Is James “Kewaunee” Lapseritis Full of Tall Tales, Relaying the Truth, or Just Plain Nuts?
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Atticus Chambers. You can visit his blog, Sasquatch Footnotes here.
Here’s long-time Sasquatch psychic, James “Kewaunee” Lapseritis, discussing his extensive career as a Bigfoot researcher, including his many telepathic communications with the Sasquatch people since about 1979. As one might expect, he connects much of his Sasquatch ‘encounters’ with UFOs.
Lapseritis has not only authored books on the subject, but he’s considered somewhat of an authority in the Bigfoot community on the mystical-spiritual dimension of this creature.
So, do you think Lapseritis is telling us the truth or he is just making this stuff up and, in the process, making a buck off of gullible Bigfoot believers? Or, maybe the guy’s batshit crazy?
Whatever the case might be, the man has every right to say what he wants no matter how unbelievable it may sound to some ears. I would caution anyone to not dismiss his words simply because they haven’t been our particular experiences. Viewpoints that run counter to conventional thinking should not be rejected outright.
There’s the need to always remember that the subject of Sasquatch, by itself and without all the other anomalies connected to it, sounds foreign and whacky to most people. It’s important among Bigfoot enthusiasts, therefore, to remain open yet cautious toward theories we may not immediately understand or agree with.
An open mind to other possibilities, however, doesn’t necessarily rule out the need for a critical eye. We must be willing to test what others claim, and they must be willing to permit it without being offended. Our purpose should be to ferret out the truth rather than to stroke egos or to be fearful of upsetting others.
Part of the problem with Lapseritis’ claims, as I see it, is that he offers no proof for what he says. One’s personal experiences cannot be scientifically proven nor objectively verified. To have encountered Sasquatch in a dream or through telepathic communication sounds great in theory, but how one does demonstrate it? How do we know that Lapseritis’ personal experiences with Bigfoot weren’t the result of indigestion? How do we know it wasn’t the result of a reaction to the prescribed medication he may be taking?
Truth is, we don’t know. Nothing that he alleges can be verified or proven using the scientific method. All we are left with are stories and esoteric experiences.
Have you noticed as well that when Bigfoot communicates telepathically with folks like Lapseritis, their messages almost always seem to be the very ones dearest to the ‘researchers’? I’m thinking of messages such as warnings of global catastrophes, the dangers of human technology, global warming, world peace, and an array of social concerns.
Doesn’t it strike you a bit odd that Sasquatch is worried about such matters? That should probably be the first clue that what you’re really getting from such ‘telepathic messages’ is not Bigfoot’s opinions, but the opinions of guys like Lapseritis. These are his social viewpoints wrapped up in the furry cloak of Bigfoot.
As for Sasquatch, he’s too busy foraging for food, patrolling his territory, and tending to his family to be concerned with the complexities of human society.
Lapseritis may be deliberately conning everyone or he may be genuinely sincere, but easily led to misinterpret his own subjective experiences as more than what they really are. In much the same way as deeply religious people – who often make more of their spiritual ‘impressions’ and ‘feelings’ than what they actually are – so also Lapseritis tends to embellish his private ‘encounters’ with Sasquatch.
Here’s Lapseritis’ interview and a review of his Sasquatch telepathic ‘experiences’. The reader can make up his or her own mind as to the truth of what he says.
Just your standard bigfoot loving, dick cheese eating, knob gobbling tool bag.
ReplyDeleteI think nobody listened to you and ripped into you about your Bigfoot encounter, and now you're angry.
Deletehttp://www.sasquatchgenomeproject.org/linked/biotic_taphonomic_signature_analysis_and_neoichnology1.pdf
DeleteInteresting paper.
The evidence clearly and accurately illustrates and constructs a baseline profile of both physical and behavioral diagnostic characteristics assignable to this new species. The totality of the evidence analysis very conclusively proves that a new “Hominin” species with an estimated height of over 8’8”, a 16” foot print and physically capable of striding over two times the
Deletedistance of contemporary humans is currently living and feeding upon various ungulate (Cervidae) species in the immediate vicinity of Mount St. Helen’s. Furthermore, a cursory examination of the applicable literature related specifically to the ichnofossil track print strongly suggests that there is large amount of additional historical and contemporary geographically
situated data and analysis consistent with the assertions, declarations, and conclusions contained
within this essay. When taken in totality the information and analysis presented in this paper accurately establishes baseline Forensic Taphonomic and Neoichnologic evidence profiles that are measureable, verifiable, and comparable in the process of definitively identifying and
eventually classifying a new “Hominin” species resident to the Mount St. Helen’s ecosystem.
