Thursday, March 31, 2016

Is There Archaeological Evidence of Bigfoot?


A person by the name of Michael Townsend announced last year that he had found archaeological evidence of bigfoot, in the form of some teeth marks on a bone. Townsend, an accredited college instructor, offered the challenge for any scientist to refute or debunk his findings. PRetty strong claims in the scientific community.

n 2015, Mitchel Townsend was featured in an article that announced that they had found archaeological evidence of Bigfoot, the mysterious ape-man said to wander the woods in the Northwest of North America. The article “Proof of Bigfoot is in the bones, college instructor says” reported that Townsend had found stacked bones in the woods with evidence of large human bite marks, and that this was evidence for the existence of Sasquatch. At the end of the article, Townsend challenges scientists to refute their findings that the chewed bones they found are evidence for Bigfoot’s existence.

Challenge Accepted! Luckily for me, I have the wonderfully brilliant Lisa Bright as a colleague at MSU, and her research on taphonomy is cited in the Mills, Mills and Townsend study (not yet published). Today, I’ll be sharing the background and possible interpretations of what the bioarchaeology and archaeology of Bigfoot would be if there was evidence, and tomorrow Lisa will share her research and discuss the issues with the Mills et al.

To read the article, click here. 

74 comments:

  1. fake monkey suit, blown out by sykes. Poor joergy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got monkey suit?

      Coast to Coast AM March 19th 2016;
      http://youtu.be/UitNUuJsWPs
      38mins - "almost finished studying Zana's DNA."

      How's the magic airforce base?
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/top-5-incredible-stories-from-mulders_14.html?m=0

      Cookoo!!

      Delete
    2. Joe you admitted last year that you made that air force base comment anonymously. It shows how desperate and pathetic you are. Sykes is destroying bigfoot and i love it. Whats it like Joerg? Knowing that your world is crumbling as your magic monkey and its diaper are falling apart.

      Delete
    3. And serious quetion Joerg? What will you do when Zanas study comes out to be simply african american???? What will you say? Will you apologize and do an about face?

      And notice that in that C2C interview, the idea of bigfoot is pretty much debunked by Sykes. He points out more negative about the evidence than anything positive. But further more, what does Zanas study have anythign to do with his other conclusions that bigfoot doesnt exist. Thats what the evidence is saying. LOL Your tears make me happy :)

      Delete
    4. How dare you challenge me. I am Joe the almighty and I will crush you with cut n paste. Just because I'm a fat, d ickless, loser with a poo fetish doesn't mean you can challenge me. You've made me so angry I'm thinking about leaving my basement and finding Bigfoot myself. I wonder if mom can come with me and toast pop tarts and wipe my huge bottom. Look out anonymous I'm coming for you.

      Tiddly Doo my mom wipes my poo

      Joe

      Delete
    5. Patterson has been debunked so many times its ridiculous. Mark Anders is the only bigfoot I've seen that looks real.

      Delete
    6. You fellas got monkey suit ?
      didn't think so
      I see Fake Joe chimes in with his usual daily dose of bollocks . nice one fake Joe, hope you get to escape your basement soon
      Iktomi- you are wasting your time with these fools. They are just trolls come on here for no other reason than to antagonize you and nothing else. Hopefully they will leave here once the next big video game comes out

      Joe

      Delete
    7. I love it how no one responds to "Joe" as Joe. The trolls refuse to call him Joe. They just keep pounding lktomi and ignore the sick man who posts as "Joe". Or it could be another of Joetomis personalities.

      Delete
    8. ^ did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed today son ?
      i would recommend the lobotomy . it was tailor made for trolls such as yourself
      Now please bugger off !

      Joe

      Delete
    9. 12:20... Do you feel like the nutter you look now? Would you like to post the comment where I claimed that? Of course you wouldn't.

