Thursday, June 16, 2016

Impressive Image Of Possible Juvenile Bigfoot Captured In Oklahoma


The persistence of Robert Dodson may have paid off. Dodson captured an image of what appears to be a bigfoot lying in the brush at his research location in Southeastern Oklahoma.

57 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. "Frankly your ideas sound like a bunch of nonsense to me, and not really worth responding to."

      Andy White, PhD Anthroplogy

      Delete
    2. Remarkable how the deniers clear out when there is some actual data on the table.

      Delete
    3. From his facebook page:

      "one of the guys took this from my video im not much on this kind of stuff my self"

      That leaves a lot of questions right now.

      Delete
    4. The only question I have is whether he's a sexy bloke!

      Joe

      Delete
  2. If that is Oklahoma,not Africa. That's a rather compelling shot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh huh

      And who's watching who ?

      Precious moment indeed

      MMC

      Delete
    2. Shut Up MMC.

      Don't you have a half breed grandchild too worry about.

      Delete
    3. Damn that's an ugly thing to say.

      Delete
    4. Stueys on the psychotropic muscle, as usual

      MMC

      Delete
    5. MMC is getting blown the f#ck out!!! And i love it!!!

      Delete
  3. Damn....it's not ONE,but TWO.Little one with momma looking right over the top of it's head.
    Look at the shape of the heads....

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's a hand visible on either side.And who was just said Robert Dodson never comes up with anything.....probably some idiot who hasn't left his room in 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to him someone came up with it from his video. That could mean several different things besides it being real.

      Delete
    2. Lol, I think a good many of DS's viewers troll him by "finding" things. I'm not saying that happened here but it would be nice to have more info other than just a photo.

      Delete
    3. I'm sure it won't be much trouble for Mr. Dodson to post the video that still was taken from with a time mark when it appears. I'll be interested in seeing that.

      Delete
    4. How could my viewers troll me by "Finding" things, when I'm the one who decides what photo's get posted, and which do not?
      Besides I put every time and date where I find a creature.

      RD needs to go back to this EXACT SPOT and re-film it, to make sure this is a legit pic.

      Delete
    5. Dr. Sasquatch, good idea, it's actually better then the crap you sling

      Delete
    6. JEALOUS DAN, HOW'S IT GOING! WHAT EVIDENCE CAN YOU BRING TO THE TABLE?

      Delete
  5. There are several juvenile bigfoot visible in this video.

    Nice work RD.

    If you see something and zoom in and let the camera collect data without moving it for a minute or so it would be much appreciated and you would get some help finding them in your videos.

    That adds Oklahoma to the list of places I've seen BF in someone's research video.

    At some point the overwhelming number of clear videos of BF will make existence basically undeniable.

    Do not, however, confuse Undeniable for Proven. The Proven category is going to require the type of evidence that is going to be very difficult to obtain. The subject may be stuck in the Undeniable category for quite some time.

    I don't see how you wade in and "secure a specimen" with an unknown number of 800+ lb adult guardians near. That could go badly real quick. No its going to be scat and hair for a very long time. Its not the type of creature that you can just dart (or shoot dead) and then drag off or approach and take samples. It is not the solitary creature that Hollywood has made it out to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here lemme fix that.

      You're an idiot Scott.

      Delete
    2. Today your butt is a little less hurt than yesterday. Eventually your butt-hurtedness will diminish until you fully regain use of your butt and learn not to stick it where it will get chewed off.

      Delete
    3. Speaking of butt's. Scott, I want you to give me the brown nose if you know what i mean. Give it to me Scott!!!

      Delete
  6. The Army sends in 12 man teams to eliminate one.That's 12 Special Forces guys armed to the teeth,with night vision and M14's.THey don't fool around with .223 for the big fella.Aparently,if you piss him off,he'll tear you to shreds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've heard you could send in all of Delta Force and still take major casualties in an attempt to just get one.

      Delete
    2. I heard they once sent Chuck Norris in after him - Norris stumbled out of the woods half conscious, badly beaten and with a sore ass.

      Delete
    3. The story is bogus and made up to begin with. But lets humor it and your statements. For an animal supposedly the size of a grizzly bear or bigger, a 223 is a horrible choice in weaponry, and proves you really don't know much about guns. The 223 is designed to be fast and accurate, but it does not have the stopping power that other larger cartriages have. So if a highly trained unit expecting to encounter a bigfoot came into an area, they would certainly have weapons suited for that. Large calibers with lots of stopping power. Not 223 (a 22 calliber load).

      Delete
    4. You misread what he wrote. He said they don't mess around using the .223. M14s use .308 rounds (which in itself is probably too light).

      If you jump on someone it's always good to make sure you read carefully what was written to begin with.

      Delete
    5. The reason the military uses the .223 is it's hyper velocity. A small package delivered in a prompt manner does the trick. There are hundred's of thousands off dead communist/terrorist/liberals who would agree.

