Friday, April 8, 2016

The Squatch Detective Steve Kulls Returns To The Internet Airwaves


Steve Kulls and his co-host Chris Bennett are back at it again with Squatch Detective Radio. They can be heard each week on the Beyond Borders Paranormal Radio Network. Check it out:

Chris Bennett and I are so glad to be back on the airwaves at Beyond Borders Paranormal Radio Network. Visit our other sister shows there as well!!!

The show can be heard on Sundays 10PM EST (9CST), and accessed through the Beyond Borders website or by going to SquatchdetectiveRadio.com. The show archive page is also up and functioning where you can listen to the program replay or download it.

Our guest lineup is filling fast and we are booked until June. More guest announcements this week.

We’re also excited to be doing an “Out of the Box” show every third Sunday of the month, featuring a guest on topics other than our hairy friends.

Check out more by clicking here.

119 comments:

  1. Who does this refer to ... the US public can read the story in the news ,,, the UK can`t ...

    http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/lawyer-injunction-stopping-sun-revealing-celebrity-threesome-means-famous-can-now-use-children-stop

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ doesn`t need a drink to be a weirdo.

      What an utter wanker he is...utterly and completely.

      Delete
    2. Nor... You can do better than that, surely?

      Delete
    3. Lktomi, did you see last night where they discovered a very rare type of cricket in Africa this last week. It was thought to be extinct. Its called a "moon cricket". Check it out buddy.

      Delete
    4. Racist coward. Why don't you ever put your name to this stuff?

      Delete
    5. pee in my face..........please!!!!

      Delete
    6. Bob H passed a polygraph that he wore the suit. What other proof is needed!

      Delete
    7. "Heironimus’ results are equally problematic; McCormick (the guy who conducted his polygraph) died in 2009 and Heironimus’ attorney, Barry Woodard, did not respond to requests from another local polygraph expert for a peer review of the test results. The ‘Lie Detector’ show’s credibility also took a hit when host Ed Gelb was accused of exaggerating his own academic credentials and the show was victimized by a guest who made up a story, aced Gelb’s polygraph and then bragged about it in a magazine."

      Delete
    8. Good God joetomi....you are doing very real self harm here. This is no longer funny and certainly not healthy. Please take a break.

      Delete
    9. Keep giving me what I want, troll.

      : )

      Delete
    10. simply said GRAYS taking human subjects for use in cloning and hybrid experiments...
      GRAYS been doing it for years

      Delete
  2. Has anyone found Butchy Kid's monkey suit?

    That's right, its CGI.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      Does it burn?

      Delete
    2. Yes Iktomi it burns like hell!
      If I was a skeptic, Patty would pi ss me off to no end. She might even make me angry hahaha!

      Delete
    3. Shoulder pads, anatomically incorrect breasts, gun turret suit seperation... yup it burns

      Delete
    4. ^ I should say skeptard. Skeptic would be a compliment.

      Delete
    5. 4:17... Every single last bit of your comment has been taken apart in the following links;
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns%20&%20Meldrum%20Commentary_2013.pdf
      ... Every last thing you see on Patty, is explainable and comparable to recognised biological tissue.

      Delete
    6. 4:17

      Now how are those pendulous breasts not anatomically correct ?

      MMC

      Delete
    7. He obviously knows better than a pioneering breast reduction surgeon (second link provided).

      Delete
    8. All opinions of course. No factual proof of any of it.

      Delete
    9. Sorry... Expert opinion is what counts, unless in your world, an agenda driven unqualified opinion trumps that of course.

      The facts are in those links.

      Delete
    10. ^ not an expert

      - except at wanking

      Delete
    11. Cool lets use expert opinion. Todd disotel said he is 99.9% sure there is no bigfoot. Ouch. Oh and before you bring up that he is on meldrums bigfoot journal. Why wouldnt he be if he is interested in the topic? Doesnt mean it in anyway makes bigfoot real.

      Thats just one expert. Ill give you some more after your meltdown below. My pleasure.

      Delete
    12. Well, like all impartial science... You need people with other mindsets. That's cool... Distotell is also as good as the samples he's provided. I like him, I think he's cool... Interestingly he's not come out with anything scrutinising regarding Sykes' Zana work, and considering he's on Meldrum's editorial board he's no doubt had every opportunity to counter Loren Coleman's review of his book. However, shall we look at someone with more credentials than Disotell? Let's...

