The Falcon Project Needs Four "Runners"


The Falcon Project is moving forward full steam ahead with their research. This summer is going to be huge he tells us. They're recruiting more people to join the team including people on the ground, and another unit called "runners". Runners will serve as the lifeblood of the research team, and if you're interested in joining the ranks of these special people, you can hit William Barnes up using the email below. Runners will be in charge of supplying the ground team for at least 6 months, so you'll need to be healthy to do this.

Contact William Barnes if you're interested: williamallenbarnes@yahoo.com


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. I enjoyed your scripted meltdown on the cryptozoology post. Do you hire the same writer as DWA? Keep up the good work you make footers look so dumb it is hilarious.

      Delete
    2. Your failures at countering my points aren't anyone else's meltdowns kid, and you certainly don't come across like you enjoy things like the Bill Brock post that I've just taken the time to obliterate.

      ; )

      Delete
    3. I thought you called it researching bigfoot?

      Delete
    4. That occurs prior to getting the mop out.

      Delete
    5. Has Joe convinced anyone there are 9 foot monsters lurking around north america? I'm guessing no. The material is just too funny to take seriously.

      Delete
    6. Who's trying to convince flat earthers like you? I'm just using you as an instrument of demonstrated stupidity, a role you fulfil beautifully I might add.

      Delete
    7. Joe comparing people who know bigfoot don't exist with flat earthers. Hilarious. You should give your writer a bonus for that one liner

      Delete
    8. You know not a lot son... And in the face of people who are the best in their fields telling you otherwise, even less so. So yes; the flat earther comparison works perfectly.

      Just because your parents have to finish your school homework, don't paint others in a similar light son.

      Delete
    9. There is proof the earth is not flat.

      There is not proof that bigfoot exists.

      Try harder.

      Delete
    10. "In the face of every source of evidence there is short of modern type specimen for Sasquatch, in the face of the best scientists I'm relevant fields telling me that there has to be something to reports, there is no such thing as Sasquatch."

      "The earth is flat."

      Yeah... Great comparison, try harder in explaining away the evidence, no one's claiming to have proof. If I thought you had the capacity to understand Occam's Razor, I'd go ahead and explain it... But you need your parents to finish your homework.

      Delete
    11. There is no evidence to explain away. We tell you this a lot. You just dont get it do you.

      Delete
    12. And like all good followers of the religion of SCIENTISM, when you can't explain something away, you deny there's anything to explain; "all hail the supression of evidence."

      Delete
    13. bigfoot does exist. You can't say all the witnesses are lying and all the natives who know it for a fact are delusional . To see one is a rare event but the problem is there are a ton of hoaxers out there who give real researchers a bad name and give the whole field the giggle factor

      Delete
    14. you can say it. in the case of the chinese wildman they wer all wrong

      Delete
    15. Again, there is nothing to explain away.

      Prove me wrong. :)

      Delete
    16. Sorry boyo... YOU can say it, but the Chinese wildman has not been proven to not exist. "Improbable" and "5% chance of existing" by one researcher over a period where evidence still rolled in does not support your claims.

      I'll walk you through this, it's ok...

      Delete
    17. You can not say that because you can not prove something doesnt exist therefore it does exist.

      Delete
    18. No, that's a negative proof fallacy, I've never claimed to be able to prove that Sasquatch exists, only that there's evidence for an unknown primate in the US.

      My opinion is it's there 100%.

      Delete
    19. "I've never claimed to be able to prove that Sasquatch exists, only that there's evidence for an unknown primate in the US. "

      Contradict yourself much?

      Delete
    20. No... To prove that Sasquatch exists I would require a body, whilst the evidence for an unknown primate is just that because I don't have the means to classify it.

      But that's where Occam's Razor comes in.

      Dense much?

      Delete
    21. Butthurt much?

      You even admit there is no evidence but then out of nowhere make some ridiculous leap of faith that there are undiscovered apemen strolling about.

      Delete
    22. What happened to Meldrum on this project??

      Delete
    23. 11:27... Butthurt? Making sense isn't your forte I take it? I have not once admitted there's no evidence, that's the one thing I'm maintaining, silly boy... There can be evidence for something but not necessarily be proof.

      This is where Occam's Razor comes in to play though.

      Oh, and I wouldn't say undiscovered... Just not caught, son.

