Did A Bigfoot Make A Cameo Appearance On The Mantracker TV Series?


Mantracker was a reality tv series involving teams of two who would try to make it to a predesignated finish line, while being pursued by a professional tracker on horseback. Needless to say, they seldom made it. Each episode would take place in a different remote location around the U.S. In one episode, viewers noticed something walking on two legs in the background of one of the shots taken in a forest. Instant speculation questioned whether it was possibly a bigfoot or not. We take a look at the video in this classic breakdown.


Comments

  1. National geographic says bigfoot dont exist. Thats good enough for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ... But lists the state of evidence as "... A few footprints, hair samples, some droppings, a small bit of blood..."

      Delete
    2. I'd be more inclined to go with the common sense approach that if something doesn't exist... It doesn't leave it's evidence.

      Delete
    3. OR the evidence is fabricated by humans as has been proven many times.

      Delete
    4. But all native tribes say bigfoot does exist and they have been around far longer than national geographic

      Joe

      Delete
    5. I am sure Nat Geo meant alleged few footprints, hair samples, etc. If any of the listed evidence had been proven to have come from a bigfoot, then we'd be having a different conversation, now wouldn't we?

      But as obvious as this is, Joe will not admit it. He will instead assume that NatGeo meant something else something that supports the idea of bigfoot while they are in the very act of explaining why they would not likely fund bigfoot research.

      Joe does this all the time. Remember back to the Army Corps of Engineers almanac entry. He twists that obvious piece of pop culture humour into official recognition of bigfoot.

      It doesn't matter what it is, or by whom it is published. Good ole Joe can make twist it around and proclaim it support of bigfoot.

      Delusional? Oh yes, very.

      Delete
    6. Do native tribes have any proof of bigfoot? No? Then they can STFU along with all the other people insisting that bigfoot exists without any proof.

      Delete
    7. B L O W N

      T H E

      F U C K

      O U T

      Delete
    8. Well, that blew up in my face, didn't it?

      Delete
    9. Yeah, but what about the frequency of evidences that transcend time and space and are reflected in the endeavors of excelled and pioneering experts leaving their physical sign imprinted on the environment, blah, blah, blah...why do I bother? Even I don't believe it anymore.

      Delete
    10. FFS! I would say it's a coin toss at the moment as to whether a viable hybrid hominid is out there. There's no undeniable proof yes, but a possibility still exists so...(Although blurry videos, whack jobs and money hungry hippies don't help the cause lol!) As you're some what right, you're also somewhat wrong :) Just saying FFS!

      Delete
    11. A coin toss? Ugh. The existence of bigfoot, or any creature, is not a matter of odds. It's a matter of evidence. Evidence that can be tested, repeated and used to prove existence. There is none of that right now for bigfoot. Toss all the coins you want, it won't matter at all.

      Delete
    12. I like tossing. I am a huge tosser.

      I'm tossing right now.

      Ha ha ha ha ha!

      Delete
    13. FFS! Oh almost forgot MONKEY POWER! Meow Lady! Hey bro! Derp, Derp, Derp :) FFS!
      Merry Xmas Mr. Anonymous when you're done sucking the farts out of bus seats, remember to listen for Santa's sleigh :) I'm sure he'll bring you a spine, some ballz and a plastic covering for you're nose after getting out of Dmakers bunghole :) FFS!

      Delete
    14. FFS! Although there isn't much evidence there's some, along with countless stories, myths and legends.
      There's always a hint of truth in all of them :) So you're entitled to you're opinion and I don't claim that's it's "REAL" however the thought of it even having a slight chance is encouraging to me :) and that's what matters enjoy FFS!

      Delete
    15. Donald... Actually... The Nat Geo letter was as contradicting as you usually are, but they at least recognised that there is evidence. What they stated, was there is no conclusive proof. Even though they stated that this topic is "more than likely mythological", it was a contradiction I enjoyed pointing out that, that myths don't leave the list of evidences they made note of.

