What could have done this?
Wow! We're not sure what to think of this, but this sort of injury probably happens all the time in the wild. We're not saying Bigfoot did this, but BFE reader Michael Brookreson has a pretty good idea what type of animal is capable of doing this:
Texas Hillcountry Crypto picks up deer on Ozark camera trap with fresh seveBFRre depredation injury. I don't know about you guys, to me this looks like a big mountain lion lost a kill.
 |
| Mountain lion dragging deer kill |
Happy days
ReplyDeleteAmericans Want Obama to Repeal the Bill of Rights
DeleteRespondents blithely agree that liberties should be completely eviscerated in the name of fighting ISIS
ITS FOR YOU SAFETY
I just can't believe this poor little thing is still grazing.
DeleteGood spot Mike!
Robert "The Duchess" Lindsay says that he used to have to plow his mothers field of wildflowers as a child. He learned to see the beauty in life after that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteMountain lions kill by going for necks of prey. Secondary attack would be the legs to bring prey down, They don't take a chunk out of a back of a deer.
ReplyDeleteUnless they are jumping down on the animal and it moves.
DeleteWampus Beast takes down big game - hawgs, deers, cows, horses that a WAMPUS BEAST attack
DeleteHi DSM ! Hope you brought plenty of Kiehls. Stay safe!
ReplyDeleteYou can never.....EVER have enough Kiehl's or Afrin. Thank you for your support of moist skin!
DeleteI don't know what did it, but it makes me hungry for a slice with BBQ sauce. I ate some deer meat while camping on the Oregon/California border in late September.
ReplyDeleteRobert "The Duchess" Lindsay says that he set aside a recycling bin, specifically for Dovers stinky diapers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteIt was Dan.Dan did it.
ReplyDeleteAt least the Missouri Dept. of Conservation does not dismiss cougars in MO, like a lot of others do.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you only take one bite out of a Deer?
A good deer does not deserve to be eaten all at once.
Great find Mr. Brookreson.
Chuck
Anything could have done this except a bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteThis looks more like a non-fatal interaction with a vehicle than a mt. lion. Lions, or cougars, attack primarly from the rear to bring the animal down, and then go for the throat and neck area. At any rate, a lion attack would not remove a patch of skin like that. This was an encounter with a speeding buick.
ReplyDeleteThis looks more like a non-fatal interaction with a vehicle than a mt. lion. Lions, or cougars, attack primarly from the rear to bring the animal down, and then go for the throat and neck area. At any rate, a lion attack would not remove a patch of skin like that. This was an encounter with a speeding buick.
ReplyDeleteIt could have been either Joe or Rictor as they too prefer to attack from the rear.
DeleteAm i the only one thinking poor little Bambi? does nobody care? xx
DeleteAll I see is Steaks, chops, hamburgers and Sausage!
DeleteRobert "The Duchess" Lindsay says that its possible that some bigfeet are actually transgender!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteAliens done it..
ReplyDeletethe BIGFOOTs are controlled by the GRAYs
Deleteso UFOs/Aliens/Bigfoots are all working together to collect DNA
This is really grasping at straws...someone should slap the person who came up with this article (really hard) FFS!
ReplyDeleteLOL. That all this website does! It's multi-handed Hydra when it comes to grasping at straws!
DeleteCarbuncle...
ReplyDeleteI agree, have seen many on horses.
DeleteGunshot wound!
ReplyDeleteWILD BILL using that thar big KNIFE shure is
DeleteYessum sho is
Deletecould be a AK 47 round hitin high
DeleteThat's why you aim for the vitals, I see this fairly often after rifle season in Missouri. I have several similar pictures from my trail cams. It could also be a broad head injury from a mis aligned bow shot. It will likely die from infection or exposure soon enough
ReplyDeleteNo way a cougar left an injury such as this, sorry. They go for the neck not high on the shoulder
ReplyDeleteThis is clearly the best evidence since the hoaxed PGF.
ReplyDeleteYes, there is the genuine PGF which was shot in 1967, and then there is the hoaxed PGF latterly shot by Packham/BBC.
DeleteOne can only cringe at Packham's attempt at a debunk sally, the result of which was a self-debunking and auto-demolition extraordinaire.
It's painfully revealing that sceptic extremists sometimes embrace this failure and its author as a success and heroic. Their gullibility knows no bounds.
Of course on other days, they take a position 180 degrees out and declare the BBC bigfoot 'was intentionally bad in order to keep the bigfoot gravy train rollin'.' In which case they are claiming that Packham, with the BBC's support, intentionally created a howlingly hysterical PGF redux attempt.
If so, why did Packham stumble over himself and leap and jump and grasp at the flimsiest of straws to proclaim that his joke flick 'conclusively proved that that PGF is a hoax'? In those segments he hyperventilates while bounding from one unrelated 'conclusion' to the next.
He sets fire to the scientific method instantly and pours petrol on it by seizing on unrelated conjecture and speculation, gaspingly declaring them to be fact. He comes fairly unhinged while trying to connect lunatic speculation to fact, and deranged conjecture to truth.
^ this guy is the man.
DeleteRobert "The Duchess" Lindsay says that he is constantly invited to Bohemian Grove!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteCar or gunshot wound. Somebody needs to work on there shot placement. Thats a lot of tasty deer meet that should be in the freezer.
ReplyDelete