Expanded Inquiry
The evidence and analysis presented in this essay provides a unique opportunity for a variety of scientific discipline’s to further augment their individual and cross-disciplinary bodies of scientific knowledge. Wildlife biologists, anthropologists, forensic dentists, and primatologists might find some value in further examining the findings and evidence contained
within this essay. A database of pictures, measurements, analysis and original documentation are all available in conjunction with the actual surviving prey bone assemblages to those academics and scientists interested in furthering this line of inquiry. The authors of this essay welcome the opportunity to provide all of the evidence collected for further scientific examination and analysis in the process of adding to the collective scientific body of knowledge.
It is clearly evident Chewy doesn't like humous and is taking his frustration out on this blog.
DeleteChewng balz is a flaming militant homer
DeleteJoe says that sasquatch are 12ft 1200Lb
DeleteModern homo sapien sapiens!!
Get with the program. ABHOLI BONELICKER!
ANCIENT homo sapien sapien in fact, at least one type anyway. Don't take my word for it, listen to the most pioneering geneticist on the planet, Dr Sykes!
Delete: )
The most ANCIENT homo sapien sapien
DeleteIs the african pigmy!
HOW DO YA LIKE THEM APPLES!!!
Mrs, lktomi ???????
BBM o l j!!
; )
Possibly, Sykes theorise s that Zana's descendants were around 100,000 years ago... That's makes them ancient homo sapien sapien.
DeleteAny one understand what the apples thing is all about?
Pygmys ,bushman, hasda ,sandawe, are 150,000 to 190,000 yrs old ,,,
DeleteThere's your zana!! (No skull ever found)!!!
Now khwit!! ,,,how sykes determined xana's Mito!!,,,,,,,
Is TOTALY WITHIN Cacasoid parameters,,, 20,000-----50,000 yrs !!
Cacasoid = masai and neanderthal mix
96/4% FACT!!! @ 35,000Yrs bp..
APPLES?? SIT ON A COUPLE THEN YOU WILL KNOW!! UDIGG?
BBM o l j
Iktomi = fuctard that needs to get out of his moms basement
DeleteWow that was a waste of time I didn't even read it but im sure it went something like this. Im a dumb f uck that believes in bigfoot. It does exist it really does ( insert tantrum here ) I sit on my fat ass all day in moms basement and believe anything I'm told about bigfoot. Even though my d ick is really small it doesn't mean bigfoot doesn't exist because he does. So stop it you big meany just stop it. Yours sincerely Iktomi.
ReplyDelete^Severely mentally ill. Derranged and obsessed with bigfoot and penises. Try not to stare people. Just move along.
DeleteBig fan of his boyfriend dressing like the big fella and giving him a Texas hot plate. FYI that's when Iktomi lays under a glass table and watches his bf take a dump on the table top.
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!!! What a total twat. Chewie... You don't read it because you are an angry little man that can't even fathom the slightest piece of literature that doesn't consist of toilet humour and and cartoon illustrations.
Deletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial
Start with that kid, I'll be around to help you at a later time. If you need an adult to explain the big words, just be patient until I'm around next.
I'm starting to think your a little slow, you know a bit dopey. I would never read any retarded crap you suggested due to the fact your a dopey terd who believes in bigfoot.
DeleteNwah... What's the matter sweetheart? You getting a little mad because someone is pointing out how stupid you are? How abut you grow a pair, not to mention an ickle-wickle braincell, and bring something more than your uneducated, unqualified, child mindedly fearful opinion to the table and show me just why I'm so dopey?
Delete: )
I don't know how to tell you this but I'm not interested in men and if I was I could do better than you. I'm sure you will find a hairy man that you can play bigfoot and the hunter with. It's very easy to point out how dopey you are because you believe in Bigfoot. It's that simple you dopey man.
