Breaking: The Ed Waterman Bigfoot Photograph


Ladies and gentlemen. We've seen a lot of Bigfoot photographs since we've started this blog. This photograph from Washington, taken in June, is by far the best one we've came across in a long time.  Here are the reasons why:

  1. Ed Waterman, the man who took the photograph is pretty sure that this is a Bigfoot.
  2. The behavior of the creature, as described by the witnesses are hair raising. They reportedly watched the creature "on all fours, then standing up and walking into the woods". This type of behavior have been witnessed by countless others, including Justin Smeja.
  3. The witnesses were close enough to see that the creature was a 7ft tall female with "some serious birthing hips".
  4. These guys are putting it all out there, and they called it their "Patterson-Gimlin" moment.
  5. And here's a biggy: There are more photographs! This appears to be their best one.

Unless these guys are pulling our leg, their story is quite compelling. Here's the Facebook thread where the photograph was shared:

Annie M. A person??

K Elle Leigh Wow, I expected more responses to this pic! Didn't you, ed? Running around on all fours, then standing up and walking into the woods, where no trail existed. All while we stood in amazement, just watching. Pretty exciting day that was!

Ed Waterman Very exciting day. Our Patterson-Gimlin moment.

Ed Waterman No Annie. Black, no clothes and when I went back to measure, it was 7 feet tall. At that thickness it was in excess of 700 lbs. There's not a single person close to that size in our county.

K Elle Leigh I'm a witness to that. We turned around and I was stunned. Ed said TAKE A PICTURE! I didn't even have the camera ready. Thank God I was able to snap this quickly. We couldn't believe what we were seeing.

K Elle Leigh And even when I was SEEING this happen with my own eyes, my mind was saying "is that a person? A bear maybe. ." There we are, hunting squatch, seeing squatch in the woods, cloaking and whatnot. .here was one running around in the open. We were so surprised. But, prior to this happening, we were up at that place and I ran down towards Ed because I was getting rushed at by something I couldn't see. Scared me!

Ed Waterman Those are some serious birthing hips on this female squatch . . . the height is deceiving. This thing was 7 FEET TALL. It's the thickness of it that gets me. This also is one of three photos in a quick burst series. We have the same squatch in two other positions afterwards. And this was after we saw it running massively quick in circles on all fours on the trail. We walked by and were on the next ridge of the trail and it jumped out behind us. I'm surprised Kristin got such a great shot because we were 1/8th mile away at least, the telephoto is difficult to focus quickly and you have to hold it really still. K did great!


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Call me a lonely dirty old man but that BF has a pretty nice trunk. A little junk

      Delete
    2. I didn't think the same but thought it was a fat biatch walking in a dark coat and leggings! Shit she's even on a path and her hands showing.

      Delete
    3. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

      The older you get, the more beauty you see

      Delete
    4. It appears the older bigfooters get the dumber they get.

      Delete
    5. ^ says the young bull to the old bull. We know how the rest of that story goes

      HA

      Delete
    6. Its not real the head is too large not set low in on the neck, should be little to no neck kinda slumped forward , clearly a suit, I have seen one, sorry ED...

      Delete
    7. An old farmer decided it was time to get a new rooster for his hens. The current rooster was still doing an okay job, but he was getting on in years and the farmer figured getting a new rooster couldn't hurt. So he buys a new cock from the local rooster emporium, and turns him loose in the barnyard. Well, the old rooster sees the young one strutting around and he's a little worried about being replaced. He walks up to the new bird.

      "So you're the new stud in town? I bet you really think you're hot stuff don't you? Well I'm not ready for the chopping block yet. I'll bet I'm still the better bird. And to prove it, I challenge you to a race around that hen house over there. We'll run around it ten times and whoever finishes first gets to have all the hens for himself."

      Well, the young rooster was a proud sort, and he definitely thought he was more than a match for the old guy.

