Scientists Weigh In On The Bigfoot Subject
Youtuber and amateur filmmaker Jed White posted this video about scientists that have taken a look at the bigfoot phenomenon. So what do scientists believe when it comes to sasquatch? Take a look:
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
First for Mike Brookreson xx
ReplyDeletesometimes BOBO looking like BIGFOOT so you thinking that's a BIGFOOT but its just BOBO
DeleteShure is BIGFOOT ans Mountain Monsters AIMS team be da 1 to trap that BIGFOOT
ReplyDeleteHope your well xx
ReplyDeleteTRUMP doing real fine , real fine , he's a WINNER ....
DeleteThat was for Mike but it can be for everyone xx
DeleteTiddly doo
Delete^ uses fart aroma aftershave
DeleteChill xx
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p8t1RlO4Ss
And scientists conclude......they never existed. AHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHA
ReplyDeleteTrapper from the AIMS Mountain Monsters team said they been tracking BIGFOOTS for years
Delete2:51... The scientists who say otherwise are the best in their respected fields. Their credentials don't lie.
Delete^ Oooh , have they got credentials ?
DeleteToo much for you to handle, for sure.
Deleteplease list all those scientists and there credentials
DeleteJohn Bindernagel PhD Courtenay BC Canada, Colin Groves PhD Australian National University Canberra Australia, Chris Loether PhD Idaho Sate University Pocatello ID, Jeffrey McNeely PhD Chief Scientist IUCN - World Conservation Union Gland Switzerland, Lyn Miles PhD University of Tennessee Chattanooga, John Mionczynski Wildlife Consultant Atlantic City WY, Anna Nekaris PhD Oxford Brooks University Oxford England, Ian Redmond OBE Conservation Consultant Manchester England, Esteban Sarmiento PhD Human Evolution Foundation East Brunswick NJ, Zhoua Guoxing PhD Beijing Museum of Natural History Beijing China... Jane Goodall, John Napier, George Schaller, Russell Mitterneier, Daris Swindler...
DeleteGo check out how many new primates have been discovered by that list... And weep.
sorry but those arent the best in there respected fields. Your just making stuff up once again to fit your agenda. try harder
DeleteWhat's a matter? Can't use the Internet for anything other than BBW? Go take a little looksy... And if you haven't the guts, at least everyone else knows you're a loser.
Delete^ had too much chili sauce in his kebab ... so excuse his bile and the farting drivel
DeleteLooks like your sauce was too rich... With that type of come back.
DeleteThis isn`t a scientists weighing in -
ReplyDeleteit`s Thinker Thunker the man of Bluster .
And we know what he`s all about,don`t we ?
HOGWASH
ReplyDeleteyoud asain da wurd Hawgwash fer shure
DeleteI'm not watching the video, as I doubt it has scientists weighing pros AND cons. If they are only looking for supporting evidence, then it's biased.
ReplyDelete"I'm not watching the video..."
DeleteCoward.
"... If they are only looking for supporting evidence, then it's biased."
Hypocrite... Ad hominem, hypocrite.
^ can`t bear to look at the video either
DeleteCoward? Really? Because I don't care about a Bigfoot video? You are a silly man.
DeleteIktomi prefers confirmation bias, don't mind him.
Delete5:27... What you don't "care" for, is the potential for a scientist t to weigh in with a positive outlook. Man up and listen to both sides of the story for once. What you scared of?
Delete5:28... Suffers from cognitive bias.
It's just not that important. For Pete's sake, it's just Bigfoot.
Delete^ Just "bigfoot"
Delete... or,it isn`t,he means !
^
DeleteThank God you showed up to set us all straight, we could have used you a few years ago!
6:21... You post your opinion, I post mine. That's how a comment section tends to work.
Delete6:29... Trying to understand you is very difficult.