DeleteYou're "not interested in men"? Oh I see, that's wonderful news, now please stay on topic, you're digressing now and it's making you look a little stupid? Now, Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade. Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion. Begging the question is closely related to circular reasoning, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing.
DeleteNow, this means that your methods work around children who are more adapted to toilet humour than intellectual discussion, but you are with adults now... And you need to show me why I am so "dopey" t be enthusiastic about the existence of relict hominids.
Helloooooooooooooooooooooo???????????????? Here Chewie, Chewie, Chewie!!!
DeleteWow again, didn't read it but I'm gonna make another educated guess on what it says. When I was in high school I used to wet my pants and occasionally poo myself when I was in public. I decided to become a hermit and live in mommys basement so I couldn't be ridiculed anymore by the general public. It was at this moment I started to dream of a mythical creature who would protect me against all those nasty people that called me fatty, dumbass, shit for brains, cock smoker, cum dumpster and many other horrible things. After time I started to believe that this creature was real and I spend my whole life trying to convince others of my special friend bigfoot. Yours sincerely Itkomi.
DeleteI'm back now. I just took a huge s hit and it reminded me of you. Did I mention that bigfoot doesn't exist.
DeleteChewie, are you so irresponsible and unaccountable for your actions that you won't listen to an adult when they're telling you off, or in this case, read when someone points out how intellectually inferior you are? Are you experiencing difficulties in your work place with your peers by any chance? Do you put your hands in your ears and go "la la la la la la la la!!!" when fearful of being put straight? What are you afraid of... Another blow to your self esteem. Could this be why you are here to try and make yourself feel better? Your actions would certainly confirm this.
DeletePlease, enlighten me as to how investing faith in a "mythical creature" would "protect me against nasty people? How does that work in your version of logical thinking? Are you thinking straight, dear boy? Please tell me amongst all your vomit piles... What ever happened to you that you should spend the time here telling people how to think, and then have the hypocritical audacity to point the finger at other people who are allegedly trying to convince others of what's really going on?
Now then, please... Let's not fall into more child like musings of toilet humour, please explain (without falling into logical fallacies) why I'm so "dopey" to be enthusiastic about the existence of relict hominids?
You must be the dumbest f uck I have come across in a long time. Enjoy playing bigfoot or whatever you call it.
DeleteSo is this a capitulation on your part, in that you cannot present any case as to show why I am so "dopey", other than a circular reasoning and negative proof fallacy?
DeleteI hope you feel as stupid as you look son, now run along... If you want your mind bent a little more, you know where to find me.
First off please don't call me son. If you were my dad I would open a vein. Secondly you are a dopey f uck because you believe in a creature that doesn't exist. I really don't know any clearer way of saying it. Believing in Bigfoot = being a dopey terd. You are dopey because you believe in Bigfoot. I can't put it any other way you dopey c unt.
DeleteI'll call you "son", because that's how I refer to when I'm talking to children. And how can I deduce you are at least child minded? Because of your frequent use of toilet humour and your apparent requirement to self serve some level of reassurance against the boogeyman, by posting around here ten times a day that it "doesn't exist, duuuuuuuuh???".
Delete"you are a dopey f uck because you believe in a creature that doesn't exist."
You see, this is not adequate reason to show to everyone how "dopey" I am, because there is nothing is logical thinking that states you are correct to maintain such a case (this was put to you in sourcing you a circular reasoning fallacy), especially when put up against the physical evidence that I'm not even going to attempt to explain to someone so seemingly out of their depth. You might get your way by stamping around and screaming in the house, but your moma can't buy your way around here, and plainly stating that I am stupid because you cannot support your ideas with anything but logical fallacies, is a tad bit like a spoiled little brat... Not to mention a little "dopey"?
: )
Helloooooooooooooooooooooo???????????????? Here Chewie, Chewie, Chewie!!!
Delete... Chewie, Chewie, Chewiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiie?????!!!!
Delete(shaking a box of dog treats)
Oh well... I'll give them to Ruff instead.
DeleteAs long as they ain't made in China!!
