Friday, December 18, 2015

Dr. Jeff Meldrum Discusses His Inspiration For 3D Bigfoot Skeleton


A year before it was revealed, Dr. Jeff Meldrum was already talking about his 3D printed Bigfoot skeleton project. Later on the finished project was featured in the docu-fiction piece "Bigfoot Captured" on the History channel.


61 comments:

  1. Embarassment to real science.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yet he's got some of the best conservationists and primatologists in his editorial board.

      Please... Don't pretend like you know anything about science, it's slightly cringey.

      Delete
    2. The only cringey thing is someone who believes 8 foot apes can exist while eluding every single form of detection by science.

      Delete
    3. Actually... Science has been used to detect a range of evidences, to which common sense dictates that if 8 foot anomalous primates didn't exist, it wouldn't be there.

      "Cringey" perfectly articulates your time invested and nothing but logical fallacies as a stance.

      Delete
    4. Wrong as usual. Dmaker has schooled you on this before. Its like you are incapable of learning.

      Delete
    5. If I'm wrong... Please demonstrate how. Name dropping someone who has 7000 posts on BFF and is no closer to lifting his burden doesn't really account for that, or doesn't really shine you in a light that's capable of fighting his own battles now, does it?

      That's it... Stop speaking on science's behalf. I'm sure it can manage just fine without you.

      Delete
    6. Dmaker has no burden. He is not making any claims. Its pretty funny how bigfooters get so butthurt over science just like the ufo nuts, creationists and flat earthers.

      Delete
    7. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant; and the more extraordinary a claim, the heavier is the burden of proof demanded. Your extraordinary claim is that there is nothing to thousands of years of cultural and contemporary reports, that have physical evidence to support. If a critic asserts that there is evidence for disproof, he is making a claim and therefore also has to bear a burden of proof.

      I have no problem with science, in fact it's this topic's best friend. Do you think that if you name from your hero enough, he might come along to fight your little battle for you?

      Delete
    8. Wrong again. What a blunder.

      YOUR extraordinary claim is that there is something to thousands of years of reports. It is your burden to back up that claim with verified evidence. The fact is you have not done that, you merely add more claims as if somehow that helps. All you need is the one verified bigfoot and then you win and this all goes away. Dont blame your failure on others.

      There is no battle here its just me telling you that you are wrong.

      Delete
    9. My claim is that there is something to thousands of years of reports, yet I have every source of scientifically verifiable evidence just short of a modern type specimen. The requirement of a type specimen does not make that go away, because research does not start at a conclusion, and is in fact a suppression of evidence fallacy to abide by such. My "failure" is in fact waiting to be explained away by the likes of you. Your very genuine failure, is explaining it away to support your ideas that are merely propped up by another logical shortfall, a negative proof fallacy.

      It's all very well you "telling me I'm wrong", even the nuttiest of loons think they're Jesus sometimes.

      Delete
    10. "Short of a modern type specimen"

      Stopped reading right there.

      Delete
    11. And why would you do that? Is that an admission that you think a logical (intellectual) fallacy is somehow a help to you? And might I add... There is every source of verifiable evidence (short of a specimen) accumulated in that last 50 years, WITHOUT a consorted effort by professional, mainstream science to investigate.

      I've got reason to be smug, mate.

      Delete
    12. Apart from it isnt verifiable. Thats the point.

      Delete
    13. Its not verfiable by the fact that there is no verified evidence.

      Delete
    14. looking for bigfoot is like looking for a slim gal in a fat camp.

      Delete
    15. 6:25... You might think putting things in words on a forum means it's reality, but you are either naive or stupid. There is physical, biological, audio, thermal, video and the databases of reports, not to mention science journals of the last 150 years that have documented giant human skeletal remains... These are facts. Claim it's not there? There is your burden.

      Delete
    16. Sykes is coming, oh no, hold on!!!

      Delete
    17. ... Did you just have an accident? He most certainly is... Tick, tock!

      Delete
    18. says the racist who hates anything and anybody not Caucasian.

      Delete
    19. Argh right... Do you have evidence of me being racist in at least one instance?

      Delete
    20. GRAY hybrid GRAYs been doing it here for years

      Delete
    21. Troll got blown the fu ck out!!

      Delete
    22. lack tham muzrats in frence bein takin outs

      Delete
  2. Well, I saw the complete model on Bigfoot captured and it was most impressive. Must have cost a pretty penny for someone. Human skeleton next to it screams out why the vast majority of people get so freaking scared. The Forest Giants are just huge and massive. Anyway so much of the show was a joke except for this and the real researchers, not actors.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Autism...autism as far as the eye can see.

      Delete
    2. Step away from the mirror then, you will feel better.

      Delete
    3. look who's back the....farmers only down for the weekend?

      Delete
  3. "Theres a sucker born every minute" - Roger Patterson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and patterson proved it!

      Delete
    2. there are many monkey suits on amazon

      Delete
    3. Any magic ones that defy Hollywood SFX methods as well as human proportions?

