Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Florida Team Sets Trap To Test A Popular Bigfoot Theory


Regardless of what science and biology tells us, a lot of bigfoot enthusiasts believe bigfoot can see into the infrared spectrum, and use this ability to avoid camera traps in the woods. The Trail To Bigfoot team is going to test this theory by setting out infrared chem lights in an area to see if the activity stops. I'm not sure how scientific this is, but it should be interesting.


44 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. That was entertaining to watch joketomi suffer a brutal beat down in the earlier thread!

      Delete
    2. He couldn't produce that facts as usual only theories.

      Delete
    3. Bollocks to you blasted bambots!

      Joe

      Delete
    4. "Science is founded on the premise that we exist in a rational reality and from this premise it follows that every scientific belief can and should be based on evidence, otherwise it is not science. To be completely clear as to what is science it can be defined in one simple sentence; science is the unbiased effort to understand reality based on the observable physical evidence."

      You must test science with science, not dismiss it because of a negative proof fallacy; it's a major slap in the face of scientific principles. To deny the evidence prevents the awkward reality of debating it, and like all good people practicing pseudoscepticism, when something's a little difficult to answer; it's time to deny there's anything to answer. Not once has there been a reason presented to not consider this frequency of evidence. I have yet to ever come across any that claim to have proof, however what is a reality is an enthusiasm for the frequency of existing data that points to something very real residing in the wilderness of the U.S. This is why people invest enthusiasm, people who aren't prepared to swallow a preference of conclusion that cannot be supported with supporting data. People who aren't seemingly bitter at the subject, because the bipedal gorilla owed to them for their time spent, didn't show... And was never likely to to either.

      Delete
    5. I'm prepared to swallow something of yours mate !

      Joe

      Delete
    6. Perfect answer! Sums up the typical mindset of what most clever people are up against.

      Thank you.

      Delete
    7. Well at least 10:54 has a minimum of 2500 comeback's to your tired 5 same old same old comeback s
      Joe.

      Delete
    8. When those five comebacks result in the same meltdown in attempting to cope with reality, I guess you would be tried on an emotional level, wouldn't you?

      Delete
    9. ^ knows all about meltdowns - he`s broken here on a daily basis and scurries off to his dark hole (prolly brown ) to wipe away his tears.

      Delete
    10. Darling... I know you NEED to inject your emotional turmoil on to other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for you to feel some kind of control or power over your own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense. But you simply don't achieve that with me... I want you to do what you're doing because I can use you as an archetype idiot for my theories. You give me what I want. When are you going to learn this?

      Delete
    11. ^ has nothing to offer aside from the futile use of deflection aids - using abuse and irrelevance to the topic he knows in his heart is a road to nowhere - bigfoot ain`t real you fool

      Delete
    12. You are nothing by a troll. You have not ever brought anything to the comment sections other than filth and lies. You are a psychopath. You can't deflect that which has not been presented.

      Delete
  2. It NOT infrared, it is electromagnetic fields they can SEE!
    http://gizmodo.com/dogs-and-certain-primates-may-be-able-to-see-magnetic-f-1760815533

    A. Non

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NO MATTER!! the trail to bullshit team shall fail as always!!!
      DA PREZ

      Delete
  3. The share your really gives us excitement. Thanks for your sharing. If you feel tired at work or study try to participate in our games to bring the most exciting feeling. Thank you!
    sword sand souls | ninjago games | hola launcher | agario | cooking fever | goodgame big farm | red ball 4 | agar io | sword sand souls game | subway surfers | paradise bay | strike force kitty 2

    ReplyDelete
  4. So we can add infrared camera traps to the list of things bigfoot "researchers" don't understand.

    Infrared camera traps don't constantly broadcast infrared light. They only flash it when taking a picture, and by then it's too late for the bigfoot to avoid them; the picture is already taken.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So how will they know if bigfoot has "avoided" the camera traps if they have no evidence of it being there in the first place ?