      Coast to Coast AM March 19th 2016;
      http://youtu.be/UitNUuJsWPs
      42.5mins - "I've spoken to so many people that I think they have seen something. The ones that have impressed me the most are the ones along the way you are regular people who have seen something, that's didn't want the fuss. These are the people who have convinced me it is still worth looking..."
      ... That's Sykes believing people that they have seen something.
      53mins - "So we went along there and sure enough we all heard three knocks, we all heard it and it seemed to us all that there was something living under that tree... From that moment I became convinced that there was a Sasquatch living under that tree and I could adopt the mindset of a Cryptozoologist."
      ... That's Sykes confirming his own experience. I really don't think you can spin negativity on that really.

      What's more, is that as Loren Coleman addressed in his review of Sykes' last book... His general research on the subject outside of his DNA work has been a little off. This is probably why someone like Sykes is not aware of thing like dermals, audio and thermal evidence. Most enthusiasts don't, so we'll excuse him in this respect. Sykes debunks nothing of the sort... What Sykes would achieve if he was to confirm that Zana was a relict hominid, would be showing that they survived on the planet as late as 150 years ago... Smashing apart the current understanding of hominids we've shared the planet with by many tens of thousands of years. What would 150 years be? Also... Sykes has already established in his last book that Zana's DNA is ancient, not modern and from West Africa. Apologise?? You're sounding like Danny Campbell, and you know how that turned out for him.

      12:48... The PGF has never been debunked, you'd need to find a monkey suit for that, and using Mark Anders; a master at photoshop and CGI is only reinforcing how unrealistic the PGF being a hoax is. Go get a monkey suit and stop crying EVERY day of your life. It's embarrassing for a grown man.

      Delete
    10. ^ Head full of tiddly doo.

      Delete
    11. The reason Sykes is uninterested in dermals, audio, etc is because he considers anything less than incontrovertible evidence to a pointless and tedious waste of time. He made that pretty clear. Whatever Coleman thinks is irrelevant. Dermals and audio are not incontrovertible evidence. That is why he is not interested in your fantasy games.

      Delete
    12. I don`t think the less than 100% proof made above is necessarily valid because denial from the authorities is not to be taken at face value in many instances...as I would think you very well know...so just because a thing is denounced doesn`t mean always that the denouncement is true...there are many reasons officials tell lies...and as has been postulated many times there are certain valid points as to why a denial of bigfoot could be a reality.

      Delete
    13. Where did you get the idea that ellipses can be used in place of a period? You write like Sweaty Yeti.

      This has nothing to do with denouncement. Sykes was simply saying that unless the evidence being discussed is undeniably from a bigfoot, then discussion is pointless and tedious. What is being denied? That the evidence is undeniably bigfoot in origin? That is a simple fact. All alleged bigfoot evidence could have more than one origin. That is his point.

      Delete
    14. Why does Iktomi cry more than any adult man I have ever known and yet ask other people to stop crying?

      Delete
    15. You're the only person I've ever seen crying around here. DMaker has snarky superior tantrums and you whine and cry.

      Delete
    16. Donald... You have never shown a single shred of a reason for the evidence quoted above to be denied... In fact where that evidence stands, is being presented by scientists who have yet to be countered with a scientific equivalent. Lift that burden before you make claims, it gets really boring reading it.

      Dermals that how species traits across samples is consistent scientiic evidence... The evidence that counts. Audio evidence below frequencies that normal humans cannot achieve, is not incontrovertible. Please add substance to your claims, you are with people who have read your shortcomings too many times to count.

      Delete
    17. Has Donald been into the woods himself or just base his "argument" upon statements from other people ? The weight of opinion and history is against his belief,albeit as yet unproven.

      Delete
    18. I've been to some pretty "squatchy" places. The Sierras, remote areas of Vancouver Island, and countless hours in the woods of Ontario. No bigfoots, though.

      Joe, all the evidence that you cut and paste every day is not incontrovertible. It could have origins other than bigfoot. You either understand that, or you don't. I don't really care.

      Delete
    19. Enough about this Patterson BS. The Mark Anders Texas Bigfoot is where we should be focusing our attention.