      "You're on," he said, "and since I'm so great, I'll even give you a head start of half a lap. I'll still win easy!"

      So the two roosters go over to the henhouse to start the race with all the hens gathering to watch. The race begins and all the hens start cheering the old rooster on. After the first lap, the old rooster is still maintaining his lead.

      After the second lap, the old guy's lead has slipped a little -- but he's still hanging in there. Unfortunately, the old rooster's lead continues to slip each time around, and by the fifth lap he's just barely in front of the young fella. By now the farmer has heard the commotion. He runs into the house, gets his shotgun and runs into the barnyard figuring a fox or something is after his chickens. When he gets there, he sees the two roosters running around the henhouse, with the old rooster still slightly in the lead. He immediately takes his shotgun, aims, fires, and blows the young rooster away.

      "Damn. That's the third gay rooster I've bought this month."

      Delete
    8. ^
      Great joke

      I just discovered that if I leave my finger on my iphone screen your whites out joke stays on

      Delete
    9. M. K confirmed it. She's got a nice ass and she ain't afraid to use it. It confirms on all points... Haven't heard that in a while, have we?

      Delete
    10. I agree with some others. Fake. C'mon, thing is running around your house and then just strolls off into the distance like that and you can't get ONE decent clear photo. Bullshit! Looks like someone in a dark jumpsuit.

      Delete
  2. This is so obviously a person .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If bigfoot are persons, you'll have to take into account that they might look like persons and not discount the photo or video only on the grounds that the subject looks like a person.

      Delete
    2. I know what I like. I like Peters in my mouth!

      MMG

      Delete
    3. I completely agree with you both...except the Doc.

      Delete
    4. MMG, you so funny!

      I like them too!

      MMC

      Delete
  3. It's clearly a yard ape

    ReplyDelete
  4. If that's their best picture...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're gonna get thrown out of court....

      Delete
  5. This is a wood ape capable of breaking a 24 inch diameter tree at the base.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^
      That's a JREF'er capable of taking J. Randi down to the base.

      Delete
    2. Joe says a 800 lb bigfoot can scamper through the highest branches of a pine tree like a 3/4 lb squirrel. Cause their made of helium, defy physics or trees are made of reinforced concrete. He'll cut and paste you with the details when he gets home to his fat and psychopathic wife that beats him with in inches of his life...AAAAAAHHHH.... He didn't get no education.. Bum ba bumb...Bum ba bum bumb... Shout out to Roger waters for the assist!

      Delete
    3. Someone got thwacked it seems! Here's the comment that caused it, not to mention... Oil.

      "... Limb breaks could indicate such a large subject doing exactly what you're implying, whilst there are plenty of eyewitness accounts of hairy bipeds jumping 30 feet out of trees and landing quite comfortably. For example, JP Smith's first encounter was of an 8 foot grey subject jumping about 20 feet from tree to tree. Also, there's a reason why silverbacks can't achieve such motion, and it's because they don't have the physicality to achieve such. The average oak tree can weigh 14.5 tonnes... Suddenly you have a situation where an 800lbs subject could at least swing and propel itself through such dense woodland quite easily."

      Oil.

      Delete
    4. 1. A trees weight has nothing to do with a branches ability to support weight. Especially when a 800 lb pound monkey lands on it from 20 feet away.
      2. Gorillas are too fat to hang out in trees and have more incentive to do so if they could. The under growth in the jungle is much worse than in the pacific northwest.
      3. Who's JP Smith and why should I take his word for it? He could be an alcoholic, wife beating tax cheat for all I know.
      4. See Big Jon's wife about your oil fetish.

      Delete
  6. Once again it's the footers that see the bigfoots.

    Even on Facebook the acting is poor.

    Bigfooting is nothing more than a role playing game where the participants know there is no bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's also a good reason for you to get out of Mommy's basement and get some exercise

      Delete
    2. ^ Fat chance mofo. It's safe down here.