DeleteChewyBall's mostly Im LMAO at your stuff.. but seriously dude... y r one sick dude to be knowing wtf a "Texas Hotplate" is. Damn, I had to look that s hit up! :))
DeleteIktomi and ChewyBalls, you two bitches should get married its totally legal now!
DeleteIktomi and ChewyBallz should just get it over with and gak each other's schpeeners already.
DeleteChewingballz = Stuart
ReplyDeleteAlways an Ahole
No friends
Leon pretending he's sane or the stupid fuc k mmc^^^^^
DeleteHe's nuts!
ReplyDeleteTotal Bat shit crazy! See normally I'd say that nonsense was link bait to get hardup BF'ers to watch so lapshit's can earn ad money... but unfortunately he's way too far gone to be that smart.
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is enetertainment and is not real in the same way Star Wars is entertainment and not real. It's fun and that's why we're here. Sometimes people get into the make believe but they're welcome here too.
ReplyDeleteWhen Chewbacca has verified scientific forensic evidence to support his existence, come back with an adult to hold your hand.
DeleteThe entertainment is watching you post JREF comments and getting them kicked back at you around here.
hey joe how come "chick" no longer has a verified name?
Deletedid you stalk her? I notice she no longer interacts with you.
that is a pretty clear sign of who you are and what you are about creep.
What a bunch of poop- Iktomi and I interact all the time. He is fabulous! ;)
Delete~ Chick
If Chick's preference is to use anon and use a signature, then that's her prerogative. I'm sure Chick would be able to enlighten you as the reality of your bat sh*t crazy scenario.
DeleteI have my reasons for my reasons- they are not as dramatic as they may be imagined.
Delete~ Chick
This guy is obviously telling the truth. No doubt about it. Bigfoot definitely have telepathic abilities.
ReplyDeleteI Knew you would say that!!
DeleteIn a way if they do I feel sorry for them, imagine getting inside the head of most humans, what must they think of us?
DeleteHorney?
DeleteTell him to go collect his one million dollar check from Randi.
ReplyDeleteLapseritis is just another con artist in a long list of morons in Bigfootland.
Most of these assclowns bestow magical powers on Bigfoot as excuses as to why they can't find the creature.
So much gullibility coming from adults. It's shameful.
And don't say anything is possible. If that were true, nothing would be impossible.
Get your head right. Get it together. Ignore these blights on the community.
Brandi, you're a class A idiot. This guy is no worse than you. Bigfoot isn't real. You're both morons that believe in a made up creature. You're a blight on society. Patterson was a hoaxer but you're ok with him. Hypocrite.
Delete"Bigfoot isn't real"... Religiously spouted by the most fearful little insignificant on the entire blog... A free thinking Nazi that has what other people may think as a core issue in his pathetic existence. Made up creatures don't leave physical sign, darling...
DeleteOh, and do you have a monkey suit????
Brandi LOL!
DeleteHave you ever heard the term "nuttier than squirrel shit"?
ReplyDeleteYes i have,it's often used in ref to one of these
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cVfXJqp-Ds
xx
token woo means need for ratings, evidence right shawn- im waiting for you to get kicked off big brother
ReplyDeleteI worked with Jack in '78 '79 ... I moved to Oregon... he visited us when he came to the Pacific Northwest to "consult"/work with a guy David? who was doing a lot of investigating Sasquatch at the time. It was then he told me a bout the connection between UFOs/Bigfoot ... did I believe him? my first thoughts were that it was way out there lol I did know him well enough to say he really believed it (and still does) is it real? I don't know but he's not the only one who thinks there is a connection. I never really kept in touch .. life intruded ... but I did check him out on the internet ever so often ... I'm sure he'll never see this post but if you do, Jack, I'm now in NE Wyoming and sadly Doug died a few years back... I wish him well ... he's no fake.
ReplyDeleteWhy is everyone so mean, I believe in Sasquatch and I don’t care if you do or don’t believe in it, I’m going to school for Psychology and Chemistry and I know I’m not stupid just cause I believe in Sasquatch, and I also have something to say for the believers too. You can’t attack the skeptics because sometimes they do have good points as well like the Patterson hoax. We gotta put our differences aside and be more kind to one another.
ReplyDelete