Monday, May 2, 2016

Does Bigfoot Know What A Camera Is?


Many bigfoot researchers become frustrated by not being able to catch anything, let alone bigfoot, while it's in the act of doing something. Often times bait piles or traps are set up with cameras pointing at them, and each time the bait is taken but nothing is on the camera. How does this happen? Does bigfoot know what a camera is?


21 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. And then again maybe they really do.

      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/03/ape-millimetre-chimpanzees-smash-camera-drone-zoo

      Delete
    2. They absolutely do not. I'll entertain that they understand it's a foreign object, but if you are saying the understand what a camera is conceptually, well...it's not possible. Where would they have learned what a camera does? Are they familiar with photographs and video? Maybe they connect it with being observed, but that's not the same as knowing what a camera is, or what it's designed to do.

      Delete
  2. except BATSQUATCH is real because they live in Texas

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's odd how Bigfoot is the only fringe topic where its "skeptics" are more demented and obsessed than its "believers"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's also one of the most unbelievable fringe topics. Mindspeak to Bigfoot much while hopping through portals?

      Delete
    2. ^
      Hi ISF'er. Why are there so many pathological liars in your tiny little sub culture ?

      Delete
    3. we`re a sub section of the wider bigfoot association of liars and fantasists

      Delete
  4. Seriously, Bigfoot may be suspicious about something that is not part of his environment, but he can not know what a camera is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. False. Researchers like Dr. Melba Ketchum have documented the vast "mind-powers" of Bigfoots. This has been verified by the eyewitness testimony of other researchers like Dr. Mathew Johsnon, who reported firsthand witnessing Bigfoot using portals to cross between dimensions and the curvature of space-time.

      It is evident that Bigfoot can sense cameras, given their abilities to transmit electromagnetic fields from their minds. Therefore, a bigfoot can sense cameras with their mental infrasound, and then "pulse" the equipment with a mental electromagnetic blast to disable them or scramble the images.

      Delete
    2. Holy cow. If you ever question why society does not look at the evidence seriously, read your own comment and you will have the answer. Anecdote is not fact, and correlation does not equal causation. Practicing poor thinking skills does not help the case at all, and as long as enthusiasts like yourself keep making reference to claims that cannot be verified, from dubious sources,people will feel free to dismiss Sasquatch as a joke. Practice at least a sliver of critical thinking in support of your assertion. You would be laughed out of any college classroom.

      Delete
    3. I'm sorry, but where has all this so-called "critical thinking" got you? Oh yeah, 60+ years of grainy pictures and bear fur and we are no where closer to proving the existence of Sasquatch.

      People like YOU are close-minded and make the community look bad. Praytell, what evidence do you have that Sasquatches can't mindrape, travel between dimensions, or emit mental electromagnetic pulse bursts? Oh you can't? Well maybe you should spend less time being self righteous and moralizing, and more time keeping an open mind and listening to the EYE WITNESS testimony of those with firsthand experience of these creatures via habituation sites.

      Delete
    4. To anonymous 7:35:00 - And you, what evidence do you have that sasquatches can mandrake, travel between dimensions, or emit mental electromagnetic pulse burst ?

      Delete
    5. To anonymous 6:24:00 - You're a Trumpist no ?

      Delete
    6. Dear 7:35

      How is that moralizing? What part of what I said has anything to do with morals? I'm talking about the rules for evaluating claims, none of which you have demonstrated can be verified. You cannot make the claim someone is close minded when they do not take extravagant claims seriously. In fact, your uncritical acceptance of anecdotal reports is close minded since you refuse to entertain there might be flaws in your reasoning. Facts are not subjective. They are not open to interpretation based on your personal feelings. One fact that is not in dispute, is that you are unable to evaluate evidence without personal bias. You entertain only the data that appeals to a conclusion you have already arrived at. I'll give you one point for effort.

      Delete
    7. To Blueberry Jones 9:22, these behaviors (mindspeak, interdimensional portals, and EMP pulse bursts) have been OBSERVED first hand by habituators.

      Or are you one of the clowns who only accepts evidence that fits your own narrow preconceived notions of squatch while ignoring the evidence you don't like?

      Delete