      Delete
    24. I don't know, Meldrum was the lead on this project.

      Delete
  2. It's really that hard to get four guys? How will they ever build a blimp?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The project is technically and practically not viable.

      Even if it did get up in the air all it would see is the forest canopy and nothing below it.

      Footery gets funnier every year.

      Delete
    2. I 100% agree with you, but there's nothing funnier than the excuses you reel off as soon as someone points you in the direction of evidence.

      Delete
    3. No excuse required. There are zero papers and that's that. Footery has an excuse for everything though.

      Delete
    4. That's funny... I've posted you science journals documenting giant skeletal remians and you certainly had enough excuses but none good enough. If you're referring to modern day science journals that support the existence of Sasquatch, then you'll need a body... But unless you've got a negative proof fallacy at the core of your belief system, the fact that a modern version has not materialised does not mean that the evidence for an unknown primate doesn't exist, because in the face of every source of evidence short of that modern type specimen, we merely might not have reached that stage of conclusive research yet.

      Oh... And check out Manlike Monsters on Trial.

      Glad I could help.

      Delete
    5. The forest canopy is a big obstacle, however it is much less in winter and equinox times. However at night the forest giants leave the safety of the forest to raid agricultural areas under the darkness of night and can easily be picked up at this time. I would urge the operators to follow the Chuck Plan. That is to follow the edge of forest, not interiors and take advantage of their natural behavior.
      Chuck Plan out

      Delete
    6. There are giant humans so what? Im asking for a paper on bigfoot.

      Delete
    7. Yes... Hairy ones residing in the wilderness of the US. And no... You were being rhetorical.

      Delete
    8. Oh... I didn't realise the paper mentioned a 9 foot, compliant gaited, mid tarsel breaking ape man... You are quite silly Joe:)

      Delete
    9. No... But it supports an instance of audio evidence accompanying many encounters with Sasquatch.

      Excuses, excuses, excuses...

      : p

      Delete
    10. Sure!

      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      ... Glad I could help!

      Delete
    11. LOooL you retard that's not a real scientific journal. Hahahahahahaha self obliterated. I thought there may have been an actual paper in an actual journal about these giant humans. Oh boy what a blunder on my part giving you the benefit of the doubt.

      Delete
    12. No, it's not a mainstream journal like you're rhetorically referring to, but the editorial board has some of the most excelled in their respected fields, and there's nothing mkre significant;

      "The objective of the RHI is to promote research and provide a refereed venue for the dissemination of scholarly peer-reviewed papers exploring and evaluating the possible existence and nature of relict hominoid species around the world. A strictly on-line free access publication, the RHI contains primarily Research Articles, as well as Commentary & Responses, Brief Communications, Essays, News & Views, and Book Reviews."

      You wanted to see a Bigfoot, I showed you one. Journal Editorial Boards; "Editors have to be careful to select reviewers who have sufficient subject matter expertise to do justice to the manuscript. Therefore, highly technical papers or papers from niche subject areas may take longer to review, because it may take editors some time to locate appropriate reviewers. The journal editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision."

      So, what we have here are all those experts in essence recommending those research papers for peer review. If you want giant skeletal remains then I can source you these, if I choose of course as I've posted them here too many times to count. Let me know if you need anymore help.

      : )

      Delete
    13. Link doesn't work on my computer. Is it a video or photograph?

      Delete
    14. The link is to a research paper by Bill Munns, with photographs of a Sasquatch like the poster up top requested, accompanied with comparitive photographs of surface anatomy. You can see all this here;

      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/

      Delete
    15. You copy pasted the reviewer selection process for actual real science journals and applied it to your silly bigfoot journal. Silly man.

      Delete
    16. The scientific process has been adhered to in that link, by some of the best in their respected fields, to which means the process is never more important. You want a process of journal but don't want the proper processes adhered to?

      Circular arguements and contradictions always were the logic of the intellectually backward.

      : )

      Delete
    17. That took some guts for Jeffy to link to the Chinese Wildman paper. That poor guy spent 50 years investigating the wildman and never did find one piece of evidence.
      Oh well. Primitive mythology is alive and well in Joe's brain.