      Regardless of that... "Ambiguity" is Donald's favourite method of trying to muddy the waters when he can't ad hominem on people presenting an enthusiastic stance on evidence. Rookie pseudosceptics take note, this is dense-ville 101... He tried this with George Schaller's forword in Meldrum's book, he tried it with the Army Corpse of Engineers when they listed sightings, even physical evidence and even satire regarding the average ignorant who considers Sasquatch a myth... He EVEN claimed that Meldrum wasn't on record stating he believed Sasquatch to be real when a like minded troll tried it... the list goes on. He'll even do it to the point of using ambiguity to drive home the idea of ambiguity... Like maintaining scientific evidence is ambiguous, when there is no scientific equivalent to the contrary of a list of scientists confirming said source.

      Isn't it a lovely, glaringly obvious contradiction on his part, that for someone who is opposed to "coin tosses" and rests on the premise of scientific absolutes, that he should dismiss sources of evidence on ambiguous claims of ambiguity?

      5:02... You'll need to work on that burden of yours claiming all that evidence is hoaxed and proven to be the case...


      Just ask Donald.

      Delete
    16. There is no reason to assume a hint of truth in any unprovable anecdote. History has many examples of wide spread beliefs or popular stories that have no hint of truth.

      I would not give bigfoot even a slight chance of existing. There is just no reason to think so at this point, imo.

      But you have your opinion, and I have mine. The only thing that really matters is evidence, and right now, there is no evidence capable of proving the case for bigfoot.

      I do appreciate that you can express your opinion without turning into a rude bully like Joketomi.

      Take care.

      Delete
    17. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/dr-jeff-meldrum-posts-response-letter.html?m=0

      Delete
    18. Speaking of, here is the gasbag himself.

      I thought he was staying away? Well, I'm not in the mood for his ignorant nonsense today.

      Have a nice day, folks. Arguing with an ignorant fool like Joe is just not in my list of things I feel like doing anymore.

      Delete
    19. Argh yes Donald... But we don't just have anecdotes, see pal? I know you would prefer a "version" of the current state of evidence to be like that because it gives you a helping hand (ironically at something that according to you is so obvious and shouldnt require it).

      When historical stories are in fact oral histories of whole cultures that manifest in physical evidence; there's your problem. "The only thing that matters is the evidence"... Quite a ironic statement considering that 7000 BFF comments you're no closer to putting that into reality, eh? Not being able to prove the existence of Sasquatch does not equate to it being non-existent, that a logical (intellectual) fallacy... Especially that there is physical evidence to support anecdotes.

      Oh wow... Is this an admission that I bully you Donald? I do I suppose, don't I?

      : )

      Delete
    20. "I do appreciate that you can express your opinion without turning into a rude bully like Joketomi."

      "Speaking of, here is the gasbag himself."

      ... You're a hypocritical mess, Donald. Fitting you should run off now.

      Delete
    21. Donald... You seemingly don't feel like arguing with me, yet you talk about me like a little b*tch? You're a troll, no cleverer, no better in original thought and no closer to your fulfilling your obsessive requirements.

      Delete
    22. GRAY base Bigfoot keeping the humans @ bay...

      Delete
    23. 6;47

      abusive moronic troll with nothing to say

      Delete
    24. Thank you for your ignorance Donald Trump. As usual you have lowered the bar on this forum . such a git

      Joe

      Delete
    25. TRUMP on top of his GAME : )

      Delete
    26. Dmaker just blew joe the f@ck out of the water just like normal. YES YES YES. This is the best day of my life!

      Delete
    27. there goes joe plagarizing again

      Delete
    28. I think you'd better check with Dmaker about the definition on that... Whilst plagiarising his vomit piles.

      You folks who can't think for yourselves will unconditionally follow your heroes over the cliff.

      Delete
    29. Joe just plagarized in his reply. Cant even get your insults with any originality, now can you Joe?

      Delete
    30. Care to reference my plagiarism? Or are you too stupid for that?

      Delete
  2. What's his face did a breakdown of this video a few years back! And he said crew member all the way! And it was posted here on Bigfoot evidence. So why are you guys putting this question to the test again? Come on man!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh I forgot. Man Tracker was a real bad ass of a show! Much better than the finding Bigfoot show. How long would BoBo and Clifford make it till that Man Tracker dude lassoed them up? First day or second?

