Hunter Gets Terrified by Bigfoot in this Hotspot


Kelly Shaw of the RMSO shares with us the 3rd bigfoot sighting to occur in 24 hours at the old Ghost Town logging camp of Deadwood.


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. ^ just plain old mean. no points taken off though because nobody likes you. its a pity play for you

      Delete
    2. Uh oh- more meanness

      tsk tsk tsk

      Delete
    3. Bigfoots in Deadwood or iam a FOOL

      Delete
    4. ^^Work? Repeats other peoples unsubstantiated bullshit? Yeah great work... I knew of a doctor doing great work. Hung out in someone's waiting room describing a medical procedure performed by someone else. Great work...

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. - 17,0000 for unnecessary meanness

      Delete
    2. Do you assume "folks" are listening to you, 4:01? You seem to think they tune in strictly to get your verdict on any bigfoot material.

      Delete
    3. 4:47 why don't you go back to the BFF

      Delete
    4. 5:14, I can't go "back" there, because I didn't come from there.

      Delete
  3. All this guy comes up with are stories of a Bigfoot driving some redneck out of the back country. No wonder both his and his wife's sphincter muscles are tighter than a Bull's ass come fly time, every time he goes into the back country. This guy, has no clue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was the guy in a suit on that one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pink fluorescent jumpsuit, the one with the sleeves which tie across the body? I thought I recognized you.

      Delete
    2. No, I was the guy with the cardboard cut out.

      Delete
    3. Hey! Thats right. I remember him too. Didn't the other inmates call him Shaniqua?

      Delete
    4. no no, you are getting him mixed up with 4:51. He's the one that likes to play "dress up" during free time.

      Delete
  5. Do any of you JREF'ers know where J Randi and his husband went on their honeymoon ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you looking for a threesome?

      Delete
    2. Is he gay or a homophobe? I think he may be both.

      Delete
    3. ^ Haw!! jon jon Aint packin
      Any sort of what they call?
      HEAVY TIMBER!
      You gots it all wrong thier mister..

      Delete
  6. Joe has nose-dived into the deep end. I went back again to yesterday's thread to see if he responded to me. Of course he had.
    I told him I was done with him and would leave him alone to 'toss his turds into the void'.

    He's probably still there, or perhaps on even older threads, all ranty-ravy cutty-pasty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your obsession is revealed, by you "reporting" on a BFE post, about comments on another BFE post, several pages back. How many times are you going to go "back again" to check to see what Joe has done, then come to the latest BFE page to report to everyone what Joe might have said 10 pages ago?

      You're not only now commenting on your own comments, you're commenting on Joe's comments on your comments. You then comment on your comments on Joe's comments on your original comments.

      This makes for breathless reading, to be sure.

      This is navel-gazing and like some nightmarish Russian doll, inside of which are endless ever smaller replicas of the original doll, each inside of its predecessor.

      This is like one of those invented university "literature" courses, the aim of which is "to examine the ways in which we look at literature." Not about the lit, but about the ways we look at the lit.

      Then in the continuing nightmare world, courses crop up which then examine the ways in which we examine the way we look at lit, and then a course which examines the way we examine the way we examine the ways we look at lit.

      And so it goes. Inventing things to do, which are busy-work. Let's not just read the lit, let's examine the ways in which we read and look at lit, and then examine the way we examine, and then examine the way we examine the way we examine.

      Delete
    2. You need to move on, Joe already has a boyfriend. You have reached stalker status.

      Delete
    3. Commenting on day old posts aren't necessarily obsessive. Telling us about them is.

      I get what you are saying 6:06, but looking at studying methods and historical perspectives isn't bad.

      Delete
    4. 5:46 is a JREF footer for sure.

      Delete
    5. and he is bi-gayphobonic as well.

      Delete
    6. And this is what he's so upset about;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/is-this-amazing-story-from-late-1800s.html?m=0

      Easy.

      ; )

      Delete
  7. This guy is a hoaxing fool. 3 sightings and he has no evidence ?

    RMSO is a total joke.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 5 eyewitnesses in 24 hours and non of them believed in bigfoot? Maybe you're the joke.

      Delete
    2. busy fixing up old threads so you can sleep tonight?

      Delete
  8. Bigfoot does not exist. And everyone knows it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. buts you gits ausin tham guns ans such in tham woods

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story