      Patterson patterned his Bigfoot costume after an illustration in True magazine. He later redrew the True magazine image in his own publication..... plagiarism! A few years later he magically filmed the same Bigfoot. He was a known Hoaxer. He even had legal trouble regarding the camera he "borrowed"!

      The Mark Anders Bigfoot shows morphology consistent with Sasquatch reported by Sasquatch eyewitnesses. Even Sykes said the Patterson is a man in a monkey suit. The more we focus on Patterson the more we in the Bigfoot community lose credibility.

      Every moment we focus on Patterson instead of Mark Anders is a moment lost.

      Delete
    20. ^ Ha haa ha lol! indeed

      ACc

      Delete
    21. Maybe you need to go a little deeper? Maybe you need to spend more time out there? It's perfectly rational to not believe in something you haven't seen yourself... Making a career out of telling people they haven't, because you haven't (and this could be attributed to something YOU are doing wrong), is ignorant.

      No... What the evidence I cut & paste shows, are species traits of a yet to be classified primate. Now that doesn't classify anything because you need a body or DNA, but what other as of yet classified primate is running around the wilderness of the US? We've had this exchange too many times to count... And there's a lot out don't appear to understand.

      Sorry for the late replies today, I'm very busy.

      Delete
    22. If you draw a Lion, and someone else draws a lion; they'll be pretty similar. The same applies to "Bigfoot". Roger Patterson was never a "known hoaxer", it's lies, and he had help from John Green as to the sightings reports in Northern California that stemmed from the end of WW2.

      Also... He forgot to return a camera because he had just filmed one of the greatest pieces of footage ever filmed. Ever forget to return those blue movies to the rental store? I'm sure you have, did that make you a bad person?

      Mark Anders' YouTube channel shows him to be an expert at CGI. You haven't shown anyone, nor will you ever show anyone evidence that Roger Pattersom hoaxed anything.

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    23. How much time have you spent in the woods of North America, Iktomi?

      Delete
    24. 7:18 .. do you mean like a total ellipse of the sun ?

      what has the moon and sun got to do with anything ,whether it is a partial or even a full ellipse of the sun ?

      Joe

      Delete
    25. The promoting of the "Mark Anders" Bigfoot in the comments is pretty transparent. A clear attempt to draw attention. And a pretty good indicator of a hoax in my estimation.

      Delete
    26. The news must be slow getting to people in the UK.

      Only the most depraved Americans believe the Patterson footage is real.

      People's attention is turning towards the Mark Anders' Bigfoot. I am particularly struck by powerful structure of the Texas Bigfoot. Maybe its smart that Anders keeps their habituation areas secret. A lot of hunters here.

      Delete
    27. The promoting of the "Patterson" Bigfoot in the comments is pretty transparent. A clear attempt to draw attention. And a pretty good indicator of a hoax in my estimation.

      Delete
    28. Just checked out Mark Anders on YouTube...strictly comedy. No one could take it seriously.

      Delete
    29. Just checked out Roger Patterson's background...pure hoaxer. No one could take him seriously.

      Delete
    30. You obviously have not taken the time to study the morphology of the Mark Anders Texas Bigfoot. Do you even live in the US?

      Delete
    31. FFS ,the Forlorn and Forgotten Schoolchild is in a temper ... having a large lettered tantrum because he feels ignored.

      Delete
    32. As far as the Patterson Film, I'm not committed one way or the other. I'm a Bigfoot agnostic. The subject interests me, that's all. Does someone have to live in the U.S. to grasp morphology? What are you even talking about? The subject of the Anders YouTube video is nicely proportioned, I'll give you that. Someone did a nice job on the suit.

      Delete
    33. I would even say the Patterson suit is good. If the film wasn't so grainy it would look downright laughable.

      As far as the Anders Bigfoot, that's living breathing Saquatch. Case closed. Thank God Mark Anders protects Sasquatch habituation sites.

      Delete
    34. Donald... None. But I'm know people who have spent more time than most.
      10:55... Ain't nothing but a troll.
      11:02... Go get a magic monkey suit.
      11:24... Troll with no monkey suit.
      12:53...
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg
      ... Nothing laughable about seeing a grown man like you behave like that. What a disappointment you must be.