    ReplyDelete
  4. FFS! YOU KNOW ITS FUNNY LOL! FFS! Although there isn't much evidence there's some, along with countless stories, myths and legends.
    There's always a hint of truth in all of them :) So you're entitled to you're opinion and I don't claim that's it's "REAL" however the thought of it even having a slight chance is encouraging to me :) and that's what matters enjoy FFS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FFS! Hey bro nothing much really :) FFS!

      Delete
    2. ^ that figures,eh ?

      the bottle in your avatar featuring in real life more and more eh ?

      Delete
    3. Hows it hanging Harry. Why change your name from harry bandini to FFS?? Yep, one of your former friends ratted on you from this site. So why change the name?

      Delete
    4. Nice link. Care to plagarize any?

      Delete
    5. Posting a link isn't plagiarising... You stupid twat.

      Just ask Dmaker.

      Delete
    6. joe trying to get out of being caught plagarizing once again

      Delete
    7. dmaker blew joe and NC the f#ck out!!!

      Delete
    8. FFS! Mr.Anonymous please shut up and kiss dmakers arse please! it's what you're good at believe me detective work isn't lol! FFS!

      Delete
    9. Hows the collection going Harry?

      Delete
    10. FFS!!!! Stick at it brother! Your presence is killing this troll. He wants to drive everyone away, remember that.

      Delete
    11. Poor little Joergy on his last legs

      Delete
    12. And how's driving me away going for ya?

      : )

      Delete
    13. ^ running scared...note he only appears on a few threads now...he`s been run off for the most part by the superior logic and mental dexterity of better men.

      Delete
  5. I can't wait to see Star Wars! I'm going to go dressed like a wookie!!

    It's almost a bigfoot!

    Ha ha ha ha ha!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FFS! IKR! Not dressing up but, going none the less...I hope Disney doesn't screw the pooch though lol! FFS!

      Delete
    2. black storm troopers now that's progress

      Delete
    3. Can I come to the show with you? I will promise to keep my tater saber holstered.

      Delete
    4. You have a tater saber?i bet it doesn't light up xx

      Delete
    5. MEOW!!!! FFS!!!! MEOW LADY!!!! MONKEY POWER!!!!! RACIST!!!!! MEOW!!!! FFS!!! TATER SABER!!!! MEOW!!!!! FFS!!!.......DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP

      Delete
    6. hows it hanging harry. Why change names to FFS? Do you not stand by your statements as Harry Bandini?

      Delete
    7. ^ link to JoeTomi`s homepage.

      Delete
  6. BILL BROCK is on top of his GAME

    ReplyDelete
  7. Finding BIGFOOT
    what we know so far –
    Matt making $$$
    BOBO making $$$
    Cliff still way out there
    Ranae playing for the other team

    ReplyDelete
  8. I seem to have attracted someone called Ben who thinks westerners are pigs.Feel free to join in he needs winding up :) xx
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecVzEftIgz0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. caws tham bigfeets takin me hawgs ans chickins ans me dawgs goin crazie heers

      Delete
    2. Eva, you actually swore? That's a first.

      Delete
    3. Hello FFS! and NC.I did NC lol...i don't do it often i promise :) xx

      Delete
    4. Harry, nice to see you. Should i ask about the collection? You know what i mean

      Delete
    5. FFS!!!! MEOW!!!! I DONT DO IT OFTEN!!!!! MEOW!!! FFS!!!! MEOW!!!! FFS!!!........DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP DERP

      Delete
    6. Just another day on the streets of any large European/American city. The enemy from within...take over without firing a shot! And yeah, animal cruelty is not funny, just cultural driven.

      Delete
    7. FFS! poor mr. anonymous lmao :) don't worry they made a peepee extender hahaha!
      tighten up that helmet and wipe that drool off your chin son! FFS!

      Delete
    8. Harry Bandini used to school you pal... You simply show your scars when you name drop.

      : )

      Delete
    9. wwwwhut U sayin fer tham bigfoots bein reel ans sume sayin thays livin heers fer yeers

      Delete
  9. FFS! Merry Xmas Mr. Anonymous when you're done sucking the farts out of bus seats, remember to listen for Santa's sleigh :) I'm sure he'll bring you a spine, some ballz and a plastic covering for you're nose after getting out of Dmakers bunghole :) FFS!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?