This Man Is a Bigfoot Hair Expert
Here is one of those rare video of Dr. Henner Fahrenbach where he talks about the differences between a Bigfoot hair and a human's hair. The video was recorded by Thom Powell in 2002.
BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
At least Dr Fahrenbach agrees with me !!
ReplyDeleteand not that SUCK ASS jotomi !!
""""""""FIRST........ !!!
It must be a sad existence having to dedicate oneself to hate... I truly pity you mate. You do know that the more you do this, the more it makes stubborn people like me stick around, right? How many times have you tried this??
DeleteAnyway... Sykes has some of Henner's (Freeman's) Walla Walla hairs and initial testing suggests it's is a direct match to a feral human from Uzbekistan. Might I add... That the hair was retrieved from a direct sighting via three government employees.
The guy is a known hoaxer.
DeleteA video so rare it is on youtube.
DeleteFreeman was not a hoaxer, there is no evidence what so ever to show this, other than a piece of footage pseudosceptics like to reference where he stated he made artificial casts to see if these could imitate toe bending.
DeleteIktomi Freeman is an admitted hoaxer and you are a Fuctard!
Delete^ No he wasn`t and you know it...you are a simpleton troll with nothing else to do aside from attempting to rile people with what you know are untruths....so,all in all,you may get back to sucking that dick you`ve been delighting.
Delete8:53... When lies are the best you have, it's time to call it a day my friend.
DeleteFreeman was caught hoaxing many times, and he admitted to it, on several occasions. Just like all bigfoot hoaxers, they eventually get caught. Just like ol bob and roger
DeleteFreeman was never caught hoaxing. Freeman never admitted to hoaxing anything... You must learn in adult life that putting something in writing on a blog like this doesn't make it a reality. If you are so sure, then post the occasions and I will rip them apart... You won't, you can't because you are a liar and a weird disinformationist. At least try and pretend to be an adult, kid.
DeleteThanks for sharing such an informative blog with us.I really found it useful. Keep sharing more with us.
ReplyDeleteOver the years after testing many suspected bigfoot hair samples, science has found that bigfoot hair looks like human hair but unlike human hair it does not have a medulla . if they do find any DNA it usually comes back as an unknown animal. in 1996 Fahrenbach (who has a PHD and i'm assuming no one on here does) concluded that 10 hair samples from over 3 states are from an unknown primate . We are probably looking at a human/primate hybrid which will change the course of science when discovered.
ReplyDeleteOnly a matter of time lads
Joe
Exactly Joe
DeleteScience is outright admitting that they do not know all when they say "unknown species". It has to come from somewhere ! That Alone is proof too me that the big guy exists or some type of primate. Science says so
Duh !
MMC
Do some online research and you will find that some human hair does not have a medulla. Until a type specimen is catalogued, it is not possible to state with any degree of certainty that it is Bigfoot hair, after all, you need a Bigfoot to compare it to.
DeleteYet ikomijoe keeps insisting that bigfoot
Deleteare homo sapien sapien !
what a low Iq !
11:01... Sasquatch hair is consistently found to not have this and has uniform consistency across many samples, found amongst physical evidence like track impressions, that is akin to the same unclassified primate.
DeleteHairs found via = sightings = track impressions = no brainer
The significance of such samples lessens none because there is no specimen, that would be suppression of evidence. When multiple camps of primatologist share the same opinion, then it is important to LISTEN to those experts.
I also have examined no Bigfoot hairs. After examining zero Bigfoot hairs, I am also an expert. So bite me, Iktomi.
DeleteHaints, you Haint making any sense.
DeleteUntil you do perhaps you can get your fellow mates to bite you if that so pleases you
Cheerio
Joe
Aren't you affiliated with Biscardi though, Haints? You really Haint gonna get to examine any hairs swinging around "researchers" like that son.
DeleteHaints looks up to Biscardi, that's hilarious and sad. Biscardi surrounds himself with simple minded individuals who are easily manipulated. Does he make you rub his feet when you guys are in the field? You weirdo, haints.
Delete