      Delete
    6. The military stands no chance against living bigfoots. They government will only safely approach dead squatches for a number of reasons:

      1. Insane strength, speed, and telekinetic abilities. What good is trying to capture a creature that can pick you up and snap your spine like a twig? What good is shooting at a creature that can deflect the bullets with an electronic force-shield or simply stop the bullets midair with its thoughts?

      2. If you do enough online digging, you can find apocryphal stories of G-men involved in sasquatch extraction operations who were dragged through portals and never seen again. Government can't handle any more of these cases.

      3. Finally, Mount St. Helen's eruption. Noted posters like Joe and Iktomi (a few others too - sorry if I've forgotten your names) have pointed out that despite this habitat being prime bigfoot territory, no sasquatch bodies were recovered after the eruption, despite many other animal carcasses being found. They proved that government Men in Black canvassed the areas in helicopters and trucks, picking up any sasquatch bodies, swearing people to secrecy, and then returned the bodies for storage and examination (most likely with the missing giant skeleton remains, probably in Roswell).

      Military would never tango with a living bigfoot; risks aren't worth it. Best they can do is play clean-up with the bodies after a major catastrophe when the threat of a bigfoot attack is neutralized.

      Delete
  7. Paulides tells of a case when green berets involved themselves with a missing child along with the FBI. Bigfoot with something on its shoulder seen nearby. Nothing happens.
    SUPPRESSED Y'ALL! Military protecting the Bigfoots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I heard in interview of Paulides where he related that *several* missing person cases had either Rangers or Green Beret units searching but not integrated with the coordinated search effort.

      If true, that is pretty weird on its own merit because the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 prevents the use of the military "for the purpose of executing the laws" unless authorized by a special act of Congress.

      So either the searches were unrelated to a criminal act (possible, somebody goes missing and it is thought that maybe they are just lost) or its something they have received special authority from Congress for.

      Delete
    2. Possibly you mean "you're an idiot".

      Delete
  8. Hey 5:38, Can't you read? They use M-14s. An M-14 is chambered in .308 Win/7.62 Nato.It'll
    drop anything in North America,including a big
    800 lb monkey.If you actually read what I said..they don't fool around with .223 on the big fella.Maybe some night school reading classes.English 101.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol, didn't realize you replied to him. I was a little more diplomatic but you certainly have the right considering you were the OP.

      Delete
  9. The M-14 is the "velvet sledgehammer".

    ReplyDelete
  10. Looks pretty damned impressive to me. First, its not an ape because it has a hooded nose. There's obviously another one behind and to the side of it because its hand is coming up over its right shoulder. Theres another hand up in front of its face on its left side, you can see fingers.
    I've been following the work of Mark Zaskey from Crypto Reality and he's been coming up with some of the best pictures and video proof so far, but this one...this one is amazing. I think we're looking at the first good picture of an actual Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same here. Mark and Melanie showed the first one I ever saw that was convincing

      After you watch his stuff for awhile your visual cortex gets used to the different types or archetypes. Once I got used to what they looked like I could find them on my own. Finding ones that aren't featured in the video pushed me past the existence debate.

      It becomes a conservation issue at some point. Then there is the What is it?, Where are they? and How many are there? questions.

      Delete
    2. Scott me so horny, me love your man boobs long time.

      Delete
    3. OMG a bigfooter with an actual name!

      BURN HIM WITH FIRE!

      Delete
    4. Pee on me Scott!!!! Please!!!!!

      Delete
  11. I can't believe the 5th grade mentally of some of you people.

    Scott....that's what's kept me enthralled for probably 40 yrs....like you said, what are they? And more importantly, are they what we would have evolved into without some sort of intervention?

    ReplyDelete
  12. By Jove Dodson you magnificent BAS*ARD ! you've done !
    Now all you nay sayers finally have the clear photo you keep asking for and look, there are two bigfoots in the photo- an adult and a juvenile
    Case close lads. Bigfoot exists and to deny it after seeing this would be akin to denying gravity exists .
    Eat crow fellas !
    ahahaha
    Rule Britannia and Dodson !

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
  13. Really? Tell us how........

    ReplyDelete
  14. people want clear photos then when they get one they complain it looks photoshopped.
    Some people will never be satisfied and i'm going to assume their wives know that feeling all too well

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Footers pretend to have wives.

      Delete
  15. For those intereeted... clearly seen at exactly 2:40 on the video. If you dont see it your blind. Its ss clear as day.

    ReplyDelete
  16. For those intereeted... clearly seen at exactly 2:40 on the video. If you dont see it your blind. Its ss clear as day.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I found that face for Robert on June the 9th,2016. He told me that this wasn't what he was looking for.
    Herb Walker
    The Unseen World/Facebook Group

    ReplyDelete