Filmmaker ceases production after spotting a family of Bigfoots
We're not sure whether or not to believe this, but this person claims to be a filmmaker and now selling his costume before he's too afraid to go out into the woods after an encounter with a family of Bigfoots. The filmmaker left this message on our Facebook wall:
I’m an inspiring film maker in California and the pictures you’re seeing were part of a $50,000 film project. This film was to take place in the National Forest of California. As I was scouting shooting locations all across several large National Forests I observed at a distance what I believe to be a family of Sasquatches. I thought they were people in ghillie suits due to the number of hunters in the National Forest, but upon observing them for several minutes I noticed unusual long arms. Since then I have not returned to the National Forest and this $50,000 film project has been canceled. Being a huge skeptic I could not believe what I saw for a very long time. I am just now reaching out to anyone involved with Bigfoot research in hopes that if I come forward with this information I can have animal activist protect these creatures before they get hurt or killed. I'm now selling this Bigfoot on eBay at: www.ebay.com and hoping that someone will take my account seriously. If you'd like more information on what happened please contact me here asap.
Another Turd
ReplyDeleteThat's not bigfoot. That's 1970s GI Joe.
DeleteHey breaking news. That dude in the monkey suit is no other than T-FATS Timbo FATsano. You may ask how do I know this? Well in order to get my PH.D. I too drive a taxi. Just last night a picked up a whore who needed a ride into the downtown area. I was trolling some Bigfoot evidence and she asked me if I knew who that hairy bugger was. I said sorry trick I do not. She said she did and informed me she is one of ol' Timbo's regulars and swore up and down that the little penis in the photo was T-FATS Little ding-a-ling. It truly is a small (no pun) world. Ain't that right T-FAT'S.
ReplyDeleteSo the filmmaker was scouting for shooting locations when he observed a family of bigfoots for "several minutes"... Tell me what filmmaker would go looking for sites to shoot film in without taking some form of still and/or video camera with him? Methinks this story stinks.
ReplyDeleteOne who lies. He just wants some bigfoot gold.
DeleteGot Patty suit?
ReplyDeleteYup, there it is.
Not even close.
DeleteIktomi shut that sperm bank on the front of your head.
DeleteNot even close? LOL.
DeleteI hope Joe Iktomi realizes that the Patty suit comment was supposed to be facetious.
FFS! what r u 12? FFS!
DeleteThere is no patty suite mates. The PG bigfoot was the real deal . if you can kindly produce a similar suit then maybe i'll listen but til then go bugger off you troll sots
DeleteJoe
The costume in the photo is a similar suit.
DeleteThat young male sas has a future in the adult film industry. If his middle leg were to stiffen from arousal, it would be at least nine-ten inches and rather thick.
ReplyDelete^ the kinda size you use as a toothbrush ... right ?
DeleteShawn is just making shit up. Shawn posting crap and hoaxing shit; and Matt kissing Phil's ass every chance he gets. Why anyone wastes their time here is puzzling.
ReplyDeleteBecause Zen Yeti's site blows.
DeleteWHAT IS THAT BETWEEN HIS LEGS
ReplyDelete^ It`s my fat dick going in and out
DeleteI wouldn't be fooled by that dumb looking costume. And why is his wiener hanging out? Is it intended for bigfoot porn movies?
ReplyDeleteHere's a better solution, GROW A PAIR
ReplyDeleteWhat's the rule? Photos or it didn't happen.
ReplyDeleteSounds like someones funding fell through!
You can plainly see this so called bigfoot costume is not even close to what a real bigfoot looks like which is the Patterson/Gimlin film bigfoot.
ReplyDeletePatty had no neck and massive muscles which you can see in the film. This costume is a joke not fit for the worst halloween parties . go home and dream about the monkey suit that doesn't exist
Joe
Who would be dumb enough to keep the suit around? If you want a convincing hoax, you make sure to get rid of the evidence right away. And there really hasn't been a serious effort to recreate the suit. The effort from the BBC documentary wasn't even trying, and there's a reason for that. Nobody wants to watch a Bigfoot documentary that shows the evidence is poor. People who don't find Bigfoot interesting that tend not to watch shows about Bigfoot. And thats just what they are: shows meant to entertain an audience. They have no reason to alienate their viewers, they want you for ratings so they can make advertising revenue, there is nothing objective about it.
ReplyDeleteexcuses, excuses, You know what they say about excuses ?
Deleteand nobody wants to read any comments from unintelligent nobs like you who hide behind one excuse or another. Oh bloody hell, they can recreate the suit if they wanted to but they just don't want to because then people will be blown away on how easy it would be to recreate the Patty bigfoot - bollocks and you bloody well know it mate.
Don't bug me anymore til you produce the monkey suit lads.
Joe
My goodness, you are unpleasant. Why the insults?
DeleteNobody has put effort into recreating the suit because nobody cares that much. It's important to people like you, and no one else.
DeleteAnatomically correct.
ReplyDeleteYeah, they could definitely recreate a convincing suit in this day and age, but back when it was filmed? No way. They spoke to the man that was the costume designer for Disney at the time of the PG film, and he said that at the time it was filmed, even Disney's highly qualified and experienced designers that had access to the materials and the money at their disposal, couldn't have pulled it off. Disney's costume department was THE authority on costume design back then. They were at the cutting edge of design in that era, and if their staff couldn't make a suit of that caliber, then it's quite probable that no one could have.
ReplyDelete