    Seems somewhat skewed !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wow!!!! those sure can't be hoaxed,boy sandy your the man

      Delete
    2. Ha ha ha ^ ------------lol!

      Delete
    3. 11:33... You way it up. You watch a million stupid people like you fail to explain away the multitude of evidences, and come to the only explanation that Sasquatch exists, based on the hundreds of years of reports and the physical evidence that supports it.

      It's really not that hard of a concept to fathom then.

      Delete
    4. 12:46 * You "way" it up * ?

      Those must be the literary "skills" you`re so fond of reminding other people of,in action .... EH ?

      You complete illiterate fool - each day we see you attack somebody for their incorrect spelling (words which they usually spell correctly)and we find each day your complete lack of understanding of how to use words.

      Try "weigh" ...you prick.

      Delete
    5. ^ ps ... It's really not that hard of a concept to fathom .

      You berk !

      Delete
    6. Here is your comment with corrected grammar...

      "12:46. You "way it up"?

      These must be the literary "skills" you're so fond of reminding other people of in action... Eh?

      You complete illiterate fool. Each day we see you attack somebody for their incorrect spelling (words which they usually spell correctly), and we find each day your complete lack of understanding of how to use words.

      Try "weigh"... You prick."

      The literary skills I enjoy alluding to are the big words and scienific theory that's quite beyond people like you. One day you just might grow a brain cell and address the issues you're so butthurt about. Until then, you'll have me reminding you that you're just a stupid little nobody, likely lacking self esteem, suffering on an emotional level with anger issues... Not to mention still requiring that extra hug from the boogeyman. Mommy issues are a bitch. One day you'll learn to cope with them, I'm sure.

      Delete
    7. "PS. It's really not that hard of a concept to fathom.

      You berk!"

      Christ on a bike... Someone didn't do too well in school, did they? And there is no requirement to exclude the word "then".

      Delete
    8. Someone needs to make up his mind about tracks being proof or not. First he says they are. Then he says he never said that. Now he's saying they are again.

      Delete
    9. Right on cue with the literary skills! Please... Quote me as to where in this comment section I've used the word "proof". You can't use tracks as scientific proof of something as profound as a relict caveman... But in putting it with all the other forms of evidence, you'd have to be a denialist to maintain it is ilogical to be enthusiastic towards it's existence. Allow me to demonstrate;

      Tracks = dermals = hair samples = footage = thermal = audio = Occam's Razor

      Delete
    10. Iktomi =

      3 Brit CSE`s max ( plus an "E" in Math)

      level 4`s are your qualifications at tops.

      Delete

    11. The only evidence footers can offer is tarnished.

      Hoaxes all.

      Now,there`s talk of a mind speakin` dimensional autistic runnin` around the woods ..that supposedly is the "real" nature of the animal . Noted is the fact that Dr Johnson was JoeTomi`s hero until he destroyed what little faith and credence he had left just a few sad sad days ago.

      Hahahahahahahaha ahahahahahahaha

      Delete
    12. Do us a favour and show us where this evidence is tarnished. You may have narcissistic tendencies due to your diagnosis, or you may live your life beating off and communicating through a desktop screen... But merely putting words up on a comment section doesn't prove any of your words to be true.

      I'm sorry... Did Johnson demonstrate that the physical evidence I list is bunk? Did I miss that post??

      Delete
    13. ^ His hero Dr Johnson destroyed Ikky`s belief system...like all his other heroes have either been seen to be fakers or madmen.

      What of Scott Carpenter I ask you ? He believes bigfoot is a cloaking and semi earth dwelling varmint,much given to zapping passers by with invisible waves.

      Delete
    14. Tracks = dermals = hair samples = footage = thermal = audio = Occam's Razor

      All the above are either faked or merely circumstantial - there`s nil evidence they are really evidence for bigfoot - most of the above have been shown many times to have been hoaxed by supposed esteemed "in the field" researchers - yet most have been discredited.