      Delete
  7. This is a lafy taking a walk down a path. Is this a joke?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Woman with a black bob haircut, black yoga pants and black pea coat taking a walk. Jeez. I don't think she'll like being called a bigfoot with birthing hips.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ed Waterman also goes by "BF Deal"............ now you may think BF stands for "Bigfoot" but it doesn't. This person is insane. That picture is someone in a costume.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can we declare this a species? Please. The evidence continues to pile in. If this photo isn't definitive evidence I can't imagine what would be. Now, add to that all the footprints, hairs, videos, dna, reports, etc....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I nearby declare the name of this new species

      Hottious milfious

      Delete
    2. Ahh yes, I've photographed several of these milfs with birthing hips at Walmart.

      Delete
    3. MAYOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. This MIlF's for you Mr. Mayor

      MMC

      Delete
    5. HEY CHECK IT OUT THE MAYOR IS BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

      DID YOU SEE??????

      GUYS THE MAYOR IS BACK1!!!!!!

      Delete
    6. That site doesn't work. :)

      Delete
    7. I made it up man. Just like the prez

      LMFAO

      Delete
    8. Damn you got my mouth watering for Walmart Milfs now I'm going to have to settle for some Oreos.

      Delete
    9. I looked for walmartmilfs.com too and couldn't find it. You deceived me sir!

      Delete
    10. I couldn't help myself Mr Mayor. It would be a great site to start for a guy who likes photographing MIlF's with nice poopsters in walmart

      MMC

      Delete
    11. I'll stick to

      http://www.girlsinyogapants.com/

      Delete
    12. Heaven,
      I'm in heaven
      Got to sign up for a yogart class right away

      Delete
    13. I keep my poop in yogurt containers

      Delete
    14. What do you call that yogurt ?

      Fudge surprise ?

      Delete
    15. ^^ Pleased to help, it's one of my favourtie sites.

      Delete
    16. Due to a bet with Dan Cambell I may not post till Halloween, but noone said anything about product endorsement: Fellow Footers and skeptics alike. When you see an old friend like Mayor McCheese and you want to send him a gift basket, I recommend Kiehls moisturizer for men. Whether you're out like the Mayor trolling for Wal-Martians with birthing hips, or flailing through the brush hanging upside down in a barb wire fence begging Morley to stop looking at a damn bullfrog and help me, moist refreshing skin is a must. So use the cream, my tan is tough as the hide of a leather football,but moist as the contents of Skunkey Monkey's jar. The Mayor's buns will be looking good to the gal In express check out as well as that old bag of guts greater he cannot resist once he receives my gift iof this fine product. . Kiels, it might get your ass kicked for applying it at an oil rig like I almost did recently. But I had a knife. "The Following has been an unpaid endorsement of the Mayor and moist skin in General and in no way reflects the views of: Shawn, Matt, Big Doris and my new lady crush Melba Ketchum.

      Delete
    17. An Ed Waternan. If there's one thing I appreciate as much as the moisturizing goodness of Kiel's and the Mayor's choice in women, it's a new prodigy footer with a clear set of pictures that are obviously a Subject. Too bad I can't comment further as this is merely and ad, but friend me on Facebook or Google Plus and I can teach you how to make those pictures appropriately fuzzy lol. Good job man! Buy the cream.

      Delete
    18. Is it effective as a nipple cream? I started jogging recently and my nips get crazy sore!

      Delete
    19. Jogging? What ya trying to do Mayor, lose your buns?

      Delete
    20. You also might want to put a layer of Kiehls on so you don't wear your sesame seeds away.

      Hey, is one of your 'seeds' much bigger than the other?

      Delete
    21. Well, I went to the doctor a while back and he told me that he's seen 90 year olds in better physical condition than me. He also said my body and appendages look like stockings filled with cottage cheese. Jeez doc, tell me what you really think!

