Thursday, April 7, 2016

Bigfoot Expert Vardit Returns With More Sage Advice


From the youtube channel of the Crypto Blast:


Vardit, The Bigfoot Yenta, is back! And this time she helps a "distraught veterinarian in Texas", and a homicidal maniac shooting bigfoot! Vardit's Bigfoot advice is always on point.

21 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. But no bigfoot proof .

      Joe

      Delete
    2. "Proof", being a body... Does not mean there is no evidence in the line of research leading to that point. And there's plenty of evidence that large human skeletal remains have been found in the US.

      Delete
    3. ^ Don`t feed the troll.

      Delete
    4. You're right... It's just too tempting.

      Delete
    5. But this is bigfootevidence.blogspot.com not largehumanevidence.blogspot.com

      We want proof of bigfoot, not humans.

      Delete
    6. Fake Joe stars the morning by asked where the proof is . Well fake Joe- where is the monkey suit ?

      Joe

      Delete
    7. 4:07... It might be news to you, but "Bigfoot" are large, ancient humans.

      Delete
    8. Nope. That thing in the Patterson Gimlin film isn't human.

      Unless it's a man in a suit.

      Are you saying Patty is a man in a suit?

      Delete
    9. Patty has hands, feet, is bipedal, and has a human face... There is nothing in that footage that can't be attributed to anything we see in modern and ancient humans, nor primitive humans in our lineage.

      Delete
    10. Don't get so worked up. It was a hoax. Just a man in a suit.

      Delete
    11. I think you need a monkey suit for that idea, don't you?

      Delete
    12. There's not enough detail in the PG film to say what sort of face Patty has. But Patty definitely does not have a human neck. Or human feet.

      And there is enough detail in the Hoffman footage to show that that subject's ears are in the wrong place for a human, but they are exactly where expected for something else.

      Unfortunately they're also fairly close to where a gorilla mask might put them, so while the Hoffman footage is interesting, it's not proof. It's either a real bigfoot, and therefore not human, or a very clever (or very lucky) hoax showing a remarkable degree of anatomical knowledge (or dumb luck). Only an actual specimen will prove which.

      So no. Not human. What bigfoot is is pretty obvious if you know what to look for. And far far more interesting than a mere human.

      Delete
    13. "Scientists have discovered that about one in thirteen people have flexible ape-like feet. A team studied the feet of 398 visitors to the Boston Museum of Science. The results show differences in foot bone structure similar to those seen in fossils of a member of the human lineage from two million years ago. Jeremy DeSilva from Boston University and a colleague asked the museum visitors to walk barefoot and observed how they walked by using a mechanised carpet that was able to analyse several components of the foot."
      http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/06/bigfoot-trouble-mid-tarsal-break-not-indicative-of-bigfoot-anymore/

      A digitalised version of the subject in the Patterson Gimlin footage in the link below;
      https://www.sasquatchchronicles.com/this-is-a-3d-digital-image-of-patty/
      ... That is a human face.

      "Posterior from the shoulder, her scapula can be seen “winging” or becoming more prominent with the right arm swinging forwards, combined with the head turning back, away from the camera. This is a natural occurrence for the body, since the arm is attached to the triangular-shaped scapula, which is stabilized by several muscles. There is no bone-to-bone contact of the scapula/humerus unit with the rest of the body skeleton, with the exception of a small anterior pivot point provided by the clavicle. This allows for the significant mobility exhibited by the shoulder, and the protrusion of the medial border (“winging”) of the scapula. As with the above described triceps changes, this would be very difficult to replicate in a costume, and would not be a physical characteristic commonly known outside of the medical community."
      - O. Allen Guinn, III, M.D., F.A.C.S.

      HOMO Neanderthalensis were bigger than Homo Sapiens, had larger brains, more muscle mass, stronger bones and were better adapted to the cold. They were very clever hunters, weapon makers, possibly acquired language before us and had been around for 2,000 years prior to Homo Sapiens. Horses, dogs and Homo Sapiens have a nuchal ligament... Curiously chimpanzees, pigs AND NEANDERTHALS do not. Neanderthals were ancient humans that had culture, and interbred with Homo Sapiens.

      There is enough detail here to make comparative analysis;
      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
      ... And the Hoffman Bigfoot is a hoax.

      Delete
  2. This blog sucks so bad now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look, chap, bigfoot have only been in North America for 1000s of years. Mountain lions weren't discovered until 2003. The first clear photograph of a bear was 2009. Deer hadn't even been documented until the mid 1970s. Bigfoot are much bigger than all those animals so its easier for them to hide. Realistically, I'd say we should be able to get a real photo of one by 2144 and we'll be able to actually capture one by the year 3000.

      Delete
    2. Bigfoot is a large ancient human. Iktomi is a small, modern moron.

      Delete
    3. Haints has a hard-on for Iktomi!!!!!

      Delete
  3. Hi, Mrs. Iktomi Joe Yenta. Joe asked me to ask you if you will wash a pair of shorts for him. The ones he is wearing ran around the basement and made him think it was a Sasquatch.

    ReplyDelete