Monday, February 22, 2016

If Bigfoot Does These Things, They Are Way More Dangerous Than We Know


A panel of veteran bigfooters on a recent podcast discussed some very uncommon topics about the sasquatch creatures. The subjects discussed were very disturbing, and if true, might mean that bigfoot is far different than a gentle giant often thought of.


42 comments:

  1. Poor Melba K thought the gentle Sasquatch were only braiding her horses hair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi TCT

      this may sound bizzare but a lady I know who raises horses says that horses will do this to each other with their mouth and tongue. I looked on YouTube but couldn't find a thing. The "braid" in the above pic looks pretty simple and sloppy

      MMC

      Delete
    2. Hello TCT and MMC!
      Maybe they do it inadvertently while grooming each other xx

      Delete
    3. I think this should be a national holiday in every country xx

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35628239

      Delete
    4. AC COLLINS FOR PRESIDENT OF THE SUPER FRIENDS!

      Delete
    5. The Superfriends don't need a president there is no hierarchy.We exist in eternal harmony as equals xx

      Delete
    6. So I take that to mean that you support the candidacy of AC COLLINS! Thank you Eva!

      Delete
    7. Lol how did you reach that conclusion 12:48? xx

      Delete
    8. polls show Trump ahead in Nevada, Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Virginia, Oklahoma, Minnesota and Louisiana,
      ALL are BIGFOOT hot spots ....
      DUDE

      Delete
    9. Eva, AC Collins agrees with you completely in everything that you believe! So it was only natural that I assumed that you would support his candidacy!

      Delete
    10. Listen to these people and then listen to man boobs above. That dude Johnson is out of his mind! And if you listen to doc. Johnson you will be dead within a matter of time!

      Delete
  2. ans tham bigfoots eatin me chickins ans me hawgs gots to keepin me dawgs in ats nites shure do

    ReplyDelete
  3. The bigfoot has only morphed into a "gentle giant" for the same reasons other aspects of it have changed this century as well, convenience. The vast majority of Indian lore and old frontier stories paint them as an inherently violent species. Now we live in a day and age where we typically don't believe grand stories about a giant, hairy, wildman abducting our children and killing innocent people, and raping our wives, without some burden of proof beyond word of mouth. With the exception of any paranormal research that is, where word of mouth stories still carry a great deal of weight(for obvious reasons). Now we need to change the narrative of the Sasquatch to a peaceful creature who does everything it can to avoid human contact. This is to rationalize the obvious problem that one has not been caught. Its just like the belief that they are nocturnal animals. Even though a good number of sightings are during the day, we still have shifted the narrative that they are nocturnal to help explain lack of specimen. You have observable behavior that can be explained away as misidentification or hoaxes. You have thousands of folklore stories and eyewitness accounts which in the world of science means next to absolutely nothing. You supposedly have the worlds leading scientists on board not to mention an entire culture of amateur and "professional" bigfoot hunters who have yet to produce a meaningful encounter. You have a large population of hunters that now employ the use of trailcams. People claim to clearly see these things with there eyes. Can't get a definitive trailcam shot to save your lives though. My advice is shut up about any "observable" behavior of a creature that you have yet to find a specimen of. Find a specimen, let us know the "facts" after that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. F uck you!! How dare you point out the facts. I'm so angry right now. I think I'm gonna hate f uck my dog.

      Joe

      Delete
    2. ^ Dang buddy you sure are harsh on everybody. This is a blog and that means we discuss the bigfoot subject. If it bothers you so much then you should find another blog site

      And then maybe you will lighten up










      NOT !

      Delete
    3. I agree 12:49, Joe always seems to be such a negative person!

      Delete
    4. ^homoerotic obsession for Joe.

      Delete
    5. there something QUEER around here

      Delete
    6. Maybe, do you know if Joe is cute?

      Delete
    7. Are you a pitcher 1:12? Maybe we can hook up.

      Joe

      Delete
    8. 12:38... I take it that you haven't educated yourself on the subject any further than you've been advised to before you cry about people expanding your knowledge.