      "I am convinced that the Sasquatch exists, but whether it is all that it is cracked up to be is another matter altogether. There must be SOMETHING in north-west America that needs explaining, and that something leaves man-like footprints. The evidence I have adduced in favour of the reality of the Sasquatch is not hard evidence; few physicists, biologists or chemists would accept it, but nevertheless it IS evidence and cannot be ignored."
      John Napier MRCS, LRCP, DSC(Lond.) "Bigfoot- The Yeti and Sasquatch in Myth and Reality"- Sphere Books Ltd.

      How about we trade experts?

      : )

      Delete
    13. Hes a footer though. Dont count

      Delete
    14. No, he's not... And that sentiment is rhetorical and subject to gross ad hominem. Anyone delivering a positive stance, "doesn't count".

      Intellectual throw-back coward.

      Delete
    15. joe is getting blowm the f$ck out

      Delete
    16. crickets crickets, them crickets everywhere

      Delete
    17. How does Napier have more credentials than Disottel?

      Delete
    18. Sykes has impressive credentials and he says Patty looks like a dude in a suit.

      Delete
    19. Napier doesn't dmaker. Joe is just expanding on information and touting it like he always does. Even though most of the time he has no idea what the information means that he posts or how to interpret it.

      Delete
    20. "John Russell Napier, MRCS, LRCP, D.Sc. (1917 – 29 August 1987) was a British primatologist, paleoanthropologist, and physician, who is notable for his work with Homo habilis and OH 7,[3] as well as on human and primate hands/feet. During his life he was widely considered a leading authority on primate taxonomy,[1][4] but is perhaps most famous to the general public for his research on Bigfoot. Napier was an orthopedic surgeon at the University of London before being invited by Sir Wilfrid Le Gros Clark to join him in his paleoanthropology research.[2] Napier then dedicated his life afterward to primatology, becoming the founder of the Primate Society of Great Britain, and was among the group, with Louis Leakey and Philip Tobias, that named Homo habilis in the 1960s.[5] Napier later became Director of the Primate Biology Program at the Smithsonian Institution, where he examined the famous purported footage of Bigfoot, the Patterson–Gimlin film. After leaving the Smithsonian, Napier became a Visiting Professor of Primate Biology at Birkbeck College in London. He also served as President of Twycross Zoo in Leicestershire, England.[4]"
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Napier

      The DSc is a higher doctorate than a PhD, in England. In some other countries, they're equivalent... But what sets Napier superior to Distotell, is that he's actually looked at the physical evidence.

      Sykes is not a video analyst, a primatologist, an anthropologist or a wildlife biologist, a plastic surgeon or an SFX expert. He's a geneticist.

      Delete
    21. But he works on bigfoot stuff, so he must be pioneering and a leader in his field, right? Isn't that how it works with you?

      Delete
    22. I'll take anyone who's actually taken the time to look at the evidence than someone who hasn't, any day. That should be how everyone works.

      Delete
    23. I've looked at the evidence and I find it lacking.

      Delete
    24. Iktomi, can you list all the experts who have examined the evidence and make a conclusion that you don't agree with? Or do you just list those that draw a conclusion that you agree with?

      If you list 10 experts that you agree with and there are 90 that you don't, are you listing the 90 as well as the 10? What do you think that ratio is? 50/50?

      Delete
    25. You want me to do your job for you now? What a lazy young man you are, parents do your school home work for you much? Go find me ten in your camp... Take responsibility for your claims (and shortfalls).

      Delete
    26. Oh... And since I've already looked into your alleged "90 experts", none of them would be as remotely qualified as the experts I reference, nor are they as well informed.

      Delete
    27. Napier was one of the first notable scientists to give serious attention to the Bigfoot/Sasquatch phenomenon. His investigations included interviewing amateur investigators and purported eyewitnesses, visiting alleged Bigfoot sighting areas, studying the scant physical evidence, and screening the 1967 Patterson–Gimlin film, which he concluded was a clever hoax:

      Delete
    28. ^ interesting to see your next comment regarding how credible his opinion is.