      Delete
    35. The best bigfoot evidence:

      https://youtu.be/Pzpu4HlEjOU
      https://youtu.be/Eg3el8f3JnQ
      https://youtu.be/zAjAW9BKJdM
      https://youtu.be/MOx6nN4rmbw
      https://youtu.be/4MELCm0I4b0
      https://youtu.be/4qwdtUHPea8

      Delete
    36. Iktomi the loon. Patterson was a hoaxer. Joe/Iktomi has been basing her life on a hoax.

      Delete
    37. Do you got monkey suit or cgi proof? Didn't think so.

      Just because Sykes put a nail Patty's coffin doesn't mean other bigfoot aren't legit.

      Delete
    38. Yes... I provided a YouTube channel that shows the person presenting the images to be an expert at CGI.

      Did Sykes find a monkey suit?

      Delete
    39. Did Iktomi find a monkey suit?

      https://youtu.be/9XFroLxtIao

      Delete
  2. Why are there so many UK people here? They have a fantasy version of the US. Most people in the US know that Bigfoot is BS. The UK idiots think they're on to something big. Its all a hoax, you limeys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only fantasy is from people believing there's a ten thousand year old conspiracy covered by multiple cultures trying to get your money.

      Nut jobs.

      Delete
    2. Have you ever been to America? Have you ever had a bigfoot sighting? Maybe you should worry about having a shower you stinky f ucking Pom and not worry so much about a creature that doesn't exist. Poms are the worst. Just a bunch of stinky, whinging f uck sticks. Eat a d ick Itkomi/ Joe.

      Delete
    3. oh my, this lad has just lost his marbles . Do you have anything else nice to say to us today or will nothing be left of you except a pool of melted rubber by the end of the day.
      Have you ever had a bigfoot sighting ? have you ever ventured outside your basement ? have you ever kissed a girl ?
      I'm going to assume the answer to all three is no
      cheerio
      I'll save my tiddly doos for those who are more civilized

      Joe

      Delete
    4. Can you answer the question? Have you been to America? Have you had a sighting? Have you ever ventured into the forest and looked for bigfoot? Have you ever had a shower?

      Delete
    5. Oh yeah, to answer your question. Have I ever had a bigfoot sighting? Of course not you f uck head. Bigfoot doesn't exist.Your such an dumbass!!!!!!

      Delete
    6. ^ but no on the shower question

      Delete
    7. LOL looks like this guy learned the acclaimed scientific method of the Welsh.. "Prove its NOT bigfoot teethmarks!!!" And Sykes latest findings will just bring more disappointment to you all. First Ketchum, then Sykes, then Standing, then back to Ketchum, and now back to Sykes. Tell me where does the road to failure lead next?

      Delete
    8. 2:59... I have the pleasure of knowing people who have spent many decades in the wilderness of the US, people who have so much more experience than you and have seen Sasquatch multiple times.

      7:16... If a critic asserts there is no evidence, he carries his own burden and must support those ideas. If you can't, you lose... And keep praying about Sykes.

      Delete
    9. Joe is a known hoaxer for promoting Patterson. Joe is what's wrong with the bigfoot community.
      The minute you bring up Patterson you lose all credibility.

      Delete
    10. Stop crying and find a magic monkey suit... It's embarrassing for a grown man to be crying this much.

      (Cringe)

      Delete
    11. skeptics hate the PGF because they can't prove it is wrong and deep inside they probably believe it's real. Well it is real and it's up to the skeptics to prove me wrong .
      Now i can sit back and watch them fail one after another

      Joe

      Delete
    12. You sir/ma'am are a complete bigfoot zealot. so folks that have a slightly different opinion than you are either..crying,children,gamers with spare time or just idiots huh? you are the prototypical blog bully..do you post on other blogs? doubt it do you copy paste all your arguments? yes do you think sleep eat and love bfe 24/7? yes...now who needs help?..it's not to late. being passionate about the subject is wonderful but being engulfed and baited like a bluegill in a pond by every troll is just plain mental...go outside smell the flowers,get a good meal and watch the sunset.life is good don't waste it on being a bumbling buffoon on a blog

      MMG

      Delete
    13. ^ Nobody needs to prove anything to you.