      I take it you've never heard of Missing 411? There are plenty of enthusiasts who abide by the theories that these creatures are not new age hippies. Have you ever heard of a show called Sasquatch Chronicles, where people would phone in on a weekly basis to tell their experiences of violent hairy bipeds? Do you know how many researchers who were interviewed on that show were attesting to these theories? Knowing your typical response to when someone addresses your naivety on the subject, your inability to take responsibility for your claims, and probable lack of educated counter claim for these reasons, you'll no doubt make accusations that people are applying excuses. The fact that people are going missing around the same landscape and circumstances, hundreds of years after Natives have told their oral histories, is very profound. And before you use the excuse that recognised animals could be at fault, there is always considerable physical evidence of such when such when it occurs, and people will almost always show up dead or alive at the hands of such animals.

      What I find slightly weird, is you even have evidence in the title of this comment section that not all people "need to change the narrative", yet you've posted a long comment like it's the case? It's odd behaviour, akin to either a chronic denialist, or someone who doesn't familiarise himself with the topic like he should. I think it's a mix of both.

      Like any indegenous peoples, they are subsceptible to temperaments. It's as simple as that.

      To dismiss all sightings by Europeans over hundreds of years as lies or missidentification, is a bigger leap of faith than anything you can shake a stick at, ESPECIALLY as there is physical evidence to support such a high frequency of sightings. Beyond this you have ORAL HISTORIES that native people adhere to that have the exact same consistency. If I'm not mistaken, their is a whole field of science that analysis such data (anthropology)? And what alleged lack of meaningful encounter are you talking about? There are three whole databases of contemporary reports from every credible pillar of society, accounting for police officers, judges, teachers, lawyers, historians, wildlife biologists, etc. The list goes on with credible professional people, all of whom have nothing to gain but ridicule to await for their reported encounters, and on with the data pointing to something that leaves people like you seemingly in a major state of denial, not o mention a MASSIVE BURDEN OF PROOF to explain away. You'll be shown a trail cam photo, and for someone so seemingly agenda driven as you, it would merely be a "bear or a hoax". Again, this is rhetorical and a trait of denial.

      So here's one back at you... Shut up and address the evidence. Or is that so difficult that you would RATHER people forget about it for something widely acknowledged to not be around at present? It's the actions of a spoiled little brat. People like you demand evidence, only to deny it when it's shown... And there is nothing in scientific thinking, or even every day logical thinking that states that something cannot exist if it is not on the laboratory table, especially when it has repeatable scientific evidence in support.

      Delete
    9. ^^ Don't listen to him. He's just the site plagiarizer. You can't trust anything he says.

      Delete
    10. Keep up the good work Iktomi, and the schooling for cement heads continues!

      Delete
    11. NOBODY ANSWERED MY QUESTION - IS JOE CUTE?

      Delete
    12. the fake me is back with a vengeance today. His parents probably took his xbox away and grounded him for being a tosser so he comes on here.
      Bro, get a life

      Joe

      Delete
    13. Fake joe wants his hair braided real bad.

      Delete
    14. Sooty about the outburst before. When I was younger I suffered a brain injury. My uncle rammed my head into the fridge and then butt f ucked me for about an hour. He was finished in 15 minutes but I begged him to keep going. Bigfoot is real folks!!!!!

      Joe

      Delete
    15. I have a "dog" boy called sooty that I fondle for a straight swap of cash.

      Joe

      Delete
    16. 1;42 ..that`s better than have them neglect and abuse you as a child...were your parents convicted eventually ?

      Delete
    17. Donald forgot to sign with his anon account... And he thinks anyone else lacks credibility?

      Delete
  4. Joe, please don't hate fuck your dog!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bigfoot DOES NOT braid horses manes.... Horses are deathly afraid of them. I have two horses that actually twist the mane of the other horse with its mouth. So its silly thinking bigfoot do it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bigfoot is not a normal primate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'M NORMAL----------------------------------------------TK!

      Delete