      : )

      Delete
    29. ^ speak up laddie ,you`re beginning to mumble

      Delete
    30. This is a written medium kid, hearing voices again?

      Delete
    31. lame^ beyond belief,but its nice to see the third graders still running the show here

      MMG

      Delete
    32. Hearing voices AND pretending to be other people? Wow... Relapsed on the meds much?

      Delete
    33. ^^ this comment was for the bottom of the page for the husband crack down at 10:37
      no clue why it was posted here
      strange indeed

      MMG

      Delete
  3. Bob h is the man. Pwning footers 50 years on

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah... He can't find the way to the film site, has given three contradictory accounts of the "suit", and isn't tall enough to be the subject in the footage.

      Like... Totally.

      Delete
    2. The Bob H theory is stupid and old. Nothing on earth glides effortlessly like Patty.

      Delete
    3. Couple of pwning footers^ he even admitted it was a hoax and you still believe its real... wow

      Delete
    4. PWNED
      A corruption of the word "Owned." This originated in an online game called Warcraft, where a map designer misspelled "owned." When the computer beat a player, it was supposed to say, so-and-so "has been owned."
      Instead, it said, so-and-so "has been pwned."
      It basically means "to own" or to be dominated by an opponent or situation, especially by some god-like or computer-like force.
      "Man, I rock at my job, but I still got a bad evaluation. I was pwned."
      OR
      "That team totally pwned us."

      ... Yes, it appears 3:45 is a computer nerd who clings to old debunked hoax stories that help him sleep better at night.

      Delete
    5. Pwned footer duped by a hoaxer with an awful hoax^

      Delete
    6. Stick to your video games kid, finding a magic monkey suit certainly isn't your forte.

      Delete
    7. Not looking and neither is anyone else. It is not needed. It is a strawman. Just provide us the actual bigfoot and you win. Chop chop.

      Delete
    8. Not looking? That would be due to you being an intellectual coward. You see, we all have our burdens once we make a claim. I claim relict hominoids are real, and my burden is to support that. You claim that Patty is a monkey suit, your burden is to support that, and by every day going by that you fail... It makes my burden less.

      Get a monkey suit or stick to your video games.

      Delete
    9. You claim bigfoot exists. Your burden is to support that and by every day going by that you fail... it makes my burden less.

      Get a bigfoot or stick to your ape suits.

      Delete
    10. Bob h does it again look at these footers on damage control fu cking hilarious.

      Delete
    11. 4:42... My burden is provide evidence to support my claims. I do that daily, with science, and it's wonderful watching your meltdown trolling as a result.

      Don't like the evidence? Then that's another burden on your failure list.

      Delete
    12. Actually it's everyday that goes by is even more. Stop crying... open your eyes, open your mind.

      Delete
    13. 4:44...
      "If you look closely, Bob's profile does not match the creature at all. His stride and arms are way too short for him to be the person in the suit. Also, when he's walking, you can see that his knees (and feet) are nearly not as highly raised as the Patterson creature."
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/video-of-bob-heironimus-walking-with.html?m=0

      Delete
    14. 4:52... Stop whining, address the evidence, or you lose.

      Delete
    15. Looks like another one of them times where joe and his buddies pat each other on the back and declare victory despite producing zero actual bigfoots. Jesus the standard of acceptable evidence for you delinquents is low.

      Delete
    16. Hey kid... No monkey suit? Well then there's your "Bigfoot";
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      ... And please don't pretend like you adhere to any standards of evidence. You don't understand the big words and have too many issues with your self esteem for that to happen.

      Delete
    17. joe just got blown the f#ck out!

      Delete
    18. LOL. Joe used to say pwned all the time. Back then he used to sign each message with

      Much respect, bro.


      Yeah, you're one to talk about mature dialogue.

      Delete
    19. Iktomi, ad hominem much?

      Delete
    20. The trolls are butt hurt each and every time Iktomi schools them . Gotta love it ! funny thing is they keep coming back for more when rational people would have admitted defeat and walked away with their tail between their legs head hung low

      Joe

      Delete
    21. Joe got pwned. Drilled up the fizzychute.

      Delete
    22. DMaker... Pray tell, what made you add capitals to your name? Was it because you felt stupid and finally succumbed to the requirements of ten year old's grammar? Something about "mature dialogue"?

