^^Work? Repeats other peoples unsubstantiated bullshit? Yeah great work... I knew of a doctor doing great work. Hung out in someone's waiting room describing a medical procedure performed by someone else. Great work...
All this guy comes up with are stories of a Bigfoot driving some redneck out of the back country. No wonder both his and his wife's sphincter muscles are tighter than a Bull's ass come fly time, every time he goes into the back country. This guy, has no clue.
Joe has nose-dived into the deep end. I went back again to yesterday's thread to see if he responded to me. Of course he had. I told him I was done with him and would leave him alone to 'toss his turds into the void'.
He's probably still there, or perhaps on even older threads, all ranty-ravy cutty-pasty.
Your obsession is revealed, by you "reporting" on a BFE post, about comments on another BFE post, several pages back. How many times are you going to go "back again" to check to see what Joe has done, then come to the latest BFE page to report to everyone what Joe might have said 10 pages ago?
You're not only now commenting on your own comments, you're commenting on Joe's comments on your comments. You then comment on your comments on Joe's comments on your original comments.
This makes for breathless reading, to be sure.
This is navel-gazing and like some nightmarish Russian doll, inside of which are endless ever smaller replicas of the original doll, each inside of its predecessor.
This is like one of those invented university "literature" courses, the aim of which is "to examine the ways in which we look at literature." Not about the lit, but about the ways we look at the lit.
Then in the continuing nightmare world, courses crop up which then examine the ways in which we examine the way we look at lit, and then a course which examines the way we examine the way we examine the ways we look at lit.
And so it goes. Inventing things to do, which are busy-work. Let's not just read the lit, let's examine the ways in which we read and look at lit, and then examine the way we examine, and then examine the way we examine the way we examine.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Nonu
ReplyDelete^ just plain old mean. no points taken off though because nobody likes you. its a pity play for you
DeleteUh oh- more meanness
Deletetsk tsk tsk
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK KELLY SHAW!!!!
DeleteBigfoots in Deadwood or iam a FOOL
Delete^^Work? Repeats other peoples unsubstantiated bullshit? Yeah great work... I knew of a doctor doing great work. Hung out in someone's waiting room describing a medical procedure performed by someone else. Great work...
DeleteLooney f*cking toons folks
ReplyDelete- 17,0000 for unnecessary meanness
DeleteDo you assume "folks" are listening to you, 4:01? You seem to think they tune in strictly to get your verdict on any bigfoot material.
Delete4:47 why don't you go back to the BFF
Delete5:14, I can't go "back" there, because I didn't come from there.
DeleteAll this guy comes up with are stories of a Bigfoot driving some redneck out of the back country. No wonder both his and his wife's sphincter muscles are tighter than a Bull's ass come fly time, every time he goes into the back country. This guy, has no clue.
ReplyDelete- 17,0000 for unnecessary meanness
DeleteI was the guy in a suit on that one.
ReplyDeleteThe pink fluorescent jumpsuit, the one with the sleeves which tie across the body? I thought I recognized you.
DeleteNo, I was the guy with the cardboard cut out.
DeleteHey! Thats right. I remember him too. Didn't the other inmates call him Shaniqua?
Deleteno no, you are getting him mixed up with 4:51. He's the one that likes to play "dress up" during free time.
Delete^ Hey girl!
DeleteDo any of you JREF'ers know where J Randi and his husband went on their honeymoon ?
ReplyDeleteAre you looking for a threesome?
Delete4:57 just got REKT
DeleteIs he gay or a homophobe? I think he may be both.
DeleteHe's bi-gayphobonic.
Delete^ Big lil Jon???
Delete^ Haw!! jon jon Aint packin
DeleteAny sort of what they call?
HEAVY TIMBER!
You gots it all wrong thier mister..
Joe has nose-dived into the deep end. I went back again to yesterday's thread to see if he responded to me. Of course he had.
ReplyDeleteI told him I was done with him and would leave him alone to 'toss his turds into the void'.
He's probably still there, or perhaps on even older threads, all ranty-ravy cutty-pasty.
Your obsession is revealed, by you "reporting" on a BFE post, about comments on another BFE post, several pages back. How many times are you going to go "back again" to check to see what Joe has done, then come to the latest BFE page to report to everyone what Joe might have said 10 pages ago?
DeleteYou're not only now commenting on your own comments, you're commenting on Joe's comments on your comments. You then comment on your comments on Joe's comments on your original comments.
This makes for breathless reading, to be sure.
This is navel-gazing and like some nightmarish Russian doll, inside of which are endless ever smaller replicas of the original doll, each inside of its predecessor.
This is like one of those invented university "literature" courses, the aim of which is "to examine the ways in which we look at literature." Not about the lit, but about the ways we look at the lit.
Then in the continuing nightmare world, courses crop up which then examine the ways in which we examine the way we look at lit, and then a course which examines the way we examine the way we examine the ways we look at lit.
And so it goes. Inventing things to do, which are busy-work. Let's not just read the lit, let's examine the ways in which we read and look at lit, and then examine the way we examine, and then examine the way we examine the way we examine.
You need to move on, Joe already has a boyfriend. You have reached stalker status.
DeleteCommenting on day old posts aren't necessarily obsessive. Telling us about them is.
DeleteI get what you are saying 6:06, but looking at studying methods and historical perspectives isn't bad.
Hahahahahahaha!!
Delete5:46 is a JREF footer for sure.
Deleteand he is bi-gayphobonic as well.
DeleteAnd this is what he's so upset about;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/is-this-amazing-story-from-late-1800s.html?m=0
Easy.
; )
This guy is a hoaxing fool. 3 sightings and he has no evidence ?
ReplyDeleteRMSO is a total joke.
5 eyewitnesses in 24 hours and non of them believed in bigfoot? Maybe you're the joke.
Deletenope bigfoot is
Deletebusy fixing up old threads so you can sleep tonight?
DeleteBigfoot does not exist. And everyone knows it.
ReplyDeletebuts you gits ausin tham guns ans such in tham woods
Delete