      Delete
    4. There's a troll born every 30 seconds .
      any of you blokes come up with a magic monkey suit ?
      Didn't think so. I guess i'll just go back and sit down and read my newspaper in the meantime . You lads carry on trolling whilst I enjoy my morning tea

      Joe

      Delete
    5. Are you having crumpets with your tea?

      Delete
  4. The "forever war" rages on. The skeptics say "no body- no proof" and the believers say there is enough evidence to support the idea of an unknown humanoid. Speaking for myself as a one time believer I can no longer support the idea as much as I would love for it to be true. I have waited for for well over 40 years for it to be proven and yet year after year goes by and it seems we are no closer. Physical evidence is great but if it keeps being ignored or disputed then what good becomes of it? I just find it incredulous that with all the sightings and technology that the proof for it has not advanced that much. Judging just from this site alone it seems that there are current sightings all the time and lots of people out looking for it. Some even claim to see it on a regular basis! With all of this how reasonable a time is required before doubt creeps into one's mind ? Five, ten, another forty-seven years? What is the percentage factor that such a large creature supposedly seen in almost every state can escape detection for so long? How long do we keep the "faith"?

    I don't comment much because I have little to add but I do find the comments and personalities entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you accept footery is nothing but a low level religious cult.

      This is a very positive step.

      Delete
    2. Joe has zero to add yet comments all the time.

      Delete
    3. Well, at this point it does take a certain level of faith. I realize many WANT it to be true as I did but I believe I kept an open mind for a reasonable length of time and now I just have to concede it may never be proven. I have constantly heard the promises of proof over the years but it just seems to never pan out. I thought the common use of the game camera would certainly provide enough evidence but when it didn't then the talk was that they (Bigfoot) could detect and avoid them. Apparently they seem to get smarter with every failure.

      Delete
    4. Understandable curious.

      On face value, you have a point and it only took me about 5 years to nderstand thier is a serious Accusition and CONTROL problem.

      It makes no since. A statistical(scientific)(math I trust, some mathmatitions I don't!!!) evaluation would push one to say ---"Igive up, it's alll bullshit!"

      My problem was and is ------ I've seen the damn thhing! And had other knock and audible responces, each with a different witness. So thier is the dilima.

      The problem is your equation. If you listen to the rational half of your brain (narrow) your equation will only have two possible out comes --- yes or no, black or white. It's rational ------- but after considering the stagggering input data over thousands of years of "X" being a sudstative product, we DO NOT throw it away to MAKE or force the equation to sum ZERO to suit a desired outcome.
      THIS IS NOT SCIENTIFIC all you dumb-ass skeptards - Dan, Don, Anona girl (A.C.), so all you jack-offs crying science RELIGIOUSLY can kiss my ass.

      Pardon me Curious, I was not refering to you.

      The collective, utter stupidity of our reguler "shit-head skeptard" crew is mind boggling.
      They argue for Science like a bunch religious fanatics.

      Well Curious, reform your equation. The answer is somewhere other than A or B.

      And this is where we get to find out if your real or a troll. Open or narrow minded, Sharp or dull, Creative or brainwashed!

      And most of all, Wise or Scarred?

      Delete
    5. anon 10:14 - We are all in agreement you really need to get a life

      Joe

      Delete
  5. And just so you know. Nobody has a good equation, nor an answer ----- and that in and of itself should tell you something.

    What you dealing with IS DECEPTIVE by NATURE.

    It is way deeper than just being illusive. The unearthly abillities in many stories says they they are not whole-ly locked into this dimension ----- what ever that is.

    And it runs the gammit all the way up to "telepathing" to the good doctor Johnson, that in fact, they are decendents of Cain!!!

    That is the second time the story was told to a Mormon! If I'm not mistaken, Johnson is mormon. Could say 3 considering Autumn Williams, at least 3 communications with Mormons?

    This is why they are not CAIN's decendents.
    Remember I told you, they are decievers! Mormons are secretive, occultish to say nothing else and also do have a secret society within thier church. EVERY ASTRONAUT has been either a Freemason or a Secret Society Mormon!
    And so they tapped and told stories, but thier lying, probably ------ ha ha ha ha ha.

    Cain has always been my second choice.
    Alien third.
    Ancient human offshoot in 4th.

    Nephilim, ----- Boooooooooooo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And to all you TARDS------

      I AM NOT SAYING YOU DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT.

      I AM SAYING YOUR JUST A BUNCH OF PUSSIES FOR HAVING SUCH A SHIT LIFE THAT PISSING IN OTHERS FOLKS CHEERIOS, IS A RUSH.

      Take up surfing or snowbording or something you bunch of Idiots!

      Delete
    2. and you should stay on your meds. you delusional idiot...oh and kill a commie for mommy!!!

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. You = The only person who cares.

      Delete
    2. conspiracy theories are screwing around with your mind mate

      Joe

      Delete