      Delete
    18. I posted this on the Brock page earlier... But China has had many fully federally funded Yeren research campaigns. For plenty of links to news reports where the Chinese government have actively participated in the Yeren research, therefore indicating how very seriously they consider such a subject, please go here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/bigfooting-with-kelly-shaw-rmso-1st.html?m=0

      Also... That's what good science does, it takes in the perspectives of long term research as long as it's done and to the proper standard and his case, impartiality.

      Delete
    19. It seems to me that wildman had the same thing bigfoot has; witnessees, hairs, tracks, etc.

      What did all of this research find.

      Nada.

      So suck my macaque.

      Delete
    20. Are you aware of how big China is and how remote it gets? Are you also aware of how long the Yeren has been in Chinese culture? The research of one man over 50 years doesn't touch on this, nor the fact that for every year his research rolled by the evidence still accumulated, who still can't rule it out, and who's still on the RHI's editorial board. What doesn't go away is the hair, tracks, witnesses.

      Stick to your negative proof fallacy, it serves your reassurance just fine with the regards to the North American equivalent.

      Delete
    21. Are you aware there is zero confirmed evidence for any of the supposed wildmen from anywhere in the world?

      Delete
    22. As confirmed by unqualified, uneducated, anonymous you, yes.

      Delete
    23. 7: 45 ---- I will get you PROOF of Bigfoot AS SOON, as you get me PROOF of the rediculous notion of EVOLUTION.

      In all the millions of fossils dug out of the ground, there is not ONE specimen of an evolving human. Everything they got is either fully human or fully ape and nothing in between. Oh they claimed to have it in the past, but then they realized --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The science was a HOAX.

      Delete
    24. UNLESS WERE TALKING ABOUT THOSE GIANT SKELETONS OR ELONGATED SKULLS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WHICH SCIENCE WILL NOT TOUCH WITH A TEN FOOT POLE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXCEPT TO HIDE THEM OF COURSE BECAUSE IT MAKES THE THEORY OF EVO EVEN MORE STUUUUUUUUUUUPID!

      WHY DON'T YOU GO HELP THE SCIENTISTS PROOVE EVOLUTION. YOUR TARGET IS A BILLION TIMES BIGGER ----- IF IT HAPPENED, -----------------------HA HA HA HA HA H A HA HA HA H A-----------IDIOT!

      Delete
    25. Every field in science points to, predicts, creates within models, and produces results from the fact that evolution is true.

      You are just ignorant of the facts.

      Delete
    26. POINTS TO, PREDICTS? MODELS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RIGHT, SO NO PROOF, THATS WHAT I JUST TOLD YA YA IDIOT, HA HA HA HA

      DAM YOUR STUPID!!!!!!!

      Delete
    27. PRODUCES RESULTS ----WHERE?

      WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU EVEN TALKING ABOUT.

      THERE IS NOOOOOOOOOOOO PROOF OF EVOLUTION. POINT OUT ONE PIECE THAT HASN'T BEEN PROOVEN A HOAX --- BY YOUR "PREACHER SCIENTISTS!"

      Delete
    28. WE GOT SEASHELLS MIXED WITH CURRENT NATIVE SPECIES ON EVERY MAJOR MOUNT RANGE ON THE PLANET.

      WE HAVE MASS WHALE GRAVEYARDS ON MANY OF THE PLANETS MAJOR DESERTS!

      OIL TESTS "YOUNG"?

      COAL TESTS "YOUNG"?

      THE SCIENTESTS THAT DEVELOPED THE THEORY OF STRATIFICATION SAID IT HAPPENED BY "WATER"! ----- BUT THE REST OF HIS BUDDIES THAT WHERE ALLREADY TRYING TO DO AWAY WITH GOD JUST COULDN'T PUSH EVO WITH THE NOTION OF A WORLDWIDE FLOOD INTACT --------------- WELL JUST LEAVE THAT PART OUT THEN.

      YOUR PROBLEM IS --- YOU THINK SCIENCE IS HONEST, IT'S NOT. IT'S AS RELIGIOUSLY ZEALOT AS THEY COME!

      Delete
    29. HERE LITTLE TROLL, WHERE DID YOU GO ---------- COME PLAY SOME MORE!

      LETS TALK ABOUT THE "FACT" THAT EVERYTHING IS IN A STATE OF DECAY -- CANCER!

