Saturday, March 19, 2016

Scientists Weigh In On The Bigfoot Subject


Youtuber and amateur filmmaker Jed White posted this video about scientists that have taken a look at the bigfoot phenomenon. So what do scientists believe when it comes to sasquatch? Take a look:


33 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. sometimes BOBO looking like BIGFOOT so you thinking that's a BIGFOOT but its just BOBO

      Delete
  2. Shure is BIGFOOT ans Mountain Monsters AIMS team be da 1 to trap that BIGFOOT

    ReplyDelete
  3. Replies
    1. TRUMP doing real fine , real fine , he's a WINNER ....

      Delete
    2. That was for Mike but it can be for everyone xx

      Delete
    3. ^ uses fart aroma aftershave

      Delete
    4. Chill xx
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p8t1RlO4Ss

      Delete
  4. And scientists conclude......they never existed. AHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trapper from the AIMS Mountain Monsters team said they been tracking BIGFOOTS for years

      Delete
    2. 2:51... The scientists who say otherwise are the best in their respected fields. Their credentials don't lie.

      Delete
    3. ^ Oooh , have they got credentials ?

      Delete
    4. Too much for you to handle, for sure.

      Delete
    5. please list all those scientists and there credentials

      Delete
    6. John Bindernagel PhD Courtenay BC Canada, Colin Groves PhD Australian National University Canberra Australia, Chris Loether PhD Idaho Sate University Pocatello ID, Jeffrey McNeely PhD Chief Scientist IUCN - World Conservation Union Gland Switzerland, Lyn Miles PhD University of Tennessee Chattanooga, John Mionczynski Wildlife Consultant Atlantic City WY, Anna Nekaris PhD Oxford Brooks University Oxford England, Ian Redmond OBE Conservation Consultant Manchester England, Esteban Sarmiento PhD Human Evolution Foundation East Brunswick NJ, Zhoua Guoxing PhD Beijing Museum of Natural History Beijing China... Jane Goodall, John Napier, George Schaller, Russell Mitterneier, Daris Swindler...

      Go check out how many new primates have been discovered by that list... And weep.

      Delete
    7. sorry but those arent the best in there respected fields. Your just making stuff up once again to fit your agenda. try harder

      Delete
    8. What's a matter? Can't use the Internet for anything other than BBW? Go take a little looksy... And if you haven't the guts, at least everyone else knows you're a loser.

      Delete
    9. ^ had too much chili sauce in his kebab ... so excuse his bile and the farting drivel

      Delete
    10. Looks like your sauce was too rich... With that type of come back.

      Delete
  5. This isn`t a scientists weighing in -

    it`s Thinker Thunker the man of Bluster .

    And we know what he`s all about,don`t we ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Replies
    1. youd asain da wurd Hawgwash fer shure

      Delete
  7. I'm not watching the video, as I doubt it has scientists weighing pros AND cons. If they are only looking for supporting evidence, then it's biased.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I'm not watching the video..."

      Coward.

      "... If they are only looking for supporting evidence, then it's biased."

      Hypocrite... Ad hominem, hypocrite.

      Delete
    2. ^ can`t bear to look at the video either

      Delete
    3. Coward? Really? Because I don't care about a Bigfoot video? You are a silly man.

      Delete
    4. Iktomi prefers confirmation bias, don't mind him.

      Delete
    5. 5:27... What you don't "care" for, is the potential for a scientist t to weigh in with a positive outlook. Man up and listen to both sides of the story for once. What you scared of?

      5:28... Suffers from cognitive bias.

      Delete
    6. It's just not that important. For Pete's sake, it's just Bigfoot.

      Delete
    7. ^ Just "bigfoot"

      ... or,it isn`t,he means !

      Delete
    8. ^
      Thank God you showed up to set us all straight, we could have used you a few years ago!

      Delete
    9. 6:21... You post your opinion, I post mine. That's how a comment section tends to work.

      6:29... Trying to understand you is very difficult.

      Delete