      Delete
    22. Starting to the think Mayor McCheese craves da' C**k!!

      I could be wrong though!

      MMC

      Delete
    23. Mayor Mac, was extended rehab all you thought it would be? Welcome back you felon in waiting! An ace bandage will help with the chaffing from the ankle bracelet!

      Delete
    24. MB !
      jars are my life
      <B-)

      Delete
    25. Welcome back Mayor!

      See you in Florida SM!

      MMG

      Delete
  11. where are the other photos ????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dunno, if you look at the photo though it's got quite short legs and to be honest just looks like a fat dumpy woman. She could just be walking a dog hence the angle of the right arm like she's holding a dog leash and there's a whiteish blob on the other side of the track

      Delete
    2. Ed the Watermelonman is sooo disappointing

      Delete
    3. Just remember the "5 steps of a Hoax". If they're teasing you with crappy photos and promising better proof but withholding it for no apparent reason then they're probably hoaxing.

      Delete
    4. ^ Like Snowden and Greenwald? Gotch ya!

      Delete
  12. Ha! Our PG moment. Call Dr. Sykes! Call Jeffy Meldrum! I done seen a bigamafoot!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm failing to see what is so mind blowing here

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The trunk man the TRUNK !!!

      Delete
    2. Its a 7 foot tall 600 pound upright creature. Not something you witness every day. This guy even got a photo of it.

      Delete
    3. It's ALLEGEDLY a 7 foot tall 600 pound upright creature. It could also be a woman going for a stroll in the woods.

      Delete
  14. Why didn't Smeja shoot the ape in the back and then go strangle it to death, so he could leave the remains there and return a few months later to collect the rotting, stinking carcass and turn over a sample to the fake Doctor Melba?

    ReplyDelete
  15. You can clearly see the flesh color on the hand

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats just the underside of the hand. This is clearly Squatch. I've seen 4 of them.

      Delete
    2. I've seen 27 dragons. And a partridge in a pear tree. Or it could have been a Japanese Maple. I'd ask my landscaper but he has this Waffen SS vibe that just says stay away...

      Delete
  16. More evidence naysayers, enjoy your crow...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evidence? Was it behind the chick with the nice pooter?

      Delete
  17. The photo appears to be a robust woman wearing tight motorcycle leathers and a helmet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There does not appear to be any mud on the helmet that I can ascertain.

      Delete
    2. ^
      +1000....and another hundred for using the word robust instead of fat.

      Delete
    3. I am not one to keep score, but I would say a +1100 point night is more than respectable. Thank-you and goodnight!

      Delete
    4. Um, dude you get 970 for attendance.

      Delete
  18. when did rajah maples have her stroke???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1793. Scheduled to get out this weekend, I understand the grand parents are exited!

      Delete
  19. This is better evidence than Sykes could have ever provided.

    Haha looks like the last laugh is on the skeptics. No bigfoot, huh? Explain the photo, skeptards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Brain dead schmuck. Can't muster enough firing neurons in his peon brain to deduce that this is nothing more than a woman in black stretch pants. But make no mistake, his post is dead serious and clearly shows that THIS is the best fooTARDS have to offer in the Church of Bigfoot.

      Delete
    2. ^ Skeptical putz. Make no mistake that 8:48 is a rat fink.

      Delete
    3. ^ Church of Bigfoot disciple. Has a taterhole for a brain and a poop stained butt.

      Delete
    4. ^ Church of Bigfoot disciple. Has a taderhole for a brain and a poop stained butt.

      Delete
    5. ^ Church of Bigfoot disciple. Has a taterhole for a brain and a poop stained face.

      Delete
    6. ^ Church of Bigfoot disciple. Has a pea brain and a fecal matter stained face.