      EVERYTHING PUT UNDER THE SCIENTIFIC MICROSCOPE IS IN STATE OF DECAY. AS TIME GOES ON, CELLS LOOSE THE ABILITY TO PROPERLY REPRODUCE --- AGING.

      BUT YET, DIPSHIT DARWIN WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE THAT BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF TIMES, RANDOM MISTAKES( JUNK DNA) CAUSED IMPROVMENTS TO A SPECIES, AND EVEN MORE LOONEY TOONS, CAUSED ONE SPECIES TO EVOLVE INTO ANOTHER ---- RANDOMLY, ------- OVER AND OVER, HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

      TALK TO A STATISTITION, EVO DIDN'T HAPPEN, EXCEPT FOR IN THE "CHURCH" OF SCIENCE.

      THERE IS A FRENCH CANADIAN WITH A VID ON LINE ABOUT HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CHURCH OF SATAN. HE CLAIMS COMMUNICATION WITH DEMONIC SPIRITS. HE CLAIMS THE SPIRITS "COACHED" DARWIN ON HOW TO PUT THE THEORY TOGETHER. HUH? BOOOOOOOO!

      Delete
    30. SO HOW DO YOU FEEL KNOWING THAT THE THEORY YOU SO BLATANTLY STAND BEHIND WAS PUT TOGETHER BY A SPIRITUAL ENTITY. I THOUGHT YOU GUYS DIDN'T BELIEVE IN THAT ----------
      OH YAH, THE GUY THAT MADE THAT CLAIM, WAS A SCIENTIST.

      THE IDEA OF EVOLUTION HAS LESS MATHAMATICAL PROBABILITY OF HAPPENING THAN A FRIEGHT TRAIN COMMING ROLLING OUT OF YOUR ASS LOADED DOWN WITH LIVE SHORT RANGE NUKES READY TO FIRE.

      Delete
    31. DAM, I think he's dead now.

      Delete
    32. 8:50, you said:

      "Every field in science points to, predicts, creates within models, and produces results from the fact that evolution is true."

      The Theory of Evolution is, as the name says, a theory. You have just said then that a theory is a "fact" that is "true". No, it's a working theory. Since it can't be observed or measured in-process, it can't be proven as a fact.

      It's a working theory; that should be good enough for so-called evolutionists, yet they consistently holler that it is a fact.

      They regularly accidentally mistakenly state:

      Theory = fact

      That's false. They are not equivalent. There is no such premise as theory = fact. A theory is a hypothetical model.

      Delete
    33. A theory in science is as close to "fact" as you can get. A theory is not a "guess" as someone with limited intelligence might think. It is a theory backed by observable facts.

      Evolution is a fact just like gravity is a fact. It happens. Get over it.

      Delete
    34. Troll Killer is a perfect example of what happens to your mind when you listen to Rush Limbaugh everyday.

      Delete
  3. Henry May should count for at least 5 guys.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This Barnes character is semi-delusional at best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could you skeptoids please broaden your vocabulary and put away the skeptoid playbook and think for yourselves?

      There are synonyms for delusional. Look them up. They aren't in the skeptoid playbook. Look elsewhere, think hard, use your brains, think for yourselves. So far you are "nothing more than" (that one right out of the skeptoid playbook, just for kicks) regurgitating automatons.

      Delete
    2. Why use anything else when delusional sums all of you up perfectly?

      Delete
  5. Joe do you believe a bigfoot knocked on janice carters door to offer some garlic?

    Do you believe that Janice carter and various other footers attended a funeral for a bigfoot named fox?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really have no means what so ever of verifying those accounts. I do however find the book written about the family's reports a fascinating read and what's more important is it was written from what comes across as a sceptical approach, to which some of the information stands as interesting.

      To me Sasquatch are human, have culture and bury their dead like hominids, can I verify Carter the reports? No.

      Delete
    2. Oh... And allegedly, the Sasquatch knocked Janice's trailer door to request garlic, seemingly as a repellant.

      I smiled writing that out, and do agknowledge how funny that comes across.

