I see some deadfall and some indistinct dark objects. Rocks maybe. They guy that sees rock hyrax in there is on acid.

      Delete
    16. Better call in Kelly Shaw! I'm sure he would get to the bottom of it.

      Delete
    17. Kelly will submit his own pub.ic hair and it will come back as partial human.

      Delete
  3. Those are bears 2:16.

    You've discovered... bears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You say its bears every time. Even if there is no bigfoot image you say its a bear. It could be a picture of a train and you would post something about bears.

      Those are no bears. They look like a pack of rock hyrax. Is that photo taken in the high Sierras?

      Give the bears thing a rest please.

      Delete
    2. Wait rock what? Are you serious?

      The photo looks like a shrubbery. You folks need psychological help and a Vision Care Plan.

      Delete
    3. I see a fallen tree and about 20 previously unknown archaic humans including a huge one with a face as tall as a man with eyeballs about 10-12 inches diameter. Obvious photoshopping.

      Rock Hyrax come from South Africa you ninny!

      Delete
  4. Iktomi, why aren't you going? Oh, I see. If your delusions are shattered, you may go over the edge and require institutionalization. Plus, there isn't enough change under the cushions of Mum's sofa to spring for airfare. Good points.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haints you hater why dont you put your money where your mouth is, of course not you wouldn't want to come out from under your bridge for all to see the Troll that you are.

      A true skeptic would give anything to see if there is evidence and if there wasn't any truth to it then they would have strength to criticize.

      Delete
    2. Well said 4:26. Haints is bitter he put all his faith in Biscuit and was let down. Now he just hates everyone.

      Delete
    3. I've searched places alone and with a number of groups, from the Everglades and Big Cypress to Four Corners. I've seen nothing. Produce some credible evidence or SFTU.

      Delete
    4. Searching from your vehicle doesn't count Haints.

      Delete
    5. You've seen nothing haints because you are a blind idiot.

      Delete
  5. Interesting. I would certainly go if I lived nearby (short notice for those who would have liked to participate) - not that I believe in Bigfoot but merely to watch all the interaction between the participants and to see for myself what they may claim as evidence. He seems very sure and confident with what he states - almost suspiciously so for someone who claims he has never been to those areas. I take it he is aware of these small ponds up there because he has spotted them on Goggle Earth? One question I do have that being so close to inhabited areas is this an area that is frequented by hunters during hunting seasons? If so I would certainly expect makeshift binds, bent trees marking an area and even bones left by field-dressed remains of game. Now I will make two predictions (1) they will find "evidence" and we will hear about it and (2) nothing will come from it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He sounds sure and confident of what he says because that is the why they call them "confidence men".

      Eventually he will conduct paid bigfoot tours (camping) in areas he has salted with interesting stick structures etc. He'll begin to offer his videos only on a paid subscription basis like Crypto Reality just did yesterday.

      This guy seems to clash with Anthony Moffet for reasons that seem obvious to me. Anthony says little but presents videos from extremely remote areas, high alpine areas that are difficult to reach. Nathan says a lot but seems to realize it is easier to produce youtube videos of himself picking spots on Google Earth than it is to get out to the locations Anthony frequents. One is a confidence man, the other a legitimate researcher.

      Delete
    2. Moffett is just a sightseer. His videos are boring as hell, and he isn't even tracking anything. He's a trail hugger.

      Delete
    3. The skeptics are comfortable with Anthony because he never finds anything.

      Delete