      Delete
    15. To hoax species traits in convincing biological dermals, one would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many on the planet do), have a lottery win's chance of faking the EXACT same biological idea decades and States apart, and then fool multiple forensic experts. Don't like it? Prove it otherwise.
      Audio recordings that became the subject of a year-long University based engineering study, with the results determined that the vocalizations were primate in origin, and that at least one of the voices exceeded normal human ranges, that the recordings were spontaneous at the time of recording with no evidence of pre-recording or re-recording at altered tape speed... Cannot be hoaxed. Don't like it? Prove it otherwise.
      Over a dozen unknown primate hair samples, verified by multiple camps of primatologists, all morphologically uniform and all effectively indistinguishable from a human hair of the particular structure, found around sightings and tracks... Cannot be faked. Don't like it? Prove it otherwise.
      Footage that has eluded all known SFX methods of the past 100 years, even by those who have won Academy Awards, cannot be hoaxed. Don't like it? Prove it otherwise.
      None of the scientists that have verified those sources have been discredited. Most have attempted to debunk the sources listed but have ended up enthusiastic about their legitimacy. Don't like it? Prove it otherwise.

      Putting things in writing doesn't make it a reality... You might have got around in life lying and being a proper little psycho. You're with people with sound mental health now, remember.

      Delete
    16. I have to interject that all those things you mentioned are open to interpretation. Most of us have read articles and comments disputing all those things you mentioned - footprints, audio recordings, hair samples, film footage and more. The evidence is in the eye of the beholder. If this evidence wasn't circumstantial then we would not be having this debate as Bigfoot would be a proven fact. I have heard for awhile now about Sykes upcoming paper and Dr. Ketchum saying she has proof coming but it still has not materialized. I think it would be wiser if they keep their mouths shut UNTIL they have this proof in hand and then present it to the world when it is ready.

      I tell you the one thing that cannot be faked or misinterpreted is a body for examination. When that day happens I will cast aside all doubt and happily admit to all that I stand corrected.

      Delete
    17. No Mr Curious. Two of those sources, the two biological are repeatably scientific. This means they are not open to interpretation. The others are easily falsifiable and stand up to those requirements... If you maintain otherwise you must demonstrate how. This is your burden. We're having this debate because there is not specimen on a laboratory slab, but that doesn't mean the aforementioned evidence doesn't exist.

      If something exists, it doesn't leave evidence. That might be difficult for some people to get their heads around, but as long as there will be people spouting ignorance about the state of evidence, then there will be others not so similarly inclined setting the record straight.

      Delete
  6. Very strange video from the forest/woods ..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYCwyO-XidU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. some comments from the parabreakdown guy too

      Delete
    2. you mean phil " snacks" poling....his word carries alot of wieght...along with his legs as well
      DA PREZ

      Delete
    3. WELL IT JUST SO HAPPENS THAT PHIL POLING IS THE BEST!! AT VIDEO ANALYSIS,, AND MATT K IS DOING A FINE JOB AS PER!!!!

      THAT BEING SAID I "as we speak" AM HARD AT WORK ERASING THE FALLACIOUS CONCEPTION THAT ALL SUPER FRIENDS ARE DULL BORING DOLTS AND OR GULLIBLE FOOL'S....

      As always.. You're Leader!!!!

      AC collins :-) :-) :-)

      Delete
    4. Thank you for the encouraging words Mr. President.

      Delete
    5. "INDEED" !!!

      :-) :-) :-) AC collins :-) :-)

      Delete
  7. Thanks for sharing your info. I really appreciate your efforts and I will be waiting for your further write
    strike force kitty 2 | strikeforce kitty 2 | strike force kitty | strike force kitty

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for the best blog. it was very useful for me.keep sharing such ideas in the future as well. Thanks for giving me the useful information. I think I need it!
    blog pinterest folkd storify scoop it reddit imgfave storify

    ReplyDelete