      Delete
    3. I can speak firsthand about Carter Farm since I and a few others at various times actually went there and did some investigating of our own. After spending a couple of days there and talking personally with neighbors, law enforcement and the actually renters who were currently living in the SAME house where these incidents allegedly took place, I can positively say there was absolutely nothing there to confirm what Janice Carter had reported. Even the terrain (which was basically farm ground around the farm) would make it very difficult for a large creature to remain unspotted by the neighbors. I had to conclude that the whole story originated and existed only in Janice's fertile imagination. Strangely enough, based on what I seen and heard, I left feeling pity for her. I would have loved speaking personally with her but by that time she had left the farm and was residing in another state. For those of you who believe that bigfoot exists . . . you would be best served by striking Carter Farm off your list as "evidence".

      Delete
    4. Her sister says she's batsh*t crazy and Jerry Coleman destroyed her.

      http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/carter-neighbor/

      Delete
    5. Joe if I may ask - what is the book about the family's reports you are referring to? The only one I am aware of is 50 Years With Bigfoot by Mary Green and is FAR from being a skeptical approach to the subject.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. Firstly, thanks for the insight... Secondly, I'm actually a little regretful to have stated where I read about her accounts as the source was entrusted to me from someone who I am not at liberty to mention... That's gonna have to be good enough for you I'm afraid. The source I read exposed a number of vague accounts with a couple of recognised contradictions between the two sisters. However... And forgive me if I come across cynical, but I neither believe her accounts as 100% fact because I can't show evidence of them being the case, but I have no means to conclusively rule them out either. With regards to your first hand experiences in that area, even less so, you could have just put together a shoddy piece of research, I don't know you and I could quite easily state that I've been their personally and seen Sasquatch, it's a simple as that. Also... I've sourced a report by Mr Ray Crowe from an alleged sequenced Sasquatch hair, a sample that came back human, this I am very 'curious' about.

      Oh... And as I'm on my way out to get drunk, I'll be back tomorrow to respond to any comments left.

      Delete
    10. Daniel, Leave Gary Coleman out of this. And Gary Oldman for that matter. ;)

      Delete
    11. Awwww hell, i wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't stick up for Gary Busey and Gary Cole.

      Delete
    12. Hahahaha, are you kidding me? You just made up some bullcrap as per footer usual about some nonexistent piece of evidence that you just aren't at liberty to discuss. Mmmyessmmmmthesecretclubmmmseeee........,,

      There is no shortage of sitting on the fence in your life.

      Janice Carter-Coy is crazy and there is nothing to corroborate a single claim she has made. On the other hand, there is a mountain of instances that how with all probability she is lying and or pure crazy.

      Delete
    13. "The Coy/Green hair samples are the first evidence where a scientist began to see other possibilities. Dr. Henner Fahrenbach suggested that an actual hair be collected from the Bigfoot named Fox. There were numerous other hair and fecal samples available.
      Mary Green and Dr. Fahrenbach have been unfairly attacked by critics for their opinions – they differed from the “ape norm.” But both have been unfortunately driven from the Bigfoot investigation field, mostly by “armchair” researchers.
      Bob Daigle, a friend of Mary Green’s, sent a hair sample collected from the Tennessee site to a DNA geneticist (named only as Dan), who found nothing but human results, the sample sequence being an exact match. He sequenced some 300 nucleotides from a mitochondrial gene called cytochrome b, and amplified a 1100 base pair fragment, then ran the results through GeneBank.
      The GeneBank is an open access annotated collection of nucleotide sequences and their protein translations. It lists some 100,000 distinct organisms and having in 2006 some 65 billion nucleotide bases and 61 million sequences.
      Control tests were run that were deliberately contaminated with dog and cat DNA despite which still the Fox hair turned out to be human."
      - Ray Crowe

      Why so angry Dazza? I'll sit on the fence just fine thank you.

      : )

      Delete
    14. If mocking is angry in your world, I guess that would make sense. You always were a confused boy.

      I see nothing to corroborate a single claim still. Morphology tests are worthless, there is zero provenance to the sample, it tested as human contamination, and to top it off the people involved have all denounced Janice Carter-Coy and her crapola.

      Have fun on that fence, George.

      Try for some infallible evidence next 'gin.

      Delete
    15. Nope... Still angry Dazza. Although methods exist to detect and filter out cross-species contamination, few methods to detect within-species sample contamination are available. Now, the sample in question may well have been contaminated, but it's because of repeated instances of samples' results coming back this way and my research pointing me in the direction of this subject being human, that I am quite warranted in having the disposition of sitting on the fence. Sasquatch are human, but I think you're still secretly hanging on to the bipedal gorilla philosophy that got you into this topic in the first place, as a safety net argument, aren't you? That isn't a morphology test, that's a DNA test, it came back as human, 'contaminated' is your spin with just as much corroboration, I'll remain on the fence just fine thanks.