      You seem to have a rather elevated sense of position that is,I can assure you,misplaced.

      Delete
    14. 10:44. Fake MMG

      I have one question for you.

      Do you buy your panties pre bunched, or is that the only kind your boyfriend buys for you ?

      Delete
    15. skeptics hate the Mark Anders Bigfoot because they can't prove it is wrong and deep inside they probably believe it's real. Well it is real and it's up to the skeptics to prove me wrong .
      Now i can sit back and watch them fail one after another

      Delete
    16. 10:44 ... he just can`t help it and bites every single time .. even going so far as to patrol old threads to see if there may be comments he feels are in some way derogatory to his perceived blog "reputation",(little realising he`s a figure of fun).

      He really is an ill person.

      Delete
    17. As far as being a US citizen, what does that have to do with anything? I myself live in Santa Cruz CA, right near the mountains. I have no problem imagining something living up north where the forests are even more dense. Especially if it's a furtive animal. Up by Mt.Shasta, the land is so vast it would be very hard to find. Does that make Bigfoot real? No, but it makes it within the realm of possibility.

      Delete
    18. Have you seen this Bigfoot in Santa Cruz:

      https://youtu.be/CniIsC80VDE

      Delete
    19. well lets see 10:46 did i ask for proof? nope. so your comment is pointless and childish. i have more than a third grade education. if that seems elevated sorry to be you. and 10:56 so i shot down your holy prophet as for what he is, so i'm gay lol. you morons show your true colors more each time you open your illiterate mouths. no retort just 2nd grade putdowns

      Delete
    20. You are a fundie cyber Nazi. You are scared of what other people think, and clearly think that comment quantity as opposed to comment quality gets you somewhere as a basis for your faith.

      The question is, how long will this meltdown last without a god damn monkey suit?

      Delete
    21. Iktomi, YOU are the cyber Nazi. You are scared that the Mark Anders Bigfoot is real, and clearly think that comment quantity as opposed to comment quality gets you somewhere as a basis for your faith.

      The question is, how long will this meltdown last without a gosh derned monkey suit?

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    22. Not so much a monkey suit... More like photoshop and CGI.

      Now your turn... Nazi boy.

      Delete
    23. uninformed speculation, Nazi trans.

      Delete
    24. https://youtu.be/9XFroLxtIao

      Delete
  3. FFS!IF IT'S FAKE WHY CAN'T IT BE REPLICATED?FFS!
    FFS!THAT'S RIGHT EVEN TODAY IT CAN'T BE.... FFS!
    FFS! YOU KNOW WHY? BECAUSE WHAT EVER IS IN THE PG VIDEO IS A REAL CREATURE! NOT A GUY IN A SUIT! IT REALLY IS AMAZING AND THE REASON WHY SO MANY BELIEVE ENJOY IT FFS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many more do NOT believe - sucker !

      Delete
    2. THE MARK ANDERS BIGFOOT CAN'T BE REPLICATED. EVEN TODAY IT CAN'T BE REPLICATED. YOU KNOW WHY? WHATEVER IS IN THAT MARK ANDERS VIDEO IS A REAL CREATURE! NOT A GUY IN A SUIT! IT REALLY IS AMAZING AND THE REASON WHY SO MANY BELIEVE ENJOY IT FFS!

      Delete
    3. I Bigfoot was captured today in Washington State. Just heard it on the news.

      Delete
  4. Oh dear FFS ,the Forlorn and Forgotten Schoolchild is having a large lettered breakdown ... a temper tantrum because he feels ignored .. but the truth is he has nothing to say and nobody is interested in him ... poor likkle Forlorn boy he is.

    ReplyDelete