      Delete
  20. Too bad they weren't packing some heat, we could have a specimen. Its time we start carrying all the time, you never know when this kind of opportunity will present itself and at least you might be able to knock down a couple of illegal aliens a day...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sean, would you like to see the original photo K Elle Leigh captured before this was cropped from it. And the other photos surrounding it? IM me on FB or email me at prodigymarketinggroup@hotmail.com. This wasn't a fluke. We've been tracking and shooting hundreds of member of this clan for years. Just got a really cool shot one day. The 'skeptics' don't sway us from what we see, experience and photograph. Just makes them look retarded and uneducated about this species and what is really happening. We have found their huts and underground bunkers where they live, several within one hundred feet of where this sasquatch is. We know where they live.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are all your picture as blurry? Buy a better camera if this is the best you can show. I'm not a skeptic of Bigfoot. Just a skeptic of those who claim they have hundreds of pictures and can't produce a clear picture. Maybe find someone who knows how to use a camera. Just because you can't show a good picture of Bigfoot doesn't make anyone a retard. Now was that hundreds of Bigfoots you have taken pictures of? Or is it hundreds of pictures of some Bigfoots?

      Delete
    2. Have you tried knocking on the door of their huts, then hide in some nearby shrubs and when they answer the door, take a closer photo?

      Delete
  22. Joe, we were on another ridge an 1/8th mile away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly how many different Bigfoots have you taken pictures of and how many pictures have you taken total. Hundreds would not be an answer. Just trying to get a better understanding of your claims.

      Delete
    2. Ed, nice shot. Two things jump out immediately, the inline walk and the hefty torso. Thanks for sharing!

      Delete
  23. Are all of the hundreds of pictures you have taken from this far away? Do you have one sharp clear picture or not?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Keep your sleeves on footers. That's a big momma looking for her keys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She even talkin on her obama phone.

      Delete
    2. Thats right baby!


      -Big Bad Mad Momma

      Delete
  25. The way the neck meets the shoulders and the way the right arm swings out look all too human.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Clearly a large rumped, female negroid. I am approximating that this lady is probably 5'6 and weighs in excess of 350lbs. If she was on all fours it was due to her losing her breath from being out in the fresh air walking for a distance further than what she is use to. (That would be to and from her refrigerator or to her mail box to get her Obamacheck once per month).

    ReplyDelete
  27. You morons will put anything online and call it bigfoot. LOL. And trolls like me will enjoy pointing out how effing stupid you are.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm sure Sweaty Yeti see lip movement

    ReplyDelete
  29. Combined with your eye witness this should make Finding Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Where is Justin Smeja when you need him?, he coulda ended the debate as to what it is by shooting it, then running off all scared.
    only to come back an month or too later to scour the area and perhaps find a dead squirrel carcass somewhere in the forest with his hunting dogs,
    then cut a steak off the squirrel carcass... send it too Melba Ketchum so she would have another 100% proof of bigfoot DNA ?

    ReplyDelete
  31. I see Big foot, all the time bouncing from tree to tree! it can be done, it must be done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you see something bouncing from tree to tree moving gracefully....it's a ninja, bro.

      Delete
  32. We track 11 clans in different locations within 20 miles of where I live. They are landlocked on a peninsula. I first ran into them on our 160 acre ranch when I was a kid. They have always been here, at least since the 70's, likely much longer. This picture was taken less than a mile from our ranch. We have thousands of pictures of sasquatch. The reason you don't get many clear shots up close is because they cloak on you as a defense mechanism if they feel you are too close. Most photos of uncloaked squatch have to be taken from 50 feet or more back. And yes, we have walked up to their huts. They often are sitting in the entrance to their dens, which are in slash pile looking structures, teepee type structures or dug out underground, usually around pushovers or tree rootballs. This is not anything new to us. I've been tracking this clan for three years and have hundreds of photos of this clan's tree breaks, structures, stick weaves and footprints, some which have been cast. 17" and 18" prints. This picture was taken at a place of many sightings and interactions. This is not a human woman in clothes. I measured the trees next to it and it is 7 feet tall and thick. We don't have any 7 foot, 700 lb people in our county. The largest is Marvin Williams, the power forward for the Utah Jazz. This squatch is taller than he is and three times his width and weight. Believe what you wish. This photo was grabbed from the over 2000 photos on our FB page, the only place we post our photos. We don't take just photos of sasquatch, we take landscape photos of the deep forests and other wildlife, like deer, raccoons and birds. Our last five trips to these woods, we have seen one other person. A hobo on a bicycle. There aren't 7 foot ladies walking dogs here. It is very remote. As far as the flesh hands, many of the squatch in this clan have flesh hands and flesh faces too. They have about 7 different colors and looks within this clan. We habituate with them and have exchanged gifts with them for years. This wasn't a fluke, chance encounter. We see dozens of them whenever we hike there. As far as other photos, I emailed some more to Shawn last night and we have over 2000 on our FB page that 600 of the top squatchers in the country look at as we post 5 or so pics a day. We're not out to 'prove existence'. I've known they are real for over 40 years when one circled me while cutting firewood on the ranch. They still live on the ranch where I grew up. I take pictures of them there too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it is a woman you lying f*cking nut job

      Delete
  33. Where are its legs from the knee down? I see the thighs/hamstrings, but not the rest of the legs? Hmmm...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Also, the length of the arms seems a bit short. The hands come to about the waist when they should be closer to the knees. Hmmmmm...

    These are the kinds of things we must look for when trying to decipher photos, especially these days with all of the public info on their features, actions, etc.

    We must look at and examine the morphology in order to try and make sense of these kinds of photos if we are to separate the good form the bad or genuine from faked...this doesn't add up, unfortunately.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  35. If I'm wrong, I apologize...I know there is always relative information that is unknown or not taken into account by viewers who weren't there to witness it. But I find it a bit concerning that both the legs and arms seem extremely short. Any idea why that is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It might be because they constantly smear fecal matter on their face.

      Delete
  36. Ed,
    You should really take this to BFF (Bigfoot Fanasty and Friends) you will get adoring fans galore and they will believe everything you say, without question!!!
    Plus as a bounus you'll never have to back up your silly claims with any proof!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, and those same people on BFF also smear fecal matter on their faces daily.

      Delete
  37. The feet are cut off locks a lil cgi

    ReplyDelete
  38. Comments are closed for this article.

    ReplyDelete
  39. It looks to me like a overweight woman wearing a black sweatsuit,Im being serious to,it looks to sassy,look at how its arm is snapping out like its flailing. No disrespect but it doesnt look like an Animal,Ive never seen a Bigfoot but this just looks wrong to me. Why are all the Photos always outta focus? Im a believer in Bigfoot for sure but come on. Ive lived in Washington all my lige and have heard all kinds of stories from family and friends,I have some good stories.

    ReplyDelete
  40. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  41. "Ladies and gentlemen (Should be a comma or semicolon here, certainly not a period). We've seen a lot of Bigfoot photographs since we've started this blog. This photograph from Washington, taken in June, is by far the best one we've came across in a long time." -
    Really? Seriously? The most basic examination of this image: lightening/enlarging/filtering, immediately shows anyone taking 5 minutes to look, the hair is a dramatically different color and texture from the "body;" as in a completely human woman wearing a coat. Likewise, Ed's other "proof,' such as his "Sasquatch swaying in an ice storm"... is nothing more than a drooping, ice covered, evergreen branch moving in the wind. Other "Bigfoot" shots are simply dark spots in the bushes... and all of which, Ed's apparently been feeding. I'd bet the raccoons in Ed's neighborhood are rolling around, clutching their bellies, laughing hysterically. Claiming that this is credible proof of anything, especially a Bigfoot, only serves to bolster the skeptical case for the denial of Bigfoot... which is sadly, incorrect. If this is the level of proof BigfootEvidence finds convincing... well, that's just sad.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?