      The people involved? No, neighbours Dazza... If you read the book 50 Years With Bigfoot; Tennessee Chronicles of Co-Existence (this is the book I read, I had this via email and wasn't aware of it being a published piece until this morning as I was told not to divulge the author, as well as the person who sent it to me, my bad), you'll know her sister makes her own claims on about the farm as well as supporting her sister's. I live in a largely rural area and I know how cruel people can be towards social outcasts; you're either nurtured or people don't forget your mistakes. Interestingly, Carter also makes claims about the mix of Spanish, English and Native American language years before Scott Nelson came to the same conclusion based on his expertise.

      Try it up here on the fence sometime Dazza, there's no room for your haemorrhoid pillow though.

      : (

      Delete
    16. The bullcrap flows from of your mouth like the source of a fresh mountain spring.

      Have you even read Jerry Coleman's 4 part dissection and research of every claim she's made, independently around the property?

      Sometimes you need to learn when to say some stories are utter nonsense instead of pining and saying you really need to see some more.

      If there was a twink at the end of your road of decision, I'd bet you would make one quicker.

      Delete
    17. Yes, I have read it Dazza, that's why I'm on the fence.

      (Sigh)

      ; )

      Delete
  6. I nominate Joe, Henry May, Tim Fasano and Joe Rogan
    Not sure who'll win that running race but the big prize should be a huge bag of doritos

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes !
      You got it Joe !
      Just keep your distance from Rogan, he used to pretend he believed but it was all a ruse for his weak comedy act

      Delete
  7. This Falcon project will not work! this coming from very experienced 'bigfoot researchers" that had has some successes, but a lot of failures. This is waaaaay to complicated approach!, Doomed from the start.
    Use Fishing lines, cheap, simple and effective!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Please explain whose going to pay the expenses incurred by these volunteers during their stint in the woods, while completely cutoff from civilization, internet access and the means to even mail out a letter to keep the power on at their home or double wide. While your at it, blimps don't work in breezes. You can neither fly them or find a safe place to store them. The Bigfoot already know that this blimp is coming. How are you going to surprise them now? The devil is in the details.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. they will hide behind the sun until night

      Delete
    2. I'm going. Talked to Barnes the other night. It's going to be a blast and he's so much more ahead of the game than people know.

      Delete
    3. "And I ran, I ran so far away, I just ran, I ran both night and day.....they couldn't get away".

      Delete
    4. Well if Mike's going I'm not. He used to tease me at kindergarten.

      Delete
    5. Happy indeed you are going MIKE. Do keep the troops laughing. Now what I posted above is integral to getting footage, if he does not already know. I heard him on C2C am for a short time a few weeks back, and sounds like a pretty good fellow. He is using the very best hi tec equipment available that is not restricted to the military. These giants come out at night to raid agricultural areas and it is here they can be seen without the safety of the forest canopy. Follow the forest edges and look to the fields, creeks, and rivers. They will be also sneaking up on remote and not so remote farm houses and properties.

      Do keep us updated and very best of luck. I believe this project can work.
      Chuck

      Delete
    6. I think Barnes has been watching too many sci fi movies as this is almost the plot of the below movie with people on the ground and a unit called "Runners" and at night you have to get back to camp before the boogey boogey wakes.


      The Maze Runner
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1790864/

      Delete
    7. Good film, ending a little silly but I'll look over that. After all it is fiction (just like bigfoot).

      Delete
    8. Just spoke to him. Here's what impresses me, I can interact with this species on their terms any time they are in my area, William, on the other hand, has conceptualized and funded a way to perhaps do it on our level, and that's a thing that is most encouraging indeed.

      Delete
    9. I've also noted the older I get the more I talking Gandalf the Grey.

      Delete
    10. And the worser my grammar gets. :). Achtung Baby!

      Delete
    11. I don't think it'll work. Passive research is where it's at.

      Delete
    12. Mike B - you are the perfect sap for the job.

      Delete
    13. DSM - You better stock up on your Kiehl's!!!

      Delete
    14. Mike I'm aware you incredibly somehow inherited a family of bigfoots on your farm. What were the odds? Let's hope Barnes does his homework before hiring his interns.

      Delete
    15. 12:04. Exactly. This project will require William to pony up on the Kiehl's moisturizer, the Afrin, the Amstel Light. I prefer to bunk with a female researcher(s) to protect her or them in case we all get escared !

      Delete
    16. 2:44. Perhaps you've read my book "50 weeks of drinking beer with Bigfoot". Don't worry darling. William knows I have a sense of humor. That doesn't discount the fact that we have a seventy five foot command trailer that I've persobally asked Brett Michaels to trick out for me. Don't hate the player DSA, hate the game, in fact ....c'mon and join us. I'm still working on my list: Atari, rubick's cube, slinky, Jenna Jameson, case of Jameson's......

      Delete
    17. "Nasocort, whippets cracker, balloons, rubber duck, wine decanter, xmen comics through Age of Apocalypse, Tiger Balm, 17 Z Packs....

      Delete
    18. "Richard Pryor Live at the Sunset Strip", "The Very Best of Jackson Browne".....Beastie Boy's entire collection, Beck's "Odelay". Bart Cutino's Thermal equipment.......

      Delete
    19. Something tells me you ain't taking this seriously Mike.

      Using the Millennium Falcon to hunt for BF is so crazy it might just work!

      MMG

      Delete
    20. MMG, unless they are like us, people forget it's the fastest hunk of junk in the Bigfoot Community. It made the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs and physicists are still trying to solve that one and it happened a long time ago in a galaxy far....far away.

      Delete
    21. I guess you will be playing the part of Han Solo in this adventure and not the weird, socially awkward, camp gold robot

      Say hi to Matilda/Chewie for me. Erickson may have been on to something after all....

      If you run into any Ewoks give my regards to the Bigfooter formerly known at Toad Sitting...

      MMG

      Delete
    22. I'm pretty sure he's still looking for that stolen evidence on the Forest Moon of Endor.

      Delete
  9. Ah, the eternal optimism of the bigfoot world.

    No matter how many conmen, hoaxers and disapointments come their way, they are right back there just begging to be fooled one more time because this next time is going to be different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, it is......Kiehl's after shave, shave club for men, copy of Nugget magazine, Kelly Slater's phone number, Kelly Lebrock's phone number, Gerry Spence's answering service number, my own phone number.....

      Delete
    2. If I'm forgetting anything do chime in....as the old fisherman told the younger one about layered clothing and as I told last night's date...." You can always take it off....."

      Delete
    3. toilet paper, condoms and some Jack Daniels.

      Delete
  10. C'mon .....you know I make you smile a little ....speaking of that Botox, reeboks shell box, xbox, rock em sock em robots, VHS copy of Blade Runner.......

    ReplyDelete
  11. I know I'm forgetting something.....copies of "Outlaw Josey Wales" "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" "The Missouri Breaks" "Cool Hand Luke" and cassette of "Please Hammer Dont Hurt Em"

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm pretty sure that's all I need .....oh yeah...and this lampshade ....but that's all I need.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like you are loaded, DSM! ;-)

      Delete
    2. food would help also unless you plan on eating Henry May.

      Delete
    3. That's going to be a necessity. I'm thinking the Foreman Grill, a list from recipe guy, and I'll call Meredith Veira and see what she can whip up if she's not hunting for giant skeletons with her relatives.

      Delete
    4. Salt and Pepper
      Garam Masala
      127 frozen turkeys
      98 lb of mince meat
      sharp knifes and stone
      65 boxes of matches
      and a toy duck

      Delete
    5. Well you might consider bringing:

      Your fastest pair of cowboy boots- not the slick bottom ones.

      A little flask with something to keep you warm in it.

      Chocolate and tube tops for the hairy gals to leave as gifts.

      And always team up with a guy slower than you.

      Never let them see ya sweat.

      Delete
    6. Drakkar Noir....and public enemy's "It takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back". Anything else would be uncivilized. Goodnight.

      Delete
  13. Should I not return from this venture I would like you all to think of me as a cross between Robert W Morgan and Captain Morgan.

    ReplyDelete
  14. By the time Brookreson gets all his supplies loaded...

    Falcon grounded !

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?