      You won't ever find anyone using the word "pwned", and if you do, it's taking the Mickey out of that nerd.

      Delete
    23. Every time Iktomi gets put in his place, he immediately fires back with the most inane thing.

      The butthurt runs strong in that one.

      Delete
    24. I'm sorry... I would love for you to quote the comment up top where someone has achieved just that... You people need to convince yourselves more than anyone; therapy exercise.

      Delete
    25. Your hypocrisy regarding the word "pwned". Dmaker pointed it out and you fire back with issues of capitalization. If you can't address the point, you deflect.

      Delete
    26. Here's a doozy... Source the usage of "pwned". We'll see who deflects, nerd.

      Delete
    27. Pricktomi calling someone a nerd- the irony. Get some sunshine. And a little exercise wouldn't hurt either.

      Delete
    28. 6:53

      You`ve not yet produced a shred of evidence... carry on dreaming !

      Delete
    29. Yet I can present it in this very next comment and you will continue to deny it's existence like some genuine nut job.

      Carry on praying.

      Delete
  4. Steve kulls is the man !
    Can't wait to download past episodes and listen to them !
    So excited !
    oh, and Bob H is a lying tosser
    Tiddly doo

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 7;10 says what`s up ?

      Not a lot.

      Delete
    2. Isn't it cute and adorable how he places FFS before and after each sentence? It always makes me laugh and smile. I hope he continues so we can all reply every time with...

      FFS!!!

      Delete
  5. Bigfoot is real! And toad pee causes warts!

    ReplyDelete
  6. FFS! Still to this day "the suit" has not been found or replicated, with todays technology, make up effects, CGI...The suit argument is bogus! The creature is real what it is no one knows, however the movement is fluid and can't be replicated! Produce a replica and video that exactly matches the PG film or your argument is worthless...FFS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Produce a Bigfoot. That's what really counts.

      Delete
    2. FFS! I have a size 13 does that count? mr.anonymous I hope they never produce a specimen and I hope they never find them! I'm sure as soon as they do they will go extinct...FFS!

      Delete
    3. "... I hope they never produce a specimen and I hope they never find them!"

      I'm very confident that they will never produce a specimen or find them. LOL. That's convenient for you, isn't it.

      Delete
    4. It's not convenient, that's in fact a basic conservationist approach, with too many examples to count as to reasons why. You're confident? You don't come across as too confident, having to pray to your religion every day of your life.

      Delete
    5. 8:16, you don't know me well, do you? Assume much?

      Delete
    6. Your actions speak louder than anything else pal.

      Delete
    7. If an animal has remained essentially hidden all this time, I doubt it would make a huge difference in that regard. Of course if it's out there, it probably has a low population to begin with.

      Delete
    8. FFS! @ 7:43 yes it is, that was point to begin with...hope they don't find them just let them be FFS!

      Delete
  7. Bears. It's always bears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. some times Bears like Bigfoots are just wazzock in their actions

      Delete
    2. FFS! I'm an outdoors man, I fish, hunt and bush craft on the regular...I've seen bears and they look nothing like the PG film. FFS!

      Delete
    3. I agree it doesn't look like a bear. It looks like a dude in a suit.

      Delete
    4. Lol that's hilarious,almost as funny as this xx
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFxu9dOO4zk

      Delete
    5. FFS! @ 9:32 Yep that's why it can't be reproduced today...suit argument is over and done, try again little guy :) FFS!

      Delete
    6. FFS! Thats was pretty damn funny Eva...
      Meow lady hahaha FFS!

      Delete
    7. you may possibly the creepiest dude on here...you make no sense of course it could be done today...1967 another story perhaps.oh and tell your sister to quit calling...5 bucks was all it was worth

      Delete
    8. Bigfoot. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.

      Delete
    9. FFS! Yes thats why its been done...silly little guy mr. anonymous :) I make perfect sense that why you have to result to personal insults lol! FFS!

      Delete
  8. These bigfoot "witnesses" are straight up full of sh.it. they know they didnt see an ape. Fu.cking trolls

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^
      Does your husband believe you're a Bigfoot skeptic ?

      Delete
  9. Steve Kulls has a face only a Rictor could love.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Steve Kulls is fairly anti-paranormal, so the name of the show is false advertising. Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete