The other day we posted an image still from a video by Kirk Stokes showing a possible bigfoot. Now here's the video of the actual creature as it was taken. Check it out:
c'mon kirk old boy. i've seen really old vhs tapes with better quality than this rubbish, it's 2016 , get a better camera I'd be embarrassed to show this bollocks to my mates after they've had a few pints much less sober
Kirk, viewers have been telling you to get a good camera for awhile now, you could have had a lot of detail in this pic with a new camera...I hope this pic was a wake up call bro!
If he did I'm jealous. My dogs are barking at the end of the day. I don't care if it's Kate Middleton or the homeless guy with the golden voice. My feet hurt!
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
I'll be the first to say...that's pretty lame.
ReplyDeleteObvious hoax. His wife with or without a gorilla costume would be my bet.
ReplyDeleteThat's a bear
ReplyDelete'Video of a video' approach. First red flag.
ReplyDeleteMore blurry Bigfoot BS.
ReplyDeletec'mon kirk old boy. i've seen really old vhs tapes with better quality than this rubbish, it's 2016 , get a better camera
ReplyDeleteI'd be embarrassed to show this bollocks to my mates after they've had a few pints much less sober
Joe
^ Quite right ,old bean.
Deleteand i'm pretty sure it's a bear not a bigfoot.
DeleteJoe
Anywho, would any of you blokes fancy taking care of my bare arse ?
DeleteJoe
Go to bed fake Joe (and for you that is the norm) you ponderous pillock
DeleteJoe
Kirk, viewers have been telling you to get a good camera for awhile now, you could have had a lot of detail in this pic with a new camera...I hope this pic was a wake up call bro!
DeleteVHS resolution is 480. This guy's camera is 720. The problem is, it looks like he's taking a video of his camera's LCD screen.
Deletewhatever the case it looks bloody horrible . I hope it wasn't on purpose to make it seem less obvious on what it really is
DeleteJoe
Ur a nìgger.
DeleteSo does anyone believe that dr johnsons friend had an all night foot massage from a cloaked bigfoot?
ReplyDeleteIf he did I'm jealous. My dogs are barking at the end of the day. I don't care if it's Kate Middleton or the homeless guy with the golden voice. My feet hurt!
DeleteBull shizer
ReplyDeleteWhy can't someone dig up Stanley Kubrick so we can